[Frameworks] VISIONS | 10.01.18 + 11.01.18 | MIKE HOOLBOOM

[contact]

VISIONS | 10.01.18 + 11.01.18 | MIKE HOOLBOOM

VISIONS, in collaboration with la lumière collective, presents:

10.01.18
VENTRILOQUISMS
[A Selection of Works by Mike Hoolboom]
-
[Filmmaker Present | HD Projection]
+
11.01.18
LETTERS FROM HOME: ​KHALIK ALLAH AND NICHOLAS KOVATS
[Programme by Mike Hoolboom]
Dialogues : Every month VISIONS invites visiting artists to curate a programme 
in dialogue with their own work.
-
[Filmmaker Present | HD Projection]
...

20h00 | 7$
la lumière collective [7080, rue Alexandra, #506, Montréal]

More info:
www.visionsmtl.com/mike-hoolboom
https://www.facebook.com/events/515003978855260/
-
www.lalumierecollective.org

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Blackbox

[Angelica Cuevas Portilla]

There has nothing to do with the quality of screening it is just
about the importance of "premiere" and in this case for UK films.  

But as I can guess, your films and not from UK. So you don't have to
worry about it neither point out it's incongruity because there are a
lot of festivals that ask for this... so personally I don't think
there's is incongruity... 

A lot of filmmakers choose this option, to put a password for their
on-line previewing 

Where were you all these past years? 

When we don't agree with terms like this... we don't send our work! 

Happy Holidays !! 

Cheers 

Angélica 

---

Angélica Cuevas Portilla
MEX-PARISMENTAL
85 boulevard Brune
75014 Paris
France
+33-6-64 24 09 10
@MexParismental [3]
https://www.facebook.com/MexParismental
***

On 2017-12-28 20:04, Esperanza Collado wrote:

> I do understand the incongruity you are trying to point out, but it's not the 
> same to watch an online preview, which sometimes can be a domestic screener 
> instead of a professional telecine watched on a laptop, than to experience a 
> print or a digital work projected properly in a darkened space with the 
> adequate sound system, etc. For some of us the_ conditions of reception and 
> enunciation_ of the work can become an integral part of the work itself. 
> Perhaps the festival you are referring to acknowledges and values this kind 
> of works.  
> 
> 2017-12-28 2:35 GMT+01:00 Bernard Roddy :
> 
>> "If your film can be viewed online without a password it will
>> unfortunately be ineligible. A Scottish premiere is a requirement for
>> UK short films."
>> 
>> That's Kim Knowles at the Edinburgh Film Festival.  It reminds me of a
>> colleague many years ago who said the faculty weren't interested in a
>> candidate who had published something.
>> 
>> Why would one make that connection?  Unrestricted online access to a
>> work classifies it differently than restricted access via password,
>> but in either case it would be available online.  And the festival
>> requires that it be available online.  It will be considered in a
>> format that cannot be available to just anyone.  But the password will
>> likely be provided to other festivals.
>> 
>> We're in that zone of exclusivity that is both strangely satisfying
>> but also inexplicably disconcerting.  I have this feeling that the
>> objective would be articulated as follows: only those committed to a
>> certain kind of film practice are solicited.  But how to narrow the
>> submissions without making the work homogenous?
>> 
>> Bernie
>> ___
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks [1]
> 
> -- 
> 
> Esperanza Collado 
> 
> www.esperanzacollado.net [2]
> 
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
 

Links:
--
[1] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
[2] http://www.esperanzacollado.net
[3] https://twitter.com/MexParismental___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks