Re: [Call for Testers] VirtualBox 4.2.4

2012-11-08 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Brandon Gooch
jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich de...@freebsd.org wrote:
 Hi virtualbox users!

 This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit
 VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree. If you already run VirtualBox 4.2.0 you
 should definitely update to 4.2.4 because they fixed quite a few serious
 bugs upstream.

 Our plan is still to commit 4.2 to the portstree as soon as FreeBSD 9.1
 is out the door.

 If you are interested in helping with virtualbox maintenance and
 development or have noticed a bug you can easily find us on IRC.


 Please update devel/kBuild-devel before updating any of the virtualbox
 ports and ensure that your Kernel sources match your running kernel
 before building the virtualbox-ose-kmod port.

 Changes since VirtualBox 4.1:
 https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog

 VirtualBox 4.2.4 and 4.1.22 (legacy) Ports:
 http://people.freebsd.org/~decke/virtualbox/virtualbox-cft-4.2.4-20121030.tar.gz

 IRC: #freebsd-vbox on Freenode


 Bernhard on behalf of the new VirtualBox on FreeBSD Team!

 --
 Bernhard Froehlich
 http://www.bluelife.at/

 I've updated to 4.2.4 on my system running HEAD. I've hit one annoying issue.

 I've been running the 4.2.0 Call for Testing for a while now, and it
 worked very well.

 After updating to 4.2.4 and updating the guest additions on several
 Linux guests, I've found that 3D acceleration is broken. The guest on
 which I didn't update the guest additions (so it's still running
 version 4.2.0 guest additions),  3D acceleration works great.

 This is a nuisance on systems which had some form of compositing
 enabled (e.g. compiz) because the login process (GDM in this case)
 just spins indefinitely waiting on (I presume) the window manager to
 fire up.

 Anyone else seeing this?

Hm haven't checked that recently. The only thing that changed between 4.2.0
and 4.2.2 from FreeBSD side was that we have enabled DRM in the additions
for FreeBSD guests but that should not affect Linux guests at all.

I will check if I can reproduce that.

-- 
Bernhard Froehlich
http://www.bluelife.at/
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: VBox guest additions

2012-11-08 Thread Warren Block

On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:


On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:

On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Warren Block wrote:


What is the current procedure for installing guest additions on
non-FreeBSD guests?  With a FreeBSD host and XP guest, the guest exits
instantly when Devices/Install Guest Additions/Yes is chosen.  But the
downloadable guest additions from virtualbox.org aren't ISO format any more.

This is VirtualBox 4.1.22 on amd64.



Manually downloading the guest additions ISO and mounting it worked. Odd,
though.


Best way is to enable Guest Additions option in emulators/virtualbox-ose which
downloads the ISO and installs it on your host. Then you should be able to
use that menu option. If it crashes the guest then I'd like to have the VBox.log
which should give a hint why and where it crashed.


That worked fine.___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


VirtualBox and USB

2012-11-08 Thread Lino Miklav

Hello,

what is the current status of USB support under VirtualBox?

I'm trying to attach a dongle in VirtualBox 4.1.22 on FreeBSD
9 host. It can be seen in the guest, but it doesn't work. I've
tried the sysctl hw.usb.ehci.no_hs=1 trick, but it made no difference. 
Does it matter to have USB drivers compiled in

the kernel?

Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ports/173487: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable

2012-11-08 Thread edwin
Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs-emulation
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 9 03:50:08 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173487
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ports/173487: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable

2012-11-08 Thread eadler
Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable

Responsible-Changed-From-To: emulation-eadler
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 9 04:06:48 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
I'll take it.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173487
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org