lang/tcl85 and x11-toolkits/open-motif conflict each other: install file in the same place! How to force PKGNG to ignore?
I have massive trouble to update and install either ports lang/tcl and x11-toolskits/open-motif, which are both required in my installation. Some updates of the ports required the recompilation of both of them and I forgot about which one started first the update before Christmas. I came out, that both ports were reported conflicting by PKGNG on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE. In both cases the registration is denied by the error: /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib === Registering installation for tcl-8.5.13 Installing tcl-8.5.13...pkg: tcl-8.5.13 conflicts with open-motif-2.3.4 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/man/man3/Object.3.gz *** [fake-pkg] Error code 70 See the already filed PR ports/175126 and ports/174795. Since the installed ports are incomplete and to install properly the one or the other, I deleted the other one, in this case it was opportune to delete lang/tcl85 to have libXm.so back from open-motif. This nasty blocking situation needs to be solved for me right now and I'm seeking a way to force the installation. Is there a way to tell portmaster to ignore the complains and simply brute-force overwrite the flagged duplicate installation? Regards, Oliver signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: lang/tcl85 and x11-toolkits/open-motif conflict each other: install file in the same place! How to force PKGNG to ignore?
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:37:58AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: I have massive trouble to update and install either ports lang/tcl and x11-toolskits/open-motif, which are both required in my installation. Some updates of the ports required the recompilation of both of them and I forgot about which one started first the update before Christmas. I came out, that both ports were reported conflicting by PKGNG on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE. In both cases the registration is denied by the error: /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib === Registering installation for tcl-8.5.13 Installing tcl-8.5.13...pkg: tcl-8.5.13 conflicts with open-motif-2.3.4 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/man/man3/Object.3.gz *** [fake-pkg] Error code 70 See the already filed PR ports/175126 and ports/174795. Since the installed ports are incomplete and to install properly the one or the other, I deleted the other one, in this case it was opportune to delete lang/tcl85 to have libXm.so back from open-motif. This nasty blocking situation needs to be solved for me right now and I'm seeking a way to force the installation. Is there a way to tell portmaster to ignore the complains and simply brute-force overwrite the flagged duplicate installation? Regards, Oliver The workaround for now is to install tcl without man pages regards, Bapt pgpLCwVaZ6TeQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Chat and hook up with girls in your home town.
Chat and hook up with girls in your home town. http://benath.me/eD P.O. Box 215 Port Vila, VU To Unsubscribe, please click here ratefinderhubs.info/unsubscribe.php?email=po...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD wiki offline for a bit
On 6 January 2013 20:40, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@freebsd.org wrote: Hey, tl;dr Wiki is back, and everybody with account need to reset their password. Small followup. The wiki's surge protection (yet again) got confused and blocked the frontend proxy. I think it should be fixed now. If you see any 'varnish guru meditation' please let me know, and include the XID number so I can trace it in the logs. -- Simon L. B. Nielsen Hat: clusteradm ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: lang/tcl85 and x11-toolkits/open-motif conflict each other: install file in the same place! How to force PKGNG to ignore?
On 01/08/13 11:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:37:58AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: I have massive trouble to update and install either ports lang/tcl and x11-toolskits/open-motif, which are both required in my installation. Some updates of the ports required the recompilation of both of them and I forgot about which one started first the update before Christmas. I came out, that both ports were reported conflicting by PKGNG on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE. In both cases the registration is denied by the error: /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib === Registering installation for tcl-8.5.13 Installing tcl-8.5.13...pkg: tcl-8.5.13 conflicts with open-motif-2.3.4 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/man/man3/Object.3.gz *** [fake-pkg] Error code 70 See the already filed PR ports/175126 and ports/174795. Since the installed ports are incomplete and to install properly the one or the other, I deleted the other one, in this case it was opportune to delete lang/tcl85 to have libXm.so back from open-motif. This nasty blocking situation needs to be solved for me right now and I'm seeking a way to force the installation. Is there a way to tell portmaster to ignore the complains and simply brute-force overwrite the flagged duplicate installation? Regards, Oliver The workaround for now is to install tcl without man pages regards, Bapt Works, thank you. Oliver signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
building java/openjdk6 with clang and libc++
Hello, I've successfully built the java/openjdk6 port using clang and libc++ on stable/9. I've written a small post about it, if anyone is interested: http://mitchnull.blogspot.com/2013/01/quick-and-dirty-hack-to-build-openjdk6.html cheers, mitch ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating Bash
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:32:49AM -0500, Jerry wrote: Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's version is only at patch level 37, which was released on 16-Jul-2012. This is an important port and since the freeze is over with, I was wondering if this port will be updated? It will be once the dust settles over the 9.1 release. -- -- David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ audio/csound| 5.18.02 | 5.19.01 +-+ devel/ireport | 3.7.6 | 5.0.1 +-+ games/anki | 1.2.11 | 2.0.4 +-+ games/py-anki | 1.2.11 | 2.0.4 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portsc...@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Monitoring a switch
Hello. I'm looking for some software which can monitor a SNMP-enabled switch. Sure I can use Cacti to monitor bandwidth of every single port... or Nagios to warn me if some port gets some defined amount of traffic for a defined amount of time... I was wondering though, if there was some more specific tool which might be faster to setup and would do some magic automatically, like computing the total traffic flowing through, identifying bottlenecks, etc... bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Porting help requested
Hello Porters,
I'm working on updating the port sysutils/modules and am unsure how
to do something.
The port (tarfile attached) installs into ${PREFIX}/Modules/${PORTVERSION}
and creates a link ${PREFIX}/Modules/default that points to that install.
The point is to permit several installed versions of the software with
the link controlling which is used.
I want to make this updated port not conflict with any older version that
may be installed.
Here's my problems:
If an older version is installed my port fails because it can't create the
directory ${PREFIX}/Modules nor the link ${PREFIX}/Modules/default because
they already exist. I don't know how to deal with this.
When deinstalling the port I want to remove ${PREFIX}/Modules/default if it's
pointing to the version I'm deinstalling, but leave it alone otherwise.
Please give me advice on how to proceed.
Regards,
--
Hokan
Beginning Porter
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Monitoring a switch
On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: I'm looking for some software which can monitor a SNMP-enabled switch. Well, it's likely that the switch vendor offers some tools. Sure I can use Cacti to monitor bandwidth of every single port... or Nagios to warn me if some port gets some defined amount of traffic for a defined amount of time... Yes, those are reasonable starting points. I was wondering though, if there was some more specific tool which might be faster to setup and would do some magic automatically, like computing the total traffic flowing through, identifying bottlenecks, etc... Sure. What's your budget? Something like HP's OpenView (which I just learned was rebranded to HP Network Management Center), or Cisco's LAN Management stuff (evidently also rebranded) do all sorts of nice network discovery and autoconfig, routing/traffic bottleneck analysis, etc. They also cost 5 to 6-digit sums, but if you've got multiple WAN links between data centers to manage, or some complicated VM/cloud architecture, they're probably worth the price. (Of course, if you've just got a meaning one switch to manage, that would be overkill.) Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating Bash
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:15:45AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:32:49AM -0500, Jerry wrote: Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's version is only at patch level 37, which was released on 16-Jul-2012. This is an important port and since the freeze is over with, I was wondering if this port will be updated? It will be once the dust settles over the 9.1 release. I think the dust has settled. Glen pgpz2078U9NOj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Marino freebs...@marino.st wrote: possibly insecure: I think this needs to be known insecure rather than holding it's last release date against it. http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20100413-1.txt Probably other security issues as well. I didn't have to look very long. In a codebase as large as KDE's, it seems a very slim chance indeed years could go by without maintenance and still maintain security. Additionally, I'd argue that it is hard for it to be known insecure since upstream does not maintain it even for security vulnerabilities anymore, so security problems have nowhere to be reported and vulnerabilities common to KDE3 and KDE4 only get published and fixed in the latter. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?
On 1/8/2013 21:14, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Adam Vande Moreamvandem...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Marinofreebs...@marino.st wrote: possibly insecure: I think this needs to be known insecure rather than holding it's last release date against it. http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20100413-1.txt Probably other security issues as well. I didn't have to look very long. In a codebase as large as KDE's, it seems a very slim chance indeed years could go by without maintenance and still maintain security. Additionally, I'd argue that it is hard for it to be known insecure since upstream does not maintain it even for security vulnerabilities anymore, so security problems have nowhere to be reported and vulnerabilities common to KDE3 and KDE4 only get published and fixed in the latter. This doesn't count? http://cve.mitre.org/cve/ http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search?execution=e2s1 It seems to be there is somewhere to report them... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
How to apply an svn diff
Once you've created an svn diff and submitted it using send-pr, how is the diff applied to update the port? I can't seem to figure this out from reading the svn docs. -- Paul Schmehl (pa...@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/infosecurity/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to apply an svn diff
On 08/01/2013 21:47, Paul Schmehl wrote: Once you've created an svn diff and submitted it using send-pr, how is the diff applied to update the port? I can't seem to figure this out from reading the svn docs. use patch(1) Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: How to apply an svn diff
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:47:30PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: Once you've created an svn diff and submitted it using send-pr, how is the diff applied to update the port? I can't seem to figure this out from reading the svn docs. The approach I prefer involves invoking svn patch. (This is not specific to ports, btw.) g1-227(9.1-S)[1] svn help patch patch: Apply a patch to a working copy. usage: patch PATCHFILE [WCPATH] Apply a unidiff patch in PATCHFILE to the working copy WCPATH. If WCPATH is omitted, '.' is assumed. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org Taliban: Evil men with guns afraid of truth from a 14-year old girl. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. pgpdXAfIYMlpQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?
John Marino freebs...@marino.st writes: On 1/8/2013 21:14, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Additionally, I'd argue that it is hard for it to be known insecure since upstream does not maintain it even for security vulnerabilities anymore, so security problems have nowhere to be reported and vulnerabilities common to KDE3 and KDE4 only get published and fixed in the latter. This doesn't count? http://cve.mitre.org/cve/ http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search?execution=e2s1 It seems to be there is somewhere to report them... The vulnerabilities disclosed in those places are normally published after upstream has been contacted and come up with a fix for the security issue, so I don't think the lack of new KDE3 advisories compared to KDE4 ones means the former is safer. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating Bash
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:12:00 -0500 Glen Barber articulated: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:15:45AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:32:49AM -0500, Jerry wrote: Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's version is only at patch level 37, which was released on 16-Jul-2012. This is an important port and since the freeze is over with, I was wondering if this port will be updated? It will be once the dust settles over the 9.1 release. I think the dust has settled. The dust never settles; it just gets swept under the rug. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
devel/boost-libs looks hardwired for gcc/g++
=== Building for boost-libs-1.48.0_2 cd /usr/obj/usr/ports/devel/boost-libs/work/boost_1_48_0 /usr/bin/env TMPDIR=/tmp TMPDIR=/tmp SHELL=/bin/sh NO_LINT=YES PREFIX=/usr/local LOCALBASE=/usr/local MOTIFLIB=-L/usr/local/lib -lXm -lXp LIBDIR=/usr/lib CC=gcc CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -Wno-error -march=native -fno-strict-aliasing CPP=cpp CPPFLAGS= LDFLAGS= CXX=g++ ... error: toolset gcc initialization: error: no command provided, default command 'g++' not found error: initialized from /usr/obj/usr/ports/devel/boost-libs/work/boost_1_48_0/tools/build/v2/build/toolset.jam:38: in toolset.using from module toolset ... There is no gcc/++ on this system, however there is cc (clang) and gcc47 from ports, which should be used in ports if respecting CC= -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/devel-boost-libs-looks-hardwired-for-gcc-g-tp5775942.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to apply an svn diff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2013 03:49 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 08/01/2013 21:47, Paul Schmehl wrote: Once you've created an svn diff and submitted it using send-pr, how is the diff applied to update the port? I can't seem to figure this out from reading the svn docs. use patch(1) While we are on the subject of patch, has anyone else noticed the following annoyance? Suppose you create a patch against a non-existent file (using diff - -N), and let's suppose the old file is dir-orig/xxx, and the new file is dir/xxx. Then if I apply the patch to dir, and dir-orig doesn't exist, then patch issues all kinds of horrible error messages, and the new file is installed in the current directory rather than dir. I'm not sure if it is a bug or a feature. But it has bitten me more than once. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ7KyFAAoJEC3xK9GaktgHCecH/1b/MgIe177Xo0TGTvlWs0gD sU/N1oUOj/EUUgb1DJZCn+V6v6fOehVNuGydi/RqOXsAlS99QrNAxpwG6WFmb3wz dzv2sCwq4nbXv3jjssZRPHZpcvIT6HT3EScffAaGHEdLrYHWMHAjUrfyfuvBcJ6p HyI7+Sa3yebtCJLyxzZQGijMw9xiwk/VNO9AjbB4A3zjoM8veBSlHV3d7LSfov4H QNDJDLuVvTo4Wko9MuBByaQXmslUVR5ekI1Fvenud00ujV/7Artxe8bSawUT0H3K pBs00fj3XT2ik6Nitvzh1W82nLAM5oOhdbL9bzumQjIqdSrnoTN9Fp6ZdA9U8nY= =Vbr7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating Bash
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:20:30PM -0500, Jerry wrote: It will be once the dust settles over the 9.1 release. I think the dust has settled. The dust never settles; it just gets swept under the rug. Unhelpful response noted. Glen pgpaXN8t3T25q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?
I'm on the fence. It's true, that there is no low-print feature complete equivalent for KDE3. On the other hand, if nobody wants to maintain Trinity, well it should be letten go, as sooner or later there will be problems. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-delete-KDE3-ports-tp5775510p5775952.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde4 rebuild - some guidance please
On 01/05/13 05:23, David Southwell wrote: Hi I am having problems with my kde4 installation and feel the need to deinstall and start again. In view of the number of ports and dependencies can someone please let me know the cleanest way of doing this. It would probably be safer to assume an upwards and downwards recursive build. Thanks in advance david I just used: # portmaster --force-config x11/kde4 to rebuild my KDE4 from scratch. You can also pass the -f switch to rebuild in place, although I prefer blowing away and starting fresh. -- John M. Cooper -- -- John M. Cooper ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/boost-libs looks hardwired for gcc/g++
On 09/01/2013 09:53, Jakub Lach wrote: There is no gcc/++ on this system, however there is cc (clang) and gcc47 from ports, which should be used in ports if respecting CC= yes it is poorly hard-coded to use gcc there is a fix waiting in pr/173865 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/173865 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to apply an svn diff
--On January 8, 2013 9:49:06 PM + Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote: On 08/01/2013 21:47, Paul Schmehl wrote: Once you've created an svn diff and submitted it using send-pr, how is the diff applied to update the port? I can't seem to figure this out from reading the svn docs. use patch(1) That worked. Thanks. Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them. George Orwell ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to apply an svn diff
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote: While we are on the subject of patch, has anyone else noticed the following annoyance? Suppose you create a patch against a non-existent file (using diff - -N), and let's suppose the old file is dir-orig/xxx, and the new file is dir/xxx. Then if I apply the patch to dir, and dir-orig doesn't exist, then patch issues all kinds of horrible error messages, and the new file is installed in the current directory rather than dir. I'm not sure if it is a bug or a feature. But it has bitten me more than once. According to the man page for patch(1): not specifying -p at all just gives you blurfl.c, unless all of the directories in the leading path (u/howard/src/blurfl) exist and that path is relative, in which case you get the entire pathname unmodified. So to have patch put the new files in the correct locations use: patch -E -p0 patchfile Note: -E removes empty files. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to apply an svn diff
On 8 Jan 2013 21:52, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:47:30PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: Once you've created an svn diff and submitted it using send-pr, how is the diff applied to update the port? I can't seem to figure this out from reading the svn docs. The approach I prefer involves invoking svn patch. (This is not specific to ports, btw.) g1-227(9.1-S)[1] svn help patch patch: Apply a patch to a working copy. usage: patch PATCHFILE [WCPATH] Apply a unidiff patch in PATCHFILE to the working copy WCPATH. If WCPATH is omitted, '.' is assumed. I intensely dislike the way svn patch wants a file specified rather than using stdin; my technique is to use curl url | patch. I'll fix that one of these days... Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/boost-libs looks hardwired for gcc/g++
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:47:20PM +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: On 09/01/2013 09:53, Jakub Lach wrote: There is no gcc/++ on this system, however there is cc (clang) and gcc47 from ports, which should be used in ports if respecting CC= yes it is poorly hard-coded to use gcc there is a fix waiting in pr/173865 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/173865 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org FYI I'm working on an update to 1.52.0 version, which will not be hard wired anymore http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.52.0.diff regards, Bapt pgplBY2t870XS.pgp Description: PGP signature
