[Bug 210159] WITHOUT_RCS + etcupdate binary issue

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210159

Sergey  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 210141] Building sshd with WITHOUT_TCP_WRAPPERS=YES fails

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210141

Sergey  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 210145] Additional WITHOUT_DTRACE options

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210145

Sergey  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People
Summary|Extending bas with  |Additional WITHOUT_DTRACE
   |additional WITHOUT_ options |options

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 210143] WITHOUT_MODULES doesn't work with subdirectories

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210143

Sergey  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 210142] makewhatis binary is requerd for building release even with WITHOUT_MAN_UTILS=YES

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210142

Sergey  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 207446] Hang bringing up vtnet(4) on >8 cpu GCE VMs

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207446

--- Comment #9 from Andy Carrel  ---
I definitely prefer the requested vs. max terminology in your patch.

Ultimately we just need to make sure that the initialization here...

>  891 if (sc->vtnet_flags & VTNET_FLAG_CTRL_VQ) {
>  892 VQ_ALLOC_INFO_INIT([idx], 0, NULL, NULL,
>  893 >vtnet_ctrl_vq, "%s ctrl", 
> device_get_nameunit(dev));
>  894 }

...is using idx that is equal to the max_vq_pairs number provided by the host,
rather than a number that is limited by factors we take into account in the
guest.

I'll try to build and test this weekend.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"