Re: i386_set_ldt messages with today's world
On Monday 08 September 2003 03:26, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Monday 08 September 2003 00:17, Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 14:13, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: *SCHNIP* See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Something is using i386_set_ldt() static ldt allocations. We added the warning message to detect usage of these allocations so they could be changed to dynamic allocations. Our threads libraries make use of LDTs on i386, so having other code also use (possibly) the same LDT would break things. Only ode still exists which is: 541 ?? S 0:15,50 /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-2CitM What is ode? Typo? pid? I don't see how XFree86 can use i386_set_ldt(). It doesn't reference it on my box: $ nm /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 | grep ldt $ XFree86 loads various modules from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules. That said, I could find nothing about ldts being used anywhere in the source (grepping for LDT, sldt, and set_ldt). Perhaps the nvidia driver is being used? That's the only thing I could think of. Yep, exactly that's the driver I'm using (GF4MX440-8) (I'm one of those without ANY problem with this card/driver (dualHead) btw.) Is this binary only or source? Either way, it needs to be changed to use dynamic LDT allocations. Both. There is some sysctl stuff which gets compiled but the libGLcore.so etc. are binary only. I set [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the CC list. He's working on patches anyway, so he should be informed. Best regards, -Harry pgp0.pgp Description: signature
i386_set_ldt messages with today's world
Hi all, I have no idea what it means, but since today's world I get the following messages after starting x: Warning: pid 541 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 547 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 548 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 567 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 568 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 569 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 570 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 573 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 572 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 577 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Only ode still exists which is: 541 ?? S 0:15,50 /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-2CitM Thanks, -Harry pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: i386_set_ldt messages with today's world
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hi all, I have no idea what it means, but since today's world I get the following messages after starting x: Warning: pid 541 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 547 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 548 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 567 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 568 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 569 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 570 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 573 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 572 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 577 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Something is using i386_set_ldt() static ldt allocations. We added the warning message to detect usage of these allocations so they could be changed to dynamic allocations. Our threads libraries make use of LDTs on i386, so having other code also use (possibly) the same LDT would break things. Only ode still exists which is: 541 ?? S 0:15,50 /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-2CitM What is ode? Typo? pid? I don't see how XFree86 can use i386_set_ldt(). It doesn't reference it on my box: $ nm /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 | grep ldt $ -- Dan Eischen ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i386_set_ldt messages with today's world
On Sunday 07 September 2003 23:13, Daniel Eischen wrote: *SNIP* Warning: pid 577 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Something is using i386_set_ldt() static ldt allocations. We added the warning message to detect usage of these allocations so they could be changed to dynamic allocations. Our threads libraries make use of LDTs on i386, so having other code also use (possibly) the same LDT would break things. Only ode still exists which is: 541 ?? S 0:15,50 /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-2CitM What is ode? Typo? pid? Typo. Only one PID is still listed. I don't see how XFree86 can use i386_set_ldt(). It doesn't reference it on my box: $ nm /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 | grep ldt I also tried that and nothing returns. Had a look at man nm, but can't do anything with it. I'm no programmer. And first I'll have to get a i386 Microprocessor Programmer's Reference Manual, Intel. Well, like mentioned I'm no programmer, I only wondered what this was and as far as I understood it's nothing I have to worry about, but unclear to you? Let me know if I can do anything helpful. Thanks, -Harry $ pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: i386_set_ldt messages with today's world
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 14:13, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hi all, I have no idea what it means, but since today's world I get the following messages after starting x: Warning: pid 541 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 547 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 548 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 567 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 568 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 569 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 570 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 573 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 572 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Warning: pid 577 used static ldt allocation. See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Something is using i386_set_ldt() static ldt allocations. We added the warning message to detect usage of these allocations so they could be changed to dynamic allocations. Our threads libraries make use of LDTs on i386, so having other code also use (possibly) the same LDT would break things. Only ode still exists which is: 541 ?? S 0:15,50 /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-2CitM What is ode? Typo? pid? I don't see how XFree86 can use i386_set_ldt(). It doesn't reference it on my box: $ nm /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 | grep ldt $ XFree86 loads various modules from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules. That said, I could find nothing about ldts being used anywhere in the source (grepping for LDT, sldt, and set_ldt). Perhaps the nvidia driver is being used? That's the only thing I could think of. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i386_set_ldt messages with today's world
On Monday 08 September 2003 00:17, Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 14:13, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: *SCHNIP* See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Something is using i386_set_ldt() static ldt allocations. We added the warning message to detect usage of these allocations so they could be changed to dynamic allocations. Our threads libraries make use of LDTs on i386, so having other code also use (possibly) the same LDT would break things. Only ode still exists which is: 541 ?? S 0:15,50 /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-2CitM What is ode? Typo? pid? I don't see how XFree86 can use i386_set_ldt(). It doesn't reference it on my box: $ nm /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 | grep ldt $ XFree86 loads various modules from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules. That said, I could find nothing about ldts being used anywhere in the source (grepping for LDT, sldt, and set_ldt). Perhaps the nvidia driver is being used? That's the only thing I could think of. Yep, exactly that's the driver I'm using (GF4MX440-8) (I'm one of those without ANY problem with this card/driver (dualHead) btw.) Thanks, -Harry pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: i386_set_ldt messages with today's world
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Monday 08 September 2003 00:17, Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 14:13, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: *SCHNIP* See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info Something is using i386_set_ldt() static ldt allocations. We added the warning message to detect usage of these allocations so they could be changed to dynamic allocations. Our threads libraries make use of LDTs on i386, so having other code also use (possibly) the same LDT would break things. Only ode still exists which is: 541 ?? S 0:15,50 /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-2CitM What is ode? Typo? pid? I don't see how XFree86 can use i386_set_ldt(). It doesn't reference it on my box: $ nm /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 | grep ldt $ XFree86 loads various modules from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules. That said, I could find nothing about ldts being used anywhere in the source (grepping for LDT, sldt, and set_ldt). Perhaps the nvidia driver is being used? That's the only thing I could think of. Yep, exactly that's the driver I'm using (GF4MX440-8) (I'm one of those without ANY problem with this card/driver (dualHead) btw.) Is this binary only or source? Either way, it needs to be changed to use dynamic LDT allocations. -- Dan Eischen ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
