Re: BIND poisoning??
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, matt donovan wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Albert Thiel ath...@yourdatacenter.comwrote: Whoever manages BIND.. SANS has a new warning/listing on BIND (Jan 7th) that may effect FreeBSD's implementation, but I am not sure... I'm just the mailman here :) http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5641rss As I've said several times now, you need to look at https://www.isc.org/node/373 to get the full picture. This issue is only relevant for you if you are using DNSSEC to verify signatures. well the security team already knows I sent them some research I did and yes the maintainer for the bind port knows as well I m just waiting back for a reply from him. to see if he'll update the port or not. I both updated the ports and responded to you yesterday. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:42:36 +0100, Diego Depaoli wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote: We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing with KDE 4.2. kdepim4 stops building around 25% with kdepim-3.5.10 installed because libkleo complains about undefined reference to QGpgME. Can someone confirm that? Confirmed, build fails because of kdepim3 installed. We will try to fix this in RC1. Thanks, Max ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Diego Depaoli wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Andrey andrey.kosache...@gmail.com wrote:
I faced with the following issue while qt4-designer has been upgrading:
--- begin ---
[sil...@beastie][/usr/ports]sudo portupgrade -R 'qt4-*'
+++ skipped +++
Stop in
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-designer/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.3/tools/designer.
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa
/tmp/portupgrade.22823.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade
UPGRADE_PORT=qt4-designer-4.4.1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.4.1 make reinstall
--- Restoring the old version
** Fix the installation problem and try again.
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 1152 packages
found (-0 +1) . done]
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! devel/qt4-designer (qt4-designer-4.4.1) (install error)
Same here.
For some obscure reason qt4-designer refuses to build through
portmaster or portupgrade.
cd ${PORTSDIR}/devel/qt4-designer make... to go forward.
Has anyone identified the problem with running this one in portmaster? Is
there something I need to address?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Can someone commit ports/130301 (fix mail/fetchmail MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR)
please? Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc Greetings, can someone please commit ports/130301 without waiting for a longish maintainer timeout? When filing my previous PR, I overlooked that we had two MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR lines; I've also added one more MASTER_SITE for the nonce, because metalab and leo haven't yet picked up the distfile and it hinges on the availability of berlios.de. Thanks. Best regards -- Matthias Andree ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: BIND poisoning??
Thanks very much. Both of you were a great help to us all. As I tell everyone I deal with, FreeBSD is the best in all ways, this included. I have secured my servers with the workaround for the moment and will update fully shortly. -Al Albert Thiel ath...@yourdatacenter.com Your Data Center HostLongIsland.com Powerful FREE ISP Tools, Mail Website Hosting http://www.YourDataCenter.com Hewlett, New York (877)302-8642 -Original Message- From: Doug Barton [mailto:do...@freebsd.org] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:36 AM To: matt donovan Cc: Albert Thiel; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND poisoning?? On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, matt donovan wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Albert Thiel ath...@yourdatacenter.comwrote: Whoever manages BIND.. SANS has a new warning/listing on BIND (Jan 7th) that may effect FreeBSD's implementation, but I am not sure... I'm just the mailman here :) http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5641rss As I've said several times now, you need to look at https://www.isc.org/node/373 to get the full picture. This issue is only relevant for you if you are using DNSSEC to verify signatures. well the security team already knows I sent them some research I did and yes the maintainer for the bind port knows as well I m just waiting back for a reply from him. to see if he'll update the port or not. I both updated the ports and responded to you yesterday. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
mono port
Hello List, What is the status of FreeBSD mono port? Current version of lang/mono port is 1.2.5.1_1. However the latest Mono release is 2.0.1 already. It has been reported, that Mono 1.2.5 has a number of critical bugs. At least 1.2.9 would be needed by FreeBSD Mono users. What is the reason why new release of Mono has been delayed so long? ref: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/mono/ Best regards, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:39:40 -0800 (PST), Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Diego Depaoli wrote:
...
Same here.
For some obscure reason qt4-designer refuses to build through
portmaster or portupgrade.
cd ${PORTSDIR}/devel/qt4-designer make... to go forward.
Has anyone identified the problem with running this one in portmaster? Is
there something I need to address?
Doug
The problem is with qt4-designer port indeed, not with portmaster/portupgrade
tools. I'm working on fix.
Max
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can someone commit ports/130301 (fix mail/fetchmail MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR)
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote: please? I think Pav committed the fix right after you sent the email yesterday. -- Florent Thoumie f...@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can someone commit ports/130301 (fix mail/fetchmail MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR)
2009/1/9 Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org: Florent Thoumie píše v pá 09. 01. 2009 v 11:13 +: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote: please? I think Pav committed the fix right after you sent the email yesterday. I don't think I did :) Well the port fetched fine for me, so I don't see 130301 as that much pressing. I wonder what's the status of Simon, I'd like to give him few more days to answer. Oops, I didn't see the two subjects were different. My mistake. -- Florent Thoumie f...@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can someone commit ports/130301 (fix mail/fetchmail MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR)
Florent Thoumie píše v pá 09. 01. 2009 v 11:13 +: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote: please? I think Pav committed the fix right after you sent the email yesterday. I don't think I did :) Well the port fetched fine for me, so I don't see 130301 as that much pressing. I wonder what's the status of Simon, I'd like to give him few more days to answer. -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org Why do we need a film of Lord of the Rings when we have the book? Because watching a cg enhanced Legolas fire a flaming arrow into the heart of a warg is cool? - a...@asdf.com in rec.games.roguelike.angband signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: mono port
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:14:20PM +0200, Ott K?stner wrote: Hello List, What is the status of FreeBSD mono port? Current version of lang/mono port is 1.2.5.1_1. However the latest Mono release is 2.0.1 already. It has been reported, that Mono 1.2.5 has a number of critical bugs. At least 1.2.9 would be needed by FreeBSD Mono users. What is the reason why new release of Mono has been delayed so long? ref: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/mono/ I have a PR assigned to me that will update the port to 2.0.1 and a whole bunch of other ports. I'm actively working on this and hope to have it in the tree as time permits. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: mono port
On Friday 09 January 2009 2:57:27 pm Wesley Shields wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:14:20PM +0200, Ott K?stner wrote: What is the reason why new release of Mono has been delayed so long? ref: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/mono/ I have a PR assigned to me that will update the port to 2.0.1 and a whole bunch of other ports. I'm actively working on this and hope to have it in the tree as time permits. -- WXS Thank You for the information. Best regards, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted
Phil Oleson schrieb: I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase, kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the issue was with hspell. I had to rebuild it with this patch: --- Makefile.orig 2009-01-04 05:20:09.0 + +++ Makefile2009-01-04 05:20:01.0 + @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ USE_PERL5_BUILD= yes USE_GMAKE= yes GNU_CONFIGURE= yes +CFLAGS+= -fPIC MAN1= hspell.1 MAN3= hspell.3 - kdelibs @57% of build process, saw that too when playing around with area51 short before offiial CFT, using portmaster to update everything. It didn't reproduce with versions as of yesterday and following the instructions in UPDATING-area51. amd64, also ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent
On Thursday 08 January 2009 12:08:55 pm Michel Talon wrote: Hello, would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, but with some more features: it can either deliver mail locally for local users or send all other mail to a smarthost, and reads the aliases file. Hence it fulfills the needs of the person who wants a small mail agent for receiving periodic root mail, and wants to send the occasional without too much fuss. It is much simpler than sendmail, postfix or exim. For simplicity i have a tarball here: http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/dma.tgz it compiles out of the box, and it is easy to figure out how to use it. I second that .. Sendmail has turned into an unnecesary behemont for a local MTA .. dma is a lot smaller, simpler, easier to maintain, a lot less bug prone, way easier to configure and all in all, just what I need if my MTA only job will be delivering local mail ... Sendmail feels like having a HUMMER only to take my kids to school and then get back to my home .. which is only two blocks away ... :s It would be really nice if I could choose whether I want Sendmail, Postfix or dma upon installation time (sysinstall) ... Regards -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent
Gonzalo Nemmi пишет: On Thursday 08 January 2009 12:08:55 pm Michel Talon wrote: Hello, would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, but with some more features: it can either deliver mail locally for local users or send all other mail to a smarthost, and reads the aliases file. Hence it fulfills the needs of the person who wants a small mail agent for receiving periodic root mail, and wants to send the occasional without too much fuss. It is much simpler than sendmail, postfix or exim. For simplicity i have a tarball here: http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/dma.tgz it compiles out of the box, and it is easy to figure out how to use it. I second that .. Sendmail has turned into an unnecesary behemont for a local MTA .. dma is a lot smaller, simpler, easier to maintain, a lot less bug prone, way easier to configure and all in all, just what I need if my MTA only job will be delivering local mail ... Sendmail feels like having a HUMMER only to take my kids to school and then get back to my home .. which is only two blocks away ... :s It would be really nice if I could choose whether I want Sendmail, Postfix or dma upon installation time (sysinstall) ... Or exim =) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
STILL OPEN: ports/129226: update devel/boost from 1.34.1 to 1.37
Hi folks, The issue ports/129226 was filed at November, 27 2008 and remains open at present. The issue text contains a link to the patch I've created for the devel/boost port. The problem is that current port version is too old. Boost team is going to release 1.38 on the 31st of January. I have skills, time, equipment and willing for porting that new version to FreeBSD in time. I've already started with current boost-1.38. However I'm not sure that creating patches for 1.38 in time is valuable provided that it's not possible to check them in. Guys, is any other help necessary to make 1.37 ported? Sincerely, Alexander Churanov ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Max Brazhnikov m...@issp.ac.ru wrote: On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:42:36 +0100, Diego Depaoli wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote: We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing with KDE 4.2. kdepim4 stops building around 25% with kdepim-3.5.10 installed because libkleo complains about undefined reference to QGpgME. Can someone confirm that? Confirmed, build fails because of kdepim3 installed. We will try to fix this in RC1. After that, KDE4.2 builds without other issues. As usual... nice work. Now is road test time. Many thanks. -- Diego Depaoli ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try
Hello, After fixing the plist, a few more errors disappeared. But I still get some errors when doing 'port test': === Extra files and directories check man/de/man1/amulecmd.1 man/de/man1/amuleweb.1 man/de/man1/amule.1 man/de/man1/ed2k.1 man/de/man1/xas.1 man/de/man1/cas.1 man/de/man1/wxcas.1 man/de/man1/alc.1 man/de/man1/alcc.1 man/es/man1/amulecmd.1 man/es/man1/amuleweb.1 man/es/man1/amule.1 man/es/man1/ed2k.1 man/es/man1/xas.1 man/es/man1/cas.1 man/es/man1/wxcas.1 man/es/man1/alc.1 man/es/man1/alcc.1 man/eu/man1/amulecmd.1 man/eu/man1/amuleweb.1 man/eu/man1/amule.1 man/eu/man1/ed2k.1 man/eu/man1/xas.1 man/eu/man1/cas.1 man/eu/man1/wxcas.1 man/eu/man1/alc.1 man/eu/man1/alcc.1 man/hu/man1/amulecmd.1 man/hu/man1/amuleweb.1 man/hu/man1/amule.1 man/hu/man1/ed2k.1 man/hu/man1/xas.1 man/hu/man1/cas.1 man/hu/man1/wxcas.1 man/hu/man1/alc.1 man/hu/man1/alcc.1 === Cleaning up after port test Oops, I suddenly realised my error - I forgot to add the man languages in Makefile.man. After fixing that, I have no extra files. Yay! -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
amule 2.2.3 port - ready for test
Hi,
I have made an upgrade for the net-p2p/amule2 port, to version 2.2.3.
At this point, 'port test' completes without errors, and without any
extra files.
I have tested the port on FreeBSD / amd64 (7.1-stable, 7.0-stable and
6.4-stable) - it compiles and runs.
Attached is a patch for the port itself (ie it patches the files in
net-p2p/amule2) which brings the port from 2.1.3_7 to 2.2.3.
Could some of you test it before I send-pr the port update, please?
Feedback is welcome.
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
=== Generating patch
=== Viewing diff with more
diff -ruN --exclude=CVS /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/Makefile /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/Makefile 2008-08-21 08:18:04.0 +0200
+++ /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/Makefile 2009-01-05 19:07:14.0 +0100
@@ -6,20 +6,19 @@
#
PORTNAME= aMule
-PORTVERSION= 2.1.3
-PORTREVISION= 7
+PORTVERSION= 2.2.3
CATEGORIES= net-p2p
MASTER_SITES= SF/amule
-PATCH_SITES= http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/
-PATCHFILES= aMule-wx.patch?rev=1.2
-PATCH_DIST_STRIP= -p1
-
MAINTAINER= bo...@tagnet.ru
COMMENT= The all-platform eMule p2p client
+BUILD_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/flex:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/flex \
+ ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libcryptopp.a:${PORTSDIR}/security/cryptopp
+LIB_DEPENDS= curl.4:${PORTSDIR}/ftp/curl
+
LATEST_LINK= aMule2
-CONFLICTS= aMule-1.* aMule-devel-[0-9]* ed2k-hash-*
+CONFLICTS= aMule-1.* aMule-devel-[0-9]* ed2k-hash-1.*
USE_BZIP2= yes
USE_GNOME= gnomehier gnomehack gnomeprefix
@@ -45,6 +44,11 @@
AMULEDAEMON Compile aMule daemon version - EXPERIMENTAL off \
WXUNICODE Enable Unicode support on
+DOCSDIR= ${PREFIX}/share/doc/aMule-${PORTVERSION}
+PORTDOCS= ABOUT-NLS Changelog EC_Protocol.txt \
+ ED2K-Links.HOWTO INSTALL README TODO \
+ amule-win32.HOWTO.txt amulesig.txt license.txt socks4.protocol
+
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
.if !defined(WITHOUT_NLS)
@@ -119,13 +123,13 @@
post-install:
# fr manpages are still incomplete and can't be managed
# by MANLANG. Will be done when pages are complete.
+ ${GZIP_CMD} ${PREFIX}/man/fr/man1/amule.1
.if defined(WITH_AMULECMD)
${GZIP_CMD} ${PREFIX}/man/fr/man1/amulecmd.1
.endif
.if defined(WITH_AMULEWEBSRV)
${GZIP_CMD} ${PREFIX}/man/fr/man1/amuleweb.1
.endif
- ${GZIP_CMD} ${PREFIX}/man/fr/man1/amule.1
.if defined(WITH_AMULEDAEMON)
${GZIP_CMD} ${PREFIX}/man/fr/man1/amuled.1
.endif
diff -ruN --exclude=CVS /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/Makefile.man /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/Makefile.man
--- /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/Makefile.man 2006-01-04 06:59:25.0 +0100
+++ /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/Makefile.man 2009-01-10 03:02:20.0 +0100
@@ -1,12 +1,24 @@
# TODO : Add fr here when pages are complete
-MANLANG= de es hu
-MANCOMPRESSED= no
+MANLANG= de es eu hu
+#MANCOMPRESSED= no
.if defined(WITH_CAS)
-MAN1+= cas.1
-MAN1+= wxcas.1
+MAN1_EN+= cas.1
+MAN1_EN+= wxcas.1
+MAN1_DE+= cas.1
+MAN1_DE+= wxcas.1
+MAN1_ES+= cas.1
+MAN1_ES+= wxcas.1
+MAN1_EU+= cas.1
+MAN1_EU+= wxcas.1
+MAN1_HU+= cas.1
+MAN1_HU+= wxcas.1
.endif
.if defined(WITH_ALC)
-MAN1+= alc.1
+MAN1_EN+= alc.1
+MAN1_DE+= alc.1
+MAN1_ES+= alc.1
+MAN1_EU+= alc.1
+MAN1_HU+= alc.1
MAN1+= alcc.1
.endif
.if defined(WITH_AMULEWEBSRV)
@@ -20,6 +32,11 @@
.endif
.if defined(WITH_AMULEDAEMON)
MAN1+= amuled.1
+MAN1_EN+= amulegui.1
.endif
MAN1+= amule.1
-MAN1+= xas.1
+MAN1_EN+= xas.1
+MAN1_DE+= xas.1
+MAN1_ES+= xas.1
+MAN1_EU+= xas.1
+MAN1_HU+= xas.1
Files /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/aMule-2.2.3.tbz and /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/aMule-2.2.3.tbz differ
diff -ruN --exclude=CVS /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/distinfo /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/distinfo
--- /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/distinfo 2007-01-12 18:18:48.0 +0100
+++ /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/distinfo 2008-12-29 20:43:48.0 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,3 @@
-MD5 (aMule-2.1.3.tar.bz2) = 0aafdd159edb8ad5f0064da87998b47d
-SHA256 (aMule-2.1.3.tar.bz2) = 6e97e947bb7ac231b75e3b21a509a2ec0239bcd7e9dbfc6062c520a6d13b0244
-SIZE (aMule-2.1.3.tar.bz2) = 3248530
-MD5 (aMule-wx.patch?rev=1.2) = 7b61651b0abdee7dc577a03dad8025c1
-SHA256 (aMule-wx.patch?rev=1.2) = c0c0a55fb437fdf618137f2cb0c5ff59a1595aeddf5455a1bad2b2ab11b0a244
-SIZE (aMule-wx.patch?rev=1.2) = 4943
+MD5 (aMule-2.2.3.tar.bz2) = 64a0d41edbdd7cf36fa892e45a652bfd
+SHA256 (aMule-2.2.3.tar.bz2) = 8886215ae8b3aef74875cd1ace551109324649d1d353db6b0c1ac785f48dc44a
+SIZE (aMule-2.2.3.tar.bz2) = 4666001
diff -ruN --exclude=CVS /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp
--- /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp 2006-01-04 06:59:25.0 +0100
+++ /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
src/amuleDlg.cpp.orig Sun Jan 1 06:17:25 2006
-+++ src/amuleDlg.cpp Tue Jan 3 19:12:04 2006
-@@ -413,9 +413,9 @@
- {
- wxString msg = wxT( );
- #ifdef CLIENT_GUI
-- msg _(aMule remote control ) wxT(VERSION);
-+ msg _(aMule remote
Removing stale dependencies (Was: Re: Concern about using pkg_delete -r)
Josh Rickmar wrote: I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the proper list. I want to use pkg_delete to remove an installed port, but also want to remove its orphaned dependencies along with it. After looking at the pkg_delete(1) man page, the -r flag seems to be the option to use for this job. My concern, though, is about the wording: In addition to specified packages, delete all packages that depend on those packages as well. Does this mean that if I pkg_delete -r pkgA, than pkgB (a dependency) will be removed with it, even though it is dependency of pkgC? Or is pkg_delete (or pkg_deinstall) smart enough to understand this dependency and keep pkgB installed? If in this scenario pkgB would be deleted, should an extra warning be added to the man page so that users know that using this flag could potentially break their other ports? ports-mgmt/portmaster has options to do what you want. The -s option will detect any port that was installed as a dependency of another port (or ports) but is no longer needed; and will give you an option to delete it. (It's an option because things can sometimes move from being a leaf port to being a dependency.) The -e option allows you to expunge a leaf port that you no longer want and then runs portmaster again with -s to detect any newly orphaned dependencies. Both options are compatible with the -[dD] options to delete or not delete the relevant distfiles and the -b option to create backup packages of the installed bits before deleting them. I suggest running -s first, then 'portmaster -l' to get a list of what you have installed. Anything listed as a root or leaf port can be fed to the -e option. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
HEADS DOWN:
GNOME 2.24 has been merged, and the ports tree is now available. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gn...@freebsd.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
