Re: sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Hello Rick and FreeBSD friends, On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:25:23PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 15:46 +0100: Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:04:27PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 18:22 +0100: Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:20:35AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:17 +0100: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:43:16AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 +0100: I'm not an expert in tcpdump. Can anyone make sense out of the messages? If you dumped the contents, using -s 0 -X, and look at that last packet you should see 0d 0a 2e 0d 0a at the end.. which is CR/LF/./CR/LF.. If you don't see that, then for some reason sendmail/FreeBSD isn't telling the server that it's done sending which would prevent the receiving side from ack'ing the email causing the timeout... I followed your suggestions. However I'm not able to distinguish the last packet. Is there a way to find this with help of the Flags? The following is the output of tcpdump -r /root/tmp/tcpdump -X | grep Flags 11:57:56.539788 IP MyServer.com.41115 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 1001452351, win 65535, options [mss 1448,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 407239960 ecr 0], length 0 11:57:56.555262 IP Smarthost.com.smtp MyServer.com.41115: Flags [S.], seq 1277075046, ack 1001452352, win 8192, options [mss 1452], length 0 It should look something like: 09:18:34.723280 IP jmgmac.funkthat.com.64724 h2.funkthat.com.ssh: Flags [.], ack 177, win 33280, options [nop,nop,TS val 1854905469 ecr 3482476972], length 0 0x: 4510 0034 d7ac 4000 4006 e1af c0a8 0003 E..4..@.@... 0x0010: c0a8 0004 fcd4 0016 7e48 238e d872 43dc ~H#..rC. 0x0020: 8010 8200 7c08 0101 080a 6e8f 9c7d |...n..} 0x0030: cf92 61ac ..a. Notice the hex output... I didn't see any of that in your output... The last packet I was talking about is the last one that had length 1448 that your server sent... I sent two e-mails consecutively: the first without an attachment, the second with attachment. I dumped tcp of the NIC for port smtp. I got the following: 12:20:55.988622 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 18943:19104, ack 412, win 65535, length 161 0x: 4500 00c9 eebd 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@... 0x0010: d54b 3f0d 9147 0019 4ea0 36dd 15a7 38a0 .K?..G..N.6...8. 0x0020: 5018 4481 2020 2020 2020 2020 P...D... 0x0030: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0040: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 205c ...\ 0x0050: 2f20 205c 205e 0d0a 2020 2020 2020 2020 /..\.^.. 0x0060: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0070: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0080: 2020 202e 5c2e 5f2f 5f29 0d0a 0d0a 2020 \._/_).. 0x0090: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x00a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x00b0: 2020 2020 2077 2e46 7265 6542 5344 .www.FreeBSD 0x00c0: 2e6f 7267 0d0a 2e0d 0a .org. As predicted by John-Mark, the first ended with 0d0a 2e0d 0a. However it was not the last packet with length 1448. I hope that this will not spoil the party. Is the Flag [P.] more indicative? It looks like to me, but I'm just learning. Anyway the second mail ended with: 12:22:17.960896 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 35127:36575, ack 638, win 65535, length 1448 0x: 4500 05d0 fe9d 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@... snip /snip 0x0560: 5670 6876 4a67 5a5a 5a50 4b2f 4b78 3774 VphvJgZZZPK/Kx7t 0x0570: 382f 4230 594f 6b78 3449 0d0a 4a76 6551 8/B0YOkx4I..JveQ 0x0580
Re: sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends, On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:27:01PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 15:46 +0100: Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:04:27PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 18:22 +0100: Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:20:35AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:17 +0100: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:43:16AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 +0100: I'm not an expert in tcpdump. Can anyone make sense out of the messages? If you dumped the contents, using -s 0 -X, and look at that last packet you should see 0d 0a 2e 0d 0a at the end.. which is CR/LF/./CR/LF.. If you don't see that, then for some reason sendmail/FreeBSD isn't telling the server that it's done sending which would prevent the receiving side from ack'ing the email causing the timeout... I followed your suggestions. However I'm not able to distinguish the last packet. Is there a way to find this with help of the Flags? The following is the output of tcpdump -r /root/tmp/tcpdump -X | grep Flags 11:57:56.539788 IP MyServer.com.41115 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 1001452351, win 65535, options [mss 1448,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 407239960 ecr 0], length 0 11:57:56.555262 IP Smarthost.com.smtp MyServer.com.41115: Flags [S.], seq 1277075046, ack 1001452352, win 8192, options [mss 1452], length 0 It should look something like: 09:18:34.723280 IP jmgmac.funkthat.com.64724 h2.funkthat.com.ssh: Flags [.], ack 177, win 33280, options [nop,nop,TS val 1854905469 ecr 3482476972], length 0 0x: 4510 0034 d7ac 4000 4006 e1af c0a8 0003 E..4..@.@... 0x0010: c0a8 0004 fcd4 0016 7e48 238e d872 43dc ~H#..rC. 0x0020: 8010 8200 7c08 0101 080a 6e8f 9c7d |...n..} 0x0030: cf92 61ac..a. Notice the hex output... I didn't see any of that in your output... The last packet I was talking about is the last one that had length 1448 that your server sent... I sent two e-mails consecutively: the first without an attachment, the second with attachment. I dumped tcp of the NIC for port smtp. I got the following: 12:20:55.988622 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 18943:19104, ack 412, win 65535, length 161 0x: 4500 00c9 eebd 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@... 0x0010: d54b 3f0d 9147 0019 4ea0 36dd 15a7 38a0 .K?..G..N.6...8. 0x0020: 5018 4481 2020 2020 2020 2020 P...D... 0x0030: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0040: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 205c ...\ 0x0050: 2f20 205c 205e 0d0a 2020 2020 2020 2020 /..\.^.. 0x0060: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0070: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0080: 2020 202e 5c2e 5f2f 5f29 0d0a 0d0a 2020 \._/_).. 0x0090: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x00a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x00b0: 2020 2020 2077 2e46 7265 6542 5344 .www.FreeBSD 0x00c0: 2e6f 7267 0d0a 2e0d 0a .org. As predicted by John-Mark, the first ended with 0d0a 2e0d 0a. However it was not the last packet with length 1448. I hope that this will not spoil the party. Is the Flag [P.] more indicative? It looks like to me, but I'm just learning. Anyway the second mail ended with: 12:22:17.960896 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 35127:36575, ack 638, win 65535, length 1448 0x: 4500 05d0 fe9d 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@... snip /snip 0x0560: 5670 6876 4a67 5a5a 5a50 4b2f 4b78 3774 VphvJgZZZPK/Kx7t 0x0570: 382f 4230 594f 6b78 3449 0d0a 4a76 6551 8/B0YOkx4I..JveQ 0x0580: 2b6e 7765 5647 2f33 6e79 6231 6133 496f +nweVG/3nyb1a3Io 0x0590: 5474 554f 4d61 4374 696b 714b 436b 4959 TtUOMaCtikqKCkIY 0x05a0: 704a 7668 3055 416d 6c33 4754 4f4c 6455 pJvh0UAml3GTOLdU 0x05b0: 774b 4145 7151 5741 7841 4141 5a66 7647
Re: sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:04:27PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 18:22 +0100: Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:20:35AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:17 +0100: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:43:16AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 +0100: I'm not an expert in tcpdump. Can anyone make sense out of the messages? If you dumped the contents, using -s 0 -X, and look at that last packet you should see 0d 0a 2e 0d 0a at the end.. which is CR/LF/./CR/LF.. If you don't see that, then for some reason sendmail/FreeBSD isn't telling the server that it's done sending which would prevent the receiving side from ack'ing the email causing the timeout... I followed your suggestions. However I'm not able to distinguish the last packet. Is there a way to find this with help of the Flags? The following is the output of tcpdump -r /root/tmp/tcpdump -X | grep Flags 11:57:56.539788 IP MyServer.com.41115 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 1001452351, win 65535, options [mss 1448,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 407239960 ecr 0], length 0 11:57:56.555262 IP Smarthost.com.smtp MyServer.com.41115: Flags [S.], seq 1277075046, ack 1001452352, win 8192, options [mss 1452], length 0 It should look something like: 09:18:34.723280 IP jmgmac.funkthat.com.64724 h2.funkthat.com.ssh: Flags [.], ack 177, win 33280, options [nop,nop,TS val 1854905469 ecr 3482476972], length 0 0x: 4510 0034 d7ac 4000 4006 e1af c0a8 0003 E..4..@.@... 0x0010: c0a8 0004 fcd4 0016 7e48 238e d872 43dc ~H#..rC. 0x0020: 8010 8200 7c08 0101 080a 6e8f 9c7d |...n..} 0x0030: cf92 61ac..a. Notice the hex output... I didn't see any of that in your output... The last packet I was talking about is the last one that had length 1448 that your server sent... I sent two e-mails consecutively: the first without an attachment, the second with attachment. I dumped tcp of the NIC for port smtp. I got the following: 12:20:55.988622 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 18943:19104, ack 412, win 65535, length 161 0x: 4500 00c9 eebd 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@... 0x0010: d54b 3f0d 9147 0019 4ea0 36dd 15a7 38a0 .K?..G..N.6...8. 0x0020: 5018 4481 2020 2020 2020 2020 P...D... 0x0030: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0040: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 205c ...\ 0x0050: 2f20 205c 205e 0d0a 2020 2020 2020 2020 /..\.^.. 0x0060: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0070: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x0080: 2020 202e 5c2e 5f2f 5f29 0d0a 0d0a 2020 \._/_).. 0x0090: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x00a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 0x00b0: 2020 2020 2077 2e46 7265 6542 5344 .www.FreeBSD 0x00c0: 2e6f 7267 0d0a 2e0d 0a .org. As predicted by John-Mark, the first ended with 0d0a 2e0d 0a. However it was not the last packet with length 1448. I hope that this will not spoil the party. Is the Flag [P.] more indicative? It looks like to me, but I'm just learning. Anyway the second mail ended with: 12:22:17.960896 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 35127:36575, ack 638, win 65535, length 1448 0x: 4500 05d0 fe9d 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@... snip /snip 0x0560: 5670 6876 4a67 5a5a 5a50 4b2f 4b78 3774 VphvJgZZZPK/Kx7t 0x0570: 382f 4230 594f 6b78 3449 0d0a 4a76 6551 8/B0YOkx4I..JveQ 0x0580: 2b6e 7765 5647 2f33 6e79 6231 6133 496f +nweVG/3nyb1a3Io 0x0590: 5474 554f 4d61 4374 696b 714b 436b 4959 TtUOMaCtikqKCkIY 0x05a0: 704a 7668 3055 416d 6c33 4754 4f4c 6455 pJvh0UAml3GTOLdU 0x05b0: 774b 4145 7151 5741 7841 4141 5a66 7647 wKAEqQWAxAAAZfvG 0x05c0: 706b 6c36 0d0a 7a4e 6234 745a 6633 5a6c pkl6..zNb4tZf3Zl Being packet with length 1448 and sent from my side. The code 0d0a 2e0d 0a is missing. Immediately thereafter the following packets: We clearly haven't gotten the last mime-boundary, we are still in the base64 encoded data of the attachment... 12:22:18.003557 IP Smarthost.com.smtp MyServer.com.37191: Flags [.], ack 36575, win 65160, length 0 0x: 4500 0028 11fb 4000 7a06 19d0 d54b
Re: sendmail downgrade
Hello Claus Assmann, On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:32:28AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote: You are right. The following error occurs: Note: see README file in case of errors. pic -C op.me | eqn -C -Tascii | groff -Tascii -me | ul -t dumb op.txt ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 133 I don't know what it means, if someone has an idea, please... How about reading the output of the command and following the advice? Hmm, why are we putting those instructions there? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org You are so right and I had looked into the README file, as suggested. However I could not find a hint about the error, so therefore I asked for help. Please understand me correctly, I'm using sendmail/FreeBSD for almost a decade now and I had never issues. I'm also not an expert in programming, so the error message is completely unknown to me. However I had a look into the op.me file and found the solution to compile sendmail. So thnx a lot for your advice. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans Powered by (__) \\\'',) \/ \ ^ .\._/_) www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Hallo FreeBSD friends, On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:43:16AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 +0100: I found the following command, that generates some more informative output, I hope. root@MyServer:/home/MyName # sendmail -q -v Running /var/spool/mqueue/s2ODs1hH016114 (sequence 1 of 2) MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Connecting to Smarhost.com via relay... 220 CPSMTPM-CMT109.MyProvider.com MyProvider.com Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:45:21 +0100 EHLO MyServer.MyDomain.com 250-CPSMTPM-CMT109.MyProvider.com Hello [77.170.60.162] 250-TURN 250-SIZE 15744000 250-ETRN 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8bitmime 250-CHUNKING 250-VRFY 250 OK MAIL From:MyName@MyRewrittenDomainName SIZE=1254972 250 2.1.0 MyName@MyRewrittenDomainNameSender OK RCPT To:MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName DATA 250 2.1.5 MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF timeout writing message to Smarhost.com: Broken pipe MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Deferred If I copy the *s2ODs1hH016114 files to MySecondServer and run sendmail -q -v once more, I got the following: Running /var/spool/mqueue/s2ODs1hH016114 (sequence 1 of 1) MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Connecting to Smarhost.com via relay... 220 CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com MyProvider.com Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:57:56 +0100 EHLO MySecondServer.MyRewrittenDomainName 250-CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com Hello [77.170.60.162] 250-TURN 250-SIZE 15744000 250-ETRN 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8bitmime 250-CHUNKING 250-VRFY 250 OK MAIL From:MyName@MyRewrittenDomainName SIZE=1254972 250 2.1.0 MyName@MyRewrittenDomainNameSender OK RCPT To:MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName DATA 250 2.1.5 MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF . 250 2.6.0 20140324135355.gc6...@vpn.mydomain.com Queued mail for delivery MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Sent ( 20140324135355.gc6...@vpn.mydomain.com Queued mail for delivery) Closing connection to Smarhost.com QUIT 221 2.0.0 CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com Service closing transmission channel The test shows me that the problem is not on the MyProvider side. The sendmail.cf files on the two server are identical, except the names of the servers and some comments. The sendmail versions are different and the FreeBSD versions are different: MyServer: Sendmail Version 8.14.7 FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE MySecondServer: Sendmail Version 8.14.5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p4 It is also important to note that above can only be observed for some e-mails, not all. Thus some mails will be sent from MyServer, some are not! If I make a tcpdump during the connection between sendmail and smarthost concerning s2ODs1hH016114, I got the following: 11:24:23.301300 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.49165 DNSMyProvider.domain: 32794+ [1au] MX? Smarhost.com. (43) 11:24:23.320078 IP DNSMyProvider.domain MyServer.MyDomain.com.49165: 32794 1/1/1 CNAME CNameMyProvider. (125) 11:24:23.321592 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 2245424203, win 65535, options [mss 1448,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 318826742 ecr 0], length 0 11:24:23.339171 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [S.], seq 2238169153, ack 2245424204, win 8192, options [mss 1452], length 0 11:24:23.339221 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, length 0 11:24:23.355143 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 1:84, ack 1, win 65160, length 83 11:24:23.355254 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 1:24, ack 84, win 65535, length 23 11:24:23.370795 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 84:276, ack 24, win 65137, length 192 11:24:23.371025 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 24:76, ack 276, win 65535, length 52 11:24:23.392751 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 276:326, ack 76, win 65085, length 50 11:24:23.393010 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 76:119, ack 326, win 65535, length 43 11:24:23.414297 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 326:364, ack 119, win 65042, length 38 11:24:23.520345 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], ack 364, win 65535, length 0 11:24:23.535218 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 364:410, ack 119, win 65042, length 46 11:24:23.769098 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 119:1567, ack 410, win 65535, length 1448 11:24:23.769108 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274
Re: sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Hello John-Mark Gurney, On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:43:16AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Willy Offermans wrote this message on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 +0100: I found the following command, that generates some more informative output, I hope. root@MyServer:/home/MyName # sendmail -q -v Running /var/spool/mqueue/s2ODs1hH016114 (sequence 1 of 2) MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Connecting to Smarhost.com via relay... 220 CPSMTPM-CMT109.MyProvider.com MyProvider.com Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:45:21 +0100 EHLO MyServer.MyDomain.com 250-CPSMTPM-CMT109.MyProvider.com Hello [77.170.60.162] 250-TURN 250-SIZE 15744000 250-ETRN 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8bitmime 250-CHUNKING 250-VRFY 250 OK MAIL From:MyName@MyRewrittenDomainName SIZE=1254972 250 2.1.0 MyName@MyRewrittenDomainNameSender OK RCPT To:MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName DATA 250 2.1.5 MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF timeout writing message to Smarhost.com: Broken pipe MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Deferred If I copy the *s2ODs1hH016114 files to MySecondServer and run sendmail -q -v once more, I got the following: Running /var/spool/mqueue/s2ODs1hH016114 (sequence 1 of 1) MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Connecting to Smarhost.com via relay... 220 CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com MyProvider.com Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:57:56 +0100 EHLO MySecondServer.MyRewrittenDomainName 250-CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com Hello [77.170.60.162] 250-TURN 250-SIZE 15744000 250-ETRN 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8bitmime 250-CHUNKING 250-VRFY 250 OK MAIL From:MyName@MyRewrittenDomainName SIZE=1254972 250 2.1.0 MyName@MyRewrittenDomainNameSender OK RCPT To:MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName DATA 250 2.1.5 MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF . 250 2.6.0 20140324135355.gc6...@vpn.mydomain.com Queued mail for delivery MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Sent ( 20140324135355.gc6...@vpn.mydomain.com Queued mail for delivery) Closing connection to Smarhost.com QUIT 221 2.0.0 CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com Service closing transmission channel The test shows me that the problem is not on the MyProvider side. The sendmail.cf files on the two server are identical, except the names of the servers and some comments. The sendmail versions are different and the FreeBSD versions are different: MyServer: Sendmail Version 8.14.7 FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE MySecondServer: Sendmail Version 8.14.5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p4 It is also important to note that above can only be observed for some e-mails, not all. Thus some mails will be sent from MyServer, some are not! If I make a tcpdump during the connection between sendmail and smarthost concerning s2ODs1hH016114, I got the following: 11:24:23.301300 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.49165 DNSMyProvider.domain: 32794+ [1au] MX? Smarhost.com. (43) 11:24:23.320078 IP DNSMyProvider.domain MyServer.MyDomain.com.49165: 32794 1/1/1 CNAME CNameMyProvider. (125) 11:24:23.321592 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 2245424203, win 65535, options [mss 1448,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 318826742 ecr 0], length 0 11:24:23.339171 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [S.], seq 2238169153, ack 2245424204, win 8192, options [mss 1452], length 0 11:24:23.339221 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, length 0 11:24:23.355143 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 1:84, ack 1, win 65160, length 83 11:24:23.355254 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 1:24, ack 84, win 65535, length 23 11:24:23.370795 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 84:276, ack 24, win 65137, length 192 11:24:23.371025 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 24:76, ack 276, win 65535, length 52 11:24:23.392751 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 276:326, ack 76, win 65085, length 50 11:24:23.393010 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 76:119, ack 326, win 65535, length 43 11:24:23.414297 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 326:364, ack 119, win 65042, length 38 11:24:23.520345 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], ack 364, win 65535, length 0 11:24:23.535218 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 364:410, ack 119, win 65042, length 46 11:24:23.769098 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 119:1567, ack 410, win 65535, length 1448 11:24:23.769108 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274
Re: sendmail downgrade
Hello Claus Assmann and FreeBSD friends, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 07:44:20AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote: Note: see README file in case of errors. pic -C op.me | eqn -C -Tascii | groff -Tascii -me | ul -t dumb op.txt ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 133 You are so right and I had looked into the README file, as suggested. However I could not find a hint about the error, so therefore I Hmm, did you look at the right README file? Here it is: Known Problems with some *roff versions If you encounter the error: Unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 133 when trying to create op.txt then set the GROFF_NO_SGR environment variable (see grotty(1) man page), e.g., csh% setenv GROFF_NO_SGR 1 sh$ GROFF_NO_SGR=1; export GROFF_NO_SGR $Id: README,v 8.1 2004/07/20 20:25:10 ca Exp $ PS: if you don't need op.txt, then you can simply ignore the error. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org This is exactly what I found. I managed to compile sendmail 8.14.5, but I got the same error for e-mails with attachments. So e-mails without attachment are correctly finalised with CTRF.CTRF, but e-mail with attachment are not finalised and therefore the timeout error. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans Powered by (__) \\\'',) \/ \ ^ .\._/_) www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:20:35AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:17 +0100:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:43:16AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Willy Offermans wrote this message on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 +0100:
I'm not an expert in tcpdump. Can anyone make sense out of the messages?
If you dumped the contents, using -s 0 -X, and look at that last packet
you should see 0d 0a 2e 0d 0a at the end.. which is CR/LF/./CR/LF.. If
you don't see that, then for some reason sendmail/FreeBSD isn't telling
the server that it's done sending which would prevent the receiving
side from ack'ing the email causing the timeout...
I followed your suggestions. However I'm not able to distinguish the last
packet. Is there a way to find this with help of the Flags? The following
is the output of tcpdump -r /root/tmp/tcpdump -X | grep Flags
11:57:56.539788 IP MyServer.com.41115 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq
1001452351, win 65535, options [mss 1448,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val
407239960 ecr 0], length 0
11:57:56.555262 IP Smarthost.com.smtp MyServer.com.41115: Flags [S.], seq
1277075046, ack 1001452352, win 8192, options [mss 1452], length 0
It should look something like:
09:18:34.723280 IP jmgmac.funkthat.com.64724 h2.funkthat.com.ssh: Flags
[.], ack 177, win 33280, options [nop,nop,TS val 1854905469 ecr 3482476972],
length 0
0x: 4510 0034 d7ac 4000 4006 e1af c0a8 0003 E..4..@.@...
0x0010: c0a8 0004 fcd4 0016 7e48 238e d872 43dc ~H#..rC.
0x0020: 8010 8200 7c08 0101 080a 6e8f 9c7d |...n..}
0x0030: cf92 61ac..a.
Notice the hex output... I didn't see any of that in your output...
The last packet I was talking about is the last one that had length
1448 that your server sent...
--
John-Mark GurneyVoice: +1 415 225 5579
All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I sent two e-mails consecutively: the first without an attachment, the
second with attachment. I dumped tcp of the NIC for port smtp. I got the
following:
12:20:55.988622 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq
18943:19104, ack 412, win 65535, length 161
0x: 4500 00c9 eebd 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@...
0x0010: d54b 3f0d 9147 0019 4ea0 36dd 15a7 38a0 .K?..G..N.6...8.
0x0020: 5018 4481 2020 2020 2020 2020 P...D...
0x0030: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
0x0040: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 205c ...\
0x0050: 2f20 205c 205e 0d0a 2020 2020 2020 2020 /..\.^..
0x0060: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
0x0070: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
0x0080: 2020 202e 5c2e 5f2f 5f29 0d0a 0d0a 2020 \._/_)..
0x0090: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
0x00a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
0x00b0: 2020 2020 2077 2e46 7265 6542 5344 .www.FreeBSD
0x00c0: 2e6f 7267 0d0a 2e0d 0a .org.
As predicted by John-Mark, the first ended with 0d0a 2e0d 0a. However it
was not the last packet with length 1448. I hope that this will not spoil
the party. Is the Flag [P.] more indicative? It looks like to me, but I'm
just learning.
Anyway the second mail ended with:
12:22:17.960896 IP MyServer.com.37191 Smarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq
35127:36575, ack 638, win 65535, length 1448
0x: 4500 05d0 fe9d 4000 4006 c0a8 0004 E.@.@...
snip
/snip
0x0560: 5670 6876 4a67 5a5a 5a50 4b2f 4b78 3774 VphvJgZZZPK/Kx7t
0x0570: 382f 4230 594f 6b78 3449 0d0a 4a76 6551 8/B0YOkx4I..JveQ
0x0580: 2b6e 7765 5647 2f33 6e79 6231 6133 496f +nweVG/3nyb1a3Io
0x0590: 5474 554f 4d61 4374 696b 714b 436b 4959 TtUOMaCtikqKCkIY
0x05a0: 704a 7668 3055 416d 6c33 4754 4f4c 6455 pJvh0UAml3GTOLdU
0x05b0: 774b 4145 7151 5741 7841 4141 5a66 7647 wKAEqQWAxAAAZfvG
0x05c0: 706b 6c36 0d0a 7a4e 6234 745a 6633 5a6c pkl6..zNb4tZf3Zl
Being packet with length 1448 and sent from my side. The code 0d0a 2e0d
0a is missing. Immediately thereafter the following packets:
12:22:18.003557 IP Smarthost.com.smtp MyServer.com.37191: Flags [.], ack
36575, win 65160, length 0
0x: 4500 0028 11fb 4000 7a06 19d0 d54b 3f0d E..(..@.zK?.
0x0010: c0a8 0004 0019 9147 15a7 3982 4ea0 7bbd ...G..9.N.{.
0x0020: 5010 fe88
Re: sendmail downgrade
Hello Allan and FreeBSD friends, On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:33:10PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote: On 2014-03-24 10:47, Willy Offermans wrote: Dear FreeBSD friends, I used portdowngrade, but compiling sendmail 8.14.5 throws an error message. So this is not a way to go! On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:23:16PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote: Dear FreeBSD friends, Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5? -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I imagine it depends on what the error message you get is -- Allan Jude Of course, You are right. The following error occurs: Note: see README file in case of errors. pic -C op.me | eqn -C -Tascii | groff -Tascii -me | ul -t dumb op.txt ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 133 *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /root/sendmail/work/sendmail-8.14.5/doc/op *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /root/sendmail I don't know what it means, if someone has an idea, please... -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Willy * W.K. Offermans ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Dear Claus and FreeBSD friends, On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:22:30PM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote: Mar 24 14:16:01 MyServer sm-mta[11725]: s2ODCWT4011717: SYSERR(root): timeout writing message to MyProvider.com: Broken pipe Mar 24 14:16:01 MyServer sm-mta[11725]: s2ODCWT4011717: to=someaddr...@example.com, delay=00:03:29, xdelay=00:03:26, mailer=relay, pri=1284849, relay=MyProvider.com [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred Since there is a timeout error, I like to know what sendmail is writing to MyProvider.com The mail message (DATA) -- as the log entry states. Is there a way to debug sendmail to disclose the message written to MyProvider.com and the response from MyProvider.com. I'm pretty sure that There's no response... check out s2ODCWT4011717 in your mail queue. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org This sounds very reasonable, but for your better understanding the following: My old FreeBSD server is still running as well. This server runs sendmail 8.14.5 and does not show these errors. So I'm puzzled what the problem might be. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Willy * W.K. Offermans ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Dear FreeBSD friends, I found the following command, that generates some more informative output, I hope. root@MyServer:/home/MyName # sendmail -q -v Running /var/spool/mqueue/s2ODs1hH016114 (sequence 1 of 2) MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Connecting to Smarhost.com via relay... 220 CPSMTPM-CMT109.MyProvider.com MyProvider.com Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:45:21 +0100 EHLO MyServer.MyDomain.com 250-CPSMTPM-CMT109.MyProvider.com Hello [77.170.60.162] 250-TURN 250-SIZE 15744000 250-ETRN 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8bitmime 250-CHUNKING 250-VRFY 250 OK MAIL From:MyName@MyRewrittenDomainName SIZE=1254972 250 2.1.0 MyName@MyRewrittenDomainNameSender OK RCPT To:MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName DATA 250 2.1.5 MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF timeout writing message to Smarhost.com: Broken pipe MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Deferred If I copy the *s2ODs1hH016114 files to MySecondServer and run sendmail -q -v once more, I got the following: Running /var/spool/mqueue/s2ODs1hH016114 (sequence 1 of 1) MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Connecting to Smarhost.com via relay... 220 CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com MyProvider.com Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:57:56 +0100 EHLO MySecondServer.MyRewrittenDomainName 250-CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com Hello [77.170.60.162] 250-TURN 250-SIZE 15744000 250-ETRN 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8bitmime 250-CHUNKING 250-VRFY 250 OK MAIL From:MyName@MyRewrittenDomainName SIZE=1254972 250 2.1.0 MyName@MyRewrittenDomainNameSender OK RCPT To:MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName DATA 250 2.1.5 MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF . 250 2.6.0 20140324135355.gc6...@vpn.mydomain.com Queued mail for delivery MyFriend@MyFriendsDomainName... Sent ( 20140324135355.gc6...@vpn.mydomain.com Queued mail for delivery) Closing connection to Smarhost.com QUIT 221 2.0.0 CPSMTPM-cmt107.MyProvider.com Service closing transmission channel The test shows me that the problem is not on the MyProvider side. The sendmail.cf files on the two server are identical, except the names of the servers and some comments. The sendmail versions are different and the FreeBSD versions are different: MyServer: Sendmail Version 8.14.7 FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE MySecondServer: Sendmail Version 8.14.5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p4 It is also important to note that above can only be observed for some e-mails, not all. Thus some mails will be sent from MyServer, some are not! If I make a tcpdump during the connection between sendmail and smarthost concerning s2ODs1hH016114, I got the following: 11:24:23.301300 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.49165 DNSMyProvider.domain: 32794+ [1au] MX? Smarhost.com. (43) 11:24:23.320078 IP DNSMyProvider.domain MyServer.MyDomain.com.49165: 32794 1/1/1 CNAME CNameMyProvider. (125) 11:24:23.321592 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 2245424203, win 65535, options [mss 1448,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 318826742 ecr 0], length 0 11:24:23.339171 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [S.], seq 2238169153, ack 2245424204, win 8192, options [mss 1452], length 0 11:24:23.339221 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, length 0 11:24:23.355143 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 1:84, ack 1, win 65160, length 83 11:24:23.355254 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 1:24, ack 84, win 65535, length 23 11:24:23.370795 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 84:276, ack 24, win 65137, length 192 11:24:23.371025 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 24:76, ack 276, win 65535, length 52 11:24:23.392751 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 276:326, ack 76, win 65085, length 50 11:24:23.393010 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [P.], seq 76:119, ack 326, win 65535, length 43 11:24:23.414297 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 326:364, ack 119, win 65042, length 38 11:24:23.520345 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], ack 364, win 65535, length 0 11:24:23.535218 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [P.], seq 364:410, ack 119, win 65042, length 46 11:24:23.769098 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 119:1567, ack 410, win 65535, length 1448 11:24:23.769108 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 119:1567, ack 410, win 65535, length 1448 11:24:23.811918 IP ActualSmarthost.com.smtp MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274: Flags [.], ack 1567, win 65160, length 0 11:24:24.077092 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274 ActualSmarthost.com.smtp: Flags [.], seq 1567:3015, ack 410, win 65535, length 1448 11:24:24.077101 IP MyServer.MyDomain.com.51274
sendmail Broken Pipe Error
Dear FreeBSD friends, Lately I have setup a new FreeBSD server with 10.0-STABLE. Most of it went smoothly. However I have an issue with sendmail. Some of the mails can be sent out correctly, some of them stay in /var/spool/mqueue/. The provided error messages are in the latter case: Mar 24 14:16:01 MyServer sm-mta[11725]: s2ODCWT4011717: SYSERR(root): timeout writing message to MyProvider.com: Broken pipe Mar 24 14:16:01 MyServer sm-mta[11725]: s2ODCWT4011717: to=someaddr...@example.com, delay=00:03:29, xdelay=00:03:26, mailer=relay, pri=1284849, relay=MyProvider.com [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred I'm using Version 8.14.7 All was fine when I was using Version 8.14.5. Since there is a timeout error, I like to know what sendmail is writing to MyProvider.com Is there a way to debug sendmail to disclose the message written to MyProvider.com and the response from MyProvider.com. I'm pretty sure that there lays the solution to my problem. Any help is highly appreciated. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
sendmail downgrade
Dear FreeBSD friends, Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5? -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sendmail downgrade
Dear FreeBSD friends, I used portdowngrade, but compiling sendmail 8.14.5 throws an error message. So this is not a way to go! On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:23:16PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote: Dear FreeBSD friends, Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5? -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: control of order of inet devices
Hello Brooks, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 03:01:27PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:27:44AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote: On 4/17/2013 4:14 AM, Willy Offermans wrote: This is what I read in some of the articles or handbook as well. Can I reorder this linked list? Can I control the order by creating the kernel and reordering the inclusion of the device drivers? I am aware that the request sounds silly, but I have a third party program which checks its licence against the first inet device. Since I have added a new inet controller, the sequence has changed. Of course I ask for a new licence, but they want to charge me for that and I do not see any reason for that. Load old inet devices like normal, in loader.conf. Then load the new device driver before networking, after rc's started. If it'd because of probe order, then you might just have to control the probe order the hard way. If the program's calling ifconfig itself, you could write a wrapper to resort the output. And call a lawyer, getting a new ethernet card shouldn't void a license. It wouldn't be particularly hard to influence the sorting of the list if you're willing to modify the if_attach_internal() function and always insert devices with that name at the beginning. It just doesn't seem very general purpose so I'd have a hard time considering including it. -- Brooks I see und subscribe to your point. However it is not clear to me how the order is established. Maybe if I know that, I can influence the order. Can you comment on that? Where can I find the code for the if_attach_internal() function? Digging into the code might also elucidate a lot of things, so I need to ask less :). Maybe I will change the code a bit to suite my wishes. If that is the case, I will inform the list and show the code. Maybe it is useful. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans Home: +31 45 544 49 44 Mobile: +31 681 15 87 68 e-mail: wi...@offermans.rompen.nl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: control of order of inet devices
Hello Brooks, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:44:23AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 03:56:21PM +0200, Willy Offermans wrote: Dear FreeBSD friends, How can I control the order of the network devices in FreeBSD. For example, the command ifconfig lists the network devices: pcn0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8LINKSTATE ether 00:0c:46:ea:2b:32 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet 100baseFX status: no carrier rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=2008VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC ether 00:11:6b:99:7c:5a inet XXX.XXX.24.4 netmask 0xff80 broadcast 137.226.24.127 inet6 fe80::211:6bff:fe99:7c5a%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active nfe0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=82008VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE ether 00:1b:fc:df:a1:33 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier plip0: flags=8810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384 options=63RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL tap0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8LINKSTATE ether 00:22:19:10:8d:bb inet XXX.XXX.24.19 netmask 0x broadcast 137.226.24.19 inet6 fe80::2bd:83ff:fe68:7200%tap0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier pcn0 being first. However, I would like tap0 being first and of course without any output ordering trick. The order is dictated by the order the drivers are probed by the kernel. When the devices are created they are added to a linked list. There is no practical way to control the order and it has little or no effect. -- Brooks This is what I read in some of the articles or handbook as well. Can I reorder this linked list? Can I control the order by creating the kernel and reordering the inclusion of the device drivers? I am aware that the request sounds silly, but I have a third party program which checks its licence against the first inet device. Since I have added a new inet controller, the sequence has changed. Of course I ask for a new licence, but they want to charge me for that and I do not see any reason for that. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Willy * W.K. Offermans Home: +31 45 544 49 44 Mobile: +31 681 15 87 68 e-mail: wi...@offermans.rompen.nl Powered by (__) \\\'',) \/ \ ^ .\._/_) www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
control of order of inet devices
Dear FreeBSD friends, How can I control the order of the network devices in FreeBSD. For example, the command ifconfig lists the network devices: pcn0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8LINKSTATE ether 00:0c:46:ea:2b:32 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet 100baseFX status: no carrier rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=2008VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC ether 00:11:6b:99:7c:5a inet XXX.XXX.24.4 netmask 0xff80 broadcast 137.226.24.127 inet6 fe80::211:6bff:fe99:7c5a%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active nfe0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=82008VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE ether 00:1b:fc:df:a1:33 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier plip0: flags=8810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384 options=63RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL tap0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8LINKSTATE ether 00:22:19:10:8d:bb inet XXX.XXX.24.19 netmask 0x broadcast 137.226.24.19 inet6 fe80::2bd:83ff:fe68:7200%tap0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier pcn0 being first. However, I would like tap0 being first and of course without any output ordering trick. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel * W.K. Offermans Home: +31 45 544 49 44 Mobile: +31 681 15 87 68 e-mail: wi...@offermans.rompen.nl Powered by (__) \\\'',) \/ \ ^ .\._/_) www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
