Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 20:16 Chris wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:16:28 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 21:06 Chris wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:50:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org > said > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy > mm...@freebsd.org > > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing > for > > > the > > > > > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users > > > roughly a > > > > > > > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is > August > > > > > > > > 17th. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out > that > > > > > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to > > > avoid > > > > > any > > > > > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees > > > following > > > > > > > > the merge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used > now? > > > > > > > > > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives > > > this > > > > > > has been the PoR for some time. > > > > > Sure. OK. I caught this thread. But must have missed the > announcement > > > > > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs. > > > > > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was > discussed in > > > > December 2018. Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took > a > > > lot > > > > more incremental PRs than I anticipated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html > > > > > > Thank you very much, Mathew. Sorry for any bother. > > > > > > > > > No bother or not much at least. It’s just been a long haul and I’d like > > to > > wrap this up. > No doubt. > FTR I'm not looking to impede you. :-) > My only concern would be that I'd need to remaster the art of ZFS. I've > got 1500 installs to maintain, and any changes tend to alarm me. :-) > I see we're a bit behind the others, if this status report is current: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CFapSYxA5QRFYy5k6ge3FutU7zbAWbaeGN2nKVXgxCI/edit#gid=0 > Will your impending commit move us closer? Is there anything others > like myself can do to help? Close to 90% of the sources files in openzfs are shared between Linux and FreeBSD. So the features will, give or take a line item, be the same. For non developers the main thing they can do to help out is to run it in their own environments to identify any changes in behavior or regressions. If you’re doing 1500 installs it’s in your best interest to make this as smooth a transition as possible. However, it’s not something you’re going to face until you move to 13. The openzfs port is available to those who want to run it on 12. -M > > > Thanks again, Matthew. > > --Chris > > > > -M > > > > > > > > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:16:28 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 21:06 Chris wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:50:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org > said > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for > the > > > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users > roughly a > > > > > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > > > > > > 17th. > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to > avoid > > > any > > > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees > following > > > > > > the merge. > > > > > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > > > > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? > > > > > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives > this > > > > has been the PoR for some time. > > > Sure. OK. I caught this thread. But must have missed the announcement > > > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs. > > > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > > > > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew. > > > > > > > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was discussed in > > December 2018. Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took a > lot > > more incremental PRs than I anticipated. > > > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html > > Thank you very much, Mathew. Sorry for any bother. > No bother or not much at least. It’s just been a long haul and I’d like to wrap this up. No doubt. FTR I'm not looking to impede you. :-) My only concern would be that I'd need to remaster the art of ZFS. I've got 1500 installs to maintain, and any changes tend to alarm me. :-) I see we're a bit behind the others, if this status report is current: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CFapSYxA5QRFYy5k6ge3FutU7zbAWbaeGN2nKVXgxCI/edit#gid=0 Will your impending commit move us closer? Is there anything others like myself can do to help? Thanks again, Matthew. --Chris -M > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 21:06 Chris wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:50:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org > said > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for > the > > > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users > roughly a > > > > > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > > > > > > 17th. > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to > avoid > > > any > > > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees > following > > > > > > the merge. > > > > > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > > > > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? > > > > > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives > this > > > > has been the PoR for some time. > > > Sure. OK. I caught this thread. But must have missed the announcement > > > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs. > > > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > > > > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew. > > > > > > > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was discussed in > > December 2018. Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took a > lot > > more incremental PRs than I anticipated. > > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html > > Thank you very much, Mathew. Sorry for any bother. > No bother or not much at least. It’s just been a long haul and I’d like to wrap this up. -M > > --Chris > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:50:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a > > > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > > > > 17th. > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid > any > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following > > > > the merge. > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives this > > has been the PoR for some time. > Sure. OK. I caught this thread. But must have missed the announcement > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs. > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew. > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was discussed in December 2018. Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took a lot more incremental PRs than I anticipated. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html Thank you very much, Mathew. Sorry for any bother. --Chris Cheers. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a > > > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > > > > 17th. > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid > any > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following > > > > the merge. > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives this > > has been the PoR for some time. > Sure. OK. I caught this thread. But must have missed the announcement > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs. > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew. > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was discussed in December 2018. Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took a lot more incremental PRs than I anticipated. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html Cheers. > --Chris > > > > > > > > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > > 17th. > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid any > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following > > the merge. > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives this has been the PoR for some time. Sure. OK. I caught this thread. But must have missed the announcement of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs. Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew. --Chris > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > > 17th. > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid any > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following > > the merge. > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives this has been the PoR for some time. > > Thanks. > > --Chris > > > ___ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mm...@freebsd.org said On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August 17th. Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid any unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following the merge. amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? Thanks. --Chris ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images
On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August 17th. Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid any unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following the merge. amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ If you're using a platform not listed above and would be inclined to test if you had an image to work with, let us know. Alternatively, you can still build following the instructions below. The review for merging in to base can be found at: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25872 == NB: Do NOT zpool upgrade unless you are willing to live without the ability to ever rollback to the legacy zfs kmod. Checkout updated HEAD: % git clone https://github.com/mattmacy/networking.git -b projects/openzfs_vendor freebsd Checkout updated openzfs in to sys/contrib: % git clone https://github.com/zfsonfreebsd/ZoF.git -b projects/openzfs_vendor freebsd/sys/contrib/openzfs Build world and kernel with whatever your usual configuration is. Where possible the openzfs kmod is backward compatible with the cmd utils in HEAD so common operations work with existing tools and the new kmod. In the projects/openzfs_vendor branch of ZoF ozfs libraries are backward compatible with the zfs kmod in HEAD. Although ideally one would test this in a separate boot environment, the interoperability should allow one to rollback without too much difficulty. Thanks in advance for your time. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
