Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-14 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 03:25:11PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
 Hi YongHyeon,
 
 Will post on freebsd-ipfw@ as well...
 
 Does your engineering sample function normally with rxcsum/txcsum disabled?

Yes.

 
 Kind regards,
 
 Spil.
 
 
 On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:11 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
   Hi YongHyeon,
  
   With the original unmodified .ko...
  
   ifconfig output as requested at bottom
  
   Static IP-configuration does not make a difference with the ipfw
  behaviour.
  
   ipfw ruleset (based on /etc/rc.firewall simple ruleset)
   00010 allow ip from any to me dst-port 22 recv ue0
   00010 allow tcp from me 22 to any xmit ue0
   00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
   00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
   00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
   00400 deny ip from any to ::1
   00500 deny ip from ::1 to any
   00600 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16
   00700 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10
   00800 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16
   00900 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 1
   01000 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 2,135,136
   01100 deny ip from 10.16.2.1 to any in via ue0
   01200 deny ip from 172.17.2.111 to any in via re0
   01300 deny ip from any to 10.0.0.0/8 via ue0
   01500 deny ip from any to 192.168.0.0/16 via ue0
   01600 deny ip from any to 0.0.0.0/8 via ue0
   01700 deny ip from any to 169.254.0.0/16 via ue0
   01800 deny ip from any to 192.0.2.0/24 via ue0
   01900 deny ip from any to 224.0.0.0/4 via ue0
   02000 deny ip from any to 240.0.0.0/4 via ue0
   02100 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via ue0
   02200 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
   02400 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any via ue0
   02500 deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
   02600 deny ip from 169.254.0.0/16 to any via ue0
   02700 deny ip from 192.0.2.0/24 to any via ue0
   02800 deny ip from 224.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
   02900 deny ip from 240.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
   03000 allow tcp from any to any established
   03100 allow ip from any to any frag
   03200 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 setup
   03300 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 25 setup
   03400 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 465 setup
   03500 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 587 setup
   03600 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 setup
   03700 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 setup
   03800 deny log logamount 5 ip4 from any to any in via ue0 setup proto tcp
   03900 allow tcp from any to any setup
   04000 allow udp from me to any dst-port 53 keep-state
   04100 allow udp from me to any dst-port 123 keep-state
   04200 allow ip from any to any dst-port 22 recv ue0
   65535 deny ip from any to any
  
   If I remove rule 10 it will NOT work with ue0, the ruleset without rule
  10
   DOES work with re0.
  
   Found an older PR about em or fxp having trouble with natd when
   rxcsum/txcsum was enabled, that is why I started fiddling with
   rxcsum/txcsum and found that the NIC would be unusable without
   rxcsum/txcsum enabled. If only I could find that PR now
  (kern/170081???)...
   Was fixed in base...
 
  If you don't use ipfw/natd, checksum offloading of axe(4) work?
  If yes, you'd get better answer from ipfw mailing list.
 
  
   Some other post reported fake AX88772A chips (32-pin packaging vs 64 in
  the
   original) on cheap USB NICs so I checked the hardware as well and could
  not
 
  AX88772A does not support TX/RX checksum offloading.
 
   see an issue (64-pin packaging).
  
   # ifconfig ue0
   ue0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
   options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
   ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
   nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
  
   # dhclient ue0
   DHCPDISCOVER on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
   DHCPOFFER from 172.17.2.1
   DHCPREQUEST on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
   DHCPACK from 172.17.2.1
   bound to 172.17.2.111 -- renewal in 43200 seconds.
  
   # ifconfig ue0
   ue0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
   options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
   ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
   inet6 fe80::260:6eff:fe42:5b53%ue0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
   inet 172.17.2.111 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.17.2.255
   nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
   media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
   status: active
 
  I can see TX/RX checksum offloading is active and it successfully
  got a IP address via DHCP.
 
  
  
  
  
   On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:14 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
 Hi YongHyeon,

 output from verbose boot

 ugen3.2: vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3
 axe0: vendor 0x0b95 product 0x772b, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 on 

Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-13 Thread Spil Oss
Hi YongHyeon,

Will post on freebsd-ipfw@ as well...

Does your engineering sample function normally with rxcsum/txcsum disabled?

Kind regards,

Spil.


On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:11 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
  Hi YongHyeon,
 
  With the original unmodified .ko...
 
  ifconfig output as requested at bottom
 
  Static IP-configuration does not make a difference with the ipfw
 behaviour.
 
  ipfw ruleset (based on /etc/rc.firewall simple ruleset)
  00010 allow ip from any to me dst-port 22 recv ue0
  00010 allow tcp from me 22 to any xmit ue0
  00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
  00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
  00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
  00400 deny ip from any to ::1
  00500 deny ip from ::1 to any
  00600 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16
  00700 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10
  00800 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16
  00900 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 1
  01000 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 2,135,136
  01100 deny ip from 10.16.2.1 to any in via ue0
  01200 deny ip from 172.17.2.111 to any in via re0
  01300 deny ip from any to 10.0.0.0/8 via ue0
  01500 deny ip from any to 192.168.0.0/16 via ue0
  01600 deny ip from any to 0.0.0.0/8 via ue0
  01700 deny ip from any to 169.254.0.0/16 via ue0
  01800 deny ip from any to 192.0.2.0/24 via ue0
  01900 deny ip from any to 224.0.0.0/4 via ue0
  02000 deny ip from any to 240.0.0.0/4 via ue0
  02100 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via ue0
  02200 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
  02400 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any via ue0
  02500 deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
  02600 deny ip from 169.254.0.0/16 to any via ue0
  02700 deny ip from 192.0.2.0/24 to any via ue0
  02800 deny ip from 224.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
  02900 deny ip from 240.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
  03000 allow tcp from any to any established
  03100 allow ip from any to any frag
  03200 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 setup
  03300 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 25 setup
  03400 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 465 setup
  03500 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 587 setup
  03600 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 setup
  03700 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 setup
  03800 deny log logamount 5 ip4 from any to any in via ue0 setup proto tcp
  03900 allow tcp from any to any setup
  04000 allow udp from me to any dst-port 53 keep-state
  04100 allow udp from me to any dst-port 123 keep-state
  04200 allow ip from any to any dst-port 22 recv ue0
  65535 deny ip from any to any
 
  If I remove rule 10 it will NOT work with ue0, the ruleset without rule
 10
  DOES work with re0.
 
  Found an older PR about em or fxp having trouble with natd when
  rxcsum/txcsum was enabled, that is why I started fiddling with
  rxcsum/txcsum and found that the NIC would be unusable without
  rxcsum/txcsum enabled. If only I could find that PR now
 (kern/170081???)...
  Was fixed in base...

 If you don't use ipfw/natd, checksum offloading of axe(4) work?
 If yes, you'd get better answer from ipfw mailing list.

 
  Some other post reported fake AX88772A chips (32-pin packaging vs 64 in
 the
  original) on cheap USB NICs so I checked the hardware as well and could
 not

 AX88772A does not support TX/RX checksum offloading.

  see an issue (64-pin packaging).
 
  # ifconfig ue0
  ue0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
  options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
  ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
  nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
  media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
  status: active
 
  # dhclient ue0
  DHCPDISCOVER on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
  DHCPOFFER from 172.17.2.1
  DHCPREQUEST on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
  DHCPACK from 172.17.2.1
  bound to 172.17.2.111 -- renewal in 43200 seconds.
 
  # ifconfig ue0
  ue0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
  options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
  ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
  inet6 fe80::260:6eff:fe42:5b53%ue0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
  inet 172.17.2.111 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.17.2.255
  nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
  media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
  status: active

 I can see TX/RX checksum offloading is active and it successfully
 got a IP address via DHCP.

 
 
 
 
  On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:14 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
   On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
Hi YongHyeon,
   
output from verbose boot
   
ugen3.2: vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3
axe0: vendor 0x0b95 product 0x772b, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 on usbus3
axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x10
miibus1: MII bus on axe0
ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface PHY 16 on miibus1
ukphy0: OUI 0x007063, model 0x0008, rev. 1
ukphy0:  none, 

Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-10 Thread Spil Oss
Hi YongHyeon,

With the original unmodified .ko...

ifconfig output as requested at bottom

Static IP-configuration does not make a difference with the ipfw behaviour.

ipfw ruleset (based on /etc/rc.firewall simple ruleset)
00010 allow ip from any to me dst-port 22 recv ue0
00010 allow tcp from me 22 to any xmit ue0
00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
00400 deny ip from any to ::1
00500 deny ip from ::1 to any
00600 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16
00700 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10
00800 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16
00900 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 1
01000 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 2,135,136
01100 deny ip from 10.16.2.1 to any in via ue0
01200 deny ip from 172.17.2.111 to any in via re0
01300 deny ip from any to 10.0.0.0/8 via ue0
01500 deny ip from any to 192.168.0.0/16 via ue0
01600 deny ip from any to 0.0.0.0/8 via ue0
01700 deny ip from any to 169.254.0.0/16 via ue0
01800 deny ip from any to 192.0.2.0/24 via ue0
01900 deny ip from any to 224.0.0.0/4 via ue0
02000 deny ip from any to 240.0.0.0/4 via ue0
02100 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via ue0
02200 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
02400 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any via ue0
02500 deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
02600 deny ip from 169.254.0.0/16 to any via ue0
02700 deny ip from 192.0.2.0/24 to any via ue0
02800 deny ip from 224.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
02900 deny ip from 240.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
03000 allow tcp from any to any established
03100 allow ip from any to any frag
03200 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 setup
03300 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 25 setup
03400 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 465 setup
03500 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 587 setup
03600 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 setup
03700 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 setup
03800 deny log logamount 5 ip4 from any to any in via ue0 setup proto tcp
03900 allow tcp from any to any setup
04000 allow udp from me to any dst-port 53 keep-state
04100 allow udp from me to any dst-port 123 keep-state
04200 allow ip from any to any dst-port 22 recv ue0
65535 deny ip from any to any

If I remove rule 10 it will NOT work with ue0, the ruleset without rule 10
DOES work with re0.

Found an older PR about em or fxp having trouble with natd when
rxcsum/txcsum was enabled, that is why I started fiddling with
rxcsum/txcsum and found that the NIC would be unusable without
rxcsum/txcsum enabled. If only I could find that PR now (kern/170081???)...
Was fixed in base...

Some other post reported fake AX88772A chips (32-pin packaging vs 64 in the
original) on cheap USB NICs so I checked the hardware as well and could not
see an issue (64-pin packaging).

# ifconfig ue0
ue0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active

# dhclient ue0
DHCPDISCOVER on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
DHCPOFFER from 172.17.2.1
DHCPREQUEST on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 172.17.2.1
bound to 172.17.2.111 -- renewal in 43200 seconds.

# ifconfig ue0
ue0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
inet6 fe80::260:6eff:fe42:5b53%ue0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
inet 172.17.2.111 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.17.2.255
nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active




On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:14 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
  Hi YongHyeon,
 
  output from verbose boot
 
  ugen3.2: vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3
  axe0: vendor 0x0b95 product 0x772b, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 on usbus3
  axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x10
  miibus1: MII bus on axe0
  ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface PHY 16 on miibus1
  ukphy0: OUI 0x007063, model 0x0008, rev. 1
  ukphy0:  none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto,
  auto-flow
  ue0: USB Ethernet on axe0
  ue0: bpf attached
  ue0: Ethernet address: 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
  ue0: link state changed to UP
  ue0: link state changed to DOWN
  ue0: link state changed to UP

 AX88772B engineering sample I have still worked on latest current.
 Could you use a static IP rather than using DHCP and see whether
 that makes any difference?(Note, you have to revert your changes
 made to axe(4) before trying that).

 Also show me the output of 'ifconfig ue0' before/after running
 dhclient(8).

 
  Apart from what I originally described...
  Networking does work, but not when packets pass through ipfw and nat. If
 I
  add my ipfw rules before the divert natd rule networking works as
 expected,
  

Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-10 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
 Hi YongHyeon,
 
 With the original unmodified .ko...
 
 ifconfig output as requested at bottom
 
 Static IP-configuration does not make a difference with the ipfw behaviour.
 
 ipfw ruleset (based on /etc/rc.firewall simple ruleset)
 00010 allow ip from any to me dst-port 22 recv ue0
 00010 allow tcp from me 22 to any xmit ue0
 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
 00400 deny ip from any to ::1
 00500 deny ip from ::1 to any
 00600 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16
 00700 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10
 00800 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16
 00900 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 1
 01000 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any ip6 icmp6types 2,135,136
 01100 deny ip from 10.16.2.1 to any in via ue0
 01200 deny ip from 172.17.2.111 to any in via re0
 01300 deny ip from any to 10.0.0.0/8 via ue0
 01500 deny ip from any to 192.168.0.0/16 via ue0
 01600 deny ip from any to 0.0.0.0/8 via ue0
 01700 deny ip from any to 169.254.0.0/16 via ue0
 01800 deny ip from any to 192.0.2.0/24 via ue0
 01900 deny ip from any to 224.0.0.0/4 via ue0
 02000 deny ip from any to 240.0.0.0/4 via ue0
 02100 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via ue0
 02200 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
 02400 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any via ue0
 02500 deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8 to any via ue0
 02600 deny ip from 169.254.0.0/16 to any via ue0
 02700 deny ip from 192.0.2.0/24 to any via ue0
 02800 deny ip from 224.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
 02900 deny ip from 240.0.0.0/4 to any via ue0
 03000 allow tcp from any to any established
 03100 allow ip from any to any frag
 03200 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 setup
 03300 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 25 setup
 03400 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 465 setup
 03500 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 587 setup
 03600 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 setup
 03700 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 setup
 03800 deny log logamount 5 ip4 from any to any in via ue0 setup proto tcp
 03900 allow tcp from any to any setup
 04000 allow udp from me to any dst-port 53 keep-state
 04100 allow udp from me to any dst-port 123 keep-state
 04200 allow ip from any to any dst-port 22 recv ue0
 65535 deny ip from any to any
 
 If I remove rule 10 it will NOT work with ue0, the ruleset without rule 10
 DOES work with re0.
 
 Found an older PR about em or fxp having trouble with natd when
 rxcsum/txcsum was enabled, that is why I started fiddling with
 rxcsum/txcsum and found that the NIC would be unusable without
 rxcsum/txcsum enabled. If only I could find that PR now (kern/170081???)...
 Was fixed in base...

If you don't use ipfw/natd, checksum offloading of axe(4) work?
If yes, you'd get better answer from ipfw mailing list.

 
 Some other post reported fake AX88772A chips (32-pin packaging vs 64 in the
 original) on cheap USB NICs so I checked the hardware as well and could not

AX88772A does not support TX/RX checksum offloading.

 see an issue (64-pin packaging).
 
 # ifconfig ue0
 ue0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
 options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
 ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
 nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active
 
 # dhclient ue0
 DHCPDISCOVER on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
 DHCPOFFER from 172.17.2.1
 DHCPREQUEST on ue0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
 DHCPACK from 172.17.2.1
 bound to 172.17.2.111 -- renewal in 43200 seconds.
 
 # ifconfig ue0
 ue0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
 options=8000bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE
 ether 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
 inet6 fe80::260:6eff:fe42:5b53%ue0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
 inet 172.17.2.111 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.17.2.255
 nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
 status: active

I can see TX/RX checksum offloading is active and it successfully
got a IP address via DHCP.

 
 
 
 
 On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:14 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
   Hi YongHyeon,
  
   output from verbose boot
  
   ugen3.2: vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3
   axe0: vendor 0x0b95 product 0x772b, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 on usbus3
   axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x10
   miibus1: MII bus on axe0
   ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface PHY 16 on miibus1
   ukphy0: OUI 0x007063, model 0x0008, rev. 1
   ukphy0:  none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto,
   auto-flow
   ue0: USB Ethernet on axe0
   ue0: bpf attached
   ue0: Ethernet address: 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
   ue0: link state changed to UP
   ue0: link state changed to DOWN
   ue0: link state changed to UP
 
  AX88772B engineering sample I have still worked on latest current.
  

Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-09 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
 Hi YongHyeon,
 
 output from verbose boot
 
 ugen3.2: vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3
 axe0: vendor 0x0b95 product 0x772b, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 on usbus3
 axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x10
 miibus1: MII bus on axe0
 ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface PHY 16 on miibus1
 ukphy0: OUI 0x007063, model 0x0008, rev. 1
 ukphy0:  none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto,
 auto-flow
 ue0: USB Ethernet on axe0
 ue0: bpf attached
 ue0: Ethernet address: 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
 ue0: link state changed to UP
 ue0: link state changed to DOWN
 ue0: link state changed to UP

AX88772B engineering sample I have still worked on latest current.
Could you use a static IP rather than using DHCP and see whether
that makes any difference?(Note, you have to revert your changes
made to axe(4) before trying that).

Also show me the output of 'ifconfig ue0' before/after running
dhclient(8).

 
 Apart from what I originally described...
 Networking does work, but not when packets pass through ipfw and nat. If I
 add my ipfw rules before the divert natd rule networking works as expected,
 without the SYN,ACK response packets are not accepted if I e.g. connect to
 something on the axe interface. I have validated the ipfw ruleset with the
 onboard realtek NIC and it then works as expected.
 
 # usbconfig -u 3 -a 2 dump_info
 ugen3.2: product 0x772b vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
 (480Mbps) pwr=ON (200mA)
 
 Kind regards,
 
 Spil.
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:35 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:14:16PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
   Hi all,
  
   With checksum offloading enabled I cannot use my axe NIC (ASIX AX88772B).
  
   ifconfig ue0 -txcsum -rxcsum
   will make dhclient ue0 return
  
   if I re-enable txcsum and rxcsum I get an immediate response from the
  dhcp
   server.
  
   Tried to remove the csum features by commenting out
   ifp-if_capabilities |= IFCAP_TXCSUM | IFCAP_RXCSUM;
   ifp-if_hwassist = AXE_CSUM_FEATURES;
   (lines 855 and 856 in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/net/if_axe.c)
   and rebuild the module. This does remove RXCSUM and TXCSUM from options
  and
   behaves the same as disabling the features with ifconfig (i.e. does not
   work)
  
   10.0-CURRENT r248351
  
   Hope someone can help me... Spil.
 
  Last time I tried, checksum offloading worked as expected.
  Would you show me the verbose dmesg output after attaching the
  axe(4) NIC?
 
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-08 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:14:16PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 With checksum offloading enabled I cannot use my axe NIC (ASIX AX88772B).
 
 ifconfig ue0 -txcsum -rxcsum
 will make dhclient ue0 return
 
 if I re-enable txcsum and rxcsum I get an immediate response from the dhcp
 server.
 
 Tried to remove the csum features by commenting out
 ifp-if_capabilities |= IFCAP_TXCSUM | IFCAP_RXCSUM;
 ifp-if_hwassist = AXE_CSUM_FEATURES;
 (lines 855 and 856 in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/net/if_axe.c)
 and rebuild the module. This does remove RXCSUM and TXCSUM from options and
 behaves the same as disabling the features with ifconfig (i.e. does not
 work)
 
 10.0-CURRENT r248351
 
 Hope someone can help me... Spil.

Last time I tried, checksum offloading worked as expected.
Would you show me the verbose dmesg output after attaching the
axe(4) NIC?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-08 Thread Spil Oss
Hi YongHyeon,

output from verbose boot

ugen3.2: vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3
axe0: vendor 0x0b95 product 0x772b, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 on usbus3
axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x10
miibus1: MII bus on axe0
ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface PHY 16 on miibus1
ukphy0: OUI 0x007063, model 0x0008, rev. 1
ukphy0:  none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto,
auto-flow
ue0: USB Ethernet on axe0
ue0: bpf attached
ue0: Ethernet address: 00:60:6e:42:5b:53
ue0: link state changed to UP
ue0: link state changed to DOWN
ue0: link state changed to UP

Apart from what I originally described...
Networking does work, but not when packets pass through ipfw and nat. If I
add my ipfw rules before the divert natd rule networking works as expected,
without the SYN,ACK response packets are not accepted if I e.g. connect to
something on the axe interface. I have validated the ipfw ruleset with the
onboard realtek NIC and it then works as expected.

# usbconfig -u 3 -a 2 dump_info
ugen3.2: product 0x772b vendor 0x0b95 at usbus3, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
(480Mbps) pwr=ON (200mA)

Kind regards,

Spil.


On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:35 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:14:16PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  With checksum offloading enabled I cannot use my axe NIC (ASIX AX88772B).
 
  ifconfig ue0 -txcsum -rxcsum
  will make dhclient ue0 return
 
  if I re-enable txcsum and rxcsum I get an immediate response from the
 dhcp
  server.
 
  Tried to remove the csum features by commenting out
  ifp-if_capabilities |= IFCAP_TXCSUM | IFCAP_RXCSUM;
  ifp-if_hwassist = AXE_CSUM_FEATURES;
  (lines 855 and 856 in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/net/if_axe.c)
  and rebuild the module. This does remove RXCSUM and TXCSUM from options
 and
  behaves the same as disabling the features with ifconfig (i.e. does not
  work)
 
  10.0-CURRENT r248351
 
  Hope someone can help me... Spil.

 Last time I tried, checksum offloading worked as expected.
 Would you show me the verbose dmesg output after attaching the
 axe(4) NIC?

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-07 Thread Spil Oss
Hi all,

With checksum offloading enabled I cannot use my axe NIC (ASIX AX88772B).

ifconfig ue0 -txcsum -rxcsum
will make dhclient ue0 return

if I re-enable txcsum and rxcsum I get an immediate response from the dhcp
server.

Tried to remove the csum features by commenting out
ifp-if_capabilities |= IFCAP_TXCSUM | IFCAP_RXCSUM;
ifp-if_hwassist = AXE_CSUM_FEATURES;
(lines 855 and 856 in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/net/if_axe.c)
and rebuild the module. This does remove RXCSUM and TXCSUM from options and
behaves the same as disabling the features with ifconfig (i.e. does not
work)

10.0-CURRENT r248351

Hope someone can help me... Spil.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org