Re: systat -- The alternate system clock has died...

1999-09-03 Thread Michael Reifenberger

On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
...
 Anybody else seeing this?  Or is it make world time again...?
There was a patch flooding around to /sys/i386/isa/clock.c in the lists which add a:
while (rtcin(RTC_INTR)  RTCIR_PERIOD)
statclock(frame);
to the beginning of clkintr().
This seems to eliminate the problem for me.

Bye!

Michael Reifenberger
Plaut Software GmbH, R/3 Basis



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami

 * From: Tim Vanderhoek [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 * differences are 1) entries in inetd.conf are sample entries only, 2)
 * ports have no way of adding those entries to inetd.conf themselves
 * (since touching /etc is illegal).

Uh, you're contradicting yourself.  Touching /etc is not illegal.

 * 2)  The current system for having ports add their own usernames and
 * groupnames is very simple.  It is a little messy in that there are a
 * number of different pkg/INSTALL scripts, some of them broken to
 * various degrees.  Simply adding an mta username:groupname won't solve
 * that problem.

Besides those that add uid/gids, most shell ports add entries to
/etc/shells.

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



gdb and source forking

1999-09-03 Thread Kip Macy

I have been trying to apply some modifications to gdb but have noticed
that FreeBSD has basically gone off on its own path with respect to gdb.
Is there any intention pf getting these changes merged back in to the
original distribution? It looks like it would be a lot of work.

-Kip




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Just read it on slashdot: Berkeley removes Advertising Clause

1999-09-03 Thread Sebestyen Zoltan

Hi,

 I've just read this piece of news on slashdot.org that  that
 "UC-Berkeley has changed the *BSD license. Effective immediately, the 3rd
clause, that which requires acknowledgement of UCB in all advertising is
null and void.". Did the FreeBSD team do this change in FreeBSD sources?


Sebestyn Zoltn [EMAIL PROTECTED]There was a time when all on my mind 
was Love.
MAKE INSTALL NOT WARNow I find that most of the time
love's not enough in itself.

I use UNIX because reboots are for hardware upgrades.

 Kick me! Whip me!! Make me develop on AIX!!!



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami

 * From: Jonathan Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 * What I want is a simple new readable sysctl, something like:
 * 
 *  hw.clockrate:   132 
 * 
 * I think that this would be useful both for development (how fast
 * is that stupid machine down in the bunker?),  and system admininstration
 * (who needs a cpu upgrade this year?).

I like that.

 * Doing this for Pentium and better systems should be trivial.  Doing
 * it for 486 and lower would just add a timing loop.  Doing it for SMP
 * would be harder.
 * 
 *  hw.cpu0.clockrate:  233
 *  hw.cpu1.clockrate:  233
 * 
 * Possibly?  The implementer gets to pick a better name than these.

How about

hw.clockrate.cpu0:  233
hw.clockrate.cpu1:  233

(cpu0 only for uni-procs, of course).

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: gdb and source forking

1999-09-03 Thread Doug Rabson

On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote:

 I have been trying to apply some modifications to gdb but have noticed
 that FreeBSD has basically gone off on its own path with respect to gdb.
 Is there any intention pf getting these changes merged back in to the
 original distribution? It looks like it would be a lot of work.

I don't think we have gone very far from the gdb-4.18 distribution. We
have made some changes to solib.c to account for some peculiarities in our
ld.so and there may be some other minor changes elsewhere. It would be
some work to break out all our changes so that they can be invidually
submitted to FSF. Assigning all the changes to FSF is about 10x the effort
and I don't have much enthusiasm for it.

--
Doug Rabson Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.  Phone: +44 181 442 9037




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Wilko Bulte

As Chris Costello wrote ...
 On Thu, Sep 02, 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote:
  Chris Costello wrote:
  No, since it would just be useless bloat in the source tree.
  
  If we must have it, how about a port? - I'm definitely for the "this isn't a
  good idea" crowd, When I was using Linux, I thought it was 'cute'... I've
  grown up a bit since then...
 
I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy

No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath

:)
-- 
|   / o / /  _   Arnhem, The Netherlands- Powered by FreeBSD -
|/|/ / / /( (_) BulteWWW  : http://www.tcja.nl  http://www.freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Josef Karthauser

On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
 According to Mike Smith:
  If we do this, I hope a more obvious name is chosen; something like 
  "mailman" might be a start.  Or "mailperson", or "postperson", or 
  whatever.  "mta" just feels a little obscure.
 
 "smtp", the first proposal is a better idea then. "mailman" (like it is used
 on hub) is more for a human.

Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)

Joe
-- 
Josef KarthauserFreeBSD: How many times have you booted today?
Technical Manager   Viagra for your server (http://www.uk.freebsd.org)
Pavilion Internet plc.  [[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn



On Fri, 03 Sep 1999 10:41:28 +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:

 Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
 site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)

Sendmail likes mailnull and sendmail. :-)

Later,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



RE: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Wood, Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: Josef Karthauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 September 1999 10:41

 Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
 site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)

I vote for 'Pat' and any other mail software could use 'Jess'.

Rich
-- 
Rich Wood
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami

 * From: Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 * As Chris Costello wrote ...

 * I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy
 * 
 * No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath

Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least CC: me or something
so I know! ;)

-PW (W?)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Wood, Richard wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: Josef Karthauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 September 1999 10:41
 
  Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
  site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)
 
 I vote for 'Pat' and any other mail software could use 'Jess'.

I'm sorry, but that'd throw out anybody already running PP at their
site.  :-)

-- 
Dom Mitchell -- Palmer  Harvey McLane -- Unix Systems Administrator

"Ordinary folks who don't understand computers don't deserve to be
 mocked. Ordinary people who want to use their computers but refuse to
 learn anything about them do." -- slashdot comment


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Nick Hibma

  Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least CC: me or something
  so I know! ;)
  
  -PW (W?)

oh oh! He's upgraded his acronym ... He's gonna take over the world !

-- 
ISIS/STA, T.P.270, Joint Research Centre, 21020 Ispra, Italy



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Tim Vanderhoek

On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 01:10:32AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
 
 differences are 1) entries in inetd.conf are sample entries only, 2)
 ports have no way of adding those entries to inetd.conf themselves
 (since touching /etc is illegal).
 
 Uh, you're contradicting yourself.  Touching /etc is not illegal.

Well, ok, the word "illegal" was a little strong.

However, this is a long-standing policy from at least 1995/6.

See the following relevant message-IDs:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You state that touching /etc is "hardly sacred" but that it
is wise to avoid it due to the large contingent of people who
feel strongly against it.  The contingent of people appears
to have included markm and ollivier, but not Terry Lambert who
advocated "templating" so that ports could modify /etc but
still have a read-only root fs.  I could not find the previous
discussion you refer to -- it was probably only in -hackers and not
-ports).


[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A reference to the ultimate goal of switching /etc to be
read-only is made by ache.  [It does not appear he agreed with
the "large contingent" mentioned above, though].


[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A reference to the policy of not allowing ports to touch /etc
is made by ollivier.  I believe this is the message that I
read and remembered.


I suppose I could have chosen a wimpier word than "illegal", but
we have tried to avoid schmucking with /etc for quite a while...  I
believe this is a good thing to avoid.


 Besides those that add uid/gids, most shell ports add entries to
 /etc/shells.

Yes, I know that.  :-)


-- 
This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Tony Finch

Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The numeric ID is not important. Neither is the name. So long as there's
something that people maintaining ports can use. I've followed Solaris'
lead on the choice of name, ``smtp''.

Hmm. One of my Solaris boxen has

mail:x:6:6:Unprivileged mail user:/:
smtp:x:0:0:Mail Daemon User:/:

(Presumably the smtp user is privileged in order to bind to port 25.)
I prefer user  group mail since it is non-cryptic and common.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]e pluribus unix


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn



On Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:12:13 +0100, Tony Finch wrote:

 mail:x:6:6:Unprivileged mail user:/:
 smtp:x:0:0:Mail Daemon User:/:
 
 (Presumably the smtp user is privileged in order to bind to port 25.)
 I prefer user  group mail since it is non-cryptic and common.

Well, this isn't what we'd want if we sandboxed Sendmail (using the
RunAsUser option). We'd want the sendmail binary setuid root, but it'd
drop its priviledges as soon as it had bound to the port, operating
thereafter as whatever sandbox user we choose.

However, it does seem that a number of people will object to sandboxing
sendmail, since we'll be introducing a new UID into the base system
which, I'm told, causes lots of problems.

Perhaps the objections were raised because I didn't say I wanted to
sandbox Sendmail. I've looked through my sent mail and I can see that I
didn't say anything about it in my initial mail. That's unfortunate.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Oscar Bonilla

On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 12:23:38PM -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote:
 This is apparently old news, but I don't recall seeing anything about it
 on the lists, and didn't hear about it until it hit Slashdot a short while
 ago.
 
 ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change:
 
 July 22, 1999
 

Yeah, McKusick talked about this last usenix, he said he was trying to
convince UCB of how useless this clause was... seems he made it :)

does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
boot time?  do we want to?

regards,

-Oscar

-- 
For PGP Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Chris Costello

On Fri, Sep 03, 1999, Oscar Bonilla wrote:
 does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
 boot time?  do we want to?

   If it were up to me, we would not want to.  I feel we should
continue to give UCB credit regardless of whether that particular
clause in the license agreement is enforced.  Without them, where
would we be?

-- 
|Chris Costello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Your fault, core dumped.
`--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Oscar Bonilla

On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 11:32:24AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 03, 1999, Oscar Bonilla wrote:
  does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
  boot time?  do we want to?
 
If it were up to me, we would not want to.  I feel we should
 continue to give UCB credit regardless of whether that particular
 clause in the license agreement is enforced.  Without them, where
 would we be?
 

I totally agree here. Besides it shows a certaing linage to be a 
direct descendant of Berkeley Unix :)

-Oscar

-- 
For PGP Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Matthew Hunt

On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 12:01:11AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:

 Hah!  Try "mcfeely" for obscure and descriptive.  Much better than the
 much-maligned "newman" or the out-of-date "cliffy".

And "mcfeely" has connotations of rapid dispatching of mail, which the
other two certainly do not.

-- 
Matthew Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Inertia is a property
http://www.pobox.com/~mph/   * of matter.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-03 Thread Christopher T. Griffiths

Has anyone had any luck getting Sun release of StarOffice to work??

I have the new emulation ports for linux installed and have done the
different suggested installs with no luck.

I am still getting the setup screen whenever I launch soffice.

I also made sure that I created the .sversion file with the following
info:

[Versions]
StarOffice 5.1=/home/cgriffiths/Office51

also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.

If anyone could give me some help getting this working that would be
great.

Chris

Christopher T. Griffiths
Senior Network/Systems Administrator
Quansoo Group Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:   (302) 777-4141
Fax: (302) 777-4142
Mobile:  (302) 521-3436



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-03 Thread Ollivier Robert

According to Christopher T. Griffiths:
 also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.

If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on:

It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to 
-hackers ([EMAIL PROTECTED] by Mikhail Teterin).

mv libosl516li.so libosl516li.so.bak
sed -e 's,/proc/%u/cmdline,/compat/linux/so,' \
 libosl516li.so.bak  libosl516li.so
touch /compat/linux/so

(replace 516 by 517).

I've not tried it.

If you're runningolder versions of both CURRENT and STABLE, then it is just
that you don't have the patch to procfs, committed by Marcel:


revision 1.15
date: 1999/08/19 19:41:08;  author: marcel;  state: Exp;  lines: +41 -8
Let processes retrieve their argv through procfs. Revert to the original
behaviour in all other cases.

Submitted by: Andrew Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #73: Sat Jul 31 15:36:05 CEST 1999



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Tulip device driver question

1999-09-03 Thread Wes Peters

Jason Thorpe wrote:
 
 On Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:46:40 -0600
  Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Is this a real tulip, or one of the recent clones?  Bill Paul has written a
   number of drivers for various near clones of the Tulip, none of which work
   quite like the Tulip (of course).
  
   See, for instance, the al, ax, mx, pn, vr, and wb drivers.  ;^)
   ^^
  Especially this one.. it's not a Tulip clone :-)

Oh?  vr(4) disagrees:

 The VIA Rhine chips use bus master DMA and have a software interface de-
 signed to resemble that of the DEC 21x4x "tulip" chips.

I found the above list by grepping for "-i tulip" in /usr/src/sys/pci.  It 
is still a mystery to me why others don't do that before embarrassing them-
selves on a public mailing list...

-- 
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Crossing building alpha world fails

1999-09-03 Thread Warner Losh

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Kennett writes:
:   TARGET=alpha TARGET_ARCH=alpha MACHINE=alpha MACHINE_ARCH=alpha \
: make buildworld
: Is this the correct command to use for building the cross?

No.  That is not right.  Don't put the MACHINE and MACHINE_ARCH in the
environment.  They must be the HOST machine for early parts of the
build.

However, even if you didn't do that, you would lose.  You cannot cross
compile 64 bit targets on 32-bit hosts.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Wes Peters

Oscar Bonilla wrote:
 
 On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 12:23:38PM -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote:
  This is apparently old news, but I don't recall seeing anything about it
  on the lists, and didn't hear about it until it hit Slashdot a short while
  ago.
 
  ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change:
 
  July 22, 1999
 
 
 Yeah, McKusick talked about this last usenix, he said he was trying to
 convince UCB of how useless this clause was... seems he made it :)
 
 does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
 boot time?  do we want to?

No, it would mean Whistle could advertise the InterJet as being based
on "BSD" without saying the product contains software created by the
University of California and its contributors.  Source and binary
distributions would still have to maintain the copyright:

 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
 *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
 *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
 *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

Whistle would not even be able to mention that said BSD code came from UCB
without prior permission:

 * 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
 *may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
 *without specific prior written permission.

There has been quite a discussion on this issue in both -core and -committers,
where it actually has some impact.

-- 
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



APM build problem in -STABLE?

1999-09-03 Thread Kenton A. Hoover

After a recent makeworld, I needed to build a new kernel.  This is what I've 
been getting after the make:

[snip]
miranda /sys/compile/TP600 % make
cc -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit  
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes  -Wpointer-arith 
-Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused  -fformat-extensions -ansi  
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include  -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK -include 
opt_global.h -elf  ../../i386/apm/apm.c
../../i386/apm/apm.c:88: field `event_list' has incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c: In function `apm_record_event':
../../i386/apm/apm.c:965: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c:966: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c: In function `apmioctl':
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1347: `APMIO_NEXTEVENT' undeclared (first use this 
function)
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1347: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1347: for each function it appears in.)
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1354: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1358: `APMIO_REJECTLASTREQ' undeclared (first use this 
function)
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1363: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch 
statement
*** Error code 1

Stop.

Something get mangled somewhere?


| Kenton A. Hoover  | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  Private Citizen  ||
| San Francisco, California ||
|= http://www.shockwave.org/~shibumi |
|T O D A Y ' S   A F F I R M A T I O N   |
|   There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future -- |
|all these are just illusions.   |


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread John Baldwin


On 03-Sep-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
 Perhaps the objections were raised because I didn't say I wanted to
 sandbox Sendmail. I've looked through my sent mail and I can see that
 I
 didn't say anything about it in my initial mail. That's unfortunate.

If you sandbox sendmail, then it makes sense that sendmail will need a
user to be sandboxed in.  In that case, adding a new user/group is
acceptable.  It was the adding a new user/group just for the sake of
adding a new user/group that bothered many of us. ;)

 Ciao,
 Sheldon.

---

John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/
PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



FreeBSD 2.2.7

1999-09-03 Thread Ken Bolingbroke



Is there any place someone can download and install FreeBSD 2.2.7?

Ken Bolingbroke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: gdb and source forking

1999-09-03 Thread Kip Macy

I have not looked closely, but it appears that the changes to bfd to
support the solib.c changes have been quite extensive. The diff of the
.c files in bfd/ is 7000 lines long. 

I know that interacting with the FSF can be unenjoyable but gdb compiles
and runs fine on all other OSs I have used. So if the solaris and linux
crowds can keep the modifications consistent why can't we? 
Thanks for any insight.

-Kip



On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:

 On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote:
 
  I have been trying to apply some modifications to gdb but have noticed
  that FreeBSD has basically gone off on its own path with respect to gdb.
  Is there any intention pf getting these changes merged back in to the
  original distribution? It looks like it would be a lot of work.
 
 I don't think we have gone very far from the gdb-4.18 distribution. We
 have made some changes to solib.c to account for some peculiarities in our
 ld.so and there may be some other minor changes elsewhere. It would be
 some work to break out all our changes so that they can be invidually
 submitted to FSF. Assigning all the changes to FSF is about 10x the effort
 and I don't have much enthusiasm for it.
 
 --
 Doug Rabson   Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Nonlinear Systems Ltd.Phone: +44 181 442 9037
 
 
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
 
 




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-03 Thread David Krinsky

On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 08:47:54AM +0200, Soren Schmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

  wst_done: wst0: nonrecovered data error
 
 I've seen this problem LOTS of times when using the old wd based
 atapi subsystem. I've never been able to find out why this is
 happening exactly. This was part of the reason I started out
 on the new ATA driver (only in -current now). I've never had
 this problem using the ATA driver, so I'm pretty sure its the
 old driver thats at fault, probably some delicate timing prob.
 Using the new driver I do routine backups every night on
 a couble of servers, not seen a signle problem yet...

Thanks for the help, but I'm afraid I may have to burst your bubble. :-/

Upon your advice I cvsupped to today's -current and built an
appropriate kernel with the new ATA driver.  I now get one of the two
following error scenarios (which one is unpredictable, though usually
the former):

Sep  3 22:25:17 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WRITE - MEDIUM ERROR skey=3 asc=31 
ascq=00 error=00
Sep  3 22:25:17 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: REZERO_UNIT/TAPE_REWIND - MEDIUM ERROR 
skey=3 asc=31 ascq=00 error=00

or

Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WRITE - timeout error = 00
Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: atapi_transfer: bad command phase
Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: ad0: status=51 error=04
Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: ad_interrupt: hard error
Sep  3 22:34:32 bantha /kernel: atapi_interrupt: unknown transfer phase 11
Sep  3 22:34:45 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WEOF - timeout error = 00
Sep  3 22:35:15 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WEOF - timeout error = 00

The former simply returns EIO;  the latter appears to sleep
uninterruptibly on atprq.

The apparent inconsistency in which happens when supports the 
notion that this is, as you say, a subtle timing issue.  
In an effort to figure out what was going on, I tried compiling
atapi-all.c and atapi-tape.c with ATAPI_DEBUG set, but this only
caused the kernel to eventually page fault and panic.  :-/

Any ideas?  I'm quite happy to help debug this one, if you have any
thoughts on where to go with it--I need to get backups working, and
I'd much rather not have to buy a new tape drive or switch OSes...

Dave.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD 2.2.7

1999-09-03 Thread Kherry Zamore

Ken Bolingbroke wrote:

 Is there any place someone can download and install FreeBSD 2.2.7?

 Ken Bolingbroke
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

You may want to check out:
http://www.itworks.com.au/~gavin/FBSDsites.php3?release=2.2.7-RELEASE
or check the parent page,
http://www.itworks.com.au/~gavin/FBSDsites.php3...

--
Kherry Z [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code."

"In God we trust... but lock your car doors"




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



PLEASE HELP ME IN EAST TIMOR !!!!!

1999-09-03 Thread gang semang man

dear,
good evening !
My name is lolo. I'm interesting to your web site. Now, I do hope your help to break 
foreign account. Please ! I need the ways/ steps, because I need some computer 
components to develop my education. I come from Indonesia, and perhaps you know that 
my country in economic crisis. And then, My planning is to destroy Indonesia' ARMY web 
site (TNI), because Indonesia' ARMY is very bad/ Fuck. I'm stay in east Timor, 
Indonesia. 
Please give me the ways about how to buy goods (shooping) by the other man who has 
bank account or credit card. I'm waiting your information soonly.

thanks on your attention. Bye !


Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at 
http://www.eudoramail.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-03 Thread Warner Losh

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Krinsky writes:
: Any ideas?  I'm quite happy to help debug this one, if you have any
: thoughts on where to go with it--I need to get backups working, and
: I'd much rather not have to buy a new tape drive or switch OSes...

reboot.  dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/tape count=1000 bs=24k.

Then see if you still have the problem.  I've seen errors like the
ones you reported, but this fixed it for me.

Also, make sure that your drive is good.  I had one I had to return
because it was bad.  Soren said the driver worked, and I could never
get it working for me.  The replacement worked like a charm.

I also had one tape drive that I purchased at a garage sale for $0.50
that didn't have a tape head.  That made writes to it fail as well...
The other one I got at the garage sale for $0.50 has worked like a
charm and it is, I think, a rebadged STT8000.


Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



PLEASE HELP ME IN EAST TIMOR !!!!!

1999-09-03 Thread gang semang man

dear,
good evening !
My name is lolo. I'm interesting to your web site. Now, I do hope your help to break 
foreign account. Please ! I need the ways/ steps, because I need some computer 
components to develop my education. I come from Indonesia, and perhaps you know that 
my country in economic crisis. And then, My planning is to destroy Indonesia' ARMY web 
site (TNI), because Indonesia' ARMY is very bad/ Fuck. I'm stay in east Timor, 
Indonesia. 
Please give me the ways about how to buy goods (shooping) by the other man who has 
bank account or credit card. I'm waiting your information soonly.

thanks on your attention. Bye !


Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at 
http://www.eudoramail.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



sockbuf DoS

1999-09-03 Thread Brian F. Feldman

It probably needs work still, and I'd really appreciate someone
helping finish it, but I have a solution.

http://www.FreeBSD.org/~green/sbsize.patch

-- 
 Brian Fundakowski Feldman   /  "Any sufficiently advanced bug is\
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   indistinguishable from a feature."  |
 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!\-- Rich Kulawiec   /



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Sun StarOffice51 [PATCH. please test]

1999-09-03 Thread Marcel Moolenaar

Ollivier Robert wrote:

 It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to
 -hackers ([EMAIL PROTECTED] by Mikhail Teterin).
 
 mv libosl516li.so libosl516li.so.bak
 sed -e 's,/proc/%u/cmdline,/compat/linux/so,' \
  libosl516li.so.bak  libosl516li.so
 touch /compat/linux/so

jdp pointed out to me that the argv patch resulted in a slightly different
behaviour than on RH. Can someone who had to do the editing apply the
following patch, and test wether it solves the problem or? The patch is for
-current, but should apply to -stable as well.

Index: procfs_status.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_status.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 procfs_status.c
--- procfs_status.c 1999/08/28 00:46:56 1.16
+++ procfs_status.c 1999/09/04 06:32:46
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@
ps += done;
bytes_left -= done;
}
+   ps--;
}
else {
ps = psbuf;


Thanks,

-- 
Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCC Internetworking  Databases   http://www.scc.nl/
The FreeBSD projectmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Wes Peters
Warner Losh wrote:
 
 In message 199909012256.paa01...@dingo.cdrom.com Mike Smith writes:
 : If we do this, I hope a more obvious name is chosen; something like
 : mailman might be a start.  Or mailperson, or postperson, or
 : whatever.  mta just feels a little obscure.
 
 postmanpete
 
 which is both obscure and descriptive.  Sadly it may be sexist as
 well...

Hah!  Try mcfeely for obscure and descriptive.  Much better than the
much-maligned newman or the out-of-date cliffy.

-- 
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?

Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/   w...@softweyr.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-03 Thread David Krinsky
I posted this to -hardware a few days ago and haven't
gotten much in the way of feedback;  since it sounds to me
like a driver bug this seems like an appropriate forum too.

Is anyone here using -any- ATAPI drive for backup?

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide...this is 
screwy, and I really would rather not have to go out and buy a
different tape drive.  :-/

Dave.

- Forwarded message from David Krinsky krin...@bantha.org -

Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:26:21 -0400
From: David Krinsky krin...@bantha.org
To: freebsd-hardw...@freebsd.org
Subject: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD?
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i

Has anyone here successfully used a Seagate STT8000A (8 gig Travan)
ATAPI/IDE tape drive with FreeBSD?

With wst0 compiled into the kernel, the drive is recognized correctly,
and even works properly with small amounts of data;  I have been
able to back up and restore (using tar) a small test directory.

When I try to tar up a usefully-sized directory or filesystem,
however, the drive will begin its work apparently correctly, but the
tar will exit with an I/O error at a variable point a few seconds to
minutes into the backup.  The following goes to syslog:

wst_done: wst0: nonrecovered data error
total=337920 ERR=70 len=20 ASC=31 ASCQ=0

After this point, and until the next reboot, all attempts to
access the drive cause the machine to hang for a few
seconds, and then return to normal, but with the new tar
process asleep, apparently uninterruptibly, on wstdsc.
After the brief hang the following appears in the syslog:

atapi1.1: controller not ready for cmd
atapi1.1: controller not ready for cmd
atapi1.1: controller not ready for cmd
atapi1.1: controller not ready for cmd
atapi1.1: controller not ready for cmd
wst0: Sense media type failed

Has anyone seen this problem?  I am running 3.2-STABLE on a vanilla
PIII-450.  The filesystems being backed up are, in toto, quite large,
but the disk space used is less than 3GB (and should thus fit on 
one tape with or without compression).

Any help would be appreciated;  I'm willing to go to -CURRENT if it'll
fix the problem, but as this is my primary work machine I'd
rather not do so unless I'm confident it will improve the situation.

Many thanks!

Dave.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hardware in the body of the message

- End forwarded message -


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



RELENG_3 and diskless booting

1999-09-03 Thread Greg Skafte
please followup only in hackers.

I've Just cvsuped freebsd RELENG_3 as of this evening (~21:00 mdt)
and using a rom built with etherboot 4.1b9 which has worked flawlessly for
the last couple of months. Tonight I getting 



Searching for server...
My IP xxx.yyy.zzz.www Server IP aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd, GW IP fff.ggg.hhh.iii
Loading /disklessroot/hostname/kernel... FreeBSD-elf
Entry = 0xC01178A0
Segment -1, offset , read 0200, loadpoint 
text size 2 =0x001583fe  c010
Segment 2, offset , read 0200, loadpoint 0010
Segment 2, offset , read 00158400, loadpoint 00258200
Write trailing bit
data size 3= 0x00018780 00158400 C0259400
Segment 3, offset , read 00158400, loadpoint 00259400


Then the machine reboots 

previously it did .

My IP xxx.yyy.zzz.www Server IP aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd, GW IP fff.ggg.hhh.iii
Loading /disklessroot/hostname/kernel... FreeBSD-elf
Entry = 0xC0117669
Segment -1, offset , read 0200, loadpoint 
text size 2 =0x001566c6  c010
Segment 2, offset , read 0200, loadpoint 0010
Segment 2, offset , read 00158400, loadpoint 00258200
Write trailing bit
data size 3= 0x00018604 001566c8 c02576c8
Segment 3, offset 00c8, read 00156800, loadpoint 002576c8

then up comes the normal kernel boot messages to console

I see a lot of changes have occured, the booting kernel is 

FreeBSD xx 3.2-STABLE FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE #9: Thu Aug 26  22:
00:55 MDT 1999 r...@:/usr/src/sys/compile/DISKLESS  i386

and was cvsuped on Aug 26 around 21:00 MDT







-- 
Email: ska...@worldgate.com   Voice: +403 413 1910Fax: +403 421 4929
   #575 Sun Life Place * 10123 99 Street * Edmonton, AB * Canada * T5J 3H1 
----
PGP 2.6.2 Key fingerprint =  42 9C 2C A8 4D 2B C9 C4  7D B6 00 B0 50 47 20 97 
http://gras-varg.worldgate.com/~skafte/ http://www.worldgate.com/
----
When things can't get any worse, they simplify themselves by getting a whole
lot worse then complicated. A complete and utter disaster is the simplest
thing in the world; it's preventing one that's complex.   (Janet Morris)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-03 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems David Krinsky wrote:
 I posted this to -hardware a few days ago and haven't
 gotten much in the way of feedback;  since it sounds to me
 like a driver bug this seems like an appropriate forum too.
 
 Is anyone here using -any- ATAPI drive for backup?

Yup, I use one:

ast0: CONNER CTT8000-A/1.17 tape drive at ata1 as slave 
ast0: Drive empty, readonly, reverse, qfa, ecc, 512b
ast0: Max speed=600Kb/s, Transfer limit=52 blocks, Buffer size=728 blocks
 
 When I try to tar up a usefully-sized directory or filesystem,
 however, the drive will begin its work apparently correctly, but the
 tar will exit with an I/O error at a variable point a few seconds to
 minutes into the backup.  The following goes to syslog:
 
   wst_done: wst0: nonrecovered data error

I've seen this problem LOTS of times when using the old wd based
atapi subsystem. I've never been able to find out why this is
happening exactly. This was part of the reason I started out
on the new ATA driver (only in -current now). I've never had
this problem using the ATA driver, so I'm pretty sure its the
old driver thats at fault, probably some delicate timing prob.
Using the new driver I do routine backups every night on
a couble of servers, not seen a signle problem yet...

-Soren



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Dell PERC LVD card (Power Edge Raid Controller)

1999-09-03 Thread Geoff Buckingham

Through a mis-order I have aquired a PERC card (Actually an AMI megaRAID)
which I am happy to make available to anyone genuinly interested in working
on a driver (This is the PCI RAID card that goes into Dells Power Edge servers
if ordered in a RAID configuration)

-- 
Geoff Buckingham
Systems Manager
Netlink Internet Services


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



RE: Dell PERC LVD card (Power Edge Raid Controller)

1999-09-03 Thread Thomas Uhrfelt
An excellent initiative!

I think there are many administrators/system managers out there with a huge
stack of unused goods lying on the shelves to no use at all. Perhaps there
should be a database where interested devicedriver programmers could post
their needs and sysadminds could post their unneeded hardware on. Perhaps in
that way we could speed up the development of HW drivers for FreeBSD? Any
thoughts on this one?

 -Original Message-
 From: owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
 [mailto:owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org]on Behalf Of Geoff Buckingham
 Sent: den 3 september 1999 10:08
 To: hack...@freebsd.org
 Subject: Dell PERC LVD card (Power Edge Raid Controller)



 Through a mis-order I have aquired a PERC card (Actually an AMI megaRAID)
 which I am happy to make available to anyone genuinly interested
 in working
 on a driver (This is the PCI RAID card that goes into Dells Power
 Edge servers
 if ordered in a RAID configuration)

 --
 Geoff Buckingham
 Systems Manager
 Netlink Internet Services


 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
 with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: systat -- The alternate system clock has died...

1999-09-03 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
...
 Anybody else seeing this?  Or is it make world time again...?
There was a patch flooding around to /sys/i386/isa/clock.c in the lists which 
add a:
while (rtcin(RTC_INTR)  RTCIR_PERIOD)
statclock(frame);
to the beginning of clkintr().
This seems to eliminate the problem for me.

Bye!

Michael Reifenberger
Plaut Software GmbH, R/3 Basis



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
 * From: Tim Vanderhoek vand...@ecf.utoronto.ca

 * differences are 1) entries in inetd.conf are sample entries only, 2)
 * ports have no way of adding those entries to inetd.conf themselves
 * (since touching /etc is illegal).

Uh, you're contradicting yourself.  Touching /etc is not illegal.

 * 2)  The current system for having ports add their own usernames and
 * groupnames is very simple.  It is a little messy in that there are a
 * number of different pkg/INSTALL scripts, some of them broken to
 * various degrees.  Simply adding an mta username:groupname won't solve
 * that problem.

Besides those that add uid/gids, most shell ports add entries to
/etc/shells.

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



gdb and source forking

1999-09-03 Thread Kip Macy
I have been trying to apply some modifications to gdb but have noticed
that FreeBSD has basically gone off on its own path with respect to gdb.
Is there any intention pf getting these changes merged back in to the
original distribution? It looks like it would be a lot of work.

-Kip




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Just read it on slashdot: Berkeley removes Advertising Clause

1999-09-03 Thread Sebestyen Zoltan
Hi,

 I've just read this piece of news on slashdot.org that  that
 UC-Berkeley has changed the *BSD license. Effective immediately, the 3rd
clause, that which requires acknowledgement of UCB in all advertising is
null and void.. Did the FreeBSD team do this change in FreeBSD sources?


Sebestyén Zoltán sz...@netvisor.huThere was a time when all on my mind 
was Love.
MAKE INSTALL NOT WARNow I find that most of the time
love's not enough in itself.

I use UNIX because reboots are for hardware upgrades.

 Kick me! Whip me!! Make me develop on AIX!!!



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
 * From: Jonathan Lemon jle...@americantv.com

 * What I want is a simple new readable sysctl, something like:
 * 
 *  hw.clockrate:   132 
 * 
 * I think that this would be useful both for development (how fast
 * is that stupid machine down in the bunker?),  and system admininstration
 * (who needs a cpu upgrade this year?).

I like that.

 * Doing this for Pentium and better systems should be trivial.  Doing
 * it for 486 and lower would just add a timing loop.  Doing it for SMP
 * would be harder.
 * 
 *  hw.cpu0.clockrate:  233
 *  hw.cpu1.clockrate:  233
 * 
 * Possibly?  The implementer gets to pick a better name than these.

How about

hw.clockrate.cpu0:  233
hw.clockrate.cpu1:  233

(cpu0 only for uni-procs, of course).

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: gdb and source forking

1999-09-03 Thread Doug Rabson
On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote:

 I have been trying to apply some modifications to gdb but have noticed
 that FreeBSD has basically gone off on its own path with respect to gdb.
 Is there any intention pf getting these changes merged back in to the
 original distribution? It looks like it would be a lot of work.

I don't think we have gone very far from the gdb-4.18 distribution. We
have made some changes to solib.c to account for some peculiarities in our
ld.so and there may be some other minor changes elsewhere. It would be
some work to break out all our changes so that they can be invidually
submitted to FSF. Assigning all the changes to FSF is about 10x the effort
and I don't have much enthusiasm for it.

--
Doug Rabson Mail:  d...@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.  Phone: +44 181 442 9037




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Chris Costello wrote ...
 On Thu, Sep 02, 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote:
  Chris Costello wrote:
  No, since it would just be useless bloat in the source tree.
  
  If we must have it, how about a port? - I'm definitely for the this isn't a
  good idea crowd, When I was using Linux, I thought it was 'cute'... I've
  grown up a bit since then...
 
I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy

No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath

:)
-- 
|   / o / /  _   Arnhem, The Netherlands- Powered by FreeBSD -
|/|/ / / /( (_) BulteWWW  : http://www.tcja.nl  http://www.freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
 According to Mike Smith:
  If we do this, I hope a more obvious name is chosen; something like 
  mailman might be a start.  Or mailperson, or postperson, or 
  whatever.  mta just feels a little obscure.
 
 smtp, the first proposal is a better idea then. mailman (like it is used
 on hub) is more for a human.

Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)

Joe
-- 
Josef KarthauserFreeBSD: How many times have you booted today?
Technical Manager   Viagra for your server (http://www.uk.freebsd.org)
Pavilion Internet plc.  [...@pavilion.net, j...@uk.freebsd.org, j...@tao.org.uk]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



RE: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Wood, Richard
 -Original Message-
 From: Josef Karthauser [mailto:j...@pavilion.net]
 Sent: 03 September 1999 10:41

 Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
 site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)

I vote for 'Pat' and any other mail software could use 'Jess'.

Rich
-- 
Rich Wood
Home: r...@dynamite.org, r...@freebsd.org.uk
Work: r...@ruh-bath.swest.nhs.uk, r...@systemagic.co.uk


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn


On Fri, 03 Sep 1999 10:41:28 +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:

 Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
 site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)

Sendmail likes mailnull and sendmail. :-)

Later,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Wood, Richard wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: Josef Karthauser [mailto:j...@pavilion.net]
  Sent: 03 September 1999 10:41
 
  Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
  site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)
 
 I vote for 'Pat' and any other mail software could use 'Jess'.
 
That's a UK joke :)  (there's a kiddies program called Postman Pat
[and his Black  White cat Jess]).

Joe
-- 
Josef KarthauserFreeBSD: How many times have you booted today?
Technical Manager   Viagra for your server (http://www.uk.freebsd.org)
Pavilion Internet plc.  [...@pavilion.net, j...@uk.freebsd.org, j...@tao.org.uk]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
 * From: Wilko Bulte wi...@yedi.iaf.nl

 * As Chris Costello wrote ...

 * I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy
 * 
 * No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath

Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least CC: me or something
so I know! ;)

-PW (W?)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Crossing building alpha world fails

1999-09-03 Thread Michael Kennett
Hello All,

I've been trying to cross-build the alpha port of freebsd (from x86).
The build is failing in src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils.

The command I've issued is:

  TARGET=alpha TARGET_ARCH=alpha MACHINE=alpha MACHINE_ARCH=alpha \
make buildworld

Is this the correct command to use for building the cross?

The source code tree is from freebsd-current, taken as of today. The
build failed with yesterdays -current as well.

Any help is appreciated.

Michael Kennett
(m...@laurasia.com.au)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Crossing building alpha world fails

1999-09-03 Thread John Birrell
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 06:15:10PM +0800, Michael Kennett wrote:
 Hello All,
 
 I've been trying to cross-build the alpha port of freebsd (from x86).
 The build is failing in src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils.
 
 The command I've issued is:
 
   TARGET=alpha TARGET_ARCH=alpha MACHINE=alpha MACHINE_ARCH=alpha \
 make buildworld
 
 Is this the correct command to use for building the cross?
 
 The source code tree is from freebsd-current, taken as of today. The
 build failed with yesterdays -current as well.

You can't build for a 64-bit binutils target on a 32-bit host.

-- 
John Birrell - j...@cimlogic.com.au; j...@freebsd.org 
http://www.cimlogic.com.au/
CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Wood, Richard wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: Josef Karthauser [mailto:j...@pavilion.net]
  Sent: 03 September 1999 10:41
 
  Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
  site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)
 
 I vote for 'Pat' and any other mail software could use 'Jess'.

I'm sorry, but that'd throw out anybody already running PP at their
site.  :-)

-- 
Dom Mitchell -- Palmer  Harvey McLane -- Unix Systems Administrator

Ordinary folks who don't understand computers don't deserve to be
 mocked. Ordinary people who want to use their computers but refuse to
 learn anything about them do. -- slashdot comment


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: CFD: bogomips CPU performance metric

1999-09-03 Thread Nick Hibma
  Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least CC: me or something
  so I know! ;)
  
  -PW (W?)

oh oh! He's upgraded his acronym ... He's gonna take over the world !

-- 
ISIS/STA, T.P.270, Joint Research Centre, 21020 Ispra, Italy



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 01:10:32AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
 
 differences are 1) entries in inetd.conf are sample entries only, 2)
 ports have no way of adding those entries to inetd.conf themselves
 (since touching /etc is illegal).
 
 Uh, you're contradicting yourself.  Touching /etc is not illegal.

Well, ok, the word illegal was a little strong.

However, this is a long-standing policy from at least 1995/6.

See the following relevant message-IDs:

199509201159.eaa04...@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu

You state that touching /etc is hardly sacred but that it
is wise to avoid it due to the large contingent of people who
feel strongly against it.  The contingent of people appears
to have included markm and ollivier, but not Terry Lambert who
advocated templating so that ports could modify /etc but
still have a read-only root fs.  I could not find the previous
discussion you refer to -- it was probably only in -hackers and not
-ports).


gdcvv0n...@ache.dialup.ru

A reference to the ultimate goal of switching /etc to be
read-only is made by ache.  [It does not appear he agreed with
the large contingent mentioned above, though].


199601221813.taa04...@keltia.freenix.fr

A reference to the policy of not allowing ports to touch /etc
is made by ollivier.  I believe this is the message that I
read and remembered.


I suppose I could have chosen a wimpier word than illegal, but
we have tried to avoid schmucking with /etc for quite a while...  I
believe this is a good thing to avoid.


 Besides those that add uid/gids, most shell ports add entries to
 /etc/shells.

Yes, I know that.  :-)


-- 
This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Tony Finch
Sheldon Hearn sheld...@uunet.co.za wrote:

The numeric ID is not important. Neither is the name. So long as there's
something that people maintaining ports can use. I've followed Solaris'
lead on the choice of name, ``smtp''.

Hmm. One of my Solaris boxen has

mail:x:6:6:Unprivileged mail user:/:
smtp:x:0:0:Mail Daemon User:/:

(Presumably the smtp user is privileged in order to bind to port 25.)
I prefer user  group mail since it is non-cryptic and common.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finchd...@dotat.atf...@demon.nete pluribus unix


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn


On Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:12:13 +0100, Tony Finch wrote:

 mail:x:6:6:Unprivileged mail user:/:
 smtp:x:0:0:Mail Daemon User:/:
 
 (Presumably the smtp user is privileged in order to bind to port 25.)
 I prefer user  group mail since it is non-cryptic and common.

Well, this isn't what we'd want if we sandboxed Sendmail (using the
RunAsUser option). We'd want the sendmail binary setuid root, but it'd
drop its priviledges as soon as it had bound to the port, operating
thereafter as whatever sandbox user we choose.

However, it does seem that a number of people will object to sandboxing
sendmail, since we'll be introducing a new UID into the base system
which, I'm told, causes lots of problems.

Perhaps the objections were raised because I didn't say I wanted to
sandbox Sendmail. I've looked through my sent mail and I can see that I
didn't say anything about it in my initial mail. That's unfortunate.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Oscar Bonilla
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 12:23:38PM -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote:
 This is apparently old news, but I don't recall seeing anything about it
 on the lists, and didn't hear about it until it hit Slashdot a short while
 ago.
 
 ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change:
 
 July 22, 1999
 

Yeah, McKusick talked about this last usenix, he said he was trying to
convince UCB of how useless this clause was... seems he made it :)

does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
boot time?  do we want to?

regards,

-Oscar

-- 
For PGP Public Key: finger oboni...@fisicc-ufm.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Chris Costello
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999, Oscar Bonilla wrote:
 does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
 boot time?  do we want to?

   If it were up to me, we would not want to.  I feel we should
continue to give UCB credit regardless of whether that particular
clause in the license agreement is enforced.  Without them, where
would we be?

-- 
|Chris Costello ch...@calldei.com
|Your fault, core dumped.
`--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Oscar Bonilla
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 11:32:24AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 03, 1999, Oscar Bonilla wrote:
  does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
  boot time?  do we want to?
 
If it were up to me, we would not want to.  I feel we should
 continue to give UCB credit regardless of whether that particular
 clause in the license agreement is enforced.  Without them, where
 would we be?
 

I totally agree here. Besides it shows a certaing linage to be a 
direct descendant of Berkeley Unix :)

-Oscar

-- 
For PGP Public Key: finger oboni...@fisicc-ufm.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 12:01:11AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:

 Hah!  Try mcfeely for obscure and descriptive.  Much better than the
 much-maligned newman or the out-of-date cliffy.

And mcfeely has connotations of rapid dispatching of mail, which the
other two certainly do not.

-- 
Matthew Hunt m...@astro.caltech.edu * Inertia is a property
http://www.pobox.com/~mph/   * of matter.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-03 Thread Christopher T. Griffiths
Has anyone had any luck getting Sun release of StarOffice to work??

I have the new emulation ports for linux installed and have done the
different suggested installs with no luck.

I am still getting the setup screen whenever I launch soffice.

I also made sure that I created the .sversion file with the following
info:

[Versions]
StarOffice 5.1=/home/cgriffiths/Office51

also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.

If anyone could give me some help getting this working that would be
great.

Chris

Christopher T. Griffiths
Senior Network/Systems Administrator
Quansoo Group Inc.
cgriffi...@quansoo.com
Phone:   (302) 777-4141
Fax: (302) 777-4142
Mobile:  (302) 521-3436



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Wes Peters
Josef Karthauser wrote:
 
 On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
  According to Mike Smith:
   If we do this, I hope a more obvious name is chosen; something like
   mailman might be a start.  Or mailperson, or postperson, or
   whatever.  mta just feels a little obscure.
 
  smtp, the first proposal is a better idea then. mailman (like it is used
  on hub) is more for a human.
 
 Don't use 'mailman' please.  We've already got it assigned across
 site for the MailMan mailing list software. :)

And here I think it's a trademark of Karl Malone.  ;^)

-- 
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?

Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/   w...@softweyr.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread Wes Peters
Matthew Hunt wrote:
 
 On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 12:01:11AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
 
  Hah!  Try mcfeely for obscure and descriptive.  Much better than the
  much-maligned newman or the out-of-date cliffy.
 
 And mcfeely has connotations of rapid dispatching of mail, which the
 other two certainly do not.

Exactly.  Speedy Delivery is good.  Bar stools and never-emptying mail 
queues are not.

-- 
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?

Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/   w...@softweyr.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-03 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Christopher T. Griffiths:
 also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7.

If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on:

It seems that we may need to edit one of the library again. See the message to 
-hackers (199909011812.oaa29...@misha.cisco.com by Mikhail Teterin).

mv libosl516li.so libosl516li.so.bak
sed -e 's,/proc/%u/cmdline,/compat/linux/so,' \
 libosl516li.so.bak  libosl516li.so
touch /compat/linux/so

(replace 516 by 517).

I've not tried it.

If you're runningolder versions of both CURRENT and STABLE, then it is just
that you don't have the patch to procfs, committed by Marcel:


revision 1.15
date: 1999/08/19 19:41:08;  author: marcel;  state: Exp;  lines: +41 -8
Let processes retrieve their argv through procfs. Revert to the original
behaviour in all other cases.

Submitted by: Andrew Gordon a...@arg1.demon.co.uk

-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #73: Sat Jul 31 15:36:05 CEST 1999



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Tulip device driver question

1999-09-03 Thread Wes Peters
Jason Thorpe wrote:
 
 On Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:46:40 -0600
  Wes Peters w...@softweyr.com wrote:
 
   Is this a real tulip, or one of the recent clones?  Bill Paul has written a
   number of drivers for various near clones of the Tulip, none of which work
   quite like the Tulip (of course).
  
   See, for instance, the al, ax, mx, pn, vr, and wb drivers.  ;^)
   ^^
  Especially this one.. it's not a Tulip clone :-)

Oh?  vr(4) disagrees:

 The VIA Rhine chips use bus master DMA and have a software interface de-
 signed to resemble that of the DEC 21x4x tulip chips.

I found the above list by grepping for -i tulip in /usr/src/sys/pci.  It 
is still a mystery to me why others don't do that before embarrassing them-
selves on a public mailing list...

-- 
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?

Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/   w...@softweyr.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Crossing building alpha world fails

1999-09-03 Thread Warner Losh
In message 199909031015.saa37...@laurasia.com.au Michael Kennett writes:
:   TARGET=alpha TARGET_ARCH=alpha MACHINE=alpha MACHINE_ARCH=alpha \
: make buildworld
: Is this the correct command to use for building the cross?

No.  That is not right.  Don't put the MACHINE and MACHINE_ARCH in the
environment.  They must be the HOST machine for early parts of the
build.

However, even if you didn't do that, you would lose.  You cannot cross
compile 64 bit targets on 32-bit hosts.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-03 Thread Wes Peters
Oscar Bonilla wrote:
 
 On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 12:23:38PM -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote:
  This is apparently old news, but I don't recall seeing anything about it
  on the lists, and didn't hear about it until it hit Slashdot a short while
  ago.
 
  ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change:
 
  July 22, 1999
 
 
 Yeah, McKusick talked about this last usenix, he said he was trying to
 convince UCB of how useless this clause was... seems he made it :)
 
 does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at
 boot time?  do we want to?

No, it would mean Whistle could advertise the InterJet as being based
on BSD without saying the product contains software created by the
University of California and its contributors.  Source and binary
distributions would still have to maintain the copyright:

 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
 *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
 *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
 *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

Whistle would not even be able to mention that said BSD code came from UCB
without prior permission:

 * 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
 *may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
 *without specific prior written permission.

There has been quite a discussion on this issue in both -core and -committers,
where it actually has some impact.

-- 
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?

Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/   w...@softweyr.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



APM build problem in -STABLE?

1999-09-03 Thread Kenton A. Hoover
After a recent makeworld, I needed to build a new kernel.  This is what I've 
been getting after the make:

[snip]
miranda /sys/compile/TP600 % make
cc -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit  
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes  -Wpointer-arith 
-Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused  -fformat-extensions -ansi  
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include  -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK -include 
opt_global.h -elf  ../../i386/apm/apm.c
../../i386/apm/apm.c:88: field `event_list' has incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c: In function `apm_record_event':
../../i386/apm/apm.c:965: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c:966: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c: In function `apmioctl':
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1347: `APMIO_NEXTEVENT' undeclared (first use this 
function)
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1347: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1347: for each function it appears in.)
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1354: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1358: `APMIO_REJECTLASTREQ' undeclared (first use this 
function)
../../i386/apm/apm.c:1363: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch 
statement
*** Error code 1

Stop.

Something get mangled somewhere?


| Kenton A. Hoover  | shib...@marchordie.org |
|  Private Citizen  ||
| San Francisco, California ||
|= http://www.shockwave.org/~shibumi |
|T O D A Y ' S   A F F I R M A T I O N   |
|   There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future -- |
|all these are just illusions.   |


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's

1999-09-03 Thread John Baldwin

On 03-Sep-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
 Perhaps the objections were raised because I didn't say I wanted to
 sandbox Sendmail. I've looked through my sent mail and I can see that
 I
 didn't say anything about it in my initial mail. That's unfortunate.

If you sandbox sendmail, then it makes sense that sendmail will need a
user to be sandboxed in.  In that case, adding a new user/group is
acceptable.  It was the adding a new user/group just for the sake of
adding a new user/group that bothered many of us. ;)

 Ciao,
 Sheldon.

---

John Baldwin jobal...@vt.edu -- http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/
PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc
Power Users Use the Power to Serve!  -  http://www.freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



FreeBSD 2.2.7

1999-09-03 Thread Ken Bolingbroke


Is there any place someone can download and install FreeBSD 2.2.7?

Ken Bolingbroke
hack...@bolingbroke.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: gdb and source forking

1999-09-03 Thread Kip Macy
I have not looked closely, but it appears that the changes to bfd to
support the solib.c changes have been quite extensive. The diff of the
.c files in bfd/ is 7000 lines long. 

I know that interacting with the FSF can be unenjoyable but gdb compiles
and runs fine on all other OSs I have used. So if the solaris and linux
crowds can keep the modifications consistent why can't we? 
Thanks for any insight.

-Kip



On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:

 On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote:
 
  I have been trying to apply some modifications to gdb but have noticed
  that FreeBSD has basically gone off on its own path with respect to gdb.
  Is there any intention pf getting these changes merged back in to the
  original distribution? It looks like it would be a lot of work.
 
 I don't think we have gone very far from the gdb-4.18 distribution. We
 have made some changes to solib.c to account for some peculiarities in our
 ld.so and there may be some other minor changes elsewhere. It would be
 some work to break out all our changes so that they can be invidually
 submitted to FSF. Assigning all the changes to FSF is about 10x the effort
 and I don't have much enthusiasm for it.
 
 --
 Doug Rabson   Mail:  d...@nlsystems.com
 Nonlinear Systems Ltd.Phone: +44 181 442 9037
 
 
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
 with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
 
 




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-03 Thread David Krinsky
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 08:47:54AM +0200, Soren Schmidt (s...@freebsd.dk) wrote:

  wst_done: wst0: nonrecovered data error
 
 I've seen this problem LOTS of times when using the old wd based
 atapi subsystem. I've never been able to find out why this is
 happening exactly. This was part of the reason I started out
 on the new ATA driver (only in -current now). I've never had
 this problem using the ATA driver, so I'm pretty sure its the
 old driver thats at fault, probably some delicate timing prob.
 Using the new driver I do routine backups every night on
 a couble of servers, not seen a signle problem yet...

Thanks for the help, but I'm afraid I may have to burst your bubble. :-/

Upon your advice I cvsupped to today's -current and built an
appropriate kernel with the new ATA driver.  I now get one of the two
following error scenarios (which one is unpredictable, though usually
the former):

Sep  3 22:25:17 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WRITE - MEDIUM ERROR skey=3 
asc=31 ascq=00 error=00
Sep  3 22:25:17 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: REZERO_UNIT/TAPE_REWIND - MEDIUM 
ERROR skey=3 asc=31 ascq=00 error=00

or

Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WRITE - timeout error = 00
Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: atapi_transfer: bad command phase
Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: ad0: status=51 error=04
Sep  3 22:34:15 bantha /kernel: ad_interrupt: hard error
Sep  3 22:34:32 bantha /kernel: atapi_interrupt: unknown transfer phase 11
Sep  3 22:34:45 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WEOF - timeout error = 00
Sep  3 22:35:15 bantha /kernel: atapi_error: TAPE_WEOF - timeout error = 00

The former simply returns EIO;  the latter appears to sleep
uninterruptibly on atprq.

The apparent inconsistency in which happens when supports the 
notion that this is, as you say, a subtle timing issue.  
In an effort to figure out what was going on, I tried compiling
atapi-all.c and atapi-tape.c with ATAPI_DEBUG set, but this only
caused the kernel to eventually page fault and panic.  :-/

Any ideas?  I'm quite happy to help debug this one, if you have any
thoughts on where to go with it--I need to get backups working, and
I'd much rather not have to buy a new tape drive or switch OSes...

Dave.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD 2.2.7

1999-09-03 Thread Kherry Zamore
Ken Bolingbroke wrote:

 Is there any place someone can download and install FreeBSD 2.2.7?

 Ken Bolingbroke
 hack...@bolingbroke.com

 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
 with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

You may want to check out:
http://www.itworks.com.au/~gavin/FBSDsites.php3?release=2.2.7-RELEASE
or check the parent page,
http://www.itworks.com.au/~gavin/FBSDsites.php3...

--
Kherry Z d...@zamore.dhs.org
Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.

In God we trust... but lock your car doors




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



PLEASE HELP ME IN EAST TIMOR !!!!!

1999-09-03 Thread gang semang man
dear,
good evening !
My name is lolo. I'm interesting to your web site. Now, I do hope your help to 
break foreign account. Please ! I need the ways/ steps, because I need some 
computer components to develop my education. I come from Indonesia, and perhaps 
you know that my country in economic crisis. And then, My planning is to 
destroy Indonesia' ARMY web site (TNI), because Indonesia' ARMY is very bad/ 
Fuck. I'm stay in east Timor, Indonesia. 
Please give me the ways about how to buy goods (shooping) by the other man who 
has bank account or credit card. I'm waiting your information soonly.

thanks on your attention. Bye !


Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account 
at http://www.eudoramail.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-03 Thread Warner Losh
In message 19990903233326.a...@bantha.org David Krinsky writes:
: Any ideas?  I'm quite happy to help debug this one, if you have any
: thoughts on where to go with it--I need to get backups working, and
: I'd much rather not have to buy a new tape drive or switch OSes...

reboot.  dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/tape count=1000 bs=24k.

Then see if you still have the problem.  I've seen errors like the
ones you reported, but this fixed it for me.

Also, make sure that your drive is good.  I had one I had to return
because it was bad.  Soren said the driver worked, and I could never
get it working for me.  The replacement worked like a charm.

I also had one tape drive that I purchased at a garage sale for $0.50
that didn't have a tape head.  That made writes to it fail as well...
The other one I got at the garage sale for $0.50 has worked like a
charm and it is, I think, a rebadged STT8000.


Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



PLEASE HELP ME IN EAST TIMOR !!!!!

1999-09-03 Thread gang semang man
dear,
good evening !
My name is lolo. I'm interesting to your web site. Now, I do hope your help to 
break foreign account. Please ! I need the ways/ steps, because I need some 
computer components to develop my education. I come from Indonesia, and perhaps 
you know that my country in economic crisis. And then, My planning is to 
destroy Indonesia' ARMY web site (TNI), because Indonesia' ARMY is very bad/ 
Fuck. I'm stay in east Timor, Indonesia. 
Please give me the ways about how to buy goods (shooping) by the other man who 
has bank account or credit card. I'm waiting your information soonly.

thanks on your attention. Bye !


Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account 
at http://www.eudoramail.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message