Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
On 31 October 2011 20:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after. Given that RC1 is already out, you should probably check with re@ first. I'll poke them tomorrow, but since others have merged in driver changes and other stuff into -HEAD, I wouldn't be the first person to merge in bigger things. Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
Hi, On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 31 October 2011 20:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after. Given that RC1 is already out, you should probably check with re@ first. I'll poke them tomorrow, but since others have merged in driver changes and other stuff into -HEAD, I wouldn't be the first person to merge in bigger things. Maybe not the place to ask, but why are you (ie. FreeBSD folks) unable to unleash commit to `trunk' and let only required MFC go to `stable/9' ? - Arnaud ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
On 3 November 2011 09:45, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe not the place to ask, but why are you (ie. FreeBSD folks) unable to unleash commit to `trunk' and let only required MFC go to `stable/9' ? Hi, We can. It's just that we're being nice to keep the diffs between -HEAD and stable/9 low to keep things easier for release engineering. But it's taking a while and I really want to push this 11n stuff into -HEAD so I can continue active development in a way that users can actively test it. :) Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
Hi all, I'd like to merge the if_ath_tx code into -HEAD so it gets some wider testing. This includes a couple of net80211 changes but it overwhelmingly is if_ath driver changes. The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and -HEAD. Please let me know if you have any feelings/comments about this. I'll look to start doing this over the next few days. Thanks, Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
On 10/31/2011 14:17, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi all, I'd like to merge the if_ath_tx code into -HEAD so it gets some wider testing. This includes a couple of net80211 changes but it overwhelmingly is if_ath driver changes. The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and -HEAD. Is this work that is planned to be migrated to 9.0-RELEASE? If not, shouldn't it wait till after the release? -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:17:28 -0700 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi all, I'd like to merge the if_ath_tx code into -HEAD so it gets some wider testing. This includes a couple of net80211 changes but it overwhelmingly is if_ath driver changes. The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and -HEAD. Please let me know if you have any feelings/comments about this. I'll look to start doing this over the next few days. Thanks, Hi, I think it will make driver update process faster and easier, so +1 Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Aleksandr Rybalko r...@ddteam.net ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
On 31 October 2011 14:52, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and -HEAD. Is this work that is planned to be migrated to 9.0-RELEASE? If not, shouldn't it wait till after the release? Well, it depends on how long 9.0-RELEASE is going to take. If it's going to take days, then sure I can wait. But if it's going to take weeks, I'll likely _have_ the rest of the if_ath_tx missing pieces done and ready for merge into 9.0. In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after. Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD
On 10/31/2011 17:22, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 31 October 2011 14:52, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and -HEAD. Is this work that is planned to be migrated to 9.0-RELEASE? If not, shouldn't it wait till after the release? Well, it depends on how long 9.0-RELEASE is going to take. If it's going to take days, then sure I can wait. But if it's going to take weeks, I'll likely _have_ the rest of the if_ath_tx missing pieces done and ready for merge into 9.0. In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after. Given that RC1 is already out, you should probably check with re@ first. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
