Re: atomic_testandclear_, atomic_testandset_
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 01:42 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 01:38:07PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote: > > It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise. > Why not to add trivial cmpset-based implementations to the lacking > arches ? If maintainers prefer proper ll/cs assembly, they would > have the time to do it properly without ultimatum. Good point. > > > It is useful to utilize consistent atomic(9) KPI across kernel. > Agreed > > > > > -M > > > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:18 Matthew Macy wrote: > > > > > The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are > > > implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in > > > review that uses them that I intend to commit once the various design > > > issues are addressed. Please implement them so that those targets can > > > remain part of universe. > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > -M > > > > > ___ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: atomic_testandclear_, atomic_testandset_
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 01:38:07PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote: > It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise. Why not to add trivial cmpset-based implementations to the lacking arches ? If maintainers prefer proper ll/cs assembly, they would have the time to do it properly without ultimatum. It is useful to utilize consistent atomic(9) KPI across kernel. > > -M > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:18 Matthew Macy wrote: > > > The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are > > implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in > > review that uses them that I intend to commit once the various design > > issues are addressed. Please implement them so that those targets can > > remain part of universe. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > -M > > > ___ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: atomic_testandclear_, atomic_testandset_
It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise. -M On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:18 Matthew Macy wrote: > The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are > implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in > review that uses them that I intend to commit once the various design > issues are addressed. Please implement them so that those targets can > remain part of universe. > > Thanks in advance. > -M > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
atomic_testandclear_, atomic_testandset_
The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in review that uses them that I intend to commit once the various design issues are addressed. Please implement them so that those targets can remain part of universe. Thanks in advance. -M ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
