[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2014-06-05 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:23 - tinderbox 2.22 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE 
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014 
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:23 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:23 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:23 - /usr/local/bin/svn stat --no-ignore /src
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:29 - At svn revision 267079
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - building world
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - MAKESYSPATH=/src/share/mk
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - SRCCONF=/dev/null
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - TARGET=powerpc
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - TZ=UTC
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - cd /src
TB --- 2014-06-05 06:53:30 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
 Building an up-to-date bmake(1)
 World build started on Thu Jun  5 06:53:37 UTC 2014
 Rebuilding the temporary build tree
 stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
 stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
 stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
 stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
 stage 2.3: build tools
 stage 3: cross tools
 stage 4.1: building includes
 stage 4.2: building libraries
[...]
c++   -O2 -pipe 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/include 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include
 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers
 -I. 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include
 -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER 
-DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing 
-DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ 
-DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\\ 
-fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti  -c 
/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BoolAssignmentChecker.cpp
 -o BoolAssignmentChecker.o
c++   -O2 -pipe 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/include 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include
 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers
 -I. 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include
 -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER 
-DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing 
-DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ 
-DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\\ 
-fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti  -c 
/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp
 -o BuiltinFunctionChecker.o
c++   -O2 -pipe 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/include 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include
 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers
 -I. 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include
 -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER 
-DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing 
-DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ 
-DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\\ 
-fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti  -c 
/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CStringChecker.cpp
 -o CStringChecker.o
c++   -O2 -pipe 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/include 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include
 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers
 -I. 
-I/src/lib/clang/libclangstaticanalyzercheckers/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include
 -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER 
-DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing 
-DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ 
-DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0\ -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\\ 

geli passpharse only accepts first attempt, fails all others even if correct

2014-06-05 Thread Miguel Clara

In FreeBSD 10 if I fail to type my geli passphase at boot I can try 2 more 
times...

In 11 current I see the 3 attempts too.. But I fail the the first it will 
always deny the others even if they are correct.. 
I tested this on purpose countless time and just update my source and 
recompiled and still see this issue.

Is anyone else using geli on current and noticing this behavior?

Note: using zfs... Not sure if that might be related but I also have zfs+geli 
on 10 and works nice.

Thanks, 

Miguel Clara
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: geli passpharse only accepts first attempt, fails all others even if correct

2014-06-05 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-06-05 15:54, Miguel Clara wrote:
 
 In FreeBSD 10 if I fail to type my geli passphase at boot I can try 2 more 
 times...
 
 In 11 current I see the 3 attempts too.. But I fail the the first it will 
 always deny the others even if they are correct.. 
 I tested this on purpose countless time and just update my source and 
 recompiled and still see this issue.
 
 Is anyone else using geli on current and noticing this behavior?
 
 Note: using zfs... Not sure if that might be related but I also have zfs+geli 
 on 10 and works nice.
 
 Thanks, 
 
 Miguel Clara
 ___
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 

Brad David (brd@) and I discovered this while testing some changes to
the zfsboot installer. We then found there has been a PR for this for a
while. Brad has a patch out for review that solves it, hopefully we'll
have news on that soon

-- 
Allan Jude



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: geli passpharse only accepts first attempt, fails all others even if correct

2014-06-05 Thread Miguel Clara


On June 5, 2014 9:11:22 PM GMT+01:00, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2014-06-05 15:54, Miguel Clara wrote:
 
 In FreeBSD 10 if I fail to type my geli passphase at boot I can try 2
more times...
 
 In 11 current I see the 3 attempts too.. But I fail the the first it
will always deny the others even if they are correct.. 
 I tested this on purpose countless time and just update my source and
recompiled and still see this issue.
 
 Is anyone else using geli on current and noticing this behavior?
 
 Note: using zfs... Not sure if that might be related but I also have
zfs+geli on 10 and works nice.
 
 Thanks, 
 
 Miguel Clara
 ___
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 

Brad David (brd@) and I discovered this while testing some changes to
the zfsboot installer. We then found there has been a PR for this for a
while. Brad has a patch out for review that solves it, hopefully we'll
have news on that soon

Is there a link to that PR/patch? Maybe I can test if it works. 

Thanks for the reply.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: geli passpharse only accepts first attempt, fails all others even if correct

2014-06-05 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-06-05 17:07, Miguel Clara wrote:
 
 
 On June 5, 2014 9:11:22 PM GMT+01:00, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org 
 wrote:
 On 2014-06-05 15:54, Miguel Clara wrote:

 In FreeBSD 10 if I fail to type my geli passphase at boot I can try 2
 more times...

 In 11 current I see the 3 attempts too.. But I fail the the first it
 will always deny the others even if they are correct.. 
 I tested this on purpose countless time and just update my source and
 recompiled and still see this issue.

 Is anyone else using geli on current and noticing this behavior?

 Note: using zfs... Not sure if that might be related but I also have
 zfs+geli on 10 and works nice.

 Thanks, 

 Miguel Clara
 ___
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


 Brad David (brd@) and I discovered this while testing some changes to
 the zfsboot installer. We then found there has been a PR for this for a
 while. Brad has a patch out for review that solves it, hopefully we'll
 have news on that soon
 
 Is there a link to that PR/patch? Maybe I can test if it works. 
 
 Thanks for the reply.
 ___
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 

The updated patch is here:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185084



-- 
Allan Jude



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Change for the worse in rsu wireless driver

2014-06-05 Thread Adrian Chadd
hi,

please bug freebsd-usb@ about flakey usb devices.

I have a couple that i need to chase up hans about. they used to be less flakey.


-a


On 5 June 2014 01:46, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
 from Idwer Vollering vid...@gmail.com:

 I'm on 10-STABLE r267049, with a local change to
 sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rsu.c that reverts EW7622UMN back to RTL8192SU_3.

  At least my adapter is working a bit more stable now :-)

 Mine seems to get stuck in rsu_calib_task: running calibration task often.

 HTH,

 Idwer

 I browsed svnweb.freebsd.org for rsu and re in stable/10 and head, also for 
 cups in ports.

 I found an update, 4 hours old, for rsu in head, so that pushed me to update 
 the head src tree.

 That was after a time when the wireless adapter didn't connect at all, didn't 
 see the network.

 FreeBSD is flaky at times with USB, not recognizing a good USB stick in a 
 good USB port.

 After some time web-browsing with Midori 0.5.5 on System Rescue CD, which 
 itself is fickle and flaky, not as good as Midori 0.5.8 from FreeBSD ports, 
 Hiro H50191 USB wireless adapter came back and is still working, though I 
 still intend to do the system build/update for 11-head, both amd64 and i386.

 Tom

 ___
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


portsnap out-of-date?

2014-06-05 Thread Tim Kientzle
I was surprised to see “portsnap fetch” download over 6,000 patches in order to 
advance the April 22 snapshot to now:

 # portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 7 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from isc.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from Tue Apr 22 05:38:17 UTC 2014 to Fri Jun  6 01:54:39 UTC 2014.
Fetching 4 metadata patches... done.
Applying metadata patches... done.
Fetching 4 metadata files... done.
Fetching 6198 patches. 
(6198/6198) 100.00%  done. . 
done.
Applying patches... 

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: portsnap out-of-date?

2014-06-05 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:57:00PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
 I was surprised to see “portsnap fetch” download over 6,000 patches in order 
 to advance the April 22 snapshot to now:
 
  # portsnap fetch
 Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 7 mirrors found.
 Fetching snapshot tag from isc.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
 Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
 Updating from Tue Apr 22 05:38:17 UTC 2014 to Fri Jun  6 01:54:39 UTC 2014.
 Fetching 4 metadata patches... done.
 Applying metadata patches... done.
 Fetching 4 metadata files... done.
 Fetching 6198 patches. 
 (6198/6198) 100.00%  done. . 
 done.
 Applying patches... 
 

Likely due to churn in the tree, like when things like pcre are updated.

Glen



pgpqVnsHeH4AG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: portsnap out-of-date?

2014-06-05 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-06-05 23:11, Glen Barber wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:57:00PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
 I was surprised to see “portsnap fetch” download over 6,000 patches in order 
 to advance the April 22 snapshot to now:

  # portsnap fetch
 Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 7 mirrors found.
 Fetching snapshot tag from isc.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
 Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
 Updating from Tue Apr 22 05:38:17 UTC 2014 to Fri Jun  6 01:54:39 UTC 2014.
 Fetching 4 metadata patches... done.
 Applying metadata patches... done.
 Fetching 4 metadata files... done.
 Fetching 6198 patches. 
 (6198/6198) 100.00%  done. . 
 done.
 Applying patches... 

 
 Likely due to churn in the tree, like when things like pcre are updated.
 
 Glen
 

There has also been a push to get more ports to support staging, so many
old ports that don't often get much love were updated

-- 
Allan Jude



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: portsnap out-of-date?

2014-06-05 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:11:15PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:57:00PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
  I was surprised to see “portsnap fetch” download over 6,000 patches in 
  order to advance the April 22 snapshot to now:
  
   # portsnap fetch
  Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 7 mirrors found.
  Fetching snapshot tag from isc.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
  Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
  Updating from Tue Apr 22 05:38:17 UTC 2014 to Fri Jun  6 01:54:39 UTC 2014.
  Fetching 4 metadata patches... done.
  Applying metadata patches... done.
  Fetching 4 metadata files... done.
  Fetching 6198 patches. 
  (6198/6198) 100.00%  done. . 
  done.
  Applying patches... 
  
 
 Likely due to churn in the tree, like when things like pcre are updated.
 

I also intended to include that we do monitor the portsnap mirrors for
staleness, and admins get alerts when the mirrors are out of sync and/or
stale.

Glen



pgpQt2BLk7tXk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: geli passpharse only accepts first attempt, fails all others even if correct

2014-06-05 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-06-05 17:50, Allan Jude wrote:
 On 2014-06-05 17:07, Miguel Clara wrote:


 On June 5, 2014 9:11:22 PM GMT+01:00, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org 
 wrote:
 On 2014-06-05 15:54, Miguel Clara wrote:

 In FreeBSD 10 if I fail to type my geli passphase at boot I can try 2
 more times...

 In 11 current I see the 3 attempts too.. But I fail the the first it
 will always deny the others even if they are correct.. 
 I tested this on purpose countless time and just update my source and
 recompiled and still see this issue.

 Is anyone else using geli on current and noticing this behavior?

 Note: using zfs... Not sure if that might be related but I also have
 zfs+geli on 10 and works nice.

 Thanks, 

 Miguel Clara
 ___
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


 Brad David (brd@) and I discovered this while testing some changes to
 the zfsboot installer. We then found there has been a PR for this for a
 while. Brad has a patch out for review that solves it, hopefully we'll
 have news on that soon

 Is there a link to that PR/patch? Maybe I can test if it works. 

 Thanks for the reply.
 ___
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

 
 The updated patch is here:
 
 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185084
 
 
 

The fix has been committed to head:

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=267145

-- 
Allan Jude



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: geli passpharse only accepts first attempt, fails all others even if correct

2014-06-05 Thread Miguel Clara
Ah great I'll sync my source and recompile :)

Thanks


Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards
---
*Miguel Clara*
*IT - Sys Admin  Developer*
*E-mail:*miguelmcl...@gmail.com
  www.linkedin.com/in/miguelmclara/


On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:

 On 2014-06-05 17:50, Allan Jude wrote:
  On 2014-06-05 17:07, Miguel Clara wrote:
 
 
  On June 5, 2014 9:11:22 PM GMT+01:00, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org
 wrote:
  On 2014-06-05 15:54, Miguel Clara wrote:
 
  In FreeBSD 10 if I fail to type my geli passphase at boot I can try 2
  more times...
 
  In 11 current I see the 3 attempts too.. But I fail the the first it
  will always deny the others even if they are correct..
  I tested this on purpose countless time and just update my source and
  recompiled and still see this issue.
 
  Is anyone else using geli on current and noticing this behavior?
 
  Note: using zfs... Not sure if that might be related but I also have
  zfs+geli on 10 and works nice.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Miguel Clara
  ___
  freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 
  Brad David (brd@) and I discovered this while testing some changes to
  the zfsboot installer. We then found there has been a PR for this for a
  while. Brad has a patch out for review that solves it, hopefully we'll
  have news on that soon
 
  Is there a link to that PR/patch? Maybe I can test if it works.
 
  Thanks for the reply.
  ___
  freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 
  The updated patch is here:
 
  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185084
 
 
 

 The fix has been committed to head:

 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=267145

 --
 Allan Jude


___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: geli passpharse only accepts first attempt, fails all others even if correct

2014-06-05 Thread Miguel Clara


On June 6, 2014 4:23:06 AM GMT+01:00, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com 
wrote:
Ah great I'll sync my source and recompile :)

Thanks


Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards
---
*Miguel Clara*
*IT - Sys Admin  Developer*
*E-mail:*miguelmcl...@gmail.com
  www.linkedin.com/in/miguelmclara/


On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org
wrote:

 On 2014-06-05 17:50, Allan Jude wrote:
  On 2014-06-05 17:07, Miguel Clara wrote:
 
 
  On June 5, 2014 9:11:22 PM GMT+01:00, Allan Jude
allanj...@freebsd.org
 wrote:
  On 2014-06-05 15:54, Miguel Clara wrote:
 
  In FreeBSD 10 if I fail to type my geli passphase at boot I can
try 2
  more times...
 
  In 11 current I see the 3 attempts too.. But I fail the the
first it
  will always deny the others even if they are correct..
  I tested this on purpose countless time and just update my
source and
  recompiled and still see this issue.
 
  Is anyone else using geli on current and noticing this behavior?
 
  Note: using zfs... Not sure if that might be related but I also
have
  zfs+geli on 10 and works nice.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Miguel Clara
  ___
  freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 
  Brad David (brd@) and I discovered this while testing some
changes to
  the zfsboot installer. We then found there has been a PR for this
for a
  while. Brad has a patch out for review that solves it, hopefully
we'll
  have news on that soon
 
  Is there a link to that PR/patch? Maybe I can test if it works.
 
  Thanks for the reply.
  ___
  freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
 
  The updated patch is here:
 
  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185084
 
 
 

 The fix has been committed to head:

 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=267145

 --
 Allan Jude



Its working fine now, type the 1st wrong on purpose and it now accepts the 
second attempt. 

Thanks Brad for the patch and Allan for the info.

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org