Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
Hi, > On 8 Mar 2017, at 16:40, Mark Linimon wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:00:23PM +, r...@gid.co.uk wrote: >> Let me rephrase that: the link http://purelang.bitbucket.org/ >> quoted on https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions doesn’t work, > > That's the URL in lang/pure/Makefile. > >> should be https://bitbucket.org/purelang/ > > Hmm. I looked and it seems like https://purelang.bitbucket.io/ is > a better choice? What do you think? Sure. > mcl > -- Bob Bishop r...@gid.co.uk ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:00:23PM +, r...@gid.co.uk wrote: > Let me rephrase that: the link http://purelang.bitbucket.org/ > quoted on https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions doesn’t work, That's the URL in lang/pure/Makefile. > should be https://bitbucket.org/purelang/ Hmm. I looked and it seems like https://purelang.bitbucket.io/ is a better choice? What do you think? mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
Hi, > On 6 Mar 2017, at 14:16, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > >> A big chunk of this is down to lang/pure. The upstream links for >> pure at bitbucket.org have mysteriously disappeared; those who care >> may get an uneasy feeling. > > https://bitbucket.org/purelang/pure-lang/downloads/ > > has 0.66 ? Let me rephrase that: the link http://purelang.bitbucket.org/ quoted on https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions doesn’t work, should be https://bitbucket.org/purelang/ > -- > p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to > go ! > -- Bob Bishop r...@gid.co.uk ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
Hi! > A big chunk of this is down to lang/pure. The upstream links for > pure at bitbucket.org have mysteriously disappeared; those who care > may get an uneasy feeling. https://bitbucket.org/purelang/pure-lang/downloads/ has 0.66 ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:16:00 -0600 Mark Linimon wrote > Please see https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions . The perfect answer. Thank you, Mark! --Chris > > mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
Hi, A big chunk of this is down to lang/pure. The upstream links for pure at bitbucket.org have mysteriously disappeared; those who care may get an uneasy feeling. > On 6 Mar 2017, at 07:16, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Please see https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions . > > mcl > ___ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Bob Bishop r...@gid.co.uk ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
Please see https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions . mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system
I've finally been able to bootstrap CURRENT FreeBSD on some new hardware I picked up -- that is, successfully get world/kernel built/installed on it. I see there's a newer version of clang in base (4), which I had hoped that ports would pick up on, and use. But I suppose it's a bit early for ports to start requiring 4. That said; given the time it takes to build install fresh version(s) of these. Is there any way to limit the version /chosen/ by the ports tree/framework? It's painful firing up a build of a meta-port, and watch more than one version of clang/llvm be built for the BUILD_DEPENDS, only to have it cleaned and never installed, only to be built again, and again... You get the picture. :-) Anyway, as I indicated; I'm hoping to limit the ports framework to building/using only /one/ version; say >=3.9? I'd simply look through the system I have, but it's in a build session, that looks like it won't be finished for more than an hour. Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
