Re: gir-repository-atk-0.6.5_3 build error
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 06:10:10 pm Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:30:26 -0600, Janos Dohanics > > wrote: > > While building gnome2-2.28.2_1, I get this error: > > > > > Making all in gir > > gmake[2]: Entering directory > > `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5/gi > >r' /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner -v --namespace Atk --nsversion=1.0 \ > > --add-include-path=. --add-include-path=. \ > > --include=GObject-2.0 \ > > --library=atk-1.0 \ > > --libtool="/bin/sh ../libtool" \ > > --output Atk-1.0.gir \ > > --pkg gobject-2.0 \ > > --pkg atk \ > > -I`pkg-config --variable=includedir atk`/atk-1.0 \ > > `pkg-config --variable=includedir atk`/atk-1.0/atk/*.h > > /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner: not found > > gmake[2]: *** [Atk-1.0.gir] Error 127 > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5/gi > >r' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5' > > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gir-repository-gtk20. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/unique. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/audio/gnome-media. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2. > > > > However: > > > > # ls -al /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1385 Feb 12 15:50 /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner > > Looks like you did the Python upgrade? I did... portupgrade -o lang/python26 lang/python25 and cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages > 'grep python > /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner' and see what it returns. # grep python /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner #!/usr/local/bin/python2.5 I guess this is my problem... > > ...and gnomelogalyzer.sh was no help. > > > > How do I fix this problem? > > Have you follow the UPDATING for Python upgrade if it is this problem? In > general, when do the major upgrade of Python/Perl/etc. I usually rebuild > everything that depend on Python/Perl/etc. I'm portupgrading everything that depends on Python - thank you for your help... jd -- Janos Dohanics ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: mail/dbmail
Hi all, Is anybody able to update this port to the latest DBMail revision please? dbmail-2.2.15.tar.gz (13 Feb, 2010) http://www.dbmail.org/index.php?page=download It would be highly appreciated. Regards, Brad Rushworth Managing Director BitBot Software Pty Ltd Phone: 1300 BIT BOT Fax: 02 4017 0682 Email: b...@bitbot.com.au Web: www.bitbot.com.au 265 King St, Newcastle West, NSW 2302 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: gir-repository-atk-0.6.5_3 build error
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:30:26 -0600, Janos Dohanics wrote: While building gnome2-2.28.2_1, I get this error: Making all in gir gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5/gir' /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner -v --namespace Atk --nsversion=1.0 \ --add-include-path=. --add-include-path=. \ --include=GObject-2.0 \ --library=atk-1.0 \ --libtool="/bin/sh ../libtool" \ --output Atk-1.0.gir \ --pkg gobject-2.0 \ --pkg atk \ -I`pkg-config --variable=includedir atk`/atk-1.0 \ `pkg-config --variable=includedir atk`/atk-1.0/atk/*.h /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner: not found gmake[2]: *** [Atk-1.0.gir] Error 127 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5/gir' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gir-repository-gtk20. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/unique. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/audio/gnome-media. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2. However: # ls -al /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1385 Feb 12 15:50 /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner Looks like you did the Python upgrade? 'grep python /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner' and see what it returns. ...and gnomelogalyzer.sh was no help. How do I fix this problem? Have you follow the UPDATING for Python upgrade if it is this problem? In general, when do the major upgrade of Python/Perl/etc. I usually rebuild everything that depend on Python/Perl/etc. Cheers, Mezz -- me...@cox.net - m...@freebsd.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: gnome2-power-tools-2.28.2_1: no entry for /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portbrowser Committers on the hook: brooks delphij hrs lme pav Most recent CVS update was: U UPDATING U devel/clang/Makefile U devel/clang/pkg-plist U devel/clang/files/patch-tools_clang_lib_Headers_Makefile U devel/llvm-devel/Makefile U devel/llvm-devel/pkg-plist U games/egl/Makefile U games/naev/Makefile U japanese/ack/Makefile U japanese/ack/files/patch-kmain.c U net/openbgpd/Makefile U net/openbgpd/distinfo U net/openbgpd/pkg-descr U net/openbgpd/pkg-install U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_bgpctl.8 U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_bgpctl.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_irr_parser.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_irr_prefix.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_irrfilter.h U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_parser.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_parser.h U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpctl_whois.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_Makefile U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_bgpd.8 U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_bgpd.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_bgpd.conf.5 U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_bgpd.h U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_buffer.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_carp.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_config.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_control.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_imsg.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_imsg.h U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_kroute.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_log.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_mrt.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_mrt.h U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_parse.y U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_pfkey.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_pftable.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_printconf.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde.h U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde_attr.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde_decide.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde_filter.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde_prefix.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde_rib.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_rde_update.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_session.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_session.h U net/openbgpd/files/patch-bgpd_util.c U net/openbgpd/files/patch-openbsd-compat_openbsd-compat.h U ports-mgmt/Makefile U www/lighttpd/Makefile U www/lighttpd/distinfo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Combining multiple programs in single port
On Tue 16 Feb 2010 at 10:27:56 PST Doug Barton wrote: On 2/16/2010 7:33 AM, Jeroen Schot wrote: Hello all, I want to provide a port for a set of small utilities[1], all in the same scope and from the same upstream, to FreeBSD. Since all are very small (around 100 line of C), making seven separate ports seems a bit overkill. Given that these are distinctly different tools, and seem to have their own individual sources, different ports would be the way to go. In most cases where a port provides a suite of tools (e.g., my own sysutils/moreutils), you'll find that the upstream author has already bundled them together into a single distfile. Doing that on the port side seems like more trouble than it's worth. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
problem using xsane
I have an -CURRENT system connected by USB to a HP Scanjet 7400. When I use "scanimage" it works. When I use "xsane", if I hit the [Acquire preview] button, it does the scan, but thes pops a window saying: Error during read Error during device I/O and the scan vanished from the preview window. If I do a regular scan with all defaults except for the output file name I get the same error. Anyone know what's going on? Respectfully, Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Combining multiple programs in single port
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 2/16/2010 7:33 AM, Jeroen Schot wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I want to provide a port for a set of small utilities[1], all in the same >> scope and from the same upstream, to FreeBSD. Since all are very small >> (around 100 line of C), making seven separate ports seems a bit >> overkill. > > Given that these are distinctly different tools, and seem to have their > own individual sources, different ports would be the way to go. If these are package together upstream, does a meta-package/-port make sense? Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Combining multiple programs in single port
On 2/16/2010 7:33 AM, Jeroen Schot wrote: > Hello all, > > I want to provide a port for a set of small utilities[1], all in the same > scope and from the same upstream, to FreeBSD. Since all are very small > (around 100 line of C), making seven separate ports seems a bit > overkill. Given that these are distinctly different tools, and seem to have their own individual sources, different ports would be the way to go. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
unit test generator for shared C/C++ library API
Dear colleagues,
Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS
and the Linux Foundation have released a free unit test generator for
shared C/C++ library API. It helps to quickly generate simple ("sanity"
or "shallow"-quality) tests for all functions from the library API using
their signatures and data type definitions straight from the library
header files. The quality of generated tests allows to check absence of
critical errors in simple use cases and can be improved by involving of
highly reusable specialized types for the library.
This tool can execute generated tests and detect all kinds of emitted signals,
early program exits, program hanging and specified requirement failures.
It can be considered as a tool for low-cost sanity checking of library API
or as a powerful test development framework. Also it supports universal
Template2Code format of tests, random test generation mode and other useful
features. This tool is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU GPLv2.
We suppose this tool can be very useful for shared library developers
and recommend it for including to FreeBSD.
For more information, please see:
http://ispras.linux-foundation.org/index.php/API_Sanity_Autotest
Andrey Ponomarenko
Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze now in effect
> It would be nice to get the new version installed prior to the release > of FreeBSD-7.3, IMHO. a) it's not sufficiently tested. b) an upgrade to xorg is in the wings. That's certainly going to affect even more ports. Waiting for both of those to be finished would mean delaying 7.3 even longer. IMHO we're in good shape where we are to get a quick release out and then do some other upgrades to get ready for 8.1. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze now in effect
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:17:14 +0100 > Olivier Smedts articulated: > > > > I suspect this means we won't get KDE 4.4 for quite some time... > > > > http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2010/02/cft-kde-sc-4-4-0-for-freebsd/ > > > We the FreeBSD KDE Team are happy to let you know KDE SC 4.4.0 was > released few mins ago, and we’re ready for a public test. Before > you ask we don’t want to put KDE 4.4.0 in the ports tree before > FreeBSD 7.3 was released. > > > It would be nice to get the new version installed prior to the release > of FreeBSD-7.3, IMHO. Unless I am drastically wrong, installing the > new version will require a massive update of libraries, etc, similar to > the recent 'jpeg' update. It would make for a much cleaner update to > the new FreeBSD version if this procedure preceded the update rather > than postdated it. However, with the 'freeze' now in effect, there > obviously is not chance of that happening. > > Only if you install the earlier version of KDE via sysinstall. If you know KDE 4.4 is coming after the release of 7.3, then don't install the older version when you install 7.3. Or, install just the bare minimum kdelibs/kdebase. You have plenty of advanced warning, so it's not going to be a surprise. :) Personally, I always recommend to people that they don't use sysinstall to install anything except the base OS. Don't bother with the ports tree install, don't bother with installing packages off the CD. Just install the base OS, and boot into it. Then use all the standard tools (portsnap, pkg_version, pkg_add, portmaster/portupgrade, portaudit, etc) to install what you want. That way, you know exactly what's happening, and you get exactly what you want, when you want it. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Combining multiple programs in single port
Am Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:33:23PM +0100 schrieb Jeroen Schot: > I want to provide a port for a set of small utilities[1], all in the same > scope and from the same upstream, to FreeBSD. Since all are very small > (around 100 line of C), making seven separate ports seems a bit > overkill. > > What is standard procedure for this? > Are there any existing ports doing something similar? > > [1]: http://tools.suckless.org/ Please note that at least dmenu already has it's own port (x11/dmenu). Regards -- Tobias Rehbein PGP key: 4F2AE314 server: keys.gnupg.net fingerprint: ECDA F300 1B6E 9B87 8524 8663 E8B6 3138 4F2A E314 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Combining multiple programs in single port
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:02:40PM +0100, Tobias Rehbein wrote: > Am Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 04:33:23PM +0100 schrieb Jeroen Schot: > > I want to provide a port for a set of small utilities[1], all in the same > > scope and from the same upstream, to FreeBSD. Since all are very small > > (around 100 line of C), making seven separate ports seems a bit > > overkill. > > > > What is standard procedure for this? > > Are there any existing ports doing something similar? > > > > [1]: http://tools.suckless.org/ > > Please note that at least dmenu already has it's own port (x11/dmenu). You are correct. I should have mentioned I was looking at the subset lsw, slock, sselp, swarp and wmname. Regards, -- Jeroen Schot ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [kde-freebsd] HEADS UP: [CFT] KDE SC 4.4.0 for FreeBSD.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > /var/db/ports/soprano/options from my original build listed > WITH_REDLAND=true, WITH_VIRTUOSO=true, and WITHOUT_SESAME2=true. > Now, it lists just WITHOUT_SESAME2=true. > > However, on the rebuild, after updating the ports tree and KDE/PORTS from > area51, portmaster output the following: > ===>>> Creating a backup package for old version > soprano-2.4.0.1 > tar: lib/soprano/libsoprano_redlandbackend.so: Cannot stat: No such file or > directory > tar: share/soprano/plugins/redlandbackend.desktop: Cannot stat: No such > file or directory > tar: Error exit delayed from previous > errors. > pkg_create: make_dist: tar command failed with code > 256 > > Thus, it appears that even though those options were set in my initial > ports build, those files were not actually installed. Which would be why > things failed later on. > > I've rebuild soprano and redland. Strigi and kdelibs4 are in the process > of compiling. > > Once those complete, I'll try the install of kdegraphics4 and let you know > how things go. > > The rebuild after the area51 update has fixed the issue. The configure stage for kdegraphics4 found all the nepomuk libs, and installed successfully. Now to start playing with all this semantic desktop stuff. :) Thanks for all the hard work put into the KDE ports!! -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Combining multiple programs in single port
Hello all, I want to provide a port for a set of small utilities[1], all in the same scope and from the same upstream, to FreeBSD. Since all are very small (around 100 line of C), making seven separate ports seems a bit overkill. What is standard procedure for this? Are there any existing ports doing something similar? [1]: http://tools.suckless.org/ Regards, -- Jeroen Schot ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
gir-repository-atk-0.6.5_3 build error
Forgot to mention: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE amd64, freshly updated ports tree... -- Janos Dohanics ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
gir-repository-atk-0.6.5_3 build error
While building gnome2-2.28.2_1, I get this error: ===> Installing for gnome2-2.28.2_1 ===> gnome2-2.28.2_1 depends on file: /usr/local/libexec/gweather-applet-2 - found ===> gnome2-2.28.2_1 depends on executable: gnome-audio-profiles-properties - not found ===>Verifying install for gnome-audio-profiles-properties in /usr/ports/audio/gnome-media ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on executable: xml2po - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on package: gstreamer-plugins-gconf>=0.10.0 - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on package: gstreamer-plugins-good>=0.10.0 - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/intltool-extract - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on shared library: canberra-gtk.0 - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on shared library: pulse.0 - found ===> gnome-media-2.28.5_1 depends on shared library: unique-1.0.2 - not found ===>Verifying install for unique-1.0.2 in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/unique ===> unique-1.1.2_1 depends on file: /usr/local/share/gir-1.0/Gtk-2.0.gir - not found ===>Verifying install for /usr/local/share/gir-1.0/Gtk-2.0.gir in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gir-repository-gtk20 ===> gir-repository-gtk20-0.6.5_3 depends on executable: g-ir-scanner - found ===> gir-repository-gtk20-0.6.5_3 depends on file: /usr/local/share/gir-1.0/Atk-1.0.gir - not found ===>Verifying install for /usr/local/share/gir-1.0/Atk-1.0.gir in /usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk ===> Building for gir-repository-atk-0.6.5_3 gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5' Making all in gir gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5/gir' /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner -v --namespace Atk --nsversion=1.0 \ --add-include-path=. --add-include-path=. \ --include=GObject-2.0 \ --library=atk-1.0 \ --libtool="/bin/sh ../libtool" \ --output Atk-1.0.gir \ --pkg gobject-2.0 \ --pkg atk \ -I`pkg-config --variable=includedir atk`/atk-1.0 \ `pkg-config --variable=includedir atk`/atk-1.0/atk/*.h /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner: not found gmake[2]: *** [Atk-1.0.gir] Error 127 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5/gir' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk/work/gir-repository-0.6.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/accessibility/gir-repository-atk. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gir-repository-gtk20. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/unique. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/audio/gnome-media. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2. However: # ls -al /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1385 Feb 12 15:50 /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner ...and gnomelogalyzer.sh was no help. How do I fix this problem? -- Janos Dohanics ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: p5-Cairo: Error: '_OUTLIST double' not in typemap in Cairo.xs
on 15/02/2010 17:32 Дмитрий Сиваченко said the following: > Hello! > > > Sorry for that, I updated p5-ExtUtils-ParseXS and p5-Cairo and p5-Pango build > just fine now. Thanks! -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze now in effect
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:17:14 +0100 Olivier Smedts articulated: > > I suspect this means we won't get KDE 4.4 for quite some time... > > http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2010/02/cft-kde-sc-4-4-0-for-freebsd/ We the FreeBSD KDE Team are happy to let you know KDE SC 4.4.0 was released few mins ago, and we’re ready for a public test. Before you ask we don’t want to put KDE 4.4.0 in the ports tree before FreeBSD 7.3 was released. It would be nice to get the new version installed prior to the release of FreeBSD-7.3, IMHO. Unless I am drastically wrong, installing the new version will require a massive update of libraries, etc, similar to the recent 'jpeg' update. It would make for a much cleaner update to the new FreeBSD version if this procedure preceded the update rather than postdated it. However, with the 'freeze' now in effect, there obviously is not chance of that happening. -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com |=== |=== |=== |=== | Money is the root of all evil, and man needs roots. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
