Re: Add GEOM_RAID to GENERIC?

2012-05-07 Thread Alexander Motin
The only argument that stopped me is that GEOM_RAID is more active in
probing for metadata then ataraid. Now it tastes all 6 formats on every
provider in system. ataraid tasted only first level and subset of formats
depending on controller vendor. While it is possible to do the same, I am
not sure it should be done.

But may be that all is not really a problem. Most users won't notice few
extra requests unless something happen like disk failure, that can make
boot to take much longer.

07.05.2012 16:24 пользователь "John Baldwin"  написал:
>
> I installed 9.0 on a new desktop that used Intel's on-board RAID
yesterday and
> it worked great.  One nit though is I had to remember to kldload geom_raid
> manually from the shell before starting the install, and to load it from
the
> loader on the first boot after install.  The old ataraid(4) was present in
> GENERIC, so I think it would be fine for GEOM_RAID to be present in
GENERIC
> now (certainly on x86).  What do you think?
>
> --
> John Baldwin
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Add GEOM_RAID to GENERIC?

2012-05-07 Thread John Baldwin
I installed 9.0 on a new desktop that used Intel's on-board RAID yesterday and 
it worked great.  One nit though is I had to remember to kldload geom_raid 
manually from the shell before starting the install, and to load it from the 
loader on the first boot after install.  The old ataraid(4) was present in 
GENERIC, so I think it would be fine for GEOM_RAID to be present in GENERIC 
now (certainly on x86).  What do you think?

-- 
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"