I asked the person who wrote vtxassist (only SVM supports paged real
mode) - he thinks that it broke when support for big real mode was
added. He did not seem particularly inclined to fix it. It may be that
Xen's VT-x support is considered less interesting to his organization
now that VMware is free (as in beer).
-Kip
On 7/11/06, Mohacsi Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
Does anybody succeed to boot FreeBSD on an Intel Vanderpool
capable machine? My colleague tried it and the result is a BTX halt as can
be seen on the screenshots on page linked. He successfully run unmodified
Linux, Windows 2003 under Xen virtual machines, but FreeBSD failed in the
boot phase.
http://skye.ki.iif.hu/~mohacsi/freebsd/xen-vt-freebsd.png
http://skye.ki.iif.hu/~mohacsi/freebsd/xen-vt-freebsd2.png
By the way what is the state of Xen port of FreeBSD?
I already asked these questions on FreeBSD-stable but no
answers...
Thanks,
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
