Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right?
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Michael Scheidell wrote: I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him there was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more that would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix some device drivers). He asked how many? Well, I sure can't go back to him and tell him that there was only one company who contacted me back who said that they used VMware in production systems, with FreeBSD guest os. If there isn't anyone else with VMware problems, and I really want to be clear: VMware is a 'for profit' company, so, small numbers won't impress them, but if there are any companies (aside from the one that contacted me.. you don't have to again, I have your email). If no one else, I'll call him back on the phone and apologize for bothering him. I was really hoping to get some of the virtual nic issues, and hgfs issues worked out, but, I guess there isn't enough commercial interest. Hi Michael: I can't speak to your specific experience, but I do know that some VMWare folk contacted the FreeBSD release engineering team late in the 9.0 cycle to ask whether the ISO images appearing on our FTP site were the final versions they should use for qualification work or not. We advised them to wait until the release announcement was out, just in case. Robert ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right?
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Robert Watson wrote: I can't speak to your specific experience, but I do know that some VMWare folk contacted the FreeBSD release engineering team late in the 9.0 cycle to ask whether the ISO images appearing on our FTP site were the final versions they should use for qualification work or not. We advised them to wait until the release announcement was out, just in case. Oh, one other data point. Last I checked, NetApp used VMWare as a training/development platform with OnTap GX, which is FreeBSD-derived. I believe that may include shipping training VMs to customers, but you'd want to check their web site and confirm that before passing that on. I don't know if NetApp has shipped with VMWare in products; if that is the case, you might not want to bring up NetApp's work on bHyve :-). Robert ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Port libSwiften Request
Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port called libSwiften (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften or libSwiften. Is it possible the ports team could perhaps include this software in the ports collection? Regards, Jaret ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Port libSwiften Request
On 01/25/12 19:44, Jaret Bartsch wrote: Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port called libSwiften (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften or libSwiften. Is it possible the ports team could perhaps include this software in the ports collection? Would you be willing to have a crack at porting it yourself? I'm a newb myself at this, but it is possible- even if you don't fully understand makefiles :) Otherwise I'd be willing to help, but there are plenty here better qualified to answer any queries about how to do it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
port license framework
I'm just trying to get my head around the license framework. Is it supposed to be a means for a sysadmin to control what licensed software is installed? Or is it more than that? If it is more than that, why would one need to install a license from the framework if the software usually has it in the docs as copying or something else? Or am I way off? Cheers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
tripwire/and or packages PH will hate, and ask for -exp
when you install tripwire (/usr/ports/security/tripwire), at some point in the install, it asks you, 'interactively' to 'accept' the GPL2 license. (yes, I know, I could probably use USE_LICENSE=GPL2, and patch install scripts). but, then it wants to generate a site key and site pass key. none of which PH will like (TB doesn't like it, PH will hate it) But, I am not the maintainer, and just trying to get this updated to latest source version, and by updating source tree, this is no worse that it was yesterday. (and I have some portlint's that I fixed) Now: I have MANUALLY verified pkg-plist adds/subtracts, and CAN get package to build if I set NO_DB_BUILD, and manually accept license, and generate keys (so it WILL build, and deinstall, just fine) so, how do I keep pav from sending me an email in two days telling me PH won't compile this? is this enough in the Makefile to do that? NO_PACKAGE= requires manual acceptance of license agreement IS_INTERACTIVE= yes -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: tripwire/and or packages PH will hate, and ask for -exp
On 25 Jan 2012 15:43, Michael Scheidell scheid...@freebsd.org wrote: when you install tripwire (/usr/ports/security/tripwire), at some point in the install, it asks you, 'interactively' to 'accept' the GPL2 license. (yes, I know, I could probably use USE_LICENSE=GPL2, and patch install scripts). but, then it wants to generate a site key and site pass key. none of which PH will like (TB doesn't like it, PH will hate it) But, I am not the maintainer, and just trying to get this updated to latest source version, and by updating source tree, this is no worse that it was yesterday. (and I have some portlint's that I fixed) Now: I have MANUALLY verified pkg-plist adds/subtracts, and CAN get package to build if I set NO_DB_BUILD, and manually accept license, and generate keys (so it WILL build, and deinstall, just fine) so, how do I keep pav from sending me an email in two days telling me PH won't compile this? is this enough in the Makefile to do that? NO_PACKAGE= requires manual acceptance of license agreement IS_INTERACTIVE= yes PH won't touch those ports, therefore no packages and no Pavmail. Port test to check for leftover files will help. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: tripwire/and or packages PH will hate, and ask for -exp
On 1/25/12 11:11 AM, Chris Rees wrote: Now: I have MANUALLY verified pkg-plist adds/subtracts, and CAN get package to build if I set NO_DB_BUILD, and manually accept license, and generate keys (so it WILL build, and deinstall, just fine) PH won't touch those ports, therefore no packages and no Pavmail. Port test to check for leftover files will help. yes, I did test it. ok, ill fire this away to the maintainer in a pr -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
sound-juicer upgrade error
Hello all.
I try to update sound juicer, but got an error.
xsltproc -o sound-juicer-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename
sound-juicer --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam
db2omf.dtd -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.3//EN --stringparam
db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir /usr/local/share/omf
--stringparam db2omf.help_dir /usr/local/share/gnome/help
--stringparam db2omf.omf_in
/usr/ports/audio/sound-juicer/work/sound-juicer-2.32.0/help/sound-juicer/sound-juicer.omf.in
--stringparam db2omf.scrollkeeper_cl `scrollkeeper-config
--pkgdatadir`/Templates/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml
`/usr/local/bin/pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils`
C/sound-juicer.xml || { rm -f sound-juicer-C.omf; exit 1; }
Bus error (core dumped)
Also totem gives me an error, looks like the same thing
xsltproc -o totem-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename totem
--stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd
-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN --stringparam db2omf.lang C
--stringparam db2omf.omf_dir /usr/local/share/omf --stringparam
db2omf.help_dir /usr/local/share/gnome/help --stringparam
db2omf.omf_in /usr/ports/multimedia/totem/work/totem-2.32.0/help/totem.omf.in
--stringparam db2omf.scrollkeeper_cl `scrollkeeper-config
--pkgdatadir`/Templates/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml
`/usr/local/bin/pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils`
C/totem.xml || { rm -f totem-C.omf; exit 1; }
Bus error (core dumped)
things i did try
reinstall libxslt, pkg-config, gnome-doc-utils, and all installed docpook ports.
Can someone help me with this?
regards
Johan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portmaster -o behaves a little strangely (IMHO)
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:01:33 +
Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 24 January 2012 20:31, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
=== Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports
=== Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.2008 to
gcc-4.4.7.20120117
lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
(What is the preceding line -- with the -- and the similar one
below, supposed to be indicating exactly? If it means what I
think it does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting
the intention of the -o option)
No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency
of 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when
non-base gcc was in use, but have never had anyone track down the
cause authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm
assuming you already looked there.
Often happens when people stick USE_something into make.conf :)
(don't do that)
Chris
Hmmm, interesting. I do, in fact, have a USE_GCC=4.2+ line
in /etc/make.conf, conditional on ${.CURDIR} for certain ports that
just won't build with clang, which I'm using now as the default.
Doug seems to think, though, that it's something else within the ports
framework's handling of the gcc ports that's tripping up portmaster.
Not sure I even want to begin to try to track that one down. :-)
Anyway, thanks everybody for the feedback.
--
Conrad J. Sabatier
conr...@cox.net
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: tidy-lib-090315.c_1
Hi, Thierry. Since tidy-lib hadn't had any updates for over 3 years, there is a non-official patch to support new tags and correct doctype for HTML5. Is it possible to include it into the port? The patch itself: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Nov/0007.html There is also github repository you might want to look at - https://github.com/w3c/tidy-html5. Their readme says it contains not only the first patch, but additional changes. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: tidy-lib-090315.c_1
Le mer 25 jan 12 à 18:28:43 +0100, ?? ??? m...@klkvsk.ru écrivait : Hi, Thierry. Hello, Since tidy-lib hadn't had any updates for over 3 years, there is a non-official patch to support new tags and correct doctype for HTML5. Is it possible to include it into the port? The patch itself: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Nov/0007.html There is also github repository you might want to look at - https://github.com/w3c/tidy-html5. Their readme says it contains not only the first patch, but additional changes. I'm subscribed to the tidy-develop@, and there have been some recent activity. Bjoern Hoehrmann has checked these patches, and one can expect an official release. Please just wait a little! Best regards, -- Th. Thomas. pgpA2ovdFOB7s.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Port libSwiften Request
Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port called libSwiften (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften or libSwiften. Is it possible the ports team could perhaps include this software in the ports collection? Do you mean http://swift.im ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de wrote: Michael Johnson a...@ahze.net wrote: Out of curiosity, what does 'grep xcb-aux /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/*' show? Nothing. No Output. Heino ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I solved this problem by rebuilding libxfce4menu (to update the libtool profile). -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
isc dhcp does not make
FreeBSD dfw0.psg.com 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012 r...@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0 amd64 # portupgrade -N net/isc-dhcp42-server [Gathering depends for net/isc-dhcp42-server . done] --- Installing 'isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2' from a port (net/isc-dhcp42-server) --- Building '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server' === Cleaning for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License ISCL accepted by the user === Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === Extracting for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 = SHA256 Checksum OK for dhcp-4.2.3-P2.tar.gz. === Patching for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === Applying extra patch /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/files/extra-patch-bind__Makefile === Applying FreeBSD patches for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 depends on executable: gmake - found === Configuring for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d checking for gawk... gawk checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. === Script configure failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to z...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 clang? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: isc dhcp does not make
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:38:22AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: FreeBSD dfw0.psg.com 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012 r...@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0 amd64 # portupgrade -N net/isc-dhcp42-server [Gathering depends for net/isc-dhcp42-server . done] --- Installing 'isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2' from a port (net/isc-dhcp42-server) --- Building '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server' === Cleaning for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License ISCL accepted by the user === Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === Extracting for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 = SHA256 Checksum OK for dhcp-4.2.3-P2.tar.gz. === Patching for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === Applying extra patch /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/files/extra-patch-bind__Makefile === Applying FreeBSD patches for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 === isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 depends on executable: gmake - found === Configuring for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d checking for gawk... gawk checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. === Script configure failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to z...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 clang? clang what? checking for gcc... cc, doesn't look like clang. Providing the config.log, as the message suggests, would help here. Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: isc dhcp does not make
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
It was created by DHCP configure 4.2.3-P2, which was
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61. Invocation command line was
$ ./configure --localstatedir=/var --enable-paranoia --enable-early-chroot
--enable-dhcpv6 --prefix=/usr/local --mandir=/usr/local/man
--infodir=/usr/local/info/ --build=amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0
## - ##
## Platform. ##
## - ##
hostname = dfw0.psg.com
uname -m = amd64
uname -r = 9.0-STABLE
uname -s = FreeBSD
uname -v = FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012
r...@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0
/usr/bin/uname -p = amd64
/bin/uname -X = unknown
/bin/arch = unknown
/usr/bin/arch -k = unknown
/usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown
/usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown
/bin/machine = unknown
/usr/bin/oslevel = unknown
/bin/universe = unknown
PATH: /bin
PATH: /sbin
PATH: /usr/bin
PATH: /usr/sbin
PATH: /usr/X11R6/bin
PATH: /usr/local/bin
PATH: /usr/local/sbin
## --- ##
## Core tests. ##
## --- ##
configure:1838: checking for a BSD-compatible install
configure:1894: result: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel
configure:1905: checking whether build environment is sane
configure:1948: result: yes
configure:1976: checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p
configure:2015: result: ./install-sh -c -d
configure:2028: checking for gawk
configure:2044: found /usr/local/bin/gawk
configure:2055: result: gawk
configure:2066: checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)
configure:2087: result: yes
configure:2281: checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of
Makefiles
configure:2290: result: no
configure:2358: checking for gcc
configure:2385: result: cc
configure:2623: checking for C compiler version
configure:2630: cc --version 5
cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
configure:2633: $? = 0
configure:2640: cc -v 5
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
configure:2643: $? = 0
configure:2650: cc -V 5
cc: '-V' option must have argument
configure:2653: $? = 1
configure:2676: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:2703: cc -O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing
-D_PATH_DHCLIENT_SCRIPT='/usr/local/sbin/dhclient-script'
-D_PATH_DHCLIENT_CONF='/usr/local/etc/dhclient.conf'
-D_PATH_DHCPD_CONF='/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf' conftest.c 5
conftest.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set
configure:2706: $? = 1
configure:2744: result:
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h. */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME DHCP
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME dhcp
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION 4.2.3-P2
| #define PACKAGE_STRING DHCP 4.2.3-P2
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT dhcp-us...@isc.org
| #define PACKAGE dhcp
| #define VERSION 4.2.3-P2
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| int
| main ()
| {
|
| ;
| return 0;
| }
configure:2750: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
## ##
## Cache variables. ##
## ##
ac_cv_env_CC_set=set
ac_cv_env_CC_value=cc
ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_set=set
ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_value='-O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing'
ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_set=set
ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_value='-D_PATH_DHCLIENT_SCRIPT='\''/usr/local/sbin/dhclient-script'\''
-D_PATH_DHCLIENT_CONF='\''/usr/local/etc/dhclient.conf'\''
-D_PATH_DHCPD_CONF='\''/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf'\'
ac_cv_env_CPP_set=set
ac_cv_env_CPP_value=cpp
ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_set=set
ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_value=''
ac_cv_env_LIBS_set=''
ac_cv_env_LIBS_value=''
ac_cv_env_build_alias_set=set
ac_cv_env_build_alias_value=amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0
ac_cv_env_host_alias_set=''
ac_cv_env_host_alias_value=''
ac_cv_env_target_alias_set=''
ac_cv_env_target_alias_value=''
ac_cv_prog_AWK=gawk
ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC=cc
ac_cv_prog_make_gmake_set=yes
lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=262144
## - ##
## Output variables. ##
## - ##
ACLOCAL='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing
--run aclocal-1.10'
AMDEPBACKSLASH=''
AMDEP_FALSE=''
AMDEP_TRUE=''
AMTAR='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing
--run tar'
AUTOCONF='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing
--run autoconf'
AUTOHEADER='${SHELL}
/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing --run autoheader'
AUTOMAKE='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing
--run automake-1.10'
AWK='gawk'
CC='cc'
CCDEPMODE=''
CFLAGS='-O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing'
CPP='cpp'
Re: isc dhcp does not make
a basic sanity check:
echo 'int main() { return 0; }' test.c
cc -o test test.c
./test echo 'OK' || echo 'bad'
all the other ports made just fine, as did that test, of course.
reported to isc
randy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: isc dhcp does not make
On 1/25/12 7:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote: FreeBSD dfw0.psg.com 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012r...@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0 amd64 # portupgrade -N net/isc-dhcp42-server [Gathering depends for net/isc-dhcp42-server . done] snip. configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. --- Installing 'isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2' from a port (net/isc-dhcp42-server) doublecheck your portstree. make sure it is up to date. (portsnap fetch update) do a 'portsclean -C' make sure you don't have odd things in your make.conf or option knobs. compiles fine here on amd64, 9.0. tinderbox. something is borked in your server. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: isc dhcp does not make
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:04:52AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: [...] configure:2703: cc -O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing ^^^ That's why. Make sure you don't define it in /etc/make.conf. conftest.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set [...] Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: isc dhcp does not make
Hi-- On Jan 25, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Randy Bush wrote: all the other ports made just fine, as did that test, of course. reported to isc configure:2703: cc -O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_SCRIPT='/usr/local/sbin/dhclient-script' -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_CONF='/usr/local/etc/dhclient.conf' -D_PATH_DHCPD_CONF='/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf' conftest.c 5 conftest.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set configure:2706: $? = 1 You've specified a 32-bit CPU architecture, but are running on a 64-bit (aka AMD64/EM64T) platform. Get rid of the -march flag from /etc/make.conf or where-ever it is coming from. Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: isc dhcp does not make
You've specified a 32-bit CPU architecture, but are running on a 64-bit (aka AMD64/EM64T) platform. Get rid of the -march flag from /etc/make.conf or where-ever it is coming from. blush had just rsynced it in. damn! thanks. randy ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Port libSwiften Request
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:38 -0800 (PST) Jaret Bartsch jaretbart...@yahoo.ca wrote: Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port called libSwiften (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften or libSwiften. Is it possible the ports team could perhaps include this software in the ports collection? Regards, Jaret Well, if it's portable, then I'm sure somebody here could handle it. Do you have a URL for the source and/or project? What package are you trying to compile yourself? Do you need porting help with that, too? -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: isc dhcp does not make
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
checking for gcc... cc
checking for C compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to z...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the
/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log including
the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea
to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls
/var/db/pkg`).
*** Error code 1
clang?
The instructions given suggest looking at:
/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log
It's likely to be informative. Failing that, a basic sanity check:
echo 'int main() { return 0; }' test.c
cc -o test test.c
./test echo 'OK' || echo 'bad'
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right?
On the plus side, we have dozens of production FreeBSD VM's running on a mid-size vSphere 4 development. On the minus side this is down significantly from this time last year. We are migrating to FreeBSD-on-KVM as fast as we can because VMware's support for FreeBSD is as others have described (i.e. bad), and KVM is coming along nicely. This is especially egregious when you take into account their steadily increasing pricing models. OTOH it's worth taking a closer look at http://callfortesting.org/bhyve/ Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
