RFE - FreeBSD Port: zfs-snapshot-mgmt-20090201_2
Hi! I am a storage-technician working at the Swedish University of Agriculture and we are using zfs-snapshot-mgmt to create scheduled snapshots, but are failing on our disaster-recovery machine because of: /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:130:in `join': can't convert nil into String (TypeError) from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:130:in `snapshots' from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:137:in `snapshots_to_remove' from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:145:in `remove_snapshots' from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:213 from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:210:in `each' from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:210 Now, since this is a disaster-recovery unit, I would rather not have to have all filesystems mounted for the script to function as we have many servers with many file systems backing up towards this unit, which would result in quite alot of mounts that are completely unnecessary to the backup server itself. I also consider it a potential security risk having all these file systems, from all of these different machines mounted in the same place(server). I mean, if someone would like to steal as much valuable data as possible, why crack hundreds of servers and steal it piece by piece when you could just crack one and have it all, right? That doesn´t really make sense because if someone were to crack the backup server they could just mount all filesystems themselves, but only if they knew they were there. But also having them mounted feels like just handing it to them. Unfortunately I know nothing about programming so I can´t be of any help, besides testing patches, but do you think this can be done? Change the script so that it doesn´t require the file systems to be mounted for it to be able to take snapshots? Med Vänliga Hälsningar --- Karli Sjöberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8) S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66 karli.sjob...@slu.semailto:karli.sjob...@adm.slu.se ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports tree migration to Subversion
Hi list.
It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared about make
update command.
I wish to had this in ports makefile:
--- /usr/ports/Makefile 2012-06-07 09:26:08.983664775 +0300
+++ /tmp/Makefile 2012-06-28 15:25:03.0 +0300
@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@
CVS?= cvs
SUP?= csup
+GIT?= git
PORTSNAP?= portsnap
PORTSNAP_FLAGS?= -p ${.CURDIR}
.if defined(SUPHOST)
@@ -170,6 +171,15 @@
@echo Updating ${.CURDIR} from cvs repository ${CVSROOT}
@echo --
cd ${.CURDIR}; ${CVS} -R -q update -A -P -d -I!
+.elif defined(GIT_UPDATE)
+ @echo --
+ @echo Updating ${.CURDIR} from GIT+SVN repository ${CVSROOT}
+ @echo --
+.if !exists(${PORTSDIR}/.git)
+ cd ${.CURDIR}; ${GIT} svn rebase
+.else
+ ${GIT} svn clone -$(svn log -q --limit 1 $SVN_ROOT | awk '/^r/{print
$1}') $SVN_ROOT
+.endif
.else
@echo --
@echo Running ${PORTSNAP}
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 17:30 +, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
The FreeBSD ports tree will migrate from CVS to Subversion soon. The
anticipated date for the migration is July 14th. This will have no impact
for ports tree users as there will be a SVN to CVS exporter.
Please note that cvsup will still work after the migration. Nevertheless
c(v)sup is pretty dated so you may want to see if portsnap(8) will fit your
needs.
Beat and Thomas
on behalf of portmgr@
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/06/27/ports-tree-migration-to-subversion/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports tree migration to Subversion
On 28 June 2012 05:33, mbsd m...@isgroup.com.ua wrote: Hi list. It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared about make update command. I wish to had this in ports makefile: Submit a PR with this patch so portmgr will look at it. -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports tree migration to Subversion
Ok. I'll be submitting a pr when ports move to svn. Without testing, this patch is not more than dirty code. On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:55 -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: On 28 June 2012 05:33, mbsd m...@isgroup.com.ua wrote: Hi list. It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared about make update command. I wish to had this in ports makefile: Submit a PR with this patch so portmgr will look at it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
portmaster pkgng patch in portmaster/files?
A request to pkgng team and/or dougb (feel free to ignore if you think it's unreasonable). Please add the portmaster pkgng patch to portmaster/files, to be triggered by WITH_PKGNG=yes in /etc/make.conf. I often forget to pull the latest patch from the git page, when updating portmaster. This change would save some time/frustration. Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portmaster pkgng patch in portmaster/files?
On 28 June 2012 23:09, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: A request to pkgng team and/or dougb (feel free to ignore if you think it's unreasonable). Please add the portmaster pkgng patch to portmaster/files, to be triggered by WITH_PKGNG=yes in /etc/make.conf. I often forget to pull the latest patch from the git page, when updating portmaster. This change would save some time/frustration. The portmaster maintainer is reluctant to add 'official' support for pkgng until he has tested it thoroughly, which I understand is on his todo list (an understandable position, given the complexity). Perhaps I could suggest that you try out poudriere package sets in the meantime? You'll find it very fast, and discover the real power of pkgng. http://blog.etoilebsd.net/post/Home_made_pkgng_repo Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
msgmerge hangs
I've been noticing for a while now in my port builds that /usr/local/bin/msgmerge has a distinct tendency to get hung up, just sitting there spinning its wheels forever. Has anyone else ever seen this behavior, or know what may be causing it and how to correct it? Thanks! -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: RFE - FreeBSD Port: zfs-snapshot-mgmt-20090201_2
on 28/06/2012 11:16 Karli Sjöberg said the following:
Hi!
I am a storage-technician working at the Swedish University of Agriculture
and we are using zfs-snapshot-mgmt to create scheduled snapshots, but are
failing on our disaster-recovery machine because of:
/usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:130:in `join': can't convert nil into String
(TypeError)
from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:130:in `snapshots'
from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:137:in `snapshots_to_remove'
from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:145:in `remove_snapshots'
from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:213
from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:210:in `each'
from /usr/local/bin/zfs-snapshot-mgmt:210
Now, since this is a disaster-recovery unit, I would rather not have to have
all filesystems mounted for the script to function as we have many servers
with many file systems backing up towards this unit, which would result in
quite alot of mounts that are completely unnecessary to the backup server
itself. I also consider it a potential security risk having all these file
systems, from all of these different machines mounted in the same
place(server). I mean, if someone would like to steal as much valuable data
as possible, why crack hundreds of servers and steal it piece by piece when
you could just crack one and have it all, right? That doesn´t really make
sense because if someone were to crack the backup server they could just
mount all filesystems themselves, but only if they knew they were there. But
also having them mounted feels like just handing it to them.
Unfortunately I know nothing about programming so I can´t be of any help,
besides testing patches, but do you think this can be done? Change the script
so that it doesn´t require the file systems to be mounted for it to be able
to take snapshots?
How about this?
--- zfs-snapshot-mgmt 2010-06-02 05:31:28.759931924 +0300
+++ zfs-snapshot-mgmt 2010-06-01 01:49:46.665034414 +0300
@@ -127,8 +127,10 @@
end
def snapshots(prefix)
-path = File.join(@mount_point, '.zfs', 'snapshot')
-Dir.open(path).select do |name|
+#path = File.join(@mount_point, '.zfs', 'snapshot')
+#Dir.open(path).select do |name|
+s = IO.popen('zfs list -r -t snapshot -H -o name ' +
@name).readlines.collect.select { |item| item[0, @name.length + 1] == @name +
'@' }.map { |item| item[@name.length + 1 .. -1] }
+s.select do |name|
name[0, prefix.length] == prefix
end.map { |name| SnapshotInfo.new(name, @name, prefix) }
end
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports tree migration to Subversion
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:11:30PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:47:34PM -0700, Kevin Oberman thus spake: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Abthorpe tabtho...@freebsd.org wrote: The FreeBSD ports tree will migrate from CVS to Subversion soon. The anticipated date for the migration is July 14th. This will have no impact for ports tree users as there will be a SVN to CVS exporter. Please note that cvsup will still work after the migration. Nevertheless c(v)sup is pretty dated so you may want to see if portsnap(8) will fit your needs. Beat and Thomas on behalf of portmgr@ http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/06/27/ports-tree-migration-to-subversion/ While portsnap has several advantages over csup, it is unusable in my case because I have always maintained local mods to ports in the ports tree and portsnap neatly removes them. I may move to using svn to maintain my own copy of the tree and update the working directory where I can keep my customizations. You may want to look at the manpage for portsnap.conf and see how advantageous it may be to use the REFUSE option. That an excellent idea. I was thinking that, since I keep my private patches in the files directory and let the normal 'make patch' apply them, that it would still delete them, but careful reading of the man page implies that I could list these file (paths) as REFUSED and portsnap would leave them alone. I'll experiment and see of this works. If so, I can move away from csup. In any event it may be more resourcful just to go to SVN as the advantages of that cannot be taken if something like portsnap or csup is used. Updating Diffing Committing Stating Reverting I am sure the list of 'ing goes on and on. -- - (2^(N-1)) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports tree migration to Subversion
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:45:20PM +0300, mbsd wrote: Ok. I'll be submitting a pr when ports move to svn. Without testing, this patch is not more than dirty code. On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:55 -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: On 28 June 2012 05:33, mbsd m...@isgroup.com.ua wrote: Hi list. It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared about make update command. I wish to had this in ports makefile: Submit a PR with this patch so portmgr will look at it. How do you propose it should define a OOB repo ? since there is no official ... repo for git. Yes I know! there are some out there. But thats not to say they should be supported in tree until one has at least been announced as official and can be pointed to and has shown to be kept just as up to date as the svn tree. JMO -- - (2^(N-1)) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports tree migration to Subversion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/28/2012 7:25 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:45:20PM +0300, mbsd wrote: Ok. I'll be submitting a pr when ports move to svn. Without testing, this patch is not more than dirty code. On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:55 -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: On 28 June 2012 05:33, mbsd m...@isgroup.com.ua wrote: Hi list. It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared about make update command. I wish to had this in ports makefile: Submit a PR with this patch so portmgr will look at it. How do you propose it should define a OOB repo ? since there is no official ... repo for git. Yes I know! there are some out there. But thats not to say they should be supported in tree until one has at least been announced as official and can be pointed to and has shown to be kept just as up to date as the svn tree. JMO The proposed patch is for git-svn. It checks out from the *official* SVN as a local git repository. It requires no git repository to be maintained by anyone but the person who checks it out. Regards, Bryan Drewery -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP7QTxAAoJEG54KsA8mwz50ZsP/jm6/hrboW3e4lzDAUVcF+yT fZ+5dv5Ra+AhyPDii255G7NrnB9jQsbK3F2oxGYBb3OpPvqYjgTxtTBbEYgSr6EJ z5TJGjNBLrr+kGAxu2/pWp1/yF1VFoHz6/8ScSl+yJyshGLUXI9B0S6GeivubJ0F SHq7HyPSjNGMlcLcw2UXGvbSIfargAw0VU+nQajoIvDx/C/VHaH8Gyp6rVkAcGv3 QrfWqjIGsLaqPxJrKRA0b1HoQPcJ/hqXPe+koANdMaHbombDyVpr9G2lzmpWUL4Y 1m6uDy6lboH+dkaaYxk9GFZ/c4xjialmfTfQoUVBW/au5huHbivFfZb0jSJ6IuLa WinVl5HyBIZ0XXiBNz/rofLj7QQQC/5HRiyjhsKHkmmD1ZwvwFAYjoPzXa/PoMF3 j/xaAv+hmLFirA0vGTUQlJpU8L3C9S+20Y7T1hUffGX0cgWe1voXtQL1p0kUo2Ug tTTWKiuNWay0M31v8UwpdyeUHloqcVahG7nlikH1kexgL4nr6xKaIX+TEWp/eoqg TaOBTiZPVXmVUC2u3WSIF1Ho30ofOd7zXRvsPnRY4vMef+PNAOqYjSUKH4u+rGP7 0qT+GdRV4ERturlYuPb3yswAP+aAJ5Gq7TOJg34JPGn3OndhFnZvxvEG1IjkSwjG gNuKArDfwVQdGzMZCXD2 =IpdS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] Ports tree migration to Subversion
I have been using git svn rebase for src since src moved on git. I think new options SVN_UPDATE and probably GIT_UPDATE :) in make.conf are good idea. On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 20:29 -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/28/2012 7:25 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:45:20PM +0300, mbsd wrote: Ok. I'll be submitting a pr when ports move to svn. Without testing, this patch is not more than dirty code. On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:55 -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: On 28 June 2012 05:33, mbsd m...@isgroup.com.ua wrote: Hi list. It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared about make update command. I wish to had this in ports makefile: Submit a PR with this patch so portmgr will look at it. How do you propose it should define a OOB repo ? since there is no official ... repo for git. Yes I know! there are some out there. But thats not to say they should be supported in tree until one has at least been announced as official and can be pointed to and has shown to be kept just as up to date as the svn tree. JMO The proposed patch is for git-svn. It checks out from the *official* SVN as a local git repository. It requires no git repository to be maintained by anyone but the person who checks it out. Regards, Bryan Drewery -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP7QTxAAoJEG54KsA8mwz50ZsP/jm6/hrboW3e4lzDAUVcF+yT fZ+5dv5Ra+AhyPDii255G7NrnB9jQsbK3F2oxGYBb3OpPvqYjgTxtTBbEYgSr6EJ z5TJGjNBLrr+kGAxu2/pWp1/yF1VFoHz6/8ScSl+yJyshGLUXI9B0S6GeivubJ0F SHq7HyPSjNGMlcLcw2UXGvbSIfargAw0VU+nQajoIvDx/C/VHaH8Gyp6rVkAcGv3 QrfWqjIGsLaqPxJrKRA0b1HoQPcJ/hqXPe+koANdMaHbombDyVpr9G2lzmpWUL4Y 1m6uDy6lboH+dkaaYxk9GFZ/c4xjialmfTfQoUVBW/au5huHbivFfZb0jSJ6IuLa WinVl5HyBIZ0XXiBNz/rofLj7QQQC/5HRiyjhsKHkmmD1ZwvwFAYjoPzXa/PoMF3 j/xaAv+hmLFirA0vGTUQlJpU8L3C9S+20Y7T1hUffGX0cgWe1voXtQL1p0kUo2Ug tTTWKiuNWay0M31v8UwpdyeUHloqcVahG7nlikH1kexgL4nr6xKaIX+TEWp/eoqg TaOBTiZPVXmVUC2u3WSIF1Ho30ofOd7zXRvsPnRY4vMef+PNAOqYjSUKH4u+rGP7 0qT+GdRV4ERturlYuPb3yswAP+aAJ5Gq7TOJg34JPGn3OndhFnZvxvEG1IjkSwjG gNuKArDfwVQdGzMZCXD2 =IpdS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
