update of security/pssh
Hello, According to : http://www.theether.org/pssh/ parallel-ssh (pssh) is now maintained on http://code.google.com/p/parallel-ssh/ by Andrew McNabb. Current version is 2.1.1. Would you have time to look into a maintainer-update ? Cheers, Olivier -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
confused build_depends
# cd /usr/ports/net/wireshark # make -VBUILD_DEPENDS /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8:/usr/ports/cad/linux-eagle5 ... Well, eagle5 does not install the file libcrypto.so.8, thus it doesn't exist and the ports system will try to install linux-eagle5 when building wireshark. Of course linux-eagle5 is already installed, thus it will fail. If I remove linux-eagle5 the dependency works: # make -VBUILD_DEPENDS /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7:/usr/ports/security/openssl ... But why does the ports system think linux-eagle installs this library? # pkg_info -Lx eagle|grep crypto /compat/linux/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 The file is a symlink and has a distinctively different version number. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: www/firefox mail/thunderbird fail to build
Hello, I suppose the system on which the port is being compiled on is low in swap space. Try to disable compiler optimizations (make config). Here's a similar (same ?) problem http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2010-February/000682.html With a workaround, probably no longer valid/adequate http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2010-February/000692.html d Hi Dan thanks for the link and your suggestion. `make config` and de-selecting the Additional Optimizations flag has enabled me to build Firefox; just done the same for Thunderbird so I think that will be alright too although it is still building now. Best wishes, Jamie for the archives: www/firefox == firefox-3.6.12 FreeBSD 8.1 i386 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: www/firefox mail/thunderbird fail to build
On 12/02/2010 14:37, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: Hello, I suppose the system on which the port is being compiled on is low in swap space. Try to disable compiler optimizations (make config). Here's a similar (same ?) problem http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2010-February/000682.html With a workaround, probably no longer valid/adequate http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2010-February/000692.html d Hi Dan thanks for the link and your suggestion. `make config` and de-selecting the Additional Optimizations flag has enabled me to build Firefox; just done the same for Thunderbird so I think that will be alright too although it is still building now. Best wishes, Jamie You're welcome :-) d ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: updated dialog(1) replacement for ports
Thank you for your comments
Every keystroke causes the screen to completely repaint.
This can't be fully helped. Any valid key stroke is going to cause
this. However I did make invalid keystrokes skip the repainting.
If I accidentally leave off --port name, it core dumps.
Heh - I didn't test usage mistakes very well because its intended to
be handled by the ports system, not the end user. Attached patch does
fix it though:
diff --git a/.hgtags b/.hgtags
--- a/.hgtags
+++ b/.hgtags
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ 87f7ea83a8b57330e68a3c955204b7ae18f72225
3c192430abada995516ba1f949482b419affab98 version13
c12889c6ed8bdcb0085a4c5f40dc6b9fa749f29a version14
49685446bbb2cb7f9f437ff857d1cf4e87dc05e7 version15
+71c308f419475f9ccbbacd9ffd08b60dc88ca646 version16
diff --git a/dialog4ports.c b/dialog4ports.c
--- a/dialog4ports.c
+++ b/dialog4ports.c
@@ -395,6 +395,9 @@ parseArguments(const int argc, char * ar
}
#endif
+ if (arginfo-portname == NULL)
+ errx(EX_USAGE,Port name is required);
+
if (arginfo-nElements == 0)
errx(EX_USAGE,We need at least one option);
@@ -442,14 +445,15 @@ printFileToWindow(WINDOW * const win, co
*/
void
usage(void) {
- fprintf(stderr,%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n,
+ fprintf(stderr,%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n,
--port portname,
[--port-comment 'port comment'],
[--licence name of default licence],
[--licence-text filename of licence],
--option optionName=description [--hfile filename],
--radio optionName=description=option1#option2 [--hfile
filename],
- --input optionName=description [--hfile filename]
+ --input optionName=description [--hfile filename],
+ please note that this program is intended to be used by the
ports
system - not the end user
);
}
@@ -879,6 +883,8 @@ main(int argc, char* argv[])
case 27: /* ESCAPE */
weWantMore = false;
break;
+ default:
+ continue;
}
/*
this rereads the file each time. perhaps it could be
cached?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: updated dialog(1) replacement for ports
Quoth Eitan Adler on Thursday, 02 December 2010: Thank you for your comments Every keystroke causes the screen to completely repaint. This can't be fully helped. Any valid key stroke is going to cause this. However I did make invalid keystrokes skip the repainting. Ugh -- I haven't looked at the code yet, but even back in the curses days (pre-ncurses) this problem had already been solved. If I accidentally leave off --port name, it core dumps. Heh - I didn't test usage mistakes very well because its intended to be handled by the ports system, not the end user. Attached patch does fix it though: Heh -- sorry, I always begin my tests in stupid user mode. Thanks for the patch! -- Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com| http://chipsquips.com pgphvoPUFdpwg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: confused build_depends
On 2010-12-02 14:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote: # cd /usr/ports/net/wireshark # make -VBUILD_DEPENDS /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8:/usr/ports/cad/linux-eagle5 ... Well, eagle5 does not install the file libcrypto.so.8, thus it doesn't exist and the ports system will try to install linux-eagle5 when building wireshark. Of course linux-eagle5 is already installed, thus it will fail. If I remove linux-eagle5 the dependency works: # make -VBUILD_DEPENDS /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7:/usr/ports/security/openssl ... But why does the ports system think linux-eagle installs this library? # pkg_info -Lx eagle|grep crypto /compat/linux/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 The file is a symlink and has a distinctively different version number. Are you sure you are in the wireshark port? I cannot find a reference to linux-eagle5, even in older versions. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/wireshark/Makefile?annotate=1.161 # cd /usr/ports/net/wireshark # grep FreeBSD: Makefile $FreeBSD: ports/net/wireshark/Makefile,v 1.161 2010/11/28 08:57:05 marcus Exp $ # make -V BUILD_DEPENDS | tr -s ' ' '\n' | sort /usr/local/bin/intltool-extract:/usr/ports/textproc/intltool /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1:/usr/ports/lang/perl5.10 /usr/local/bin/python2.6:/usr/ports/lang/python26 /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc:/usr/ports/x11/libX11 gmake:/usr/ports/devel/gmake pkg-config:/usr/ports/devel/pkg-config # make -V RUN_DEPENDS | tr -s ' ' '\n' | sort /usr/local/lib/gio/modules/libgiofam.so:/usr/ports/devel/gio-fam-backend /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc:/usr/ports/x11/libX11 pkg-config:/usr/ports/devel/pkg-config Maybe the following bring in some light. # make showconfig # make -d A -VBUILD_DEPENDS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Looking for a JOB?
Dear Reader! Greetings of the Day!!! Are you a Fresher? Looking for a JOB? Good News is Right Here!!! Openings in Airtel and Reliance Company as a DSL Engineer with attractive packages. JUST 4 YOU. Call Now. Priya Netroute-X Infotech (P) Ltd. Your JOB search ends here. 9971466888, 42421114 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.
Hello, people! What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org and that in this case needs to be done with the port ftp/proftpd itself? Thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.
В Thu, 2 Dec 2010 23:22:06 +0200 Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net пишет: Hello, people! What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org and that in this case needs to be done with the port ftp/proftpd itself? Thanks! Check vulnerability of your server, you can by using the following command sequence: $ telnet 1.2.3.4 21 Trying 1.2.3.4... Connected to 1.2.3.4 Escape character is '^]'. 220 ProFTPD 1.3.3c Server (ProFTPD Default Installation) [1.2.3.4] HELP ACIDBITCHEZ id ; uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root),65534(nogroup) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org and that in this case needs to be done with the port ftp/proftpd itself? Presumably/hopefully, the proftpd tarball which contained the backdoor would fail to match the distinfo for the port: SHA256 (proftpd-1.3.3c.tar.bz2) = ea7f02e21f81e6ce79ebde8bbbd334bd269a039ac9137196a35309f791b24db1 SIZE (proftpd-1.3.3c.tar.bz2) = 4166609 Checking, the tarball you now fetch is the one which matches their md5 and GnuPG signing from the link above... Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: math/py-numpy size mismatch
On Thursday 02 December 2010 08:38:12 David Southwell ARPS wrote: On Wednesday 01 December 2010 12:34:38 David Southwell ARPS wrote: On 01.12.2010 18:16 (UTC+1), David Southwell ARPS wrote: File size mismatch error dns1# make clean === Cleaning for py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 dns1# make === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE === Found saved configuration for py26-numpy-1.4.1,1 === Extracting for py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 = SHA256 Checksum OK for numpy-1.5.1.tar.gz. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for numpy-ref.pdf. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for numpy-user.pdf. = SHA256 Checksum OK for amd64/fenv.c?p=203441. = SHA256 Checksum OK for amd64/fenv.h?p=203441. === Refetch for 1 more times files: numpy-ref.pdf numpy-user.pdf === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE === Found saved configuration for py26-numpy-1.4.1,1 = numpy-ref.pdf doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.5.x/. fetch: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.5.x/numpy-ref.pdf: Requested Range Not Satisfiable = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/numpy-ref.pdf: size mismatch: expected 5865550, actual 7112007 rm /usr/ports/distfiles/numpy-ref.pdf rm /usr/ports/distfiles/numpy-user.pdf Then retry. Hope this helps, Rainer Hurling Thanks v. much So far (compilation) so good BUT after deinstalling previous version reinstall failed with: dns1# make reinstall === Installing for py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 === py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 depends on executable: nosetests - found === py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found === py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 depends on executable: gcc45 - found === py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 depends on shared library: lapack.4 - found === py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 depends on shared library: blas.2 - found rm: /usr/ports/math/py- numpy/work/numpy-1.5.1/numpy/core/include/numpy/fenv/fenv.c.bak: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numpy. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numpy. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/py-numpy. Photographic Artist Permanent Installations Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography Official Portraiture Combined darkroom digital creations ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I ahd the same problem as you and after rm /usr/ports/distfiles/numpy-ref.pdf rm /usr/ports/distfiles/numpy-user.pdf I use portmaster for update and it works without problem. Mitja http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa What version of freebsd are you using? I am on 7.2 p3 running rm for numy-ref.pdf numpy-user.pdf enabled compilation but not install failed. It has nothing to do with whether one uses portmaster or portupgrade. David I am on 8.1. Mitja http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
A few questions about bsd.port.mk
I noticed a line in bsd.port.mk Kludge for pre-3.0 systems # Kludge for pre-3.0 ystems MACHINE_ARCH?= i386 According to cvs blame asami@ added both lines in revision 1.306 in 1999 Furthermore in bsd.port.mk it says ports should test against ARCH and not MACHINE_ARCH but bsd.port.subdir.mk uses MACHINE_ARCH on line 209. bsd.gnustep.mk has a similar test for MACHINE_ARCH instead of ARCH on line 136 (r1.1 by dinoex) 1) Should the initial line be removed 2) Should bsd.port.subdir.mk be changed to use ARCH instead? 3) Should bsd.gnustep.mk be changed to use ARCH instead? Overall I've been finding lots of inconsistent old hacks in bsd.*.mk and its difficult to tell which ones are still needed and which ones are not :-( -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 14:00, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: Presumably/hopefully, the proftpd tarball which contained the backdoor would fail to match the distinfo for the port: SHA256 (proftpd-1.3.3c.tar.bz2) = ea7f02e21f81e6ce79ebde8bbbd334bd269a039ac9137196a35309f791b24db1 SIZE (proftpd-1.3.3c.tar.bz2) = 4166609 Checking, the tarball you now fetch is the one which matches their md5 and GnuPG signing from the link above... For several hours on Wednesday the distinfo was updated to the compromised version (it has been reverted), so anyone who updated this port recently should check their system. -- Rob Farmer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: update of security/pssh
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: Hello, According to : http://www.theether.org/pssh/ parallel-ssh (pssh) is now maintained on http://code.google.com/p/parallel-ssh/ by Andrew McNabb. Current version is 2.1.1. Would you have time to look into a maintainer-update ? Thanks for the pointer. Added to my todo list. -- Brooks pgpA2PjbzOXUf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Rob Farmer wrote: Checking, the tarball you now fetch is the one which matches their md5 and GnuPG signing from the link above... For several hours on Wednesday the distinfo was updated to the compromised version (it has been reverted), so anyone who updated this port recently should check their system. I see-- that's useful information to be aware of. Hopefully port maintainers practice a bit more wariness about distfiles changing unexpectedly; while it's common enough that people re-roll tarballs for whatever reason, it seems like there have been more incidents of reference sites getting owned... Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.
On Dec 02, 2010, at 17:56 , Chuck Swiger wrote: On Dec 2, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Rob Farmer wrote: For several hours on Wednesday the distinfo was updated to the compromised version (it has been reverted), so anyone who updated this port recently should check their system. I see-- that's useful information to be aware of. Hopefully port maintainers practice a bit more wariness about distfiles changing unexpectedly; while it's common enough that people re-roll tarballs for whatever reason, it seems like there have been more incidents of reference sites getting owned... If ya'll are _absolutely_ certain that the current distfile is correct and not compromised then I would _strongly_ recommend that you bump PORTREVISION to make it absolutely obvious that folks see this. -aDe ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
