GEOM gbde broken?
Hi, i updated my -current box yesterday from cvs to FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #6: Sun Oct 19 17:40:10 CEST 2003. Now i'm not able to attach gbde encrypted filesystems - regardless if it's a disk image created with mdconfig, or a partition on harddisk. gdbe attach works without any error message, but when i try fsck the partition / disk it fails. I'm also not able to mount this thing. I moved the image files to another -current box (Sep 25 14:51:13 CEST 2003) and i was able to attach, fsck and mount the gdbe-disks. After gdbe attach it's possible to grep for cleartext data in /dev/$disk.bde but you're not able to fsck it: # /sbin/fsck -t ffs -p /dev/md0c.bde Cannot find file system superblock /dev/md0c.bde: CAN'T CHECK FILE SYSTEM. /dev/md0c.bde: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. /dev/md0c.bde: CANNOT SEEK BLK: -1 /dev/md0c.bde: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. # /sbin/fsck -t ffs /dev/md0c.bde ** /dev/md0c.bde Cannot find file system superblock ioctl (GCINFO): Inappropriate ioctl for device fsck_ffs: /dev/md0c.bde: can't read disk label And its also not possible to create a new gbde-device. After gdbe init and gbde attach of a newly created memory disk (-t vnode) i tried to newfs it and: # newfs -U -O2 /dev/md0c.bde /dev/md0c.bde: 4.8MB (9728 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 4 cylinder groups of 1.20MB, 77 blks, 192 inodes. with soft updates super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 160, 2624, 5088, 7552 cg 0: bad magic number What's wrong? Greetings, Thorsten ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade
Hi, On Mon, 15 Jun 2003, Chris Shenton wrote: [...] qmail is run under daemontools and all work fine (the configuration is 2 years old!), but when I delivery the first mail (localy or remote) the qmail-send process fire up to 100% of CPU infinitely All other mail are right delivery, and the CPU use is the only problem, I see in qmail-send.c that select() function, after the first message, allways return 1 same here too. I don't know what it could be - perhaps a problem with named pipes (lock/trigger)? You can find my ktrace output here: http://cs.so36.net/~ths/kdump.txt Would be nice if anyone have an idea :) A truss shows me it's running in a tight loop over this code: close(9) = 0 (0x0) select(0x9,0xbfbffcbc,0xbfbffc3c,0x0,0xbfbffc24) = 1 (0x1) Anyone else seen this or know what in FreeBSD-5.1 might have changed to cause this? Any thoughts on how I might go about diagnosing this any better? greetings, thorsten ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade
Hi, On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: I don't know what it could be - perhaps a problem with named pipes (lock/trigger)? You can find my ktrace output here: http://cs.so36.net/~ths/kdump.txt Which version of fifo_vnops.c? If the problem is present in 5.1-RELEASE, then the problem is likely to be the change made in 1.79 and 1.85. If the problem didn't show up until after the 5.1-RELEASE, then the problem could be the changes in 1.87 or 1.88. FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Thu Jun 5 19:29:29 CEST 2003 fifo_vnops.c: $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v 1.87 2003/06/01 06:24:32 truckman Exp $ bye, thorsten ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Thu Jun 5 19:29:29 CEST 2003 fifo_vnops.c: $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v 1.87 2003/06/01 06:24:32 truckman Exp $ Try upgrading to 1.88 and applying this patch: Index: sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v retrieving revision 1.88 diff -u -r1.88 fifo_vnops.c --- sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c13 Jun 2003 06:58:11 - 1.88 +++ sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c16 Jun 2003 08:44:20 - [...] Yes! This seems to work fine :) qmail-send doesn't increase cpu usage after the first mail anymore. Thanks a lot, Thorsten ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
