Re: My wish list for 6.1
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:42:51AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: SMP laptops are right around the corner, and we should be ready to support SMP out-of-the-box. Already here - Alienware Aurora m7700 Athlon X2 dual-core. http://www.alienware.com/product_detail_pages/Aurora_m7700/aurora-m_features.aspx?SysCode=PC-LT-AURORA-M-7700SubCode=SKU-DEFAULT -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: accessing NetBSD filesystem
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:54:18AM +0100, Gilbert Fernandes wrote: The FreeBSD UFS is the FFS accessed through the VFS layer, but basically the format is the same. If you want to have access, from FreeBSD, to NetBSD partitions, make sure the NetBSD partitions have been formated using FFSv2 which is the port of UFS to NetBSD. There are some differences though : no ACL support nor snapshots available there. FFS v1 and v2 are both working. I'm using that everyday. The one part which needs attention is soft updates: FreeBSD / DragonFly have it as permanent flag, NetBSD as mount option. Joerg ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: accessing NetBSD filesystem
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:16:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:54:18AM +0100, Gilbert Fernandes wrote: + + The FreeBSD UFS is the FFS accessed through the VFS layer, but basically + the format is the same. If you want to have access, from FreeBSD, to + NetBSD partitions, make sure the NetBSD partitions have been formated + using FFSv2 which is the port of UFS to NetBSD. There are some + differences though : no ACL support nor snapshots available there. + + FFS v1 and v2 are both working. I'm using that everyday. The one part + which needs attention is soft updates: FreeBSD / DragonFly have it as + permanent flag, NetBSD as mount option. Interesting. In FreeBSD fsck(8) works differently for SU-enabled FS, so having SU as a mount option won't be possible (if we want to protect our users from a foot-shooting). And because of the way SU works, it is possible to run background fsck, as the only problems are unreferenced objects (inodes, blocks, etc.). -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgpBMllV0FSGm.pgp Description: PGP signature
