Re: TrueCrypt 5.0 - Built, short test result: Ok.
Am 13.02.2008, 08:23 Uhr, schrieb Andrey Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:02:08AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote: In fact, if I create a volume with keyfile but without password, truecrypt throws ParameterIncorrect at TrueCrypt::Pkcs5Kdf::ValidateParameters:64 at me. BTW, 5.0a is already out. I tried it, and the keyfile thingy seems resolved. Port at http://www.triplefork.net/truecrypt.tgz has updated checksums. Still does not work with GELI, even if neither the partition holding the container, the source partition of the file to copy into it nor the mount point are actually encrypted. It worked for the 495-Byte file I used in my first test, but anything bigger calls for the power switch. Can't be bothered to play more with it right now, 4 times fsck a day is good enough. Michael ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??
If I understand the problem correctly, the attached patch will fix it. Please confirm this for me when you can. That fixed it Doug - thanks for the quick response. Regards, Mark ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Rong-en Fan wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:50 PM, Miroslav Lachman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using portupgrade-2.4.3_2,2. I have installed gnupg-1.4.8 and if I
tried to install Spamassassin and Amavisd-new with commands:
portinstall p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
portinstall amavisd-new
they both are trying to install CURL and openldap-client. Spamassassin
and Amavisd-new do not depend on it, so I think it is dependency for
GnuPG-2 (but I am using GnuPG-1).
If I try cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin make install clean
or
cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/ make install clean
the whole installation is successfuly done without installing CURL and
openldap-client. (it is expected result for me)
...or em I wrong and I must add 'security/gnupg' = 'security/gnupg1' in
to ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf?
Yes, according to /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Problem persist even if I have installed gnupg-1.4.8 and in pkgtools.conf:
ALT_PKGDEP = {
'security/gnupg' = 'security/gnupg1',
}
`portinstall p5-Mail-SpamAssassin` still want to install CURL and
openldap-client.
Any other thoughts?
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How is this possible?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:47:34PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On February 13, 2008 1:00:50 AM + Shaun Amott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:38:31PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
The Makefile has:
LIB_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/pcapy.so:${PORTSDIR}/net/py-pcapy
How is it possible to get the file doesn't exist when the file does
in fact exist? Very weird.
LIB_DEPENDS expects a library name/version. The dependency is checked
with ldconfig; although the error message is misleading in this case.
Thanks, Shaun. So it should be RUN_DEPENDS?
More than likely, yes. Unless it is needed to build, in which case it
should be a BUILD_DEPENDS.
-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Matthew Seaman writes: Building your own INDEX is easy (just type 'make index' in /usr/ports) but very time consuming -- probably 45 minutes or so on a typical desktop box On a lightly loaded p4/2.2Ghz (with only 512mb of RAM) it routinely takes about 75 minutes. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
running wireshark as a non root user
hi howto configure freeBSD 6.3 to run wireshark as a non root user ? if I start it as a normal user, I cannot choose the interfaces. ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: running wireshark as a non root user
Piotr ha scritto: howto configure freeBSD 6.3 to run wireshark as a non root user ? if I start it as a normal user, I cannot choose the interfaces. sudo wireshark -- Alex Dupre ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: running wireshark as a non root user
Am Mi, 13.02.2008, 15:10, schrieb Piotr: howto configure freeBSD 6.3 to run wireshark as a non root user ? if I start it as a normal user, I cannot choose the interfaces. This is a wireshark FAQ: http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/CapturePrivileges -- /\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: spamd port
Quoting Doug Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am trying to get the port mail/spamd to work on FreeBSD 6.2. There is not a lot of information on actually using spamd. So far I have figured out that I have to kldload pf and then a pfctl -e before attempting to start spamd. However, spamd-setup actually does nothing. pfctl -s rules shows an error message: No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled I have no idea what ALTQ is (or if its even required) since I can find no references to it in the kernel config files or kld modules. There is a page on setting up spamd at http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/spamd.setup.html but it doesn't address this issue or have any extra steps that need to be done. Any ideas what is going on here? I would start by getting pf running as expected and do some rule changing and testing to understand it a bit better and THEN I would look at spamd which I found a bit confusing although well worth the effort. My salvation in spamd was a an excellent,common sense write-up by Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you can find at: http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/openbsd-spamd.txt You can use Peter´s excellent work from the beginning to get pf going or by using the samples in /usr/share/examples/pf enjoy, ed ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Robert Huff wrote: Matthew Seaman writes: Building your own INDEX is easy (just type 'make index' in /usr/ports) but very time consuming -- probably 45 minutes or so on a typical desktop box On a lightly loaded p4/2.2Ghz (with only 512mb of RAM) it routinely takes about 75 minutes. Robert Huff Last time i have built the INDEX on a core 2 duo machine, it took less than 10 minutes, in fact 8 minutes if i remember well, which is ways less than the numbers you are claiming. -- Michel TALON ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net-im/openfire port related question.
Hello all. I am a maintainer of the net-im/openfire port. I have a report from Dmitri Frolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] that openfire uses the same uid as security/stunnel port. Could someone please suggest me as how i can resolve this situation? P.S. Please cc me, because i am not subscribe to this list. -- == - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. --- == ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-im/openfire port related question.
On 2/13/08, Nikolay Pavlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. I am a maintainer of the net-im/openfire port. I have a report from Dmitri Frolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] that openfire uses the same uid as security/stunnel port. Could someone please suggest me as how i can resolve this situation? If you look at security/cyrus-sasl2/pkg-install, it checks to see if the username exists, if it doesn't exist, then it checks if the uid is available, if it is not available, it increments the uid until it finds an available uid. Both ports should be using a similar routine to check if the uid/gid they are requesting is available. Scot ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Portmaster ignoring +IGNOREME??
Mark Ovens wrote: If I understand the problem correctly, the attached patch will fix it. Please confirm this for me when you can. That fixed it Doug - thanks for the quick response. Good news, thanks for testing it. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-im/openfire port related question.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:50:45PM +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote: Hello all. I am a maintainer of the net-im/openfire port. I have a report from Dmitri Frolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] that openfire uses the same uid as security/stunnel port. Could someone please suggest me as how i can resolve this situation? Change uid/gid in net-im/openfire/pkg-install. Add new values to /usr/ports/UIDs, /usr/ports/GIDs to prevent this situation in the future. -- Adios ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-im/openfire port related question.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Scot Hetzel wrote: On 2/13/08, Nikolay Pavlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. I am a maintainer of the net-im/openfire port. I have a report from Dmitri Frolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] that openfire uses the same uid as security/stunnel port. Could someone please suggest me as how i can resolve this situation? If you look at security/cyrus-sasl2/pkg-install, it checks to see if the username exists, if it doesn't exist, then it checks if the uid is available, if it is not available, it increments the uid until it finds an available uid. Both ports should be using a similar routine to check if the uid/gid they are requesting is available. Actually, that's old hat. The current standard is that you should pick an otherwise unused UID (and/or GID) from /usr/ports/UIDs and register that as belonging to your port. Submit a maintainer update with patches to UIDs and GIDs plus modifications to the way the port is installed so that it uses the allocated numbers, and you're golden. If another port has a UID clash with yours and you have established rights by registering the uid in this way, then you can insist that the other port is changed to not clash with yours. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHszJi8Mjk52CukIwRCEuQAJ0aFoas/I1LVqZ9Nen7f+pv9rPB7wCfZmMS c717kxRoTQeRWfVdccCwqPc= =KFDI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michel Talon wrote: Robert Huff wrote: Matthew Seaman writes: Building your own INDEX is easy (just type 'make index' in /usr/ports) but very time consuming -- probably 45 minutes or so on a typical desktop box On a lightly loaded p4/2.2Ghz (with only 512mb of RAM) it routinely takes about 75 minutes. Last time i have built the INDEX on a core 2 duo machine, it took less than 10 minutes, in fact 8 minutes if i remember well, which is ways less than the numbers you are claiming. So, one of you has a machine that's a few years old now, and the other has a machine that's top of the line and pretty shiny. That range of difference in performance is not at all unexpected. It's not processor speed that's the ultimate determinant -- building the INDEX is critically dependent on disk IO rates too. I suspect the Michel probably has fast SAS drives and/or a pretty useful hardware RAID controller whilst Robert is using run of the mill IDE or SATA drives. Doing something to cause most of the ports tree to be cached in VM before you start (like, for instance, running make index as a rehearsal) will make a big difference to the time required. Of course, that is most effective if you've got lots of available RAM. etc. etc. Basically the more cojones your machine has in all departments, the faster it will build an index. /me tactfully withdraws as this thread descends into a 'my machine is better than your machine' contest... Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHszEo8Mjk52CukIwRCENPAJ9YIZpo24hachry02eh5fcyIGsNowCfQCJN e89RZ7ftQs2JsHCNpnYvSn4= =JyoV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-im/openfire port related question.
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 20:38:45 Peter Pentchev wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:09:38PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: Scot Hetzel wrote: On 2/13/08, Nikolay Pavlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. I am a maintainer of the net-im/openfire port. I have a report from Dmitri Frolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] that openfire uses the same uid as security/stunnel port. Could someone please suggest me as how i can resolve this situation? If you look at security/cyrus-sasl2/pkg-install, it checks to see if the username exists, if it doesn't exist, then it checks if the uid is available, if it is not available, it increments the uid until it finds an available uid. Both ports should be using a similar routine to check if the uid/gid they are requesting is available. Actually, that's old hat. The current standard is that you should pick an otherwise unused UID (and/or GID) from /usr/ports/UIDs and register that as belonging to your port. Submit a maintainer update with patches to UIDs and GIDs plus modifications to the way the port is installed so that it uses the allocated numbers, and you're golden. If another port has a UID clash with yours and you have established rights by registering the uid in this way, then you can insist that the other port is changed to not clash with yours. ...and that's precisely what I did with the stunnel port five months ago, in rev. 1.48 of the ports/UIDs file :) Before that, stunnel just invoked pw groupadd and then pw useradd without any specific ID's, but now it always uses 341. Hmmm, that might indeed be a problem if this user ID is already taken by another account on the user's system; I'll see if I can work something out on the autodetection front, but my advice to Nikolay would be to pick another user ID and register it in the ports/UIDs file, at least for the benefit for people who have not yet installed openfire and shall do so for the first time in the future :) G'luck, Peter Ok guys. Thanks for suggestions. I'll try to figure this out. -- == - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. --- == ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-im/openfire port related question.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:09:38PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: Scot Hetzel wrote: On 2/13/08, Nikolay Pavlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. I am a maintainer of the net-im/openfire port. I have a report from Dmitri Frolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] that openfire uses the same uid as security/stunnel port. Could someone please suggest me as how i can resolve this situation? If you look at security/cyrus-sasl2/pkg-install, it checks to see if the username exists, if it doesn't exist, then it checks if the uid is available, if it is not available, it increments the uid until it finds an available uid. Both ports should be using a similar routine to check if the uid/gid they are requesting is available. Actually, that's old hat. The current standard is that you should pick an otherwise unused UID (and/or GID) from /usr/ports/UIDs and register that as belonging to your port. Submit a maintainer update with patches to UIDs and GIDs plus modifications to the way the port is installed so that it uses the allocated numbers, and you're golden. If another port has a UID clash with yours and you have established rights by registering the uid in this way, then you can insist that the other port is changed to not clash with yours. ...and that's precisely what I did with the stunnel port five months ago, in rev. 1.48 of the ports/UIDs file :) Before that, stunnel just invoked pw groupadd and then pw useradd without any specific ID's, but now it always uses 341. Hmmm, that might indeed be a problem if this user ID is already taken by another account on the user's system; I'll see if I can work something out on the autodetection front, but my advice to Nikolay would be to pick another user ID and register it in the ports/UIDs file, at least for the benefit for people who have not yet installed openfire and shall do so for the first time in the future :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence would be seven words long if it were six words shorter. pgpoLDl19Fp2M.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Miroslav Lachman wrote: Miroslav Lachman wrote: Hi, I am using portupgrade-2.4.3_2,2. I have installed gnupg-1.4.8 and if I tried to install Spamassassin and Amavisd-new with commands: portinstall p5-Mail-SpamAssassin portinstall amavisd-new they both are trying to install CURL and openldap-client. Spamassassin and Amavisd-new do not depend on it, so I think it is dependency for GnuPG-2 (but I am using GnuPG-1). If I try cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin make install clean or cd /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/ make install clean the whole installation is successfuly done without installing CURL and openldap-client. (it is expected result for me) ...or em I wrong and I must add 'security/gnupg' = 'security/gnupg1' in to ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf? OK. Just another strange behavior - `portinstall postfix` shown an OPTIONS dialog, where I checked SASL which will install cyrus-sasl2 during postfix installation. Cyrus-sasl2 is installed as dependency before postfix compilation - with default options (an OPTIONS dialog for cyrus-sasl2 did not appeared). After successful instalation of postfix with confirming all the questions about adding new user, activation in mailer.cf etc., portupgrade shown an OPTIONS dialog for cyrus-sasl2 and then start compilation of cyrus-sasl2 which was installed before postfix compilation by portinstall itself! So second istallation failed: --- Installing the new version via the port with make flags: WITH_BDB=true WITHOUT_MYSQL=true WITHOUT_PGSQL=true WITHOUT_SQLITE=true WITHOUT_DEV_URANDOM=true WITHOUT_ALWAYSTRUE=true WITHOUT_KEEP_DB_OPEN=true WITHOUT_AUTHDAEMOND=true WITH_LOGIN=true WITH_PLAIN=true WITH_CRAM=true WITH_DIGEST=true WITHOUT_OTP=true WITHOUT_NTLM=true === Installing for cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 === cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.15 - found === cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 depends on shared library: db41.1 - found *** Updated user `cyrus'. === Generating temporary packing list === Checking if security/cyrus-sasl2 already installed === cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of security/cyrus-sasl2 without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall.7043.1 env make WITH_BDB=true WITHOUT_MYSQL=true WITHOUT_PGSQL=true WITHOUT_SQLITE=true WITHOUT_DEV_URANDOM=true WITHOUT_ALWAYSTRUE=true WITHOUT_KEEP_DB_OPEN=true WITHOUT_AUTHDAEMOND=true WITH_LOGIN=true WITH_PLAIN=true WITH_CRAM=true WITH_DIGEST=true WITHOUT_OTP=true WITHOUT_NTLM=true DEPENDS_TARGET=package reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. --- ** Install tasks 2: 1 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! security/cyrus-sasl2 (install error) Why is portinstall installing cyrus-sasl2 twice? Why portinstall did not shown an OPTIONS dialog for the first time? (this is on a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 without previous versions of a mentioned ports) I don't know when/where/what was changed in portupgrade, but current version seems almost useless to me. Installing of Trac plugins ends with error installing apache-1.3.41 (why if I have Apache 2.2.8 and Trac installed) Previous versions were OK in this situation and tracking and filling all ALT_PKGDEP isn't easy task. Manual installation of apache-ant needs only 5 dependencies # pkg_info -rR apache-ant-1.7.0_1 Information for apache-ant-1.7.0_1: Depends on: Dependency: xtrans-1.0.4 Dependency: xproto-7.0.10_1 Dependency: xextproto-7.0.2 Dependency: javavmwrapper-2.3 Dependency: diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 installation by portupgrade ends with more than 60 # pkg_info -rR apache-ant-1.7.0_1 Information for apache-ant-1.7.0_1: Depends on: Dependency: pkg-config-0.22_1 Dependency: xproto-7.0.10_1 Dependency: fixesproto-4.0 Dependency: xineramaproto-1.1.2 Dependency: xf86vidmodeproto-2.2.2 Dependency: xf86miscproto-0.9.2 Dependency: xf86dgaproto-2.0.3 Dependency: xextproto-7.0.2 Dependency: videoproto-2.2.2 Dependency: xtrans-1.0.4 Dependency: scrnsaverproto-1.1.0 Dependency: renderproto-0.9.3 Dependency: recordproto-1.13.2 Dependency: randrproto-1.2.1 Dependency: printproto-1.0.3 Dependency: libICE-1.0.4,1 Dependency: libSM-1.0.3,1 Dependency: libXdmcp-1.0.2 Dependency: libXau-1.0.3_2 Dependency: libfontenc-1.0.4 Dependency: inputproto-1.4.2.1 Dependency: kbproto-1.0.3 Dependency: libX11-1.1.3,1 Dependency: libxkbfile-1.0.4 Dependency: liboldX-1.0.1 Dependency: libXext-1.0.3,1 Dependency: libdmx-1.0.2
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:57:56 +0100 Miroslav Lachman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was happy user of portupgrade for many years, but if all above is the right way to the future, maybe it is time to give a chance for portmaster or anything else. I am not experiencing the same problems that you seem to be having. Perhaps we could try this. Update your ports tree, and see what running this command shows: pkg_version -vIL= Then perhaps listing your /etc/make.conf file and the portupgrade pkg_tool.conf file. Also, what command line flags are you using with portupgrade? Perhaps, portupgrade is simply trying to update out of date dependencies. I use portmanager from time to time, and that discovers out of date dependencies that portupgrade failed to update. Perhaps the new version is correctly finding and updating these files. Just my 2¢. -- Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: PGP signature
howto use Konqueror as root while another user ?
hi howto use Konqueror as root while another user from the wheel group ? I've tried kdesu konqueror, but it doesn't work and I get a lot of errors. I'm using freeBSD 6.3 with KDE 3.5 ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade installing unexpected dependencies
Matthew Seaman writes: It's not processor speed that's the ultimate determinant -- building the INDEX is critically dependent on disk IO rates too. I suspect the Michel probably has fast SAS drives and/or a pretty useful hardware RAID controller whilst Robert is using run of the mill IDE or SATA drives. 10k Seagate 80mb/s LVD SCSI. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: howto use Konqueror as root while another user ?
Hi, Piotr wrote: hi howto use Konqueror as root while another user from the wheel group ? I've tried kdesu konqueror, but it doesn't work and I get a lot of errors. I'm using freeBSD 6.3 with KDE 3.5 open a terminal window, switch to root and start konqueror. It works on my 6.3 machine. When you start konqueror from the menu, you are using your own account but not root. Erich ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: howto use Konqueror as root while another user ?
Hi, I think he wants to use konqueror locally just to see his files and he cannot get access to his root files. Erich Remko Lodder wrote: On Thu, February 14, 2008 6:47 am, Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, Piotr wrote: hi howto use Konqueror as root while another user from the wheel group ? I've tried kdesu konqueror, but it doesn't work and I get a lot of errors. I'm using freeBSD 6.3 with KDE 3.5 open a terminal window, switch to root and start konqueror. It works on my 6.3 machine. When you start konqueror from the menu, you are using your own account but not root. Erich INSERT BIG HORRIBLE WARNING *** DONT use browsers and mailreaders and the like as root. If something is fishy on the other end (mostly you dont control the other side!) you'll be screwed. Your data will get compromised, and your machine might be joining a ghost network, hitting on others. I strongly STRONGLY (did I say STRONGLY!) dis-advise that you will be using this. //remko Hat: someone who works with security on a daily basis, and needs to handle ghosts machines that try to hit my networks, everyday. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: howto use Konqueror as root while another user ?
On Thu, February 14, 2008 8:06 am, Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, I think he wants to use konqueror locally just to see his files and he cannot get access to his root files. Erich The advise remains the same, dont do it. Normally documentation and all is just readable as every users, so I dont see the point in using root for that either. -- /\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Remko Lodder | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xhttp://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
