[Frameworks] rephotographing 16mm (Morgan Hoyle-Combs)

2016-07-13 Thread Robert Withers
> List:FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> From:rober...@earthlink.net
> Subject: 1. Rephotographing 16mm (Morgan Hoyle-Combs)
> Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list
>   
> 
> 
> Morgan,
> Do you wish to stay in film process and avoid digital processing, through 
> which these things are easily handled?
> You don't need to do optical printing--make a contact print made with 
> appropriate light settings ("timing") and choice of stock. Work with your lab 
> on this. Of course the contact print will be flipped left to right, and 
> emulsion side (it will be A wind not B wind).
> 
> Best wishes,
> Robert Withers
> New York City
> withe...@earthlink.net
> 
> Re:
>   1. Rephotographing 16mm (Morgan Hoyle-Combs)
> From: Morgan Hoyle-Combs <mhoyleco...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Frameworks] Rephotographing 16mm
> Date: July 12, 2016 6:26:48 AM EDT
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>
> 
> 
> Hello all, 
> 
> Not sure if my first message got through, but here it goes again:
> 
> One of my 16mm films came out a little too dense. It was a Double X roll 
> processed as a reversal but the end result was rather dark. There's still 
> images but they need to be blown out. Is there a way to rephotograph the roll 
> to give it more contrast? Could this be done via optical printer? 
> 
> Let me know whatever helps! 
> 
> -Morgan



___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] Rephotographing 16mm

2016-07-12 Thread Scott Dorsey
Likely you could also just get it contact printed.  I think just about every
lab out there would make an internegative from it and then an interpositive
from the interneg but in days gone by it used to be possible to make a 
reversal interpositive right off the original.  The downside of this is that
your interpositive is A-roll but that might not disturb you.
--scott
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] Rephotographing 16mm

2016-07-12 Thread Christine Lucy Latimer
, Kajtek Zedd;* Thus Spake Zarathustra* starring Nick
> Zedd, Rev Pat Moonblood, Saint Rev Jen;* Paintings 2009-11, No Plague
> Like Home* starring Saint Rev Jen, Vox;* Demonic Sweaters* starring Gio
> Guzman, Diriak Romay, Jose Luis Cruz, Ivania, Odiosa Athena, Zerak Zedd;
> Admission $10
>
> 7/16
> Montreal, Quebec h2x2v1: *Cinema Excentris*
> 9 PM, 3536 St-Laurent
> *VISIONS 16.07.15 = ROBERT TODD | SHORTS*
> VISIONS en collaboration avec Double Negative Collective présente LA
> POETIQUE DE L'ESPACE : LES FILMS DE ROBERT TODD (16mm, 70mins) 16.07.15 |
> 21h | Cinema Excentris | En présence du cinéaste | Filmmaker present copies
> 16mm | 16mm prints sans dialogues | no dialogue "A specialist in lyrical
> 16mm filmmaking as well as a sound and visual artist, Robert Todd
> continually produces short works that resist categorization." « Spécialiste
> de la réalisation de films lyriques tournés en 16mm et artiste en arts
> sonores et visuels, Robert Todd réalise incessamment de courts films qui
> résistent à toute catégorisation. »
>
> 7/16
> New York, New York: *Anthology Film Archives*
> http://www.anthologyfilmarchives.org/
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=ba66f0bd38=4e65756555>
> 6:15 pm, New York, NY.
> *ICP: BARR/GIBBONS/AUDER PROGRAM*
> Given the blatant parallels between voyeurism and the cinema, it is no
> surprise that artists have used it as a point of departure for works that
> can be in turn hilarious and sobering. Burt Bar’s THE WOMAN NEXT DOOR
> utilizes refined shots, minimal dialogue, and an ambient soundtrack to
> create a stripped-down examination of isolation and voyeurism as we follow
> a man’s evolution from curious neighbor to a full-fledged voyeur. Barr
> explains, “The man’s life is so restrictive, that every sound she makes,
> every glimpse of her becomes a monumental event.” The title reveals the
> basic premise for Joe Gibbons’s SPYING, a brilliant and perverse work
> described by J. Hoberman as, “An exercise in applied voyeurism – a
> hilariously perverse MAN WITH A MOVIE CAMERA.” Michel Auder’s THE
> CONVERSATION, BROOKLYN finds him eavesdropping on two women as they talk
> about their lives, sex, drugs, motherhood, and more. Auder has said, “That
> really might be the most transgressive video I ever made because you really
> see those two young women talking…. They are about to be women, and they
> are talking right there on my stoop and I can hear them from my studio and
> I just put my camera out and it just happened.” Burt Barr THE WOMAN NEXT
> DOOR (1984, 19 min, video) Joe Gibbons SPYING (1977-78, 31.5 min, Super
> 8mm-to-16mm. Preserved by Bard College with support from the National Film
> Preservation Foundation.) Michel Auder THE CONVERSATION, BROOKLYN (2003, 4
> min, digital) Total running time: ca. 60 min.
>
> *SUNDAY, JULY 17, 2016*
>
> 7/17
> New York, New York: *Anthology Film Archives*
> http://www.anthologyfilmarchives.org/
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=fadd9b9e29=4e65756555>
> 8:00 pm, New York, NY.
> *ICP: BARR/GIBBONS/AUDER PROGRAM*
> See notes for July 16, 6:15 pm.
> --
>
> *Let us know about your alternative film/video event!*
>
> Enter your event announcements by going to the Flicker Weekly Listing Form
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=b4b03c18bd=4e65756555>
> .
>
> To receive the weekly listing via email, send a message to Subscribe
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=42d844a69a=4e65756555>.
> To unsubscribe see the link at the bottom of this email.
>
>
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=fe2170efd0=4e65756555>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email was sent to frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> *why did I get this?*
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage1.com/about?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=1aa4289c98=4e65756555=d0bf93ad3a>
> unsubscribe from this list
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=1aa4289c98=4e65756555=d0bf93ad3a>
> update subscription preferences
> <http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/profile?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=1aa4289c98=4e65756555>
> Flicker · nowhere · San Francisco, CA 94110 · USA
>
> [image: Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp]
> <http://www.mailchimp.com/monkey-rewards/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter_medium=email_campaign=monkey_rewards=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=1>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Morgan Hoyle-Combs <mhoyleco...@yahoo.com>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>
> Cc:
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 19:52:58 -0700
> Subject: [Frameworks] Rephotographing 16mm
> Hello all,
>
> One of my 16mm films came out a little too dense. It was a Double X roll
> processed as a reversal but the end result was rather dark. There's still
> images but they need to be blown out. Is there a way to rephotograph the
> roll to give it more contrast? Could this be done via optical printer?
>
> Let me know whatever helps!
>
> -Morgan
>
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] Rephotographing 16mm

2016-07-12 Thread Amanda Christie
I often enjoy running film that is too dense through a reducer which is a 
chemical that actually pulls out some of the excess silver.

Farmer's reducer was wonderful (two part powder packet) but they don't make 
it anymore... I used to have a lot of expired packets... I'm sure there is a 
recipe out there to make some.

It is very tricky though, and it's easy to go too far and loose your whole 
image... so be careful and go little by little it keeps reducing even after 
you take it out of the bath and put it into the water... so remove it just 
before you get to where you want to be this step you can do in the light, 
so you can watch it reducing, then take it out before it's done and put it in 
the water.

Don't do it your first time on footage that is precious though 
It's really easy to fuck up and either loose your whole image or have really 
inconsistent results.


adc


On 2016-07-12, at 7:26 AM, Morgan Hoyle-Combs wrote:

> Hello all, 
> 
> Not sure if my first message got through, but here it goes again:
> 
> One of my 16mm films came out a little too dense. It was a Double X roll 
> processed as a reversal but the end result was rather dark. There's still 
> images but they need to be blown out. Is there a way to rephotograph the roll 
> to give it more contrast? Could this be done via optical printer? 
> 
> Let me know whatever helps! 
> 
> -Morgan
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


[Frameworks] Rephotographing 16mm

2016-07-09 Thread Morgan Hoyle-Combs
Hello all,

One of my 16mm films came out a little too dense. It was a Double X roll 
processed as a reversal but the end result was rather dark. There's still 
images but they need to be blown out. Is there a way to rephotograph the roll 
to give it more contrast? Could this be done via optical printer? 

Let me know whatever helps! 

-Morgan___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks