Re Post!: What to make of the script /usr/src/tools/LibraryReport/LibraryReport.tcl?

1999-03-28 Thread Michael E. Mercer
Hello again, 

Posted this a few days ago...no response...

so I am trying again.

Later
Michael

Michael E. Mercer wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 Sorry for posting to two lists...not sure where this should go.
 
 I saw an email where someone mentioned this script...
 
 how do I make out what this script is telling me and even
 though this script says a library is stale, does this mean
 I can remove it???
 
 Also I read someones post about the motherboard not getting enough
 power and causing things to run slow...how do I check if I fall
 into this catagory? and if I do fall into it, how do I remedy it?
 
 Thanks
 Michael Mercer
 mmer...@ipass.net
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
 with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



apache13-fp probs: fpsrvadm.exe core dumps.

1999-03-28 Thread Michael E. Mercer
Hello all,

I am running 4.0 current and am trying to get apache13-fp
to install, however the executable fpsrvadm.exe core dumps.

I have tried to do this on two different 4.0 machines, 
same thing happens on both.

Is there something I am missing?

later
Michael Mercer


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



What to make of the script /usr/src/tools/LibraryReport/LibraryReport.tcl?

1999-03-26 Thread Michael E. Mercer
Hello,

Sorry for posting to two lists...not sure where this should go.

I saw an email where someone mentioned this script...

how do I make out what this script is telling me and even 
though this script says a library is stale, does this mean 
I can remove it???

Also I read someones post about the motherboard not getting enough
power and causing things to run slow...how do I check if I fall 
into this catagory? and if I do fall into it, how do I remedy it?


Thanks
Michael Mercer
mmer...@ipass.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: make release fails

1999-03-21 Thread Michael E. Mercer
Daniel,

I'm guessing here, but check your existing make.conf file in /etc
against the one in /usr/src/etc/make.conf. I know the newer one
has an option MAKE_KERBEROSIV. See if that helps...

As far as how to start where it failed,  I have no idea..SORRY.
I would like to know that myself.

later
Michael Mercer

Daniel Lang wrote:
 
 Hiho,
 
 I'm using a 3.1-STABLE system, up to date with a current
 CVS-tree.
 No I would like to install a few other boxes as well, so I
 thought 'make release' would be the thing.
 
 I set the RELEASETAG to RELENG_3,
 make release then seems to run fine, until it wants to
 build kerberosIV. This fails with
 'don't know how to make k_getpwuid.c' (or similar).
 
 Now the thing is, I'm not USA_RESDIDENT, so I don't have
 Kerberos installed, and I don't want it in the release
 anyway. I tried to set 'NOKERBEROS', 'NOCRYPT', etc,
 but it doesn't seem to work.
 But I have to admit, that I made a 'make rerelease' after
 the build broke down. I didn't want it to remove the whole
 chroot-tree and check the whole stuff out again, since this
 takes AGES (even on my sort of fast machine).
 
 If anyone has any hints, how to avoid building kerberos,
 preferrably without having to do a 'make release' and set
 the trees up from scratch again, I would be grateful.
 
 Any other general hints for 'make release' or some
 more documentation apart from /usr/src/release/Makefile
 would be nice, as well.
 
 Btw, I'm not subscribed to any of the mailing-lists, I'd rather
 browse the archives. So if anyone likes to answer, please include
 a cc: to my personal address, or at least give me hint like
 'Watch the ...-list' or 'You _should_ be subscribed to ...'.
 
 Cheers,
  Daniel
 --
 IRCnet: Mr-Spock - Agartim billiard bumba m'abdul in papejim twista
 -  rumba rock n rolla. Leik'ab mai. Spirzon Heroin se'osit gaula. -
- Marijuana esit gaula. Haschisch. Opis. -
 RL: Daniel Lang * d...@leo.org * +49 89 8540017 * http://www.leo.org/~dl/
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



rfork()

1999-03-20 Thread Michael E. Mercer
Hello,

This was posted to freebsd-questions with no reply.
I tried this and the child process created a core file.
I also tried the other options and they seem to work.
Just RFPROC and RFMEM DON'T!

Thanks,
Michael Mercer




Can any one suggest how to use rfork( RFPROC | RFMEM );
according to the manual, freeBSD supports this and it should create a
new process
which will share the address space.
But what I'm getting is
a) It returns only to the parent process with a childID.
b) It doesn't go into child part
c) 'PS' shows that a child process is active.
Code:
#include unistd.h
main()
{
int childId;
printf(Parent Process start \n);
if ( (childId = rfork(RFMEM | RFPROC) ) == 0 ) {
printf(In Child childId(%d) PId(%d)\n,
childId,getpid() );
sleep(4);
exit(0);
}
{
char buf[10] = Samit;
int nRet;
printf(Parent process continues with childId(%d)
%s,PID(%d)\n,
 childId, buf,getpid());
sleep(5);
}
}

Output:
$ cc test.c
$ a.out 
$ Parent Process start
Parent process continues with childId(10759) Samit,PID(10758)
ps
  PID  TT  STAT  TIME COMMAND
10697  p2  Ss 0:00.07 -sh (sh)
10758  p2  S  0:00.00 a.out
10759  p2  Z  0:00.00  (a.out)
10760  p2  R+ 0:00.00 ps

 why it is created zombie and it does not execute the code ?

--Samit.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: rfork()

1999-03-20 Thread Michael E. Mercer
John,

With very little experience in assembly, could you or
someone else give me a small example?

Thanks in advance,
Michael Mercer


John S. Dyson wrote:
 
 Michael E. Mercer said:
  Hello,
 
  This was posted to freebsd-questions with no reply.
  I tried this and the child process created a core file.
  I also tried the other options and they seem to work.
  Just RFPROC and RFMEM DON'T!
 
 rfork(RFMEM) doesn't easily work from C.  You need to
 create an assembly stub.
 
 --
 John  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
 dy...@iquest.net  | it makes one look stupid
 jdy...@nc.com | and it irritates the pig.
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
 with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message