[Bug 240955] Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240955 Jason Helfman changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |j...@freebsd.org CC||j...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 240955] Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240955 --- Comment #1 from PauAmma --- Meanwhile, it was fixed following my earlier email to freebsd-doc@. (See https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc?view=revision=53449.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?
On 2019-09-18 09:07, Pau Amma wrote: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-gnome.html (in 6.10.1. Introduction) contains a mention of adding DEVELOPER=yes to /etc/make.conf that to me looks out of place and redundant with that in section 3, https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting.html. In addition, maybe that mention should be repeated in section 4, https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/slow-porting.html. Opinions? (Note: "go file a bug" is a perfectly valid opinion.) Thanks for the report! I've just committed a fix for this. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc?view=revision=53449 -jgh signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Bug 240955] Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240955 Bug ID: 240955 Summary: Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook? Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any URL: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/port ers-handbook/using-gnome.html OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Website Assignee: d...@freebsd.org Reporter: paua...@gundo.com Section 6.10.1, Introduction contains a mention of adding DEVELOPER=yes to /etc/make.conf that to me looks out of place and redundant with that in section 3, https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting.html. In addition, maybe that mention should be repeated in section 4, https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/slow-porting.html. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-gnome.html (in 6.10.1. Introduction) contains a mention of adding DEVELOPER=yes to /etc/make.conf that to me looks out of place and redundant with that in section 3, https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting.html. In addition, maybe that mention should be repeated in section 4, https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/slow-porting.html. Opinions? (Note: "go file a bug" is a perfectly valid opinion.) ___ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
