Re: tk85 Port Maintenance
On 2012-Nov-14, 14:52, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: Off-list On 11/13/12 01:59, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2012-Nov-08, 09:12, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: On 11/08/12 03:13, Pietro Cerutti wrote: snip By the way, Tcl/Tk 8.5.13 is bound to be released in the next few days (the first RC is out now, actually). You might want to include the update in your diff :) http://pastebin.com/UmasjFfz I fear this won't be enough. There are implications of the update that you're not considering, e.g., PORTREVISION, distinfo, modifications to the patch files, ... I suggest that you take a step back and read the FreeBSD's Porters Handbook [1]. It is very well written and contains a lot of information you cannot do without if you plan to maintain a port. I'm sorry, I'm not seeing what I'm missing. As I said, PORTREVISION, distinfo, and the patch files. Look them up in the handbook. -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project g...@freebsd.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp pgpkkW10QTA4p.pgp Description: PGP signature
FreeBSD Port: asterisk10-10.10.0
Hello, Current asterisk10 port does not build chan_h323 when it selected in `make config`. Could you, please, check it? Thank you. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[patch] databases/db42 clang -fPIC issue
Hi,
In CURRENT, clang can not compile database/db42.
here is a error message:
BEGIN---8ERROR MESSAGE8---
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/cxx_db.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `_ZTV2Db'
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
.libs/cxx_db.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)
*** [libdb_cxx-4.2.la] Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/databases/db42/work/db-4.2.52/build_unix.
*** [do-build] Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/databases/db42.
END---8ERROR MESSAGE8---
linker said 'recompile with -fPIC'.
Actualy,
BEGIN---8COMPILE LOG8---
c++ -c -I. -I./../dist/.. -D_THREAD_SAFE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
-pipe -fconserve-space ./../dist/../cxx/cxx_txn.cpp -DPIC
END---8COMPILE LOG8---
there is a -DPIC flag, but not -fPIC.
Why not?
db42 uses its own libtool rather than FreeBSD's ${LOCALBASE}/bin
/libtool.
configure said:
BEGIN---8PART OF configure8---
LIBTOOL= '$(SHELL) ./libtool'
END---8PART OF configure8---
this libtool compiles c++ source without -fPIC flag if CC is clang.
libtool in ${LOCALBASE} was patched for FreeBSD. but db42
libtool was NOT. so -fPIC flag was lost.
Here is a patch for fix this issue.
I'd send-pr this issue as ports/173627.
But
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173627
said No PRs Matched Query
So I posted it here.
Would you like to review/commit this patch?
Thanks.
--- files/patch-dist::configure.orig2012-11-13 06:09:38.0 +0900
+++ files/patch-dist::configure 2012-11-13 06:17:55.0 +0900
@@ -1,7 +1,16 @@
../dist/configure.orig Wed Dec 5 13:14:02 2001
-+++ ../dist/configure Wed Dec 5 13:24:01 2001
-@@ -8794,10 +8794,10 @@
- INSTALLER=\$(LIBTOOL) --mode=install cp
+--- ../dist/configure.orig 2012-11-13 06:08:49.0 +0900
../dist/configure 2012-11-13 06:16:09.0 +0900
+@@ -20046,7 +20046,7 @@
+
+
+ SOFLAGS=-rpath \$(libdir)
+-LIBTOOL_PROG=${SHELL} ./libtool
++LIBTOOL_PROG=$prefix/bin/libtool
+
+ # Set SOSUFFIX and friends
+
+@@ -20138,13 +20138,13 @@
+ INSTALLER=\$(LIBTOOL) --mode=install cp -p
MAKEFILE_CC=\$(LIBTOOL) --mode=compile ${MAKEFILE_CC}
-MAKEFILE_SOLINK=\$(LIBTOOL) --mode=link ${MAKEFILE_CCLINK} -avoid-version
@@ -12,4 +21,8 @@
+MAKEFILE_XSOLINK=\$(LIBTOOL) --mode=link ${MAKEFILE_CXXLINK} -version-info
${DB_VERSION_MINOR}
MAKEFILE_CXXLINK=\$(LIBTOOL) --mode=link ${MAKEFILE_CXXLINK}
- # Configure for shared libraries, static libraries, or both. If both are
+-LIBTOOL=\$(SHELL) ./libtool
++LIBTOOL=$prefix/bin/libtool
+
+ case $host_os in
+ cygwin*)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
New port question JBoss 7.1.3
Hello there. I made some time ago port for JBoss 7.1.1, which is currently in ports tree. It called java/jboss7. Now I sending to you (any committer will do) new port - jboss71. I'm not sure I want to replace jboss7 with 7.1.3, since soon there will be 7.2. And they have a big difference between 7.1 and 7.2. So, I'd like to keep jboss7 (7.1.1) and introduce jboss71 (7.1.3) and a bit later jboss72 (with some CR). Is this ok? Since there's many files in plist, I can't attach shar to PR, If there is need in PR after this email, I'll create one. Thanks! -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: New port question JBoss 7.1.3
Hi Yerenkow, Good job. That organization is the best. Rodrigo Brito Em 15/11/2012, às 12:14, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com escreveu: Hello there. I made some time ago port for JBoss 7.1.1, which is currently in ports tree. It called java/jboss7. Now I sending to you (any committer will do) new port - jboss71. I'm not sure I want to replace jboss7 with 7.1.3, since soon there will be 7.2. And they have a big difference between 7.1 and 7.2. So, I'd like to keep jboss7 (7.1.1) and introduce jboss71 (7.1.3) and a bit later jboss72 (with some CR). Is this ok? Since there's many files in plist, I can't attach shar to PR, If there is need in PR after this email, I'll create one. Thanks! -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ sysutils/sleuthkit | 4.0.0 | 4.0.1 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portsc...@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PR missing
--On November 14, 2012 6:26:31 PM -0500 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 14 November 2012 17:56, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: send-pr, and the confidential flag is not set. But what would that have to do with multiple PRs having disappeared? 173555 is the highest numbered PR appearing on Bug Reports. Mine is 137581, but 173556-? are missing. Hey: Your PR made it through. The cluster machines were recently physically moved, upgraded, and generally discombobulated. We know that GNATS is down (as are a few other pages) and are trying to get them up as fast as possible. Thanks for the explanation. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them. George Orwell ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: New port question JBoss 7.1.3
2012/11/15 Rodrigo Brito rodrigobr...@bsd.com.br Hi Yerenkow, Good job. That organization is the best. Rodrigo Brito Thanks. Will someone take it? There seems some troubles with GNATS currently. Em 15/11/2012, às 12:14, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com escreveu: Hello there. I made some time ago port for JBoss 7.1.1, which is currently in ports tree. It called java/jboss7. Now I sending to you (any committer will do) new port - jboss71. I'm not sure I want to replace jboss7 with 7.1.3, since soon there will be 7.2. And they have a big difference between 7.1 and 7.2. So, I'd like to keep jboss7 (7.1.1) and introduce jboss71 (7.1.3) and a bit later jboss72 (with some CR). Is this ok? Since there's many files in plist, I can't attach shar to PR, If there is need in PR after this email, I'll create one. Thanks! -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
On 11/15/2012 9:03 AM, portsc...@portscout.zi0r.com wrote: Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ sysutils/sleuthkit | 4.0.0 | 4.0.1 +-+ Taking - it has a shlib bump, so will wait for port freeze to be done. If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portsc...@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: icinga-1.8.1
Hello, I'm contacting you today wondering if the Icinga port for FreeBSD is still being maintained, as the link http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/icinga/ no longer exists and http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-mgmt/icinga found after searching at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=icingastype=all seems to no longer exist as well. At the worst, I'm reporting dead links for now-unmaintained packages, and in such a case I will build from the source supplied by the original Icinga project. At the best, I'm hoping to hear the port is still being maintained. -- Thank you, Samantha Smith ELDnet Computer Services Owner Email: saman...@eldnetcomputers.com Office: 973-310-4290 Direct Line: 201-951-5634 http://www.eldnetcomputers.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: icinga-1.8.1
On 15/11/12 15:09 -0500, Samantha Smith wrote: Hello, I'm contacting you today wondering if the Icinga port for FreeBSD is still being maintained, as the link http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/icinga/ no longer exists and http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-mgmt/icinga found after searching at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=icingastype=all seems to no longer exist as well. At the worst, I'm reporting dead links for now-unmaintained packages, and in such a case I will build from the source supplied by the original Icinga project. At the best, I'm hoping to hear the port is still being maintained. Hi, Don't worry, icinga seems to be maintained, as you can see in our svn repo[1]. For a few days we are experiencing some issue in the servers infastructure, and I think this is the reason the links doesn't work. regards, - rodrigo [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net-mgmt/icinga/ -- Thank you, Samantha Smith ELDnet Computer Services Owner Email: saman...@eldnetcomputers.com Office: 973-310-4290 Direct Line: 201-951-5634 http://www.eldnetcomputers.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: icinga-1.8.1
On 2012-11-15 21:09, Samantha Smith wrote: Hello, I'm contacting you today wondering if the Icinga port for FreeBSD is still being maintained, as the link http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/icinga/ no longer exists and http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-mgmt/icinga found after searching at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=icingastype=all seems to no longer exist as well. At the worst, I'm reporting dead links for now-unmaintained packages, and in such a case I will build from the source supplied by the original Icinga project. At the best, I'm hoping to hear the port is still being maintained. The port is well maintained :) The FreeBSD port system moved to subversion, please update your link list. http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net-mgmt/icinga/ -- Regards, olli ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkg upgrade - Nothing to do
Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:58:37 +0100, Julien Laffaye jlaff...@freebsd.org a écrit : pkg version compares against the local ports tree. It would be nice to be able to compare against a repository. Is there some plans for this? Regards. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkg upgrade - Nothing to do
On 11/15/2012 3:10 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:58:37 +0100, Julien Laffaye jlaff...@freebsd.org a écrit : pkg version compares against the local ports tree. It would be nice to be able to compare against a repository. Is there some plans for this? Regards. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org From pkg-version(8): -I Use INDEX file for determining if a package is out of date. -P Use ports for determining if a package is out of date. This is the default if a ports tree exists. The tree used can be overridden by PORTSDIR, see pkg(5) for more information. -R Use repository catalogue for determining if a package is out of date. This is the default if no ports tree exists. Regards, Bryan Drewery ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [patch] databases/db42 clang -fPIC issue
(List post, with a courtesy copy to Takeshi.)
Am 15.11.2012 12:53, schrieb Takeshi Taguchi:
Hi,
In CURRENT, clang can not compile database/db42.
here is a error message:
Hi Takeshi,
I am the maintainer of said port, and I can confirm that your bug report
is in the database, but the web interface is currently not being
updated. Sorry for that.
Also sorry for the build issues the port gave you on 10-CURRENT.
However, I cannot reproduce the problem on FreeBSD 9 amd64 with clang,
and I also have other reports on http://pastebin.ca/2251922 that the
build succeeds on a recent 10-CURRENT, and that -fPIC remains inside the
build arguments on clang++ command lines. Said FreeBSD system was at
SVN revision r242852, built on amd64 with a GENERIC kernel on Nov 10.
Can you try to figure out the differences in the build logs, and
possibly update your world and retry?
How exactly have you configured your system to use clang(++)?
Is there anything in /etc/make.conf or /etc/src.conf?
Can you send me your config.log file OFF-LIST (send directly to my
address), from .../databases/db42/work/db-4.2.52/build_unix/ ?
(This is $WRKSRC/config.log, try: make -V WRKSRC -C /usr/ports/*/db42
to obtain the WRKSRC path.)
Reviewing your patch, the replacement could be improved to use
${LIBTOOL} rather than something you have derived from $prefix;
furthermore, we use $prefix for a package we are about to install, and
$localbase for packages that we expect to already be installed (like
dependencies).
I need to understand better why we would need to patch things, before I
go into that. We may need to patch something else, elsewhere (because
it needs to be more generic than for just the db42 port).
Thank you and best regards
Matthias Andree
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
diaspora*
Is anyone working on making a port for diaspora? -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid. -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PR missing
2012-11-15 8:26 Eitan Adler wrote: Hey: Your PR made it through. The cluster machines were recently physically moved, upgraded, and generally discombobulated. We know that GNATS is down (as are a few other pages) and are trying to get them up as fast as possible. Thank all of you for working for the issue. I would be glad if you show us the progress on freebsd.org website, twitter or somewhere else. -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta m...@vmeta.jp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Is PR database updated?
Hi there, A couple of days ago I filed a PR for a new port. I even received the confirmation mail with the following URL: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173631 But when I click on it, it says the PR doesn't exist. Is there some problem with the PR database? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Is PR database updated?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: Is there some problem with the PR database? The web part of the database is not updating. We are working on it. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
