Re: FreeBSD Port: pound-2.4.5
Hi, Updated yesterday. Please do test. Anders. On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:52:47PM +0100, Albert Gabàs | Astabis wrote: Dear Anders/pound maintainer, When you plan to upgrade the port to the 2.5 release?? Thank you, Regards -- Albert Gabàs - Astabis Information Risk Management -- Anders. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fltk-1.1.10 Committers on the hook: anders dinoex gahr gerald glarkin glewis kevlo lx oliver wen Most recent CVS update was: U astro/Makefile U astro/gmapcatcher/Makefile U astro/gmapcatcher/distinfo U astro/gmapcatcher/pkg-descr U astro/gmapcatcher/pkg-plist U lang/gcc44/Makefile U lang/gcc44/distinfo U net/dgd-lpmud/Makefile U net/dgd-lpmud/distinfo U net/dgd-lpmud/files/patch-2.4.5-dgd-sys-driver.c U net/dgd-lpmud/files/patch-lpmud.dgd ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64
On 03/23/10 17:31, Sean McAfee wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2. Regards, O. Hartmann You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a binary backup. If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just run pkg_add on the resulting tbz and you're back in business. I do this whenever I upgrade OO, Firefox, Thunderbird, or anything other program I can't wait around for while I freshly compile. Just for the record: deleting OO 3.1.1 via pkg_delete and trying to install new OO 3.2 fails at the same point as before. Oliver ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Firefox 3.6.X and Thunderbird 3.0.X crashing with Radeon graphics on FBSD 8.0-STABLE SMP/sm64 box
Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform. The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04 CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, QuadCore Intel Q6600 on a P35-based motherboard. Thunderbird 3 crashes rarely compared to Firefox 3. The longer the application thunderbird runs, the higher the likelyhood the app crashes and vanishes. Sometimes this happens immediately after starting thunderbird, sometimes it takes its few minutes or half an hour. Firefox 3 is sensitive to its pull-down menus or requester showing up in some situations. I can provoke a crash by clicking onto a pull-down-menu in firefox 3, it immediately dumps a core. Well, I wouldn't write s cross-posting if I would be sure this behaviour is due to some oddities in my installation, but since this odd behaviour occured both on Firefox 3.6 and Thunderbird 3 in several situations and with several tries to get a workaround, I feel desperately lost. What I did so far: - Recompiling EVERY port on my box (four times in a row to make sure everything is right, its a pain with nearly 950 ports). - Deinstalling both Firefox 3 and Thunderbird 3 and installing the binary packages from FreeBSD.ORG I have a private UP box, running the same OS FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 on a single core Athlon 3500+ with only 2GB of RAM. There I use both Thunderbird 3.0.3 and Firefox 3.6.2 without any problem. I suspect the X11 server or some part of the accelerator stuff triggering the crashes. On the both machines, WITHOUT_NOUVEAU = YES is defined. On the UP box at home, I utilise a HD4830 graphics accelerator with DR enabled. The lab's box have had both HD4670 and now HD4770 accelerators, both do not work properly with the state-of-the-art drivers supported by the official pots collection. HD4670 never got to work since the new RadeonHD driver 1.3 was introduced (prior to that it worked), the new HD4770 works with explicitely disabling DRI and crashes whenever I leave a session (quit windowmaker). Well, this is another story, but I suspect the Radeon driver infrastructure causing the problems - but I'm not sure. I use perl-threaded 5.10, but I guess this is not a problem since the problems occur whether I have threaded perl or not. As I said, I feel like a dead man in the water ... Regards, Oliver ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox 3.6.X and Thunderbird 3.0.X crashing with Radeon graphics on FBSD 8.0-STABLE SMP/sm64 box
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 + O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform. The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04 CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, QuadCore Intel Q6600 on a P35-based motherboard. Thunderbird 3 crashes rarely compared to Firefox 3. The longer the application thunderbird runs, the higher the likelyhood the app crashes and vanishes. Sometimes this happens immediately after starting thunderbird, sometimes it takes its few minutes or half an hour. Firefox 3 is sensitive to its pull-down menus or requester showing up in some situations. I can provoke a crash by clicking onto a pull-down-menu in firefox 3, it immediately dumps a core. If you suspect the graphics card's driver is at fault then I would try linux-opera or even linux-firefox and see whether it also dies when you use a drop-down menu. Another possibility would be to set hw.physmem to say 3G or 4G in loader.conf and see whether that affects thunderbird/firefox. Who knows, there may some weird problem caused by all that memory? That would a fairly quick and cheap way to test this. -- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: tomcat-6.0.24
Hi! Please, fix small FreeBSD port error. In the tomcat-6.0.24 rc.d script missed line: procname=java after: name=tomcat60 rcvar=`set_rcvar` pidfile=/var/run/tomcat60.pid This make impossible to correct run /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat6 status. I mean status is not work - it is not visible tomcat60.pid file for rc.d script. I use: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 i386 tomcat-6.0.24 Best regards, Yan Zlobin y...@zlobin.name http://yan.zlobin.name/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ISC DHCP 4?
On 2010-03-23 13:37:48 (+0100), Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: When I was looking for ISC DHCP server version 4 or newer, I was surprised that I didn't find any port. Am I looking for the wrong thing, or is 3.1 really the newest version in ports? What are people using for IPv6? I'm using ISC DHCPv4 for IPv6, but I've not got around to actually turning it into a port in much the same style as the v3 ports currently in the tree (with sepparate ports for the client and the server and such). It would not surprise me if there are many other people in similar situations. There's also something to be said for picking up DHCPv4 for the base system, but that's a different discussion. :-) - Philip -- Philip PaepsPlease don't Cc me, I am phi...@freebsd.org subscribed to the list. Pills to be taken in twos always come out of the bottle in threes. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Enlightenment build failure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/03/18 06:01, Piotrek wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:38:05 + RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:47:58 +0100 Piotrek pioku...@gmail.com wrote: When i try to install /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment i end up with following message: Even when it builds, it's an E17 development snapshot from over 2 years ago. I found it too buggy and incomplete to be any practical use. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org So my question to maintainer now, is it going to be updated to newest svn version soon or do people have to wait until it will hit stable ?? Cc'ing to maintainer... Cheers, - -- Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttp://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLqm/qAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBR5EH/1mw/Tmdn19vptZvLFaw0/ym 7ukqwqtORQ0u31x3RjlotIb7ouDvZdkY6NS/Wk+8e13MzWYsrDTozdMB/Z6nwX3w xKDnp+DPqmWPrIcv/pru/+DT7sYKfMpsiS3xKmm620860B/2dV2fvJUHB8+D4zhi 0oOP0HrpUKlKpeaHahU5LjDnQqLd/ldEXDUDwesAGe0GrJKQb7tXMOP+yyGrm8pD 5TjjqRyyoz1bX+rg3eqxJtGYpn66kX9c/v6AqY0BbQ1uZku72gQtbSnxtbAfOCi4 GZQB25g1QMpbpnYakajTtbx9IlYO8ZclzWkzQhbp9QZqNu69sYuND0wBlQgj2YQ= =WtjR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
python and HUGE_STACK_SIZE
A coworker of mine got bit by this bug on and off for the last few weeks and it appears he might not be the only one as documented in this blog: http://tomster.org/blog/archive/2006/09/27/size-does-matter If python needs to be compiled with HUGE_STACK_SIZE on FreeBSD, is there a reason to provide the option to not compile python with it, or at the very least, should it default to being on? I'm not a python guy, so I am just asking in case what is in the blog post is true. -- Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer -- Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: python and HUGE_STACK_SIZE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [freebsd-python@ cc'ed] On 2010/03/24 15:20, Steven Kreuzer wrote: A coworker of mine got bit by this bug on and off for the last few weeks and it appears he might not be the only one as documented in this blog: http://tomster.org/blog/archive/2006/09/27/size-does-matter If python needs to be compiled with HUGE_STACK_SIZE on FreeBSD, is there a reason to provide the option to not compile python with it, or at the very least, should it default to being on? Ah, yes this is the thing I turn on on all systems I have myself... I'd vote for enabling it by default. Cheers, - -- Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttp://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLqpwyAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBrwwIAJfEAeJ9QXTvgOeMRyAdekcU teYGqTVP1W3qE7adxvM/2MMQm4ogyJtAJBu9UQVAwiYtckNd1mpaIuQdfDvuc1fD vD5OT+8Sy+TXqxLi2A29HZkOCvOoYuZ03WwyF5YMpMU6uPHGa0fnx+gNtXGuOxSN V45ZWxlEwNNKv+WYZzehF5jJvIPLXadrPYP/y53loIXqxA5htV+ZPpiGeidwTDun u+o5AjLrcRKRM+hrf10X6gfCgJZpQyqeL88fDqhUX6uL1QIQJHg1nBHQ+6DbZrR9 R2cCadkhCF2X3nC3stTDi/KvuAZ4rZZo02lUf8MdxK7PX8T9cd4A7brHCltxoOU= =UaWe -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox 3.6.X and Thunderbird 3.0.X crashing with Radeon graphics on FBSD 8.0-STABLE SMP/sm64 box
On 03/24/10 15:06, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 + O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform. The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04 CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, QuadCore Intel Q6600 on a P35-based motherboard. Thunderbird 3 crashes rarely compared to Firefox 3. The longer the application thunderbird runs, the higher the likelyhood the app crashes and vanishes. Sometimes this happens immediately after starting thunderbird, sometimes it takes its few minutes or half an hour. Firefox 3 is sensitive to its pull-down menus or requester showing up in some situations. I can provoke a crash by clicking onto a pull-down-menu in firefox 3, it immediately dumps a core. If you suspect the graphics card's driver is at fault then I would try linux-opera or even linux-firefox and see whether it also dies when you use a drop-down menu. Another possibility would be to set hw.physmem to say 3G or 4G in loader.conf and see whether that affects thunderbird/firefox. Who knows, there may some weird problem caused by all that memory? That would a fairly quick and cheap way to test this. -- Gary Jennejohn You're right, I'll test this as soon as I'm back in my lab. Oliver Hartmann ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: python and HUGE_STACK_SIZE
Hi-- On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Xin LI wrote: If python needs to be compiled with HUGE_STACK_SIZE on FreeBSD, is there a reason to provide the option to not compile python with it, or at the very least, should it default to being on? Ah, yes this is the thing I turn on on all systems I have myself... I'd vote for enabling it by default. I've run and written quite a bit of Python (including Trac, Mailman, the Python IDE, our own custom stuff [like some log munging and web processing stuff], and even a few graphical Python games) without ever turning HUGE_STACK_SIZE on. I don't have any objection to turning it on, but it's not needed by default for most things. YMMV. Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Unknown Facts
Hai, I would like to invite you to neat blog covering various unknown facts into our life. Please do remove some time and visit http://dhristionline.com http://dhristionline.com Regards Neha ** Unsubscribe Policy This mail was sent to po...@freebsd.org Dated 25/03/2010 If you have received this newsletter accidentally and you are not the intended receipient then kindly Unsubscribe mailto:unsubscr...@dhristionline.com?subject=please unsubscribe me immediately immediately. If this link does not work reply with the subject REMOVE. REPORT SPAM mailto:reporteds...@dhristionline.com?subject=spam Reported or forward a copy to reporteds...@dhristionline.com mailto:reporteds...@dhristionline.com The following physical address associated with mailling list:- Neha +91-9420818377 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: python and HUGE_STACK_SIZE
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: I've run and written quite a bit of Python (including Trac, Mailman, the Python IDE, our own custom stuff [like some log munging and web processing stuff], and even a few graphical Python games) without ever turning HUGE_STACK_SIZE on. I don't have any objection to turning it on, but it's not needed by default for most things. YMMV. Yes, I've had the same experience. When doing socket level python stuff, I've had to increase the buffer size, which seems to be at least indirectly related to stack size but setting it manually has been easy enough. Are there any negative repercussions to turning on huge ie like would scripts start using more memory, or is just giving them the ability to use it without explicitly setting it? -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
