Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
Hi, On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: You need to: 1) Upgrade your source tree to Jan 28 or later for 3.X or Jan 26 or later for 4.0 current, and make world and config and remake and install a new kernel, or 2) Take your existing source and add -DCOMPAT_LINUX_THREADS to CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf and make world and remake and install your kernel. Also, you need to add the posix priority extensions to your kernel (see LINT). Why /net option in StarOffice 5.0 don't work? I make one install under Linux RedHat 5.0 with setup /net and I was sucessfull but in my FBSD 3.0-Stable (30Jan1999) it don't work. Are there any schedule to make work linux clone in SMP kernel? I'm using dual PII motherboard. Many Thanks, Paulo. -- ... Overall we've found FreeBSD to excel in performace, stability, technical support, and of course price. Two years after discovering FreeBSD, we have yet to find a reason why we switch to anything else -David Filo, Yahoo! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
Hi, On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: You need to: 1) Upgrade your source tree to Jan 28 or later for 3.X or Jan 26 or later for 4.0 current, and make world and config and remake and install a new kernel, That's ok now :-). Thanks, Paulo. -- ... Overall we've found FreeBSD to excel in performace, stability, technical support, and of course price. Two years after discovering FreeBSD, we have yet to find a reason why we switch to anything else -David Filo, Yahoo! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
There's a yield() syscall that is enabled permanently. Is there any harm in untangling it from the POSIX sched_yield()? :-) I've got a synch_yield() in kern_synch and a call into it from yield() in kern_thread that duplicates the yield() behavior for the non-RTPRIO, non-sched_yield() condition. synch_yield() also KASSERTS that p == curproc since nothing else makes sense. However, I've woken up to a gcc SIG 11 during my world build. This is from yesterday AM sources and is the first crash for my crash box. Though I doubt it is my patches I'll look a bit to convince myself. Prior to this that system has been running a week with a patched world. Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufa...@hda.com) Realtime development, Machine control, HD Associates, Inc. Safety critical systems, Agency approval To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
LINUX clone? sched_yield?
Hi, I'm trying to install StarOffice 5.0 in my FBSD-3.0-STABLE (26Jan1999). When setup is running the kernel reports: linux_clone(303): Not enabled Jan 30 15:05:39 foker /kernel: cmd setup.bin pid 303 tried to use non-present sched_yield Jan 30 15:05:53 foker last message repeated 892 times What's happening? Many thanks, Paulo Fragoso. ps: I'm using one Multi-Processor motherboar with LX chip set, 2 PII 266MHz: FreeBSD foker.nlink.com.br 3.0-STABLE FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE #1: Sat Jan 30 14:56:27 EST 1999 pa...@foker.nlink.com.br:/usr/src/sys/compile/KERNEL-SMP i386 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec0 -- ... Overall we've found FreeBSD to excel in performace, stability, technical support, and of course price. Two years after discovering FreeBSD, we have yet to find a reason why we switch to anything else -David Filo, Yahoo! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install StarOffice 5.0 in my FBSD-3.0-STABLE (26Jan1999). When setup is running the kernel reports: linux_clone(303): Not enabled Jan 30 15:05:39 foker /kernel: cmd setup.bin pid 303 tried to use non-present sched_yield Jan 30 15:05:53 foker last message repeated 892 times What's happening? sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :) Use the options: options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L Many thanks, Paulo Fragoso. ps: I'm using one Multi-Processor motherboar with LX chip set, 2 PII 266MHz: FreeBSD foker.nlink.com.br 3.0-STABLE FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE #1: Sat Jan 30 14:56:27 EST 1999 pa...@foker.nlink.com.br:/usr/src/sys/compile/KERNEL-SMP i386 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec0 -- ... Overall we've found FreeBSD to excel in performace, stability, technical support, and of course price. Two years after discovering FreeBSD, we have yet to find a reason why we switch to anything else -David Filo, Yahoo! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___ gr...@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ http://www.freebsd.org/ _ __ ___ | _ \__ \ |) | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ ___ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 03:33:26PM -0300, Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install StarOffice 5.0 in my FBSD-3.0-STABLE (26Jan1999). When setup is running the kernel reports: linux_clone(303): Not enabled Jan 30 15:05:39 foker /kernel: cmd setup.bin pid 303 tried to use non-present sched_yield Jan 30 15:05:53 foker last message repeated 892 times What's happening? You need to: 1) Upgrade your source tree to Jan 28 or later for 3.X or Jan 26 or later for 4.0 current, and make world and config and remake and install a new kernel, or 2) Take your existing source and add -DCOMPAT_LINUX_THREADS to CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf and make world and remake and install your kernel. Also, you need to add the posix priority extensions to your kernel (see LINT). Or, there is also more information at http://lt.tar.com -- Richard Seaman, Jr. email: d...@tar.com 5182 N. Maple Lanephone: 414-367-5450 Chenequa WI 53058 fax: 414-367-5852 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:54:36 -0500 (EST), Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org said: sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :) Use the options: options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L Peter: is there any harm in enabling these features permanently? -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same woll...@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:54:36 -0500 (EST), Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org said: sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :) Use the options: options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L Peter: is there any harm in enabling these features permanently? This bumps the version that the system says it is but I think the pieces are in place. If Bruce has any POSIX tests he can rebuild the system with POSIX_VERSION and _KPOSIX_VERSION set to 199309L and see what happens. This is the right thing to do for -current, and I have it turned on with a NO_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING option in the patches I'm about to commit. Fixed-priority scheduling is broken in the SMP case and I'm planning on disabling both RTPRIO and _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING on SMP unless one turns it on with RTPRIO_AND_SMP_ANYWAY. SMP and RTPRIO function but not correctly. Programs that assume that the presence of the header means the subsystem is present will fail on SMP the way they fail now. When my build world completes I'm planning on applying essentially the patches that are in my home directory on freefall in PATCHES.sched. Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufa...@hda.com) Realtime development, Machine control, HD Associates, Inc. Safety critical systems, Agency approval To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?
sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :) Use the options: options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L Peter: is there any harm in enabling these features permanently? There's a yield() syscall that is enabled permanently. Is there any harm in untangling it from the POSIX sched_yield()? :-) This bumps the version that the system says it is but I think the pieces are in place. If Bruce has any POSIX tests he can rebuild the system with POSIX_VERSION and _KPOSIX_VERSION set to 199309L I don't have any for P1003.1b, only the NIST ones for POSIX.1. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
