Bug in GEOM or in gstat?

2003-08-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
Hi there,

when running gstat I'm seeing things like this:

dT: 0.509  flag_I 50us  sizeof 240  i -1
 L(q)  ops/sr/s   kBps   ms/rw/s   kBps   ms/w   %busy Name
1189149   21136.2 39785   20.6   87.8| da0
1226218   8891   14.2  8785   24.6   94.3| da1
0104 49   2144   10.7 55   7037   34.0   58.3| da2
1189149   21136.2 39785   20.9   88.4| da0s1
1226218   8891   14.2  8785   24.7   94.4| da1s1
0104 49   2144   10.8 55   7037   34.1   58.4| da2s1
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1a
0  2  2  8   10.9  0  00.02.1| da0s1b
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1d
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1e
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1f
 4294967295187147   21056.2 39785   21.2   99.0| da0s1g
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1d
 4294967295226218   8891   14.3  8785   24.8   89.7| da1s1e
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da2s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da2s1d
0104 49   2144   10.8 55   7037   34.3   58.5| da2s1e

Notice the high numbers in the L(q) row, this seems like an underflow
somewhere.  The numbers don't stay like that, they are fluctuating.

regards,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Systemadministrator   Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
Vienna University Computer Center  Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
University of Vienna   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bug in GEOM or in gstat?

2003-08-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp

Hi Lucas,

Which versions ?  5.0, 5.1 or -current ?

Does the large numbers persist when the system is idle, or do they
fall back to zero ?

Poul-Henning

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lukas Ertl writes:
Hi there,

when running gstat I'm seeing things like this:

dT: 0.509  flag_I 50us  sizeof 240  i -1
 L(q)  ops/sr/s   kBps   ms/rw/s   kBps   ms/w   %busy Name
1189149   21136.2 39785   20.6   87.8| da0
1226218   8891   14.2  8785   24.6   94.3| da1
0104 49   2144   10.7 55   7037   34.0   58.3| da2
1189149   21136.2 39785   20.9   88.4| da0s1
1226218   8891   14.2  8785   24.7   94.4| da1s1
0104 49   2144   10.8 55   7037   34.1   58.4| da2s1
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1a
0  2  2  8   10.9  0  00.02.1| da0s1b
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1d
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1e
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1f
 4294967295187147   21056.2 39785   21.2   99.0| da0s1g
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1d
 4294967295226218   8891   14.3  8785   24.8   89.7| da1s1e
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da2s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da2s1d
0104 49   2144   10.8 55   7037   34.3   58.5| da2s1e

Notice the high numbers in the L(q) row, this seems like an underflow
somewhere.  The numbers don't stay like that, they are fluctuating.

regards,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Systemadministrator   Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
Vienna University Computer Center  Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
University of Vienna   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bug in GEOM or in gstat?

2003-08-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:


 Hi Lucas,

 Which versions ?  5.0, 5.1 or -current ?

CURRENT from this morning CEST.

 Does the large numbers persist when the system is idle, or do they
 fall back to zero ?

This is a snapshot from an idle system:

dT: 0.510  flag_I 50us  sizeof 240  i -1
 L(q)  ops/sr/s   kBps   ms/rw/s   kBps   ms/w   %busy Name
0  4  0  00.0  4 63   10.52.6| da0
0 20  0  00.0 20314   25.1   10.0| da1
0  2  0  00.0  2 318.51.7| da2
0  4  0  00.0  4 63   10.62.6| da0s1
0 20  0  00.0 20314   25.2   10.0| da1s1
0  2  0  00.0  2 318.51.7| da2s1
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1a
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1b
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1d
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1e
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1f
 4294967293  4  0  00.0  4 63   10.6  561.0| da0s1g
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1d
 4294967294 20  0  00.0 20314   25.2   10.0| da1s1e
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da2s1c
0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da2s1d
0  2  0  00.0  2 318.51.7| da2s1e

561% busy is nice, too :-)

regards,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Systemadministrator   Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
Vienna University Computer Center  Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
University of Vienna   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bug in GEOM or in gstat?

2003-08-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:

 This is a snapshot from an idle system:

 dT: 0.510  flag_I 50us  sizeof 240  i -1
 0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da0s1f
  4294967293  4  0  00.0  4 63   10.6  561.0| da0s1g
 0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1c
 0  0  0  00.0  0  00.00.0| da1s1d
  4294967294 20  0  00.0 20314   25.2   10.0| da1s1e

To clarify that: on the idle system the high numbers for L(q) don't fall
back to 0 again.

regards,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Systemadministrator   Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
Vienna University Computer Center  Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
University of Vienna   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]