jpeg build problem

[Radek Krejča]

Hi, I have problem with build of jpeg from ports - latest ports, csup 10 
minutes ago.

=> Attempting to fetch from http://www.ijg.org/files/.
jpegsrc.v8b.tar.gz

===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===>  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===>  Extracting for jpeg-8_3
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for jpeg8b/jpegsrc.v8b.tar.gz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for jpeg8b/jpegexiforient.c.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for jpeg8b/exifautotran.txt.
cp: /usr/ports/distfiles//jpegexiforient.c: No such file or directory
*** Error code 1


Radek

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Eclipse-3.6.1_1 amd64 error missing libjawt.so

[David Southwell]

> Hello!
> 
> 06.01.2011, 04:37, "David Southwell" :
> > Any ideas what may be happening here:
> > 
> > /usr/local/sbin/pkg_libchk
> > reports:
> > eclipse-3.6.1_1:
> > /usr/local/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/149/1/.cp/l
> > ibswt- awt-gtk-3655.so misses libjawt.so
> > however:
> > dns1# whereis libjawt.so
> > libjawt.so: /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16/work/diablo-
> > jre1.6.0_07/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> 
> Chillout, pal.
> At first, pkg_licbchk isn't a "tool for 100% headshot", and you need to be
> a very accuerati with gathered results.
> 
> At second, eclipse starts via special shell script, which sets correct
> paths for libraries. And it's a usual practice for big java-depended
> applications.
I like Cava !
OK that explains why I get the same pkg_libchk result for openoffice :-)
Thanks
David

Cava for U


Chilled !

   ; @   :   @
::
 : :
  :   :
   ::
: :
  : :
:  :
  
   ::
   ::
   ::
   ::
   ::
   ::
  ;;;



Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: copyright status of bsdnss.c

[Arthur de Jong]

On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:48 -0800, Jacques Vidrine wrote:
> The file was originally published under the BSD license that covers
> the entire ports collection ( made explicit later by
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/COPYRIGHT?rev=1.1 ).

Thanks for the clarification. Having only one license in the files makes
life somewhat easier for me (e.g. for Debian you need a copyright
analysis and less exceptions is easier).

> But, I don’t really care … you have my permission to re-license it
> under any license you choose as long as other contributors agree.  I
> appreciate you checking.

Thanks. Since everyone involved has now responded, I will include the
file.

Thank you all for your quick response! (and best wishes for 2011)

-- 
-- arthur - art...@arthurdejong.org - http://arthurdejong.org --


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Eclipse-3.6.1_1 amd64 error missing libjawt.so

[Dima Panov]

Hello!

06.01.2011, 04:37, "David Southwell" :
> Any ideas what may be happening here:
>
> /usr/local/sbin/pkg_libchk
> reports:
> eclipse-3.6.1_1:
> /usr/local/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/149/1/.cp/libswt-
> awt-gtk-3655.so misses libjawt.so
> however:
> dns1# whereis libjawt.so
> libjawt.so: /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16/work/diablo-
> jre1.6.0_07/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
>
> Thanks in advance

Chillout, pal. 
At first, pkg_licbchk isn't a "tool for 100% headshot", and you need to be a 
very accuerati with gathered results.

At second, eclipse starts via special shell script, which sets correct paths 
for libraries. 
And it's a usual practice for big java-depended applications.

-- 
Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org)
k...@freebsd team

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Eclipse-3.6.1_1 amd64 error missing libjawt.so

[David Southwell]

Any ideas what may be happening here:

/usr/local/sbin/pkg_libchk
reports:
eclipse-3.6.1_1: 
/usr/local/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/149/1/.cp/libswt-
awt-gtk-3655.so misses libjawt.so
however:
dns1# whereis libjawt.so
libjawt.so: /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16/work/diablo-
jre1.6.0_07/lib/amd64/libjawt.so

Thanks in advance

David



Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: GPLv3 and LICENSE

[Charlie Kester]

On Wed 05 Jan 2011 at 07:55:38 PST Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:

Hello;

I was just looking around FreeBSD's Wiki and I found a page
where ports with GPLv3 license are listed:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndGPLv3

While this list is necessarily incomplete, I would think
the right place to write the license would be in the
ports tree using the new LICENSE= tag.

I only looked a few but it seems like most of the ports
in that list don't set the value!

I suggest that committers enforce a policy of tagging GPLv3 code when
the port is updated.


I don't disagree, but we're still waiting for clear instructions on how
to use the LICENSE tag and related infrastructure.  There's nothing in
the Porter's Handbook yet.

There should probably be something in the main handbook too, so users
will know how to go about accepting or rejecting the various licenses.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

New version of OpenSC not compatible with current OpenSSH port

[Kevin Oberman]

Good day,

I just learned that OpenSC 0.12.0, recently committed to ports is not
compatible with openssh-portable 5.2. It requires at least 5.3. As a
result, upgrading opensc is a serious problem for those of us depending
on SmartCards for SSH keys.

Could you mitigate this by:

Adding a note to UPDATING that upgrading opensc will break integration
with OpenSSH

Restoring the openssh-portable port to its state before the OPENSC and
OPENSCPINPATCH configuration options (along with the scardpin.patch file) were
removed? 

Also, does anyone know if work is going on to port 5.3p1 or more recent?
The current released version is 5.6p1.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: ober...@es.net  Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

GPLv3 and LICENSE

[Pedro F. Giffuni]

Hello;

I was just looking around FreeBSD's Wiki and I found a page
where ports with GPLv3 license are listed:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndGPLv3

While this list is necessarily incomplete, I would think
the right place to write the license would be in the
ports tree using the new LICENSE= tag.

I only looked a few but it seems like most of the ports
in that list don't set the value!

I suggest that committers enforce a policy of tagging
GPLv3 code when the port is updated.

cheers,

Pedro.


  
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

java/netbeans segfaults

[David Demelier]

Hello,

I just wanted to try netbeans here on FreeBSD :

#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00080225dd34, pid=38650, tid=34805431360
#
# JRE version: 6.0-b20
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (17.0-b16 mixed mode bsd-amd64 )
# Problematic frame:
#
[error occurred during error reporting (printing problematic frame), id 0xb]

# An error report file with more information is saved as:
# /home/markand/hs_err_pid38650.log
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
#   http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
#
Abort trap

The file hs_err_pid38650.log is long so I uploaded it right here :

http://files.malikania.fr/hs_err_pid38650.log

Is it possible that openjdk could be the problem?

Cheers,

--
David Demelier
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

[Douglas Thrift]

Hello,

Since ISC dhcpd 4.1 now supports DHCPv6, but a single instance of the
daemon can't do both IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6, it would be nice if the rc.d
script from the port could be configured to start the daemon twice. Has
anyone thought about this at all or implemented anything?

Thanks!
-- 
Douglas William Thrift


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: security/rkhunter 1.3.8 - false warning?

[Vaida Bogdan]

Hi, I'm no longer the maintainer of this port, please remove me from there.

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why
> does it do that?
> From /var/log/rkhunter.log:
> [03:01:30]   /etc/passwd [ Warning ]
> [03:01:30] Warning: The file '/etc/passwd' exists on the system, but
> it is not present in the rkhunter.dat file.
>
> Previous versions never complained about that file.
> HTH
> --
> Regards,
> Torfinn Ingolfsen
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"