Re: Heads up for breaking drm update.
On 2019-05-20 17:21, Michael Butler wrote: On 2019-05-19 23:21, Johannes Lundberg wrote: On 5/19/19 7:36 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Johannes Lundberg wrote: LinuxKPI in base have received a lot of updates recently for Linux 5.0, a couple of them will break drm-current-kmod. So, as of r347973 you will need drm-current-kmod 4.16.g20190519. Ports have been updated and new packages should be available shortly. If drm-current-kmod is broken, should I venture to ask about drm-stable-kmod and drm-legacy-kmod? That's a very good question. Maybe I should have included more information regarding what's not affected. The last series of commits have been to LinuxKPI in -CURRENT. As such: drm-kmod: Meta port, not relevant drm-current-kmod: See original message drm-fbsd11.2-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT drm-fbsd12.0-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT drm-legacy-kmod: Not affected by changes in LinuxKPI drm-stable-kmod does not exist anymore. Stable drm kmod ports for other than -CURRENT are more or less frozen in separate branches where they only receive bug fixes (drm-fbsdxxx-kmod). Hope that answers your questions. It should also be noted that drm-current now has a new dependency on lindebugfs. It won't load without it :-( Previously, lindebugfs was part of the port, and loaded from the port. With this update, we simply switched to using the debugfs version that was imported into base. Regards -- Niclas Zeising FreeBSD Graphics Team ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Heads up for breaking drm update.
On 2019-05-19 23:21, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > On 5/19/19 7:36 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Johannes Lundberg wrote: >>> LinuxKPI in base have received a lot of updates recently for Linux 5.0, >>> a couple of them will break drm-current-kmod. So, as of r347973 you will >>> need drm-current-kmod 4.16.g20190519. Ports have been updated and new >>> packages should be available shortly. >>> >> If drm-current-kmod is broken, should I venture to ask >> about drm-stable-kmod and drm-legacy-kmod? > > That's a very good question. Maybe I should have included more > information regarding what's not affected. The last series of commits > have been to LinuxKPI in -CURRENT. As such: > > drm-kmod: Meta port, not relevant > drm-current-kmod: See original message > drm-fbsd11.2-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT > drm-fbsd12.0-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT > drm-legacy-kmod: Not affected by changes in LinuxKPI > > drm-stable-kmod does not exist anymore. Stable drm kmod ports for other > than -CURRENT are more or less frozen in separate branches where they > only receive bug fixes (drm-fbsdxxx-kmod). > > Hope that answers your questions. It should also be noted that drm-current now has a new dependency on lindebugfs. It won't load without it :-( imb ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Heads up for breaking drm update.
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 08:21:18PM -0700, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > On 5/19/19 7:36 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > >> LinuxKPI in base have received a lot of updates recently for Linux 5.0, > >> a couple of them will break drm-current-kmod. So, as of r347973 you will > >> need drm-current-kmod 4.16.g20190519. Ports have been updated and new > >> packages should be available shortly. > >> > > If drm-current-kmod is broken, should I venture to ask > > about drm-stable-kmod and drm-legacy-kmod? > > That's a very good question. Maybe I should have included more > information regarding what's not affected. The last series of commits > have been to LinuxKPI in -CURRENT. As such: > > drm-kmod: Meta port, not relevant > drm-current-kmod: See original message > drm-fbsd11.2-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT > drm-fbsd12.0-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT > drm-legacy-kmod: Not affected by changes in LinuxKPI > > drm-stable-kmod does not exist anymore. Stable drm kmod ports for other > than -CURRENT are more or less frozen in separate branches where they > only receive bug fixes (drm-fbsdxxx-kmod). > > Hope that answers your questions. > Yes, that answers my question. Thanks. -- Steve ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Heads up for breaking drm update.
On 5/19/19 7:36 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Johannes Lundberg wrote: >> LinuxKPI in base have received a lot of updates recently for Linux 5.0, >> a couple of them will break drm-current-kmod. So, as of r347973 you will >> need drm-current-kmod 4.16.g20190519. Ports have been updated and new >> packages should be available shortly. >> > If drm-current-kmod is broken, should I venture to ask > about drm-stable-kmod and drm-legacy-kmod? That's a very good question. Maybe I should have included more information regarding what's not affected. The last series of commits have been to LinuxKPI in -CURRENT. As such: drm-kmod: Meta port, not relevant drm-current-kmod: See original message drm-fbsd11.2-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT drm-fbsd12.0-kmod: Not affected by changes in -CURRENT drm-legacy-kmod: Not affected by changes in LinuxKPI drm-stable-kmod does not exist anymore. Stable drm kmod ports for other than -CURRENT are more or less frozen in separate branches where they only receive bug fixes (drm-fbsdxxx-kmod). Hope that answers your questions. /Johannes > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Heads up for breaking drm update.
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > LinuxKPI in base have received a lot of updates recently for Linux 5.0, > a couple of them will break drm-current-kmod. So, as of r347973 you will > need drm-current-kmod 4.16.g20190519. Ports have been updated and new > packages should be available shortly. > If drm-current-kmod is broken, should I venture to ask about drm-stable-kmod and drm-legacy-kmod? -- Steve ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Heads up for breaking drm update.
Hi Cross posting to -current and -x11. LinuxKPI in base have received a lot of updates recently for Linux 5.0, a couple of them will break drm-current-kmod. So, as of r347973 you will need drm-current-kmod 4.16.g20190519. Ports have been updated and new packages should be available shortly. A drm-???-kmod port for 5.0 drivers will be created as soon as we fixed a pretty serious vm page cache memory leak (limited to 5.0 code in ports). Once 5.0 is regarded stable, it will replace the 4.16 as default for -CURRENT (and future 12.1) (rejoice Vega graphics users:)) Until then, feel free to test with r347973+ and https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm/tree/drm-v5.0 Cheers! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
