Re: Not sure if this is an important bug...
Hi, same 12 under bhyve on a 11.2p4, it's working here on Intel platform, from dmesg: [] FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA9 r339293 GENERIC-NODEBUG amd64 FreeBSD clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final 335540) (based on LLVM 6.0.1) VT: init without driver. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 v5 @ 3.00GHz (2999.55-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin="GenuineIntel" Id=0x506e3 Family=0x6 Model=0x5e Stepping=3 Features=0x9f83fbff Features2=0xfeda7a17 AMD Features=0x24100800 AMD Features2=0x121 Structured Extended Features=0xf39 XSAVE Features=0x1 TSC: P-state invariant Hypervisor: Origin = "bhyve bhyve " [] ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Not sure if this is an important bug...
In message <201810082255.w98mtn1p033...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W. Gri mes" writes: >> I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and >> it explodes because of an unemulated instruction: >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081 >> >> I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0 > >Can you try an earlier alpha for me? Specifically A3, I think this >may be some hand optimization of memmov stuff that included a new >instruction that we did not use before. ALPHA[3-6] works, ALPHA[78] fails as reported in the ticket -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Not sure if this is an important bug...
> I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and > it explodes because of an unemulated instruction: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081 > > I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0 Can you try an earlier alpha for me? Specifically A3, I think this may be some hand optimization of memmov stuff that included a new instruction that we did not use before. -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Not sure if this is an important bug...
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 07:12:59PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and > > it explodes because of an unemulated instruction: > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081 > > > > I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0 > > > > I did see the PR when it was opened. Hopefully the right people can > take a look at this relatively soon. > > Glen > I saw the original posting by phk and was going to try and validate it here on my x230, which might narrow this down to an AMD only issue, or a "we starting using new instructions" issue. But time has gotten far away from me and was not able to do that. I do know that I ran an earlier 12.0Alpha3 on my 11.1 x230 laptop without issue. -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Not sure if this is an important bug...
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 07:12:59PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and > it explodes because of an unemulated instruction: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081 > > I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0 > I did see the PR when it was opened. Hopefully the right people can take a look at this relatively soon. Glen signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Not sure if this is an important bug...
I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and it explodes because of an unemulated instruction: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081 I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
