Re: bin/79228: [patch] extend arp(8) to be able to create blackhole records
The following reply was made to PR bin/79228; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dan Lukes To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/79228: [patch] extend arp(8) to be able to create blackhole records Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:05:22 +0100 Not true, it doesn't work in 8.x nor in HEAD. It disappeared during rewrite of network stack. But current problem is not related to this PR, so there is no reason to unclose it. This PR has been submited in 2005, reviewed and committed in 2008, I requested it's close in 2009. Not surprising when outdated a lot in 2011 ... Anyway, thank to anybody who spent time to solve the problem ... Dan ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: bin/79228: [patch] extend arp(8) to be able to create blackhole records
The following reply was made to PR bin/79228; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dan Lukes To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/79228: [patch] extend arp(8) to be able to create blackhole records Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:50:53 +0100 Already commited and MFCed into 7-R It seems it will not be MFCed into 6-R anymore. This PR should be closed. Dan ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: kern/116747: [ndis] FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT crash with Dell TrueMobile 1400 wireless card
The following reply was made to PR kern/116747; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dan Lukes To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, roar.petter...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/116747: [ndis] FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT crash with Dell TrueMobile 1400 wireless card Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:48:33 +0100 Just for evidence ... Same problem (unknown NDIS error C000138D then panic) but immediatelly on kernel module load. OS FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 card: Atheros AR8131 vendor:device: chip: 1969:1063 card: 1025:0229 NDIS 5.1 windows driver version 1.0.0.26 Dan ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: inconsistent downloading rate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal/wrote, On 06/02/03 21:26: this is my first post in this ML. i'm using d-link 538TX NIC and my freebsd recognize it as a rl0. when i'm downloading from my ftp server (other computer) with basic configuration maximum rate 200KBps, my freebsd box able to get only 80KBps max. the strange thing is when i using MS XP (don't hate it ^_^), i'm able to get 190-200KBPS, so i try to figure out why this thing happen. Inconsistent full-duplex/half-duplex setting on rl0. Don't trust 'auto' - set it manually. Dan -- Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206 root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of www.freebsd.cz AKA: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: xe pcmcia interface broken, more debug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 12/28/02 01:11: # ping -c 1 -s 2000 darkstar PING darkstar.sajd.net (192.168.1.11): 56 data bytes xe0: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1518 > max 1514) xe0: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1518 > max 1514) # ifconfig xe0 | grep mtu xe0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 Hm, real frame size (1518) exceeds 4 bytes above largest standard Ethernet packet. Are you using vlans with 'vlandev xe0', isn't it ? Dan -- Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206 root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of www.freebsd.cz AKA: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Re: pseudo-device ef
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 12/26/02 19:11: > I have FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE here and pseudo-device ef doesn't seem to do > the right thing. When compile kernel wth this option I see all the ef > symbols in kernel: ... > but no XXNfM interfaces come into existance after boot. > On the other hand, if I load the corresponding module if_ef via > loader.conf, everything works like charm. > Am I missing something or is there a problem with the code ? The ef code creates preudointerfaces on init only. It doesn't catch the interface creation after initialisation. You should load 'ef' module after all other network-interface related module are loaded already. Dan -- Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206 root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of www.freebsd.cz AKA: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Re: broadcast over loopback
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 12/05/02 20:41: Is there a reason that the broadcast flag is not set on the loopback interface? It seems like it might be useful to allow applications that use broadcast to continue to work even when loopback is the only interface. Your application shouldn't use broadcast unless it knows it run in broadcast capable environment or it shouldn't refuse to run when it cannot send a packet - as it doesn't care where it's packets are sent to. BTW, the broadcast are handled in mad way in TCP/IP stack already - the destination of 255.255.255.255 is silently rewritten to network broadcast and sent over first interface (if it is broadcast capable) or it is routed (often to default route). You can't send the non-network broadcast to interface of your choice (unless you use bpf). Dan -- Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206 root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of www.freebsd.cz AKA: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Re: if_ef doesn't work with if_fxp?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 11/14/02 15:26: I checked with our network/netware guy, and he's told me that we're running "0 interface with an Ethernet_II frame", so I've got fxp0f0 configured with our network number, which he's given me as 0x83a2c800 Yust for fun - 0x83a2c800=131.162.200.0, so your try to hide real IP by "xx"ing it has failed. Our network is a B-Class, with from x.x.128.x up being divided into subnets of 8 C-classes each ... so subnet 128, 136, 144, etc ... our netware server is on subnet 200, which is the 83a2c800 that he's given Well - we must diferentiate what we are speaking about. If you are trying to set up IPX network, then the informations about IP network topology is irelevant. You need to know the IPX network topology, IPX network numbers and so on. I don't know what the 0x83A2C800 number is - it seems to be IP not IPX network number, but I'm not sure. You should ask your Netware server administrator. me ... the computer I'm working on is a laptop, so will be on several different subnets, but never on subnet 200 ... is 83a2c800 the netnum The correct IPX network number must be set to the same number as the IPX network number assigned to network avaiable on cable you are connected in. Under Windows seems to be possible set the IPX network to 0x00 requesting autodetection of the correct value. As you know, there must be a properly configured IPX router between you and server unless your IPX adress is from the same IPX NET as server's (it is similar law as for IP) Dan -- Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206 root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of www.freebsd.cz AKA: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
