[Bug 264094] cc_htcp(4): Setting net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm to htcp triggers panic on the most recent CURRENT

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264094

Kubilay Kocak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Some People
 CC||toolch...@freebsd.org
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|toolch...@freebsd.org
  Flags||maintainer-feedback?(toolch
   ||a...@freebsd.org)

--- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak  ---
(In reply to Michael Tuexen from comment #12)

Any details on that isolation that could help toolchain@ with root causing and
resolution Michael?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 264179] 13.1-RELEASE hands in boot with Intel Alderlake GbE NIC

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264179

Kubilay Kocak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||264030
 Status|New |Open
Summary|Boot hangs up with  |13.1-RELEASE hands in boot
   |Alderlake's intel GbE NIC   |with Intel Alderlake GbE
   ||NIC
 CC||n...@freebsd.org
   Keywords||needs-qa

--- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak  ---
- Can you confirm boot behaviour is OK on 12.1-RELEASE ?
- Is the system able to boot single user? (to obtain and attach pciconf -lv and
usbconfig list output)
- Does boot verbose show anything additional?
- How does behaviour change without any USB devices connected?
- How does behaviour change after disabling USB controllers in BIOS/UEFI?
- How does behaviour change after disabling:
   - just onboard network controller
   - just pci network controller
   - both network controllers


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264030
[Bug 264030] [tracking] 13.1-RELEASE issue reports
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 264179] Boot hangs up with Alderlake's intel GbE NIC

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264179

Mark Linimon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||IntelNetworking, regression
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 264191] mbuf: debugnet panics with mbuf cache with multiple instances of the same driver

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264191

--- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak  ---
See also base 5a7de2b42caf via bug 258923 apologies.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 258923] [mlx4en] Wrong mbuf cluster size in mlx4_en_debugnet_init leads to panic

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258923

Kubilay Kocak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
   ||gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2641
   ||91

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 264191] mbuf: debugnet panics with mbuf cache with multiple instances of the same driver

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264191

Kubilay Kocak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hsela...@freebsd.org,
   ||n...@freebsd.org
   See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
   ||gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2589
   ||23
Summary|debugnet panics with mbuf   |mbuf: debugnet panics with
   |cache with multiple |mbuf cache with multiple
   |instances of the same   |instances of the same
   |driver  |driver
  Flags||maintainer-feedback?(cem@fr
   ||eebsd.org),
   ||maintainer-feedback?(markj@
   ||FreeBSD.org),
   ||maintainer-feedback?(hselas
   ||k...@freebsd.org)
   Keywords||crash, needs-qa
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
 Status|New |Open
   Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People

--- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak  ---
^Triage: Unsure of specific relevance, but see also src 5a7de2b42caf via 258923
given mlx mention here and mlx, panic, debugnet_mbuf_reinit() and debugnet
activation there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 264193] pf: scrub max-mss rule stops working (but still counts) after 13.1-RELEASE upgrade

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264193

Kubilay Kocak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|New |Open
  Flags||mfc-stable13?,
   ||mfc-stable12-
Summary|Broken scrub max-mss|pf: scrub max-mss rule
   ||stops working (but still
   ||counts) after 13.1-RELEASE
   ||upgrade
 Blocks||264030
 CC||n...@freebsd.org
   Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|p...@freebsd.org
   Keywords||needs-qa, regression


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264030
[Bug 264030] [tracking] 13.1-RELEASE issue reports
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 264094] cc_htcp(4): Setting net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm to htcp triggers panic on the most recent CURRENT

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264094

--- Comment #14 from Jessica Clarke  ---
Yes, it's a problem with how VNET (and DPCPU) are designed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 264094] cc_htcp(4): Setting net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm to htcp triggers panic on the most recent CURRENT

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264094

--- Comment #13 from Michael Tuexen  ---
Just another data point: Disabling VNET also works around the problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 245981] bnxt(4): BCM57414 / BCM57416 not initializing: bnxt0: Unable to allocate device TX queue / queue memory

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245981

--- Comment #31 from SJ  ---
I couldn't find a version matching 21.65.33.33, but downgraded the NIC firmware
to 21.60.22.11 and everything worked fine after loading the kernel module.
Tried upgrading to 22.00.07.60 again after that and can confirm that now works
as well. 

Bit of an odd one, but happy to report no further issues. Cheers!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 263824] genet(4): Driver interface may overwrite memory in a consecutive memory copy operations when parsing TX packet

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263824

Mike Karels  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|In Progress |Closed
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from Mike Karels  ---
Fixed on main and stable/13

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 263824] genet(4): Driver interface may overwrite memory in a consecutive memory copy operations when parsing TX packet

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263824

--- Comment #7 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug:

URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=7e6e22aab6b993e42328bafe0f64ee14a2b7c43c

commit 7e6e22aab6b993e42328bafe0f64ee14a2b7c43c
Author: Mike Karels 
AuthorDate: 2022-05-09 12:19:52 +
Commit: Mike Karels 
CommitDate: 2022-05-23 11:53:01 +

genet: fix output packet corruption in uncommon case

The code for the "shift" block in the COPY macro set the pointer for
the next copy block to the wrong value.  In this case, the link-layer
header would be overwritten by the network-layer header.  This case is
difficult or impossible to exercise in the current driver without
changing the value of the hw.genet.tx_hdr_min sysctl.  Correct the
pointer.  While here, remove a line in the macro that was marked
"unneeded", which was actually wrong.

PR: 263824
Submitted by:   jiah...@blackberry.com

(cherry picked from commit 1de9aa4d4f7938f36e6485dad817908a6e45bb32)

 sys/arm64/broadcom/genet/if_genet.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 264059] mlx4en(4) Mellanox ConnectX-3 10g eth not working in 13.1: mlx4_core0: Unable to determine PCI device chain minimum BW

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264059

Hans Petter Selasky  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|Open|Closed

--- Comment #11 from Hans Petter Selasky  ---
Thank you!

Then I'll close this issue.

--HPS

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 264059] mlx4en(4) Mellanox ConnectX-3 10g eth not working in 13.1: mlx4_core0: Unable to determine PCI device chain minimum BW

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264059

--- Comment #10 from crb  ---
Sorry, I thought I left a message and closed this.  I was, indeed, missing the
module you suggested.  When I loaded that the machine started working.  Thank
you!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 264059] mlx4en(4) Mellanox ConnectX-3 10g eth not working in 13.1: mlx4_core0: Unable to determine PCI device chain minimum BW

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264059

--- Comment #9 from Hans Petter Selasky  ---
Ping

--HPS

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 264094] cc_htcp(4): Setting net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm to htcp triggers panic on the most recent CURRENT

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264094

Michael Tuexen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|tue...@freebsd.org  |b...@freebsd.org
 Status|In Progress |Open

--- Comment #12 from Michael Tuexen  ---
Resigning as assignee since it is a clang issue, not a networking issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 264094] cc_htcp(4): Setting net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm to htcp triggers panic on the most recent CURRENT

2022-05-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264094

--- Comment #11 from Michael Tuexen  ---
(In reply to Jessica Clarke from comment #6)
I just tested that the problem does not show up if you build the CC module in
the kernel using the CC_HTCP kernel option.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.