On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:41:11PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the makefiles are a bit broken if make -j13 is used. What
> I see here is that osreldate.h in obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/ looks
> like this:
>
>
> ...
> #ifdef _KERNEL
> #ifdef _KERNEL
> #error "/usr/include/osreldate.h cannot be used in the kernel, use sys/param.h"
> #error "/usr/include/osreldate.h cannot be used in the kernel, use sys/param.h"
> #else
> #else
> #undef __FreeBSD_version
> #undef __FreeBSD_version
> #define __FreeBSD_version 500035
> #define __FreeBSD_version 500035
> #endif
> #endif
>
>
> When looking at the output of "make -j13 world", it looks like some parts
> are being run more than once:
>
>
> --
> >>> stage 4: populating /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
> --
> cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 OBJFORM
> AT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec PERL5LIB=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/li
> bdata/perl/5.6.1 GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin GROFF_FONT_PATH=
> /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/groff_font GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i38
> 6/usr/share/tmac DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 INSTALL="sh /usr/src/tools/inst
> all.sh" PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/
> obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin make -f Makefile.inc1 S
> HARED=symlinks includes incsinstall
> ===> share/info
> ===> share/info
> ===> include
> ===> include
> Setting up symlinks to kernel source tree...
>
>
I also see the breakage with -j8 "make release", but in a different place,
while building "krb5" dist. I'm currently testing this patch.
%%%
Index: Makefile.inc1
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
retrieving revision 1.273
diff -u -r1.273 Makefile.inc1
--- Makefile.inc1 12 May 2002 16:00:43 - 1.273
+++ Makefile.inc1 14 May 2002 06:32:01 -
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
@echo "--"
@echo ">>> stage 4: populating ${WORLDTMP}/usr/include"
@echo "--"
- cd ${.CURDIR}; ${WMAKE} SHARED=symlinks includes incsinstall
+ cd ${.CURDIR}; ${WMAKE} includes; ${WMAKE} SHARED=symlinks incsinstall
_libraries:
@echo
@echo "--"
%%%
Now I know why running "make all install" is not a good idea (in the -j
case). ``.ORDER: all install'' or ``.ORDER: includes incsinstall'' do not
work because these do not cause the necessary ordering for sub-dependents.
What I mean here is that:
all: ${PROG} ${SCRIPTS} ${FILES} _includes _manpages
install: realinstall
realinstall: _proginstall _scriptsinstall _filesinstall _incsinstall _maninstall
And ``.ORDER: all install'' does not cause e.g. _includes and _incsinstall
to be run in sequence.
One might now wonder why not fix it like this:
.ORDER: _includes _incsinstall
The answer is that makefiles are allowed to redefine "includes" and/or
"incsinstall". In that case, _includes and/or _incsinstall won't even
be defined, and we'd now have to make sure (in this particular makefile)
that "make includes incsinstall" works in -j case by providing the
necessary .ORDER'ing, while not running "making" and "installing" parts
together in the -j case will "just work".
Bruce, yes I am aware of the problem with _incsinstall attempting to
"make" includes if they are not built.
I even attempted to fix it like this:
%%%
.if exists(${file})
_fooinstall: _fooinstall_${file}
_fooinstall_${file}: ${file}
${INSTALL} ${.ALLSRC} ...
.endif
%%%
But this unfortunately breaks the common "make all install" case, which
is (as should be apparent from the previous paragraph) is just wrong in
the -j case.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
msg38308/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
