Steps to prune and add Ada ports?
Before opening an Problem Reports, I thought I'd run what I'd like to do by the FreeBSD ports mailing list. The following five ports need to be deleted: lang/gnat-doc-html lang/gnat-doc-info lang/gnat-doc-ps lang/gnat-doc-texi lang/gnat-doc-tex Reason: These provide documentation for GNAT 3.15p, which was deleted from the ports tree more than 5 years ago. Should I submit a PR to get this done? There is no maintainer listed for them. Secondly, I've been working for months to bring GNAT, the GNAT Programming Studio (GPS), the Ada Web Server (AWS), and other packages to all four major BSDs. The website tracking the progress of this work is http://www.dragonlace.net I've already developed seven FreeBSD ports for the following: GNAT-AUX (based on GCC 4.6) GPS 5.0 AWS 2.10w GPRBuild-AUX GnatPython GTKAda 2.22 XML/Ada 4.1w The last six ports on the list don't currently exist in the tree. GNAT AUX is a significantly patched version of GNAT that passes all tests (~3200) on both AMD64 and i386. It should replace the gnat-gcc44 port which doesn't produce a usable AMD64 GNAT (The port maintainer agreed on IRC #Ada). Additionally, gnat-gcc42 should be pruned because it doesn't build on FreeBSD 8. The other FSF GNAT port is gnat-gcc43. It builds on FreeBSD 7 and 8, but only for the i386 platform. I don't know how well it passes the regression testsuite. There could be a debate if there's value in having gnat-gcc43 in the tree once GNAT-AUX is available. Some of the proposed ports require GPRBuild to build, and the version of GPRBuild I'm providing requires GNAT AUX. It will not build on GNAT GPL or any gnat-gcc both due to changes in the compiler and hardcoded executable names. This would also be a reason to prune the older GNAT ports as they would not be able to build many (or any?) of the Ada software in the ports tree anyway. What's the best approach to add these 7 Ada ports (again, already developed) and start removing the useless ones? I'm willing to maintain the all the ports that I submit. Regards, John ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Steps to prune and add Ada ports?
Better to send PRs to add or remove these ports. I am intersting to take. wen 2011/1/4 John Marino freebs...@marino.st: Before opening an Problem Reports, I thought I'd run what I'd like to do by the FreeBSD ports mailing list. The following five ports need to be deleted: lang/gnat-doc-html lang/gnat-doc-info lang/gnat-doc-ps lang/gnat-doc-texi lang/gnat-doc-tex Reason: These provide documentation for GNAT 3.15p, which was deleted from the ports tree more than 5 years ago. Should I submit a PR to get this done? There is no maintainer listed for them. Secondly, I've been working for months to bring GNAT, the GNAT Programming Studio (GPS), the Ada Web Server (AWS), and other packages to all four major BSDs. The website tracking the progress of this work is http://www.dragonlace.net I've already developed seven FreeBSD ports for the following: GNAT-AUX (based on GCC 4.6) GPS 5.0 AWS 2.10w GPRBuild-AUX GnatPython GTKAda 2.22 XML/Ada 4.1w The last six ports on the list don't currently exist in the tree. GNAT AUX is a significantly patched version of GNAT that passes all tests (~3200) on both AMD64 and i386. It should replace the gnat-gcc44 port which doesn't produce a usable AMD64 GNAT (The port maintainer agreed on IRC #Ada). Additionally, gnat-gcc42 should be pruned because it doesn't build on FreeBSD 8. The other FSF GNAT port is gnat-gcc43. It builds on FreeBSD 7 and 8, but only for the i386 platform. I don't know how well it passes the regression testsuite. There could be a debate if there's value in having gnat-gcc43 in the tree once GNAT-AUX is available. Some of the proposed ports require GPRBuild to build, and the version of GPRBuild I'm providing requires GNAT AUX. It will not build on GNAT GPL or any gnat-gcc both due to changes in the compiler and hardcoded executable names. This would also be a reason to prune the older GNAT ports as they would not be able to build many (or any?) of the Ada software in the ports tree anyway. What's the best approach to add these 7 Ada ports (again, already developed) and start removing the useless ones? I'm willing to maintain the all the ports that I submit. Regards, John ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- 真理从来没有战胜过谬误，真理只有在坚持谬误的人死去后才成为真理。 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
missing libjawt.so pkg_libchk report for eclipse ooo
What installs libjawt? eclipse-3.6.1_1: /usr/local/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/149/1/.cp/libswt- awt-gtk-3655.so misses libjawt.so openoffice.org-3.2.1: /usr/local/openoffice.org-3.2.1/openoffice.org/basis3.2/program/libofficebean.so misses libjawt.so David Photographic Artist Permanent Installations Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography Official Portraiture Combined darkroom digital creations Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: missing libjawt.so pkg_libchk report for eclipse ooo
Hello! 04.01.2011, 23:01, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net: What installs libjawt? eclipse-3.6.1_1: /usr/local/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/149/1/.cp/libswt- awt-gtk-3655.so misses libjawt.so openoffice.org-3.2.1: /usr/local/openoffice.org-3.2.1/openoffice.org/basis3.2/program/libofficebean.so misses libjawt.so Check your JDK installation (jdk16, opernjdk6 or other) -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: missing libjawt.so pkg_libchk report for eclipse ooo
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net writes: Hi, What installs libjawt? Any jre installed ? e...@srvbsdfenssv:~ locate libjawt.so /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so Regards Éric Masson -- Il veut que frjv disparaisse afin que les contacts entre pirates et public soit réduits. Cela afin d'assurer son pain quotidien. lepen va etre content d'apprendre que des ges partageant ses idees -+- Gleny in: http://www.le-gnu.net - Le Godwin pour les nuls -+- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Thanks in advance David Photographic Artist Permanent Installations Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography Official Portraiture Combined darkroom digital creations Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hi! pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? Yes. When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? The only file where libiodbc and unixODBC conflict is in /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. Some other suggestion: File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. -- Regards, jhell,v JJH48-ARIN ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net: On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Steps to prune and add Ada ports?
Thanks Wen, I submitted PR 153676 to delete the old gnat doc ports. Regarding the seven new ports, should I write one PR to cover all seven, or seven individual PRs? Some are dependencies of others, so it kind of makes sense to submit them together. John wen heping wrote: Better to send PRs to add or remove these ports. I am intersting to take. wen 2011/1/4 John Marino freebs...@marino.st: Before opening an Problem Reports, I thought I'd run what I'd like to do by the FreeBSD ports mailing list. The following five ports need to be deleted: lang/gnat-doc-html lang/gnat-doc-info lang/gnat-doc-ps lang/gnat-doc-texi lang/gnat-doc-tex Reason: These provide documentation for GNAT 3.15p, which was deleted from the ports tree more than 5 years ago. Should I submit a PR to get this done? There is no maintainer listed for them. Secondly, I've been working for months to bring GNAT, the GNAT Programming Studio (GPS), the Ada Web Server (AWS), and other packages to all four major BSDs. The website tracking the progress of this work is http://www.dragonlace.net I've already developed seven FreeBSD ports for the following: GNAT-AUX (based on GCC 4.6) GPS 5.0 AWS 2.10w GPRBuild-AUX GnatPython GTKAda 2.22 XML/Ada 4.1w The last six ports on the list don't currently exist in the tree. GNAT AUX is a significantly patched version of GNAT that passes all tests (~3200) on both AMD64 and i386. It should replace the gnat-gcc44 port which doesn't produce a usable AMD64 GNAT (The port maintainer agreed on IRC #Ada). Additionally, gnat-gcc42 should be pruned because it doesn't build on FreeBSD 8. The other FSF GNAT port is gnat-gcc43. It builds on FreeBSD 7 and 8, but only for the i386 platform. I don't know how well it passes the regression testsuite. There could be a debate if there's value in having gnat-gcc43 in the tree once GNAT-AUX is available. Some of the proposed ports require GPRBuild to build, and the version of GPRBuild I'm providing requires GNAT AUX. It will not build on GNAT GPL or any gnat-gcc both due to changes in the compiler and hardcoded executable names. This would also be a reason to prune the older GNAT ports as they would not be able to build many (or any?) of the Ada software in the ports tree anyway. What's the best approach to add these 7 Ada ports (again, already developed) and start removing the useless ones? I'm willing to maintain the all the ports that I submit. Regards, John ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: desktopbsd-tools
On 1/4/11, jmdennis @dslextreme.com jmden...@dslextreme.com wrote: Thanks for pointing out my duh moment. I did not think about having to edit any thing but it makes sense since you had mentioned that it should be DS_ATTACHED. I guess who ever build the PBI for PC-BSD needs to do this as well. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.comwrote: On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 16:48:35 -0800 jmdennis @dslextreme.com jmden...@dslextreme.com wrote: Ok below is the error I am getting. After trying to install this I am unable to launch Konqueror because I believe that it screws up the settings. It installs KDE 3.5.10 which makes sense since this is what desktopbsd was running the last version that it had. I am installing the ports and use those directions. In file included from moddevinfo.cpp:30: moddevinfo.ui.h: In member function 'int modDevInfo::insertDevice(devinfo_dev*, void*)': moddevinfo.ui.h:38: error: 'DIS_ATTACHED' was not declared in this scope *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/desktopbsd-tools/work/desktopbsd-tools/libdesktopbsd-ui. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/desktopbsd-tools/work/desktopbsd-tools. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/desktopbsd-tools. Edit moddevinfo.ui.h and change DIS_ATTACHED to DS_ATTACHED. Then compile it. -- Gary Jennejohn I was told the problem is with the port of wondering if the port is going to be fixed. When I did a search on this problem I found the same error but at the time it was with this port and FreeBSD 7. I guess the port was fixed but now with FreeBSD 9 it is broken again. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net: On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. OK guys now I AM confused!! Question is what will work? Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu suggests: A: ___ /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. __ B Some other suggestion: File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option? David Photographic Artist Permanent Installations Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography Official Portraiture Combined darkroom digital creations Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.2-PRERELEASE and Flash
[ Suggest not to cc: freebsd-stable@ from this point on; freebsd-ports@ is added ] ,--- You/ben (Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:16:26 +) * | I've followed the steps at | http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/desktop-browsers.html without any | errors, except that neither Firefox nor any other browser will play | flash movies. about:plugins doesn't show a flash plugin. | I've spent a while googling and all I can find is variations on the | instructions from the handbook. I don't know where to start looking for | the problem. I play Flash in Firefox, (native) Opera and Chrome -- perfectly now. For Firefox, the instructions in the Handbook worked for me. | I'd be really grateful to whoever could point me in the right direction. Search freebsd-ports@ for opera, flash and my name -- I was a part of a conversation about it, some three months ago. Running Opera with -debugplugin helps. -- Alex -- alex-goncha...@comcast.net -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hi! Dima Panov write: jh...@dataix.net wrote: Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? So a drive to replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
divHello!/divdivnbsp;/divdivdiablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment./divdivplease, don't rely on it in real environment./divdivnbsp;/divdivcorrect solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system libraries/divdivof course, after build native jdk, diablo package should be dropped./divdivnbsp;/divdiv05.01.2011, 02:24, David Southwell lt;da...@vizion2000.netgt;:/divblockquotep style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; Hello!/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal lt;a href=mailto:jh...@dataix.net%3e;jh...@dataix.netgt;/a;:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt; On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;Hi/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ nbsp;(includes unixODBC)/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s):/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;libiodbc-3.52.7/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;virtuoso-6.1.2_1/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;I need virtuoso on this system./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;How do I preceed?/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt; Replace libiodbc with unixODBC/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt; They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; libiodbc and required by virtuoso./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;OK guys now I AM confused!!/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Question is what will work?/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Kurt Jaeger lt;a href=mailto:li...@opsec.eu%3e;li...@opsec.eugt;/a; suggests:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;A:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;___/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;/usr/local/include/sql.h/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;differently./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;What I would suggest:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make deinstall/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make install/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make install/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make install/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make deinstall/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make reinstall/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent:
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! 05.01.2011, 02:27, Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu: Hi! Dima Panov write: jh...@dataix.net wrote: Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? Sorry, I'm not an odbc profi to provide a correct answer, please search in virtuoso mailinglists, reasons was published AFAIR before switching to libiodbc. So a drive to replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ? yes. anyway, unixODBC was staled some time ago, and now no reasons to continue support it qt4/kde4 was switched to libiodbc some months ago. -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Can people please stick to plain text. This is really quite unreadable Thanks Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment. please, don't rely on it in real environment. correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system libraries of course, after build native jdk, diablo package should be dropped. 05.01.2011, 02:24, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal href=mailto:jh...@dataix.net%3e;jh...@dataix.net;: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; virtuoso-6.1.2_1 style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; I need virtuoso on this system. style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; How do I preceed? style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; Replace libiodbc with unixODBC style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. OK guys now I AM confused!! style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Question is what will work? style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Kurt Jaeger href=mailto:li...@opsec.eu%3e;li...@opsec.eu; suggests: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; A: ___ /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. __ B style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Some other suggestion: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option? -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 Photographic Artist Permanent Installations Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography Official Portraiture Combined darkroom digital creations Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Quoth David Southwell on Tuesday, 04 January 2011: Can people please stick to plain text. This is really quite unreadable Thanks Agreed. At least mark HTML content as type text/html instead of text/plain. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com| http://chipsquips.com pgp1DCgSL0qA7.pgp Description: PGP signature
security/rkhunter 1.3.8 - false warning?
Hi, rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why does it do that? From /var/log/rkhunter.log: [03:01:30] /etc/passwd [ Warning ] [03:01:30] Warning: The file '/etc/passwd' exists on the system, but it is not present in the rkhunter.dat file. Previous versions never complained about that file. HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment. please, don't rely on it in real environment. correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system libraries of course, after build native jdk, diablo package should be dropped. 05.01.2011, 02:24, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net;: Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net;: On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. OK guys now I AM confused!! Question is what will work? Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu; suggests: A: ___ /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. __ B Some other suggestion: File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option? -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/pecl-intl: what's up?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/27/2010 02:55 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote: I'm trying to upgrade roundcube, and pecl-intl isn't building. Removing the IGNORE shows a number of linker errors. I found PR#153438 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153438 suggesting that the patches are no longer needed. Removing them makes the build complete successfully. The resulting roundcube seems to be running fine, as well as other PHP apps I have on the same box (mediawiki). Stefan Ok so it seems that these patches are conditional on the version of PHP that is installed. If you are trying to install with PHP 5.2 then you don't need the patch files if you are using PHP 5.3 then you do need them. I will create a patch to address this. Build logs for builds without the patches present: http://tinderbox.tomjudge.com/tb/errors/8.1-PECL-5.3-amd64/pecl-intl-1.1.2_2.log http://tinderbox.tomjudge.com/tb/logs/8.1-PECL-5.2-amd64/pecl-intl-1.1.2_2.log TJ - -- TJU13-ARIN -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNI137AAoJEMSwVS7lr0Od9loIAKKLzt8mvrlPLgARKXVFEjtH 9pZ9jMRWXD0HWMgdaiFBbZdVri3r5GlkgIw1qclbE+y0VE2TMmZWn0AA0rk0v6Ja KsRi64CZ9o/YBVdtQf9Wsb5RnI76cxA5M8XRhH68lrTvXdLMbvBnoBrvWCjz77A+ 1JHhcroimdTVD0ABdA8u2soaPH3gXWVy0kkMPYRthpipodqxHsHpOFCA23ipw35G 7AfEVaOIoKZzczTgqFGLrKbmNSIrFf2kf85gtNHk6c+cQv38ktsV9E+5jLsYinTi zV76/HhLY0TPuVro2JB2B05M7qSnpF0o6//qDNqFWrP35kT5RMMqFic/cR50AQM= =w1wT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: security/rkhunter 1.3.8 - false warning?
On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why does it do that? It's buggy? RKHunter is better known for generating vast numbers of obscure false positives than it is for actually providing a security benefit. Something like tripwire or a functioning backup system which can provide a comparison of changes against current filesystem state is much more likely to be useful. Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Upgrading mysql50-{server,client,scripts} to 5.0.91
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on FreeBSD? Tom - -- TJU13-ARIN -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNI2koAAoJEMSwVS7lr0OdtKcIAITSu/eIYxg2HJ24pZl7lDpv MCqbC1JMvYrGJ48plo5n9226TyL8Z5GBH/Xsx/fQixiox2o+IvBI9UocdMorUbMv NuALGd94//69c748wibNJ76smVIBzB2a8DFa74FhYqDBSW6CLSVJaZFG7ApkaLZ7 Z++PUvJUev39a/FncvOkAQAPHzrAOOq3vcwk7AeJHYC0/WTWS0bW9Pm2ELKmBxEP sjRFI3CeIZB+yfdINTjuPdqFw9KSHPVVg77eq6HjZ3bCLrJffktMyPC3+mpfTVJ6 8CFctRtRWkIao1eNZElZLmViCFanmpOxK1Fa3Rld2C6NJ7dTLPW1tYt5xoS9G2o= =SbzR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.2-PRERELEASE and Flash
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:14:12AM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote: I play Flash in Firefox, (native) Opera and Chrome -- perfectly now. For Firefox, the instructions in the Handbook worked for me. I followed the handbook process only yesterday and i'm not experiencing any problems with Firefox and flash either. It slows the browser up a bit but then it's always done that for me. jamie ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading mysql50-{server,client,scripts} to 5.0.91
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Tom Judge wrote: Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on FreeBSD? There shouldn't be. I think ports is still at mysql-server-5.0.90_2, which works fine, but I would expect that 5.0.91 would also be fine Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading mysql50-{server,client,scripts} to 5.0.91
On 01/04/2011 01:03 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Tom Judge wrote: Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on FreeBSD? There shouldn't be. I think ports is still at mysql-server-5.0.90_2, which works fine, but I would expect that 5.0.91 would also be fine Thanks, seems to be ok, filed a PR for the update: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153690 Tom -- TJU13-ARIN ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Xfce 4.8pre3
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 22:49:32 +0100, Olivier Duchateau wrote: Hi, I don't know, if anyone follows development of Xfce 4.8, the next stable version comes out soon, scheduled on January 16th, 2011. There are still « things », that do not work well or are broken, in particular Thunar (thunar-volman is broken due to lack of udisks and gudev), and trash applet panel. I know that also miwi has done some work for xfce 4.8. He gave me his working directory for 4.8pre2 about 2 weeks ago. Probably that helps but don't ask me about the status or details of it. http://home.bluelife.at/patches/xfce48.tgz Wouldn't it be a good to talk to oliver@ first before duplicating all the work? How about creating a repository for Xfce ports like the ones that already exist for GNOME, KDE, Xorg, VirtualBox, Gecko, ... ? -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: security/rkhunter 1.3.8 - false warning?
Hi, On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why does it do that? It's buggy? RKHunter is better known for generating vast numbers of obscure false positives than it is for actually providing a security benefit. Something like tripwire or a functioning backup system which can provide a comparison of changes against current filesystem state is much more likely to be useful. Well, rkhunter hasn't generated any false warnings for me in a few years now. YMMV, and you are of course entitled to your own opinion. If anyone has anything useful in answer to the question I asked, feel free to provide it. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Steps to prune and add Ada ports?
2011/1/4 John Marino freebs...@marino.st: Thanks Wen, I submitted PR 153676 to delete the old gnat doc ports. Regarding the seven new ports, should I write one PR to cover all seven, or seven individual PRs? Some are dependencies of others, so it kind of makes Both OK. wen sense to submit them together. John wen heping wrote: Better to send PRs to add or remove these ports. I am intersting to take. wen 2011/1/4 John Marino freebs...@marino.st: Before opening an Problem Reports, I thought I'd run what I'd like to do by the FreeBSD ports mailing list. The following five ports need to be deleted: lang/gnat-doc-html lang/gnat-doc-info lang/gnat-doc-ps lang/gnat-doc-texi lang/gnat-doc-tex Reason: These provide documentation for GNAT 3.15p, which was deleted from the ports tree more than 5 years ago. Should I submit a PR to get this done? There is no maintainer listed for them. Secondly, I've been working for months to bring GNAT, the GNAT Programming Studio (GPS), the Ada Web Server (AWS), and other packages to all four major BSDs. The website tracking the progress of this work is http://www.dragonlace.net I've already developed seven FreeBSD ports for the following: GNAT-AUX (based on GCC 4.6) GPS 5.0 AWS 2.10w GPRBuild-AUX GnatPython GTKAda 2.22 XML/Ada 4.1w The last six ports on the list don't currently exist in the tree. GNAT AUX is a significantly patched version of GNAT that passes all tests (~3200) on both AMD64 and i386. It should replace the gnat-gcc44 port which doesn't produce a usable AMD64 GNAT (The port maintainer agreed on IRC #Ada). Additionally, gnat-gcc42 should be pruned because it doesn't build on FreeBSD 8. The other FSF GNAT port is gnat-gcc43. It builds on FreeBSD 7 and 8, but only for the i386 platform. I don't know how well it passes the regression testsuite. There could be a debate if there's value in having gnat-gcc43 in the tree once GNAT-AUX is available. Some of the proposed ports require GPRBuild to build, and the version of GPRBuild I'm providing requires GNAT AUX. It will not build on GNAT GPL or any gnat-gcc both due to changes in the compiler and hardcoded executable names. This would also be a reason to prune the older GNAT ports as they would not be able to build many (or any?) of the Ada software in the ports tree anyway. What's the best approach to add these 7 Ada ports (again, already developed) and start removing the useless ones? I'm willing to maintain the all the ports that I submit. Regards, John ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.2-PRERELEASE and Flash
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:14:12AM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote: I play Flash in Firefox, (native) Opera and Chrome -- perfectly now. For Firefox, the instructions in the Handbook worked for me. I followed the handbook process only yesterday and i'm not experiencing any problems with Firefox and flash either. It slows the browser up a bit but then it's always done that for me. Allow me to suggest flashblock.mozdev.org. Works fine as an add-on, but here's also a port in www/xpi-flashblock. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.2-PRERELEASE and Flash
Allow me to suggest flashblock.mozdev.org. Works fine as an add-on, but here's also a port in www/xpi-flashblock. I'll give it a go, thanks :-) jamie ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
