Re: lang/chicken, fails to package, needs MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE

2011-10-08 Thread Vitaly Magerya
Doug Barton wrote:
 On 10/05/2011 15:19, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
 Doug Barton wrote:
 Trying to create a package for lang/chicken today, it fails to build at
 all with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, so it needs MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= true in the
 Makefile.

 True.
 
 Do you mind if I go ahead and add that sooner rather than later?

I'll appreciate if you will.

I actually have a seemingly working fix, but I'll submit it after the
upstream will accept it.

 Seems to work for me on 8.2-RELEASE amd64.
 Can you send me your build/install/package logs?
 I'll try to reproduce the problem.
 
 Sure, here you go:
 
 http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/chicken-build.log
 
 FYI, I did some more testing and it only fails on i386. I confirmed your
 experience that it works fine on 8-amd64.

I'll look into it, thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze starts soon

2011-10-08 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org:

 In preparation for 9.0 the ports tree will be in feature freeze
 after release candidate 1 (RC2)is released, currently planned for
 October 17.

Was there a typo here?  Did you mean release candidate 1 or 2?

RC1 seems more logical, since RC1 has not been released yet,
and October 17 is only nine days away.


Tom

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2011-10-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 October 2011 10:53,  per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
 lini...@freebsd.org wrote:

 portname:           net-mgmt/portmon
 deprecated because: No more public distfiles

 I was able to fetch it earlier today:

 $ ( cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/portmon  make fetch-recursive )
 === Fetching all distfiles for portmon-2.0 and dependencies
 ===  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
 ===  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
 = portmon-2.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
 = Attempting to fetch from http://voodoo.bawue.com/download/.
 portmon-2.0.tar.gz                            100% of  104 kB   71 kBps

Looks like a false negative when bapt tested it, I've undeprecated it
since the stated reason is no longer true.

Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze starts soon

2011-10-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 October 2011 10:22, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
 from Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org:

 In preparation for 9.0 the ports tree will be in feature freeze
 after release candidate 1 (RC2)is released, currently planned for
 October 17.

 Was there a typo here?  Did you mean release candidate 1 or 2?

 RC1 seems more logical, since RC1 has not been released yet,
 and October 17 is only nine days away.





-- Forwarded message --
From: Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org
Date: 7 October 2011 17:34
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze starts soon
To: develop...@freebsd.org develop...@freebsd.org
On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:20, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote:

 In preparation for 9.0 the ports tree will be in feature freeze
 after release candidate 1 (RC2)is released, currently planned for
 October 17.

Sorry about the typo, just to be clear I did mean RC2, not RC1 as
usual as an RC3 has been planned in this release cycle.

Erwin--
This mail is for the internal use of the FreeBSD project committers,
and as such is private. This mail may not be published or forwarded
outside the FreeBSD committers' group or disclosed to other unauthorised
parties without the explicit permission of the author(s).
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: devel/cross-gcc and cross-binutils: how to set TGTARCH and TGTABI

2011-10-08 Thread Thomas Mueller

 You cannot use this port to build toolchaing for compiling Linux and
 NetBSD applications.  This port creates toolchain using the newlib
 libc library, which is used by some embedded operating systems (e.g.
 rtems, ecos).  It can also be used to build bare-metal standalone
 applications.  Linux on the other hand is using glibc and NetBSD their
 own libc implementation, so this toolchain would not work.
 
 Stanislav Sedov

Thanks for clarification.  What you say was not obvious from the pkg-descr.

Now I will know one blind alley to avoid in cross-compiling for Linux and 
NetBSD.

Tom

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: irc/bitlbee skype support

2011-10-08 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi,

On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:44, Любомир Григоров wrote:
 I just realized it's in the devel version that this has been added. Is there 
 any chance of getting a -devel port with the skype support?

I do not currently have any plans for a irc/bitlbee-devel port - I simply do 
not have the time to maintain it. Sorry.

Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: cvs commit: ports/security/cyrus-sasl2 Makefile ports/security/cyrus-sasl2/files patch-plugins::gssapi.c

2011-10-08 Thread Michael Butler

On 10/07/11 19:48, Doug Barton wrote:

In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0
because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :)


This appears to have been fixed by the (reversion of a) change to 
bsd.port.mk in SVN r226162 - I still used the UNAME_r kludge, however,


imb


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: cvs commit: ports/security/cyrus-sasl2 Makefile ports/security/cyrus-sasl2/files patch-plugins::gssapi.c

2011-10-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 Oct 2011 20:34, Michael Butler i...@protected-networks.net wrote:

 On 10/07/11 19:48, Doug Barton wrote:

 In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0
 because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
 there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :)


 This appears to have been fixed by the (reversion of a) change to
bsd.port.mk in SVN r226162 - I still used the UNAME_r kludge, however,


r226162 has been reverted for now, so your fix is still relevant.

Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: lang/chicken, fails to package, needs MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE

2011-10-08 Thread Doug Barton
On 10/08/2011 00:41, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
 Doug Barton wrote:
 On 10/05/2011 15:19, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
 Doug Barton wrote:
 Trying to create a package for lang/chicken today, it fails to build at
 all with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, so it needs MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= true in the
 Makefile.

 True.

 Do you mind if I go ahead and add that sooner rather than later?
 
 I'll appreciate if you will.

Ok, done, thanks.

 FYI, I did some more testing and it only fails on i386. I confirmed your
 experience that it works fine on 8-amd64.
 
 I'll look into it, thanks.

Thanks again. :)


Doug

-- 

Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go

Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2011-10-08 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:27:12AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
 On 8 October 2011 10:53,  per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
  lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
 
  portname:           net-mgmt/portmon
  deprecated because: No more public distfiles
 
  I was able to fetch it earlier today:
 
  $ ( cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/portmon  make fetch-recursive )
  === Fetching all distfiles for portmon-2.0 and dependencies
  ===  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
  ===  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
  = portmon-2.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
  = Attempting to fetch from http://voodoo.bawue.com/download/.
  portmon-2.0.tar.gz                            100% of  104 kB   71 kBps
 
 Looks like a false negative when bapt tested it, I've undeprecated it
 since the stated reason is no longer true.
 

This one in particular as been test for times with in three weeks to make sure
(because I'm a user of it) upstream was down.

I'm happy to see that it is up again.

regards,
Bapt


pgpKmqQO0JevH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2011-10-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 Oct 2011 23:29, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:

 On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:27:12AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
  On 8 October 2011 10:53,  per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
   lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
  
   portname:   net-mgmt/portmon
   deprecated because: No more public distfiles
  
   I was able to fetch it earlier today:
  
   $ ( cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/portmon  make fetch-recursive )
   === Fetching all distfiles for portmon-2.0 and dependencies
   ===  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
   ===  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
   = portmon-2.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
   = Attempting to fetch from http://voodoo.bawue.com/download/.
   portmon-2.0.tar.gz100% of  104 kB   71
kBps
 
  Looks like a false negative when bapt tested it, I've undeprecated it
  since the stated reason is no longer true.
 

 This one in particular as been test for times with in three weeks to make
sure
 (because I'm a user of it) upstream was down.

 I'm happy to see that it is up again.


I'll see about sticking the distfiles on my mirror too then, if upstream is
unreliable.

Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org