Re: FreeBSD Port: libreoffice-3.3.0_4
2011/2/10 Ян Злобин yan_zlo...@agniyoga.ru Hi! Please say, is there the simple way to build libreoffice without libwpg and libwps? They wants qt. -- Best Regards, Yan Zlobin E-mail: yan_zlo...@agniyoga.ru WWW: http://yan.zlobin.name/ Jabber: yan_zlo...@agniyoga.ru Currently not but if you don't want Qt simply add NOPORTDOCS knobs while building libwps and libwpg --- regards, Bapt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: libreoffice-3.3.0_4
Hi! Please say, is there the simple way to build libreoffice without libwpg and libwps? They wants qt. Best Regards, Yan Zlobin E-mail: yan_zlo...@agniyoga.ru WWW: http://yan.zlobin.name/ Jabber: yan_zlo...@agniyoga.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Snort troubles
Hello. # cd /usr/ports/security/snort # make extract /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 63: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --cflags returned non-zero status /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 64: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --libs returned non-zero status /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 63: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --cflags returned non-zero status /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 64: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --libs returned non-zero status ... Maybe this is because: # perl -v This is perl, v5.8.9 built for i386-freebsd-64int Is this a bug in the port? Does snort require a newer perl? Should I switch to 5.10? 5.12? bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Cannot open MS Word file with libreoffice-3.3.0_3
2011/2/9 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com: On Wednesday February 9 2011 06:29:16 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: That should be fixed in 3.3.0_4 regards, Bapt I am recompiling it now but I have one question: I got a message (from the first 3.3.0): aclocal.m4.16: Warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.63. You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranted to. Yes, I have version 2.68. Thanks in advance. Mitja http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org It's normal, do not care about this :) (if this is the only remaining problem it's nice :)) regards, Bapt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: xfce 4.8pre3 preview
Hi, here you'll find the latest xfce 4.8.1 ports: http://people.freebsd.org/~oliver/xfce/xfce-4.8.1_ports.tar.gz I aditionally fixed some plugins. The remaining BROKEN ports are: deskutils/xfce4-volstatus-icon sysutils/thunar-volman-plugin sysutils/xfce4-places-plugin multimedia/xfce4-media x11/xfce4-wmdock-plugin This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Hi oliver@ tarball haven't Mk changes? Best Regards Ilya A. Arhipov ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: xfce 4.8pre3 preview
Hi Ilya, Ilya A. Archipov mi...@heavennet.ru wrote: Hi oliver@ tarball haven't Mk changes? you are right. I fixed the tarball. Thanks for letting me know! This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Snort troubles
Yep. Its a chicken or egg thing. See earlier post in ports for a minor makefile change. Or install libnet11 first. If you want patches ill send them to you in an hour but installing libnet11 is a quick workaround Important. Afterinstalling libnet11. Do a make clean in snort dir. -- Michael Scheidell CTO SECNAP Network Security 561-948-2259tel:5619482259 -Original message- From: Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, wfree...@gmail.com wfree...@gmail.com Sent: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 09:40:46 GMT+00:00 Subject: Snort troubles Hello. # cd /usr/ports/security/snort # make extract /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 63: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --cflags returned non-zero status /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 64: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --libs returned non-zero status /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 63: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --cflags returned non-zero status /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found Makefile, line 64: warning: /usr/local/bin/libnet11-config --libs returned non-zero status ... Maybe this is because: # perl -v This is perl, v5.8.9 built for i386-freebsd-64int Is this a bug in the port? Does snort require a newer perl? Should I switch to 5.10? 5.12? bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Onesided conflict: editors/openoffice.org-3 with devel/cppunit (= editors/libreoffice)
I just tried to reinstall editors/openoffice.org-3 after recently installing editors/libreoffice that pulled in devel/cppunit -- I could not, since editors/openoffice.org-3 conflicts with devel/cppunit. Why is there a one-sided conflict? If editors/openoffice.org-3 and devel/cppunit really install files to the same location, both should conflict each other. Which files are installed by both ports? Looking in /var/db/pkg/cppunit-1.12.1/+CONTENTS and /var/db/pkg/openoffice.org-3.3.0/+CONTENTS on a machine that I still have both installed on, I cannot find any common files. Both ports are installed with default options. I only find the commit message from 2010-Apr-1 of OOo adding the conflict, but it does not say which files and since pkg-plist is generated, I cannot find out if the conflict was resolved in the meantime. It would make testing of editors/libreoffice difficult if you could not have it installed with editors/openoffice.org-3 at the same time. Cheers, Jan Henrik ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.
I've updated port. The only thing left - setting dependency on py-gobject by USE_GNOME variable. But if i run pkg_info -f on installed port, i see: Dependency: py26-gobject-2.26.0 dependency origin: devel/py-gobject So, maybe this dependency is implicit and i should not care? Updated port can be obtained here: http://intara.org.ru/tortoisehg1.shar or from attachment. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Snort troubles
On 2/10/11 4:28 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
# cd /usr/ports/security/snort
# make extract
/usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found
Is this a bug in the port?
yep, my fault.
Does snort require a newer perl?
no.
has been tried on perl 5.8.9, 7.3 i386, 7.2 amd64, perl 5.10 amd64 on
7.3, 8.1, etc.
(even works on 6.4 i386), BUT WON'T COMPILE pcap on 5.5
Should I switch to 5.10? 5.12?
no
try this patch: DO A MAKE CLEAN first, then apply patch, then try
again.
diff -bBru /tmp/Makefile Makefile
--- /tmp/MakefileTue Feb 8 22:50:03 2011
+++ MakefileWed Feb 9 10:41:46 2011
@@ -60,8 +61,13 @@
USE_AUTOTOOLS=libtool
USE_LDCONFIG=yes
LIBNET_CONFIG?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/libnet11-config
+.if exists($(LIBNET_CONFIG}))
LIBNET_CFLAGS!=${LIBNET_CONFIG} --cflags
LIBNET_LIBS!=${LIBNET_CONFIG} --libs
+.else
+LIBNET_CFLAGS=-I${LOCALBASE}/include/libnet11
+LIBNET_LIBS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib/libnet11 -lnet
+.endif
LIBNET_INCDIR=${LIBNET_CFLAGS:M-I*:S/-I//}
LIBNET_LIBDIR=${LIBNET_LIBS:M-L*:S/-L//}
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
__
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Onesided conflict: editors/openoffice.org-3 with devel/cppunit (= editors/libreoffice)
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:30:07 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester m...@janh.de wrote: I just tried to reinstall editors/openoffice.org-3 after recently installing editors/libreoffice that pulled in devel/cppunit -- I could not, since editors/openoffice.org-3 conflicts with devel/cppunit. I had the same problem every time I updated openoffice (without libreoffice). Why is there a one-sided conflict? If editors/openoffice.org-3 and devel/cppunit really install files to the same location, both should conflict each other. Which files are installed by both ports? Looking in /var/db/pkg/cppunit-1.12.1/+CONTENTS and /var/db/pkg/openoffice.org-3.3.0/+CONTENTS on a machine that I still have both installed on, I cannot find any common files. Both ports are installed with default options. I only find the commit message from 2010-Apr-1 of OOo adding the conflict, but it does not say which files and since pkg-plist is generated, I cannot find out if the conflict was resolved in the meantime. It would make testing of editors/libreoffice difficult if you could not have it installed with editors/openoffice.org-3 at the same time. Cheers, Jan Henrik -- wbr, tiger ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Snort troubles
Snort 2.9.0.4 is getting released today, I believe, and I'll push an updated
port either tomorrow or Monday which will also have the fix for the libnet
issue in it as well.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Michael Scheidell
michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote:
On 2/10/11 4:28 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
# cd /usr/ports/security/snort
# make extract
/usr/local/bin/libnet11-config: not found
Is this a bug in the port?
yep, my fault.
Does snort require a newer perl?
no.
has been tried on perl 5.8.9, 7.3 i386, 7.2 amd64, perl 5.10 amd64 on 7.3,
8.1, etc.
(even works on 6.4 i386), BUT WON'T COMPILE pcap on 5.5
Should I switch to 5.10? 5.12?
no
try this patch: DO A MAKE CLEAN first, then apply patch, then try
again.
diff -bBru /tmp/Makefile Makefile
--- /tmp/MakefileTue Feb 8 22:50:03 2011
+++ MakefileWed Feb 9 10:41:46 2011
@@ -60,8 +61,13 @@
USE_AUTOTOOLS=libtool
USE_LDCONFIG=yes
LIBNET_CONFIG?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/libnet11-config
+.if exists($(LIBNET_CONFIG}))
LIBNET_CFLAGS!=${LIBNET_CONFIG} --cflags
LIBNET_LIBS!=${LIBNET_CONFIG} --libs
+.else
+LIBNET_CFLAGS=-I${LOCALBASE}/include/libnet11
+LIBNET_LIBS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib/libnet11 -lnet
+.endif
LIBNET_INCDIR=${LIBNET_CFLAGS:M-I*:S/-I//}
LIBNET_LIBDIR=${LIBNET_LIBS:M-L*:S/-L//}
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
__
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For
Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Dean Freeman
Research Analyst, Sourcefire VRT
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:36:40PM +0300, arrowdodger wrote:
I've updated port. The only thing left - setting dependency on py-gobject by
USE_GNOME variable.
But if i run pkg_info -f on installed port, i see:
Dependency: py26-gobject-2.26.0
dependency origin: devel/py-gobject
So, maybe this dependency is implicit and i should not care?
Obviously USE_GNOME does not support devel/py-gobject now. All you can
do is to use BUILD_DEPENDS/RUN_DEPENDS.
Your pkg_info result indicates that you've installed gobject, but it
means nothing to users of this port. The ports infrastructure generates
dependency list according to the Makefile. If py-gobject is required,
add it to the corresponding *_DEPENDS explicitly. Otherwise gobject will
not be installed.
Updated port can be obtained here:
http://intara.org.ru/tortoisehg1.shar
or from attachment.
Some comments:
- PORTNAME can be different with the path. PORTNAME=tortoisehg is OK.
- We usually use USE_PYTHON=yes
- It would be better to keep patches in *-patch: targets.
Move ${REINPLACE_CMD} actions to post-patch:.
- If this port does not need to run configure or so. Use
do-configure:
@${DO_NADA}
Regards,
--
Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh sunpoet at sunpoet.net sunpoet at FreeBSD.org
4096R/CC57E36B 8AD8 68F2 7D2B 0A10 7E9B 8CC0 DC44 247E CC57 E36B
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~sunpoet/pgpkeys.txt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: vuze-4.3.1.4_2
Hi! Please, update vuze. Deniss ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh sunp...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:36:40PM +0300, arrowdodger wrote:
I've updated port. The only thing left - setting dependency on py-gobject
by
USE_GNOME variable.
But if i run pkg_info -f on installed port, i see:
Dependency: py26-gobject-2.26.0
dependency origin: devel/py-gobject
So, maybe this dependency is implicit and i should not care?
Obviously USE_GNOME does not support devel/py-gobject now. All you can
do is to use BUILD_DEPENDS/RUN_DEPENDS.
Your pkg_info result indicates that you've installed gobject, but it
means nothing to users of this port. The ports infrastructure generates
dependency list according to the Makefile. If py-gobject is required,
add it to the corresponding *_DEPENDS explicitly. Otherwise gobject will
not be installed.
Updated port can be obtained here:
http://intara.org.ru/tortoisehg1.shar
or from attachment.
Some comments:
- PORTNAME can be different with the path. PORTNAME=tortoisehg is OK.
- We usually use USE_PYTHON=yes
- It would be better to keep patches in *-patch: targets.
Move ${REINPLACE_CMD} actions to post-patch:.
- If this port does not need to run configure or so. Use
do-configure:
@${DO_NADA}
Regards,
Done.
How should i submit new port? Open an PR?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Snort troubles
On 02/10/11 15:01, Dean Freeman wrote: Snort 2.9.0.4 is getting released today, I believe, and I'll push an updated port either tomorrow or Monday which will also have the fix for the libnet issue in it as well. Ok, thanks to everyone. I can wait until next week. bye av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.
How should i submit new port? Open an PR? There are two easy ways to submit the port. The first is to use send-pr(1) or the web base form to submit the problem report. Please make sure to submit it as a shar and use the change-request option. The second way does the above for you. Install ports-mgmt/porttools and run port submit. Of course you should run port test first :-) -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 18:21 +0300, arrowdodger wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh sunp...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:36:40PM +0300, arrowdodger wrote:
I've updated port. The only thing left - setting dependency on py-gobject
by
USE_GNOME variable.
But if i run pkg_info -f on installed port, i see:
Dependency: py26-gobject-2.26.0
dependency origin: devel/py-gobject
So, maybe this dependency is implicit and i should not care?
Obviously USE_GNOME does not support devel/py-gobject now. All you can
do is to use BUILD_DEPENDS/RUN_DEPENDS.
There is now a pygobject USE_GNOME switch.
-Koop
Your pkg_info result indicates that you've installed gobject, but it
means nothing to users of this port. The ports infrastructure generates
dependency list according to the Makefile. If py-gobject is required,
add it to the corresponding *_DEPENDS explicitly. Otherwise gobject will
not be installed.
Updated port can be obtained here:
http://intara.org.ru/tortoisehg1.shar
or from attachment.
Some comments:
- PORTNAME can be different with the path. PORTNAME=tortoisehg is OK.
- We usually use USE_PYTHON=yes
- It would be better to keep patches in *-patch: targets.
Move ${REINPLACE_CMD} actions to post-patch:.
- If this port does not need to run configure or so. Use
do-configure:
@${DO_NADA}
Regards,
Done.
How should i submit new port? Open an PR?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Snort 2.9.0.4 port update
All: I have submitted a patch to update the Snort port from 2.9.0.3 to 2.9.0.4, which was released today. This includes a workaround for a libnet issue in the makefile for the previous port. -- Dean Freeman Research Analyst, Sourcefire VRT ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
