Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64)
i thought I had captured these. just add options AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 to your kernel. Adrian On 6 January 2012 09:14, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote: I am getting the following error when trying to build recent 10.0-CURRENT kernel (amd64)? [..snip..] cc -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -msse3 -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/ath_hal -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RHURLIN/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -fno-omit-frame-pointer -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RHURLIN -mno-sse -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mno-mmx -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -fstack-protector -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs -fdiagnostics-show-option -c /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c: In function 'ath_tx_aggr_comp_aggr': /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3136: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_flags' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3139: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_ba_low' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3140: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_ba_high' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3156: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_tid' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3158: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_tid' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/ath. *** Error code 1 I observe this behaviour on three boxes. Any help is really appreciated. Thanks in advance, Rainer Hurling ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64)
On 06.01.2012 18:30 (UTC+1), Adrian Chadd wrote: i thought I had captured these. just add options AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 to your kernel. Ah, I indeed missed the new option in GENERIC, because I build with modified kernel config file. I commented all wireless network drivers and their options out. But the error remains. Is it necessary to have this option uncommented even when the driver ath is commented out? Many thanks for your fast response, Rainer Adrian On 6 January 2012 09:14, Rainer Hurlingrhur...@gwdg.de wrote: I am getting the following error when trying to build recent 10.0-CURRENT kernel (amd64)? [..snip..] cc -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -msse3 -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/ath_hal -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RHURLIN/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -fno-omit-frame-pointer -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RHURLIN -mno-sse -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mno-mmx -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -fstack-protector -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs -fdiagnostics-show-option-c /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c: In function 'ath_tx_aggr_comp_aggr': /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3136: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_flags' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3139: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_ba_low' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3140: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_ba_high' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3156: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_tid' /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c:3158: error: 'struct ath_tx_status' has no member named 'ts_tid' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/ath. *** Error code 1 I observe this behaviour on three boxes. Any help is really appreciated. Thanks in advance, Rainer Hurling ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64)
On 6 January 2012 10:19, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote: I commented all wireless network drivers and their options out. But the error remains. Is it necessary to have this option uncommented even when the driver ath is commented out? Yes, because of how the wlan/ath modules are built. You need to have AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 in the kernel config file, as the driver/module currently doesn't build without it. I'll eventually fix that, but right now I just want to leave that option in and not hack up the Makefile to define said option. Otherwise other options (eg enabling 11n, enabling hal debugging, etc) are completely ignored when building modules. Same with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH i believe. I should really re-verify that. Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64)
2012/1/6 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org On 6 January 2012 10:19, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote: I commented all wireless network drivers and their options out. But the error remains. Is it necessary to have this option uncommented even when the driver ath is commented out? Yes, because of how the wlan/ath modules are built. You need to have AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 in the kernel config file, as the driver/module currently doesn't build without it. I'm sorry for intruding in this topic, but it seems to me similar subject; Did FreeBSD ever tried to make config variables structured and with specified dependencies? To make clear what I mean - is anyone tried to implement some deps spec file (Or some special Makefile's sections, whatever), so if you specified feature A in kernel, it can check if you also specified B (which is required by A)? In this way config could provide feedback when you trying to build kernel without needed dependencies, and many peoples could save their time not compiling non-buildable kernel. I'll eventually fix that, but right now I just want to leave that option in and not hack up the Makefile to define said option. Otherwise other options (eg enabling 11n, enabling hal debugging, etc) are completely ignored when building modules. Same with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH i believe. I should really re-verify that. Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64)
On 06.01.2012 22:42 (UTC+1), Adrian Chadd wrote: On 6 January 2012 10:19, Rainer Hurlingrhur...@gwdg.de wrote: I commented all wireless network drivers and their options out. But the error remains. Is it necessary to have this option uncommented even when the driver ath is commented out? Yes, because of how the wlan/ath modules are built. You need to have AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 in the kernel config file, as the driver/module currently doesn't build without it. I just tested it with AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 enabled (but ath devices disabled) and it builds fine. I'll eventually fix that, but right now I just want to leave that option in and not hack up the Makefile to define said option. Otherwise other options (eg enabling 11n, enabling hal debugging, etc) are completely ignored when building modules. Same with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH i believe. I should really re-verify that. Even with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH disabled the kernel builds. So it seems this is not necessary to activate. Thanks again for help and clarifying it, Rainer Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64)
On 06.01.2012 22:49 (UTC+1), Alexander Yerenkow wrote: 2012/1/6 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org mailto:adr...@freebsd.org On 6 January 2012 10:19, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de mailto:rhur...@gwdg.de wrote: I commented all wireless network drivers and their options out. But the error remains. Is it necessary to have this option uncommented even when the driver ath is commented out? Yes, because of how the wlan/ath modules are built. You need to have AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 in the kernel config file, as the driver/module currently doesn't build without it. I'm sorry for intruding in this topic, but it seems to me similar subject; No problem. I also sometimes have to try for functional configs, before kernel build again. Some kind of deps spec could be very useful. And also some kind of notification for relevant kernel config changes, introduced by updates, would be of help. Did FreeBSD ever tried to make config variables structured and with specified dependencies? To make clear what I mean - is anyone tried to implement some deps spec file (Or some special Makefile's sections, whatever), so if you specified feature A in kernel, it can check if you also specified B (which is required by A)? In this way config could provide feedback when you trying to build kernel without needed dependencies, and many peoples could save their time not compiling non-buildable kernel. I'll eventually fix that, but right now I just want to leave that option in and not hack up the Makefile to define said option. Otherwise other options (eg enabling 11n, enabling hal debugging, etc) are completely ignored when building modules. Same with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH i believe. I should really re-verify that. Adrian -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
