Re: [Frameworks] PF2 & 7302 questions
Hey Chris, I've used a lot of PF2 and for daylight I've rated it at ISO 4 whereas in tungsten or on a contact printer I would shoot for something beneath ISO1. Whatever is a higher voltage on your contact printer probably will work better for the PF2 cause it's slow. On a JK with the LED upgrade I had to expose each frame anywhere between 1-4 seconds. It took an extremely long time! And yes, I've mostly used Dektol or D19 to process which creates pretty hi contrast images particularly after duplicating a couple times over or when contact printing from an original. best of luck! Zach On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:51 AM mstark...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I have worked with both these stocks - i prefer pf2 which i find to be > extremely robust in terms of tolerance of light and to create high contrast > images. I don’t know about the developer you are using as i have used > dektol and mostly rodinal. 7302 may well be the one that needs the lower > voltage? I have used that before too and found it similar to pf2. I can’t > remember which was more sensitive. Both stocks to my knowledge are fine > with dark room redlight and like i said pf2 can tolerate a quite a lot of > light. > > Hope that is helpful, > > Mary > On 1 Oct 2018, at 11:21, Chris G wrote: > > > Frameworkers, > > > > I'm trying to figure out a few things about these print stocks. Does > anyone know which is faster? An older B&W contact printer I'm using has two > exposure settings, one for the ORWO stock and one for Kodak, I believe both > to only affect the lamp operation voltage, one setting has a lower voltage > than the other. Unfortunately it isn't terribly clear as to which of the > two stocks corresponds to which setting, and can only assume that one is > more light-sensitive than the other, and to go by that before running a > test. > > > > Also, does anyone have experience processing either of these stocks in > D-96? Will it yield more grain and less contrast than D-97? The main > difference I see between the formulas is the lack of Borax in D-97... > > > > Are both stocks orthochromatic? Will any orange darkroom safelight be > okay to work with? > > > > Thanks! > > Christopher > > ___ > > FrameWorks mailing list > > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > ___ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] PF2 & 7302 questions
Best to do a clip-test as different batches of 7302 can have variable speeds. Rob > On 1 Oct 2018, at 11:21, Chris G wrote: > > Frameworkers, > > I'm trying to figure out a few things about these print stocks. Does anyone > know which is faster? An older B&W contact printer I'm using has two exposure > settings, one for the ORWO stock and one for Kodak, I believe both to only > affect the lamp operation voltage, one setting has a lower voltage than the > other. Unfortunately it isn't terribly clear as to which of the two stocks > corresponds to which setting, and can only assume that one is more > light-sensitive than the other, and to go by that before running a test. > > Also, does anyone have experience processing either of these stocks in D-96? > Will it yield more grain and less contrast than D-97? The main difference I > see between the formulas is the lack of Borax in D-97... > > Are both stocks orthochromatic? Will any orange darkroom safelight be okay to > work with? > > Thanks! > Christopher > ___ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] PF2 & 7302 questions
Hi Chris, I have worked with both these stocks - i prefer pf2 which i find to be extremely robust in terms of tolerance of light and to create high contrast images. I don’t know about the developer you are using as i have used dektol and mostly rodinal. 7302 may well be the one that needs the lower voltage? I have used that before too and found it similar to pf2. I can’t remember which was more sensitive. Both stocks to my knowledge are fine with dark room redlight and like i said pf2 can tolerate a quite a lot of light. Hope that is helpful, Mary On 1 Oct 2018, at 11:21, Chris G wrote: > Frameworkers, > > I'm trying to figure out a few things about these print stocks. Does anyone > know which is faster? An older B&W contact printer I'm using has two exposure > settings, one for the ORWO stock and one for Kodak, I believe both to only > affect the lamp operation voltage, one setting has a lower voltage than the > other. Unfortunately it isn't terribly clear as to which of the two stocks > corresponds to which setting, and can only assume that one is more > light-sensitive than the other, and to go by that before running a test. > > Also, does anyone have experience processing either of these stocks in D-96? > Will it yield more grain and less contrast than D-97? The main difference I > see between the formulas is the lack of Borax in D-97... > > Are both stocks orthochromatic? Will any orange darkroom safelight be okay to > work with? > > Thanks! > Christopher > ___ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks