Re: Linux JDK 1.3 and hotspot (native threads)
>> "Georg-W" == Georg-W Koltermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg-W> I tried the patch and found it makes no difference. The current SUN Georg-W> JVM (1.3.0_02) gives the SIG11 as I indicated before. The latest IBM Georg-W> JVM (IBM build cx130-20010329) hangs around and eats up CPU time. It Georg-W> mostly eats system time (usage is about 8% user, 91% system). A Georg-W> normal kill is ineffective, I have to send it a -9 in order to Georg-W> terminate. Running SUn JVM 1.3.0_02 on Solaris 2.6 gives me exactly the same error once in a while, but only (I think) when using with -server, i.e. the hotspot server. This might well be a JVM problem, not a problem of the Linux emulation. -- Peter Mutsaers | Dübendorf| UNIX - Live free or die [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Switzerland | Sent via FreeBSD 4.3-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: egcs unstable
>> "MM" == Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MM> After (by accident) compiling world (excluding kernel) with MM> optimization disabled (ie -O0) and installing the resulting MM> binaries, xemacs (21.1.7) coredumps with a bus error. I MM> recompiled and reinstalled xemacs and all was fine. Now, after MM> building and installing world (excluding kernel again) with MM> optimization (ie -O), xemacs does exactly the same: core dumps MM> on bus error. I'll recompile xemacs again and expect it to be MM> solved, but something is definitely broken: xemacs should not MM> core dump after recompiling world with only a simple change in MM> compiler flags. Are you sure this isn't a problem with xemacs itself? Reading the xemacs group, I read about crashes all the time on various platforms. It is getting worse with newer versions (the 19.x versions were pretty stable). Anyway I stick to good old GNU emacs (I can do without inline images for the time being) which is rock solid, also after -current 'make world's. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: recent apm changes
OK, here I am once more, after yet another reboot :) Now I'm running an unpatched -current from last week. It behaves almost the same, except for the delay in 'zzz'. That is, the system will go in suspend mode (albeit without spinning down the disks immediately) after a BIOS timeout or power-button press. If I use 'zzz', I have to do the known 'sleep 1; zzz' trick. This is the difference. Regards, -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Powered by FreeBSD (-current). See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: recent apm changes
Followup: I decided to upgrade my P2B BIOS version. I had 1005, went to 1010. This made a difference! Now suspend works. However still the disks keep spinning until they reach their BIOS timeout. In Linux & Windows, there is some hook when going to suspend mode that spins down the (IDE) disks. This is nice, since it is well possible that you go to suspend but do not set a disk spindown timeout. Weird that 1005 did not, but 1010 does suspend with FreeBSD (& your patch, I didn't try without it again), while 1005 did work with Linux & Windows. That's why I didn't think of upgrading before. I'll report what happens with the original (non patched) kernel later. >> "MI" == Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MI> Hi, MI> I got ASUS P2B M/B & ATX case and assembled new box yesterday. With MI> my patch, new box successfully transit into suspend state. There is MI> no sounds from CPU fun, chassis fun and IDE HDD spin (powered down by MI> BIOS setting, Power management setup -> PM Timers -> HDD Power Down: MI> 1 Min.). The power led keeps flashing during suspending. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: recent apm changes
>> "MI" == Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MI> Hi, MI> I got ASUS P2B M/B & ATX case and assembled new box yesterday. With MI> my patch, new box successfully transit into suspend state. There is MI> no sounds from CPU fun, chassis fun and IDE HDD spin (powered down by MI> BIOS setting, Power management setup -> PM Timers -> HDD Power Down: MI> 1 Min.). The power led keeps flashing during suspending. MI> Without the patch, suspending system is never successful (standby MI> also), message `slept 00:00:00' comes up :-( MI> The key release event seems prevent suspend, so some sort of delay MI> mechanism would be necessary such as my patch. MI> Now I'm wondering why your PC doesn't get quite. I suspect that MI> hardware configuration different from yours (I have no SCSI HD on new MI> box). Any suggestions? After a new cvsup I tried your patch again. Same result. Here is my dmesg output. It is about the same at boot, but the APM debug output when suspend is tried is completely different. Copyright (c) 1992-1999 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #9: Mon Aug 16 20:56:59 MET DST 1999 plm@muon:/var/arch/fbsd/src/sys/compile/PLM Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Xeon/Celeron (350.80-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x651 Stepping = 1 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 268423168 (262132K bytes) avail memory = 257990656 (251944K bytes) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Probing for PnP devices: CSN 1 Vendor ID: CTL00e4 [0xe4008c0e] Serial 0x1f5ceca5 Comp ID: PNPb02f [0x2fb0d041] Add hook "pcm resume handler" Add hook "pcm suspend handler" pcm1 (SB16pnp sn 0x1f5ceca5) at 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1 flags 0x15 on isa npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface apm0: on motherboard apm: APM BIOS version 0102 apm: Code16 0xc00f, Data 0xc00fdbd0 apm: Code entry 0x7770, Idling CPU disabled, Management enabled apm: CS_limit=0x, DS_limit=0x apm: Engaged control enabled apm: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 apm: Slow Idling CPU disabled Add hook "default suspend" Add hook "default resume" pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vga-pci0: irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 ata-pci0: at device 4.1 on pci0 ata-pci0: Busmastering DMA supported ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 14 on ata-pci0 ata1 at 0x0170 irq 15 on ata-pci0 chip1: at device 4.2 on pci0 chip2: at device 4.3 on pci0 ahc0: irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 ahc0: aic7850 Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/255 SCBs ed0: irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 ed0: address 00:40:95:00:57:83, type NE2000 (16 bit) isa0: on motherboard fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60-0x6f on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model MouseMan+, device ID 0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> sio2 at port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 4 on isa0 sio2: type 16550A sio3 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 3 on isa0 sio3: type 16550A ppc0 at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppb0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: MLC,PCL,PML lpt0: on ppbus 0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ata0: master: setting up UDMA2 mode on PIIX4 chip OK ad0: ATA-4 disk at ata0 as master ad0: 6485MB (13281408 sectors), 13176 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S ad0: piomode=4, dmamode=2, udmamode=2 ad0: 16 secs/int, 0 depth queue, DMA mode ata0: slave: setting up UDMA2 mode on PIIX4 chip OK ad1: ATA-4 disk at ata0 as slave ad1: 9543MB (19545120 sectors), 19390 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S ad1: piomode=4, dmamode=2, udmamode=2 ad1: 16 secs/int, 0 depth queue, DMA mode ata1: master: setting up UDMA2 mode on PIIX4 chip OK ad2: ATA-3 disk at ata1 as master ad2: 8693MB (17803440 sectors), 17662 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S ad2: piomode=4, dmamode=2, udmamode=2 ad2: 16 secs/int, 0 depth queue, DMA mode Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 11) changing root device to wd2s1a APM ioctl: cmd = 0x20005005 called apm_event_enable() cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present cd1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd1: 3.300MB/s transfers cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Logical unit not ready, cause not reportable up to here at boot time. this happens when APM SUS
Re: recent apm changes
>> "MS" == Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> "MS" == Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> Then after 5 seconds the screen blanks, the power light starts >> >> flashing (indicating suspend mode), but when I hit a key, the >> >> console says (slept 00:00:02) only, and programs in fact >> >> continued running (thus it didn't go or remain in suspend mode >> >> at all). >> MS> I think you'll find that programs didn't, in fact, continue MS> running; rather they paused and then resumed when you came out MS> of suspend. >> >> I'm running seti@home, and it really continued while my >> computer was 'suspended'. Also a little test program continued >> running. MS> What you're failing to offer here, and thus why I remain MS> skeptical, is any evidence that suggests that these programs MS> were "running" while the system believed itself to be MS> suspended. I can see that after one hour of 'suspend' mode, the program has done for one hour worth of calculations. Really, I am not insane and know when my programs have run and done work and when not. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: recent apm changes
>> "MS" == Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Then after 5 seconds the screen blanks, the power light starts >> flashing (indicating suspend mode), but when I hit a key, the >> console says (slept 00:00:02) only, and programs in fact >> continued running (thus it didn't go or remain in suspend mode >> at all). MS> I think you'll find that programs didn't, in fact, continue MS> running; rather they paused and then resumed when you came out MS> of suspend. I'm running seti@home, and it really continued while my computer was 'suspended'. Also a little test program continued running. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: recent apm changes
>> "MI" == Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MI> Please try this patch. MI> If it still fails, it's worth to try increasing APM_SUSPEND_DELAY, MI> something like: MI> #define APM_SUSPEND_DELAY 3 Alas, it doesn't make a difference. I tried too with APM_SUSPEND_DELAY 5. What I see when I issue 'zzz', is a delay of 5 seconds, but in between programs keep running (and thus keep generating interrupts I guess). Then after 5 seconds the screen blanks, the power light starts flashing (indicating suspend mode), but when I hit a key, the console says (slept 00:00:02) only, and programs in fact continued running (thus it didn't go or remain in suspend mode at all). Anyway thanks for you efforts so far. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Powered by FreeBSD (-current). See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: recent apm changes
>> "MI" == Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: plm> In contract, if I suspend in Linux of Windows, the computer shuts up plm> immediateley and is quiet. Only sometimes there is a (not too loud) plm> little fan (I think it is the CPU fan) running for a few more minutes. MI> I've read Linux code (v2.2.9) closely, noticed they put cli MI> before APM BIOS call and save & restore segment registers. I MI> suspect these two (or only cli?) affect the suspending state. MI> To clarify, could you try attached patches (for MI> sys/i386/i386/bioscall.s) one by one? I've tried them all. They don't make a difference alas. In doing so, to my surprise I found out that when I suspend my computer in FreeBSD, it isn't suspended at all! I have an ATX case with an Asus P2B motherboard. When I suspend my computer, the power led starts flashing (and keeps doing so). When I suspend my computer in Linux or Windows, as mentioned, the computer gets quiet (HDD spins down etc). The led flashes. Now I found out that when I suspend it in FreeBSD (either with sleep 1; zzz or with the suspend button or through the BIOS timer), the led starts flashing, but processes just keep running! I never paid attention to it, but I got suspicious because I'm running setiathome which accesses the harddrive occasionally, and even during suspend mode I heard the typical HDD sound sometimes. So the problem is not an incomplete suspend, but no suspend at all. It seems to suspend at first, the led starts flashing, the screen is blanked, but somehow the computer keeps running. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Powered by FreeBSD (-current). See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: recent apm changes
>> "MI" == Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> PAO has a small sleep in the apm driver, while -current didn't the >> last time I looked. MI> OK, I'll work on this. MI> To Peter Mutsaers: MI> Could you try following command to suspend and see any improvements? MI> % sleep 3 && apm -z & I have done this before, and it does bring the computer into suspend indeed (light flashes). But for my real problem, noise reduction, this doesn't help of course. The disks keep spinning, and so do all fans (CPU or whatever). In contract, if I suspend in Linux of Windows, the computer shuts up immediateley and is quiet. Only sometimes there is a (not too loud) little fan (I think it is the CPU fan) running for a few more minutes. regards, -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
recent apm changes
Hello, After Linux I gave FreeBSD a try again, when I saw some improvements to APM had been committed. I hoped for a real suspend mode, but alas. Now I'm wondering what makes the difference, and whether I could do it myself. Let me explain: I run my (desktop) computer in the living room. I don't want to shut it down all the time, but it must be 100% quiet when I'm not using it. In Linux, when suspend mode is activated (either through a short press on the power button or by the (BIOS) timer ), the disks also spin down (immediately, not waiting for their timer, which I disabled) and also the CPU fan and/or the FAN of the box switches off. In FreeBSD, when I activate suspend mode, I see the light on my computer blinking, indicating it has gone into suspend mode, but still there is no reduction in noise whatsoever. The disks keep spinning, the CPU fan (or whatever) too. I could activate the BIOS spindown timer on the HDD's, but I'd rather not (since then I also get spindowns while I'm normally working with the computer) but still the other fan will always continue to run. What can I do to change this behaviour? Can anyone explain what Linux (or Win95 for that matter) are doing to make it 100% quiet in suspend mode? Then I could give it a try to have FreeBSD do the same. Currently this prevents me from using FreeBSD alas. Thanks, -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Suspend mode
A while ago (I think when 3.X was still current) when my (ATX) desktop system would go in suspend mode (using zzz, waiting for the timeout or by pushing <4s on the power button) the system would become completely quiet: - disks spin down - CPU fan of Nowadays, some fan keeps running. This is very annoying (forcing me to halt -p all the time instead of going to suspend mode) since the system is in the living room and the noise (even though it is not very loud) is unacceptable. I vaguely remember changes to APM some months ago, I think the problem started back then. Has something changed some months ago that might have caused this? Is there a way to have a complete & quiet suspend again? Thanks in advance, -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Powered by FreeBSD (-current). See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: BitKeeper (was Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files)
>> "RW" == Robert Watson writes: RW> So will bitkeeper provide a nice interface for migrating code RW> from an existing and well-established CVS repository to RW> whatever they use? I've looked at bitkeeper and wonder what exactly are it's advantages over CVS. It's model looks very much geared towards the fragmented way Linux is developed, offering no advantages for more centralized models such as FreeBSD or most commercial internal environments. In the Linux environment the 'patch' is everything, and the kernel looks like a big pile of 'patches' to me. Thus in bitkeeper generating these patch sets (containing history & log messages) to submit from one repository to another is important, because people exchange patches all the time. The other thing is some graphic tools (written in tcl/tk) but there are also some of such GUI layers for CVS, though they've never become very popular because the command line (combined with UNIX pipes & std. commands, filters) cannot be beaten for this type of work IMO. I'd suggest to at least wait a (long) while to see how it is developing. At the moment I see absolutely no advantage for more centralized development models. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know p...@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Running FreeBSD-current UNIX. See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: suspend mode broken since one week ago
>> "WL" == Warner Losh writes: WL> In message <87so9r3x44@muon.xs4all.nl> Peter Mutsaers writes: WL> : Is this a bug that I should report through send-pr, is it already WL> : known as a bug or is this an intentional change in behaviour? WL> This is a known bug. I thought I kludged around it in apm.c in the WL> timeframe that you mentioned. Do you have WL> $Id: apm.c,v 1.80 1999/04/21 07:57:55 imp Exp $ WL> or newer? Today I did a cvsup which upgraded apm.c from 1.79 to 1.80. Now after a reboot when X starts, the screen gets garbled and crashes after a while. When I press the suspend button and resume from suspend, the system reboots. I don't know if apm.c is causing this (probably the screen corruption and crash has another cause). -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know p...@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Running FreeBSD-current UNIX. See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
suspend mode broken since one week ago
I rebuilt my kernel just after the new config stuff (nexus). Since then (but I'm not 100% sure it is related to this) my desktop computer doesn't suspend anymore. Before that, I could suspend it either by: - pressing the suspend button - zzz command (apm -z) - wait until BIOS-set time for suspend mode passes Now it won't suspend in any way anymore (which is irritating since my computer is in the living room; it must be quiet but I don't want it to reboot all the time). Is this a bug that I should report through send-pr, is it already known as a bug or is this an intentional change in behaviour? -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know p...@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Running FreeBSD-current UNIX. See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
LZS (STAC) compression in i4b?
Hello, Does current i4b support LZS/STAC compression? My ISP just enabled it on their ISDN ports, I'd like to use it. Or is compression not necessary in the kernel driver, but in the userspace programs (ppp, pppd). When I grep through ppp sources I do see STAC mentioned somewhere. -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know p...@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+-- Running FreeBSD-current UNIX. See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
aic (adaptec 152x) still not supported in -current?
Hello, When CAM was integrated someone reported that the aic driver was not ready yet for CAM, but that "Brian Beattie is working on it". At the moment, looking in LINT, it looks like aic still isn't supported. Is that true? Does anyone know whether it will be? Thanks, -- Peter Mutsaers | Abcoude (Utrecht), | Trust me, I know p...@xs4all.nl | the Netherlands| what I'm doing. ---+-+- Running FreeBSD-3.0 UNIX. See http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
