Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Soeren Schmidt 
It seems Takanori Watanabe wrote:
 Would you try it?
 
 http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff
 http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz

Just did here, ASUS P4S8X board, 

With the CVS version power off doesnt work, it prints the 
power system off using ACPI waits a couble seconds, prints
that the ACPI poweroff function timed out and reboots :(

With the above applied it is even worse, it prints the
power system off using ACPI and then hangs the system
without powering off :( :(

Besides this both seems to work, except they both find
dual CPU's which I dont have :)

-Søren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Jun Sue 
I tested it in my laptop. Everything works however
just as the previous version. I didn't see any bug in
my machine fixed. Anyway I think it is worth to check
in.

Jun Su

_
Do You Yahoo!? 
NetVista A30 
http://ad.cn.doubleclick.net/clk;5313999;7930402;p?http://www.ibm.com/cn/promotion/pc/netvista_a30/index.shtml

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Takanori Watanabe 
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gr
over, Andrew wrote:
 From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp
i/downloads/CHANGES.txt
 
 I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from
 iwasaki@

Iwasaki seems to be busy now.

This is against the Linuxized version but you should be able to get the
gist of it:

--- 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c.orig Wed Mar  5
17:00:15 2003
+++ 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c  Wed Mar  5
17:01:30 2003
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
   /* Ensure that we have a valid GPE number for this GPE block */
 
   if ((gpe_number  gpe_block-block_base_number) ||
-  (gpe_number = (gpe_block-register_count * 8))) {
+  (gpe_number - gpe_block-block_base_number =
(gpe_block-register_count * 8))) {


Thanks. I'll apply it.


BTW. I noticed that some definition for structure is added and
its naming collide to our OS-dependent module.
We has been avoided it by using non-linuxlized ACPI-CA that
has the naming rule of beggining with 'Acpi' not 'acpi_'.
Would you care about it next time?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Takanori Watanabe 
Would you try it?

http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz

The OSD interface of
void
AcpiOsDerivePciId(ACPI_HANDLE Rhandle, ACPI_HANDLE Lhandle,
ACPI_PCI_ID **Id)

is not impremented yet. (Only Do-Nothing function)
If this is impremented, PCI-PCI bridge handling on ACPI-CA
is will be better.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message