FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ lang/slib | 3b3 | 3b4 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portsc...@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Firefox-i18n installing failure
Hello. It looks like there's a dot to much should be firefox-21 not firefox-2.1. Cleaning for firefox-i18n-21.0 === firefox-i18n-21.0 cannot install: unknown Firefox version: firefox-2.1. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n. Thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox-i18n installing failure
On 16.05.13 05:36, Leslie Jensen wrote: Hello. It looks like there's a dot to much should be firefox-21 not firefox-2.1. Cleaning for firefox-i18n-21.0 === firefox-i18n-21.0 cannot install: unknown Firefox version: firefox-2.1. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n. I forgot to commit one file with the update. It should be OK now. Please update your ports tree and try again. Florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Firefox-i18n installing failure
2013-05-16 11:49, Florian Smeets skrev: On 16.05.13 05:36, Leslie Jensen wrote: Hello. It looks like there's a dot to much should be firefox-21 not firefox-2.1. Cleaning for firefox-i18n-21.0 === firefox-i18n-21.0 cannot install: unknown Firefox version: firefox-2.1. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n. I forgot to commit one file with the update. It should be OK now. Please update your ports tree and try again. Florian Even though I solved my problem it still asks for one to === Fetching all distfiles required by firefox-i18n-21.0 for building Please define FIREFOX_I18N_ALL to install all languages When only installing Swedish I think I'm doing the right thing but it still fails === Found saved configuration for firefox-i18n-17.0.1 === firefox-i18n-21.0 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found === Fetching all distfiles required by firefox-i18n-21.0 for building = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xpi/firefox-i18n-21.0/sv-SE.xpi. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xpi/firefox-i18n-21.0/sv-SE.xpi. === Giving up on fetching files: xpi/firefox-i18n-21.0/sv-SE.xpi xpi/firefox-i18n-21.0/sv-SE.xpi Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]. *** [checksum] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n. *** [checksum] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n. *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n/work/.extract_done.firefox-i18n._usr_local] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n. *** [configure] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n. === make failed for www/firefox-i18n === Aborting update === Update for www/firefox-i18n failed === Aborting update === Killing background jobs Terminated Thanks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: teTeX and TeXLive
Hiroki Sato wrote: If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob: TEX_DEFAULT= texlive [snip] Please test TeXLive and send your failure report to me. Once it is confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch the default value from tetex to texlive at some point. Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to do any testing myself (busy busy busy), but the following issues have been reported on the FreeBSD Forums and I'm passing them along here. If you're not on the Forums and you'd like me to either pass back a response or ask followup questions, let me know. AvW * print/latex-cjk has option DVIPDFMX hardcoded to teTeX stuff. * print/freetype-tools's RUNDEPEND=t1asm is hard coded to teTeX and conflicted with bulk print/texlive-base's pkg-plist. * print/texlive-base needs to be more modularized to achieve drop-in replacement with teTeX for downstream ports. -- I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. pgpoXyNjErxVi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [texlive, FreeBSD 10.x-amd64] build error: _ThreadRuneLocale: TLS definition in /usr/lib/libc.so section .tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in gsftopk.o
Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote in 51939aed.3060...@passap.ru: bs Hi, bs bs I've got an error while building texlive-base at fresh CURRENT: bs - bs % uname -a bs FreeBSD BB049.int.wart.ru 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #21 r250633: bs Tue May 14 13:53:42 SAMT 2013 bs b...@bb049.int.wart.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB64X amd64 bs - bs bs I have TEX_DEFAULT=texlive at the /etc/make.conf. bs bs Here is a tail of te log (full log 719 KB bs ftp://ftp.wart.ru/pub/FreeBSD/errorlogs/texlive.make.log.txt ): Thank you for the report. I am trying to reproduce this now. -- Hiroki pgpiQruc2Y8EH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: teTeX and TeXLive
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote in CAO+PfDe0nEdG=6zvnce90ktjsy4jyrk9jr1pmfbawrbj5cb...@mail.gmail.com: de 2013/5/12 Florent Peterschmitt flor...@peterschmitt.fr: de Le 11/05/2013 20:36, Hiroki Sato a écrit : de Hello, de de As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can de choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for pre-compiled de packages is still teTeX. de de If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob: de de TEX_DEFAULT= texlive de de To do this, almost all of ports which use TeX will depend on TeXLive. de Although some ports which install a new TeX macro package may not de work because of incompatibility such as difference of directory de structure between the two, ones which use TeX for typesetting should de work fine. Ones to install macro packages which were non-standard in de teTeX but are included in TeXLive will be fixed or removed. de de Please test TeXLive and send your failure report to me. Once it is de confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch the default de value from tetex to texlive at some point. de de de Thank you very much, however I have a install failure on poudriere de with ports tree up to date 5 minutes ago: Thank you for your report. I have received several reports about install failures on poudriere and am investigating them. -- Hiroki pgp1NQuUTYl0t.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: teTeX and TeXLive
On 16 May 2013 14:02, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven f...@skysmurf.nl wrote: Hiroki Sato wrote: If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob: TEX_DEFAULT= texlive [snip] Please test TeXLive and send your failure report to me. Once it is confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch the default value from tetex to texlive at some point. Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to do any testing myself (busy busy busy), but the following issues have been reported on the FreeBSD Forums and I'm passing them along here. If you're not on the Forums and you'd like me to either pass back a response or ask followup questions, let me know. Thanks for your message But :) AvW * print/latex-cjk has option DVIPDFMX hardcoded to teTeX stuff. That is a problem for the latex-cjk port maintainer. * print/freetype-tools's RUNDEPEND=t1asm is hard coded to teTeX and conflicted with bulk print/texlive-base's pkg-plist. That is a problem for the freetype maintainers. * print/texlive-base needs to be more modularized to achieve drop-in replacement with teTeX for downstream ports. This in particular is a long term goal, however I and many others greatly appreciate Hiroki-san's efforts to bring TeX Live to FreeBSD ports. It may come later. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: teTeX and TeXLive
Chris Rees wrote: Thanks for your message But :) Hey, I'm just the messenger ;-) * print/latex-cjk has option DVIPDFMX hardcoded to teTeX stuff. That is a problem for the latex-cjk port maintainer. * print/freetype-tools's RUNDEPEND=t1asm is hard coded to teTeX and conflicted with bulk print/texlive-base's pkg-plist. That is a problem for the freetype maintainers. Fair enough. I'll pass it back to the Forums and notifty the maintainers in question. * print/texlive-base needs to be more modularized to achieve drop-in replacement with teTeX for downstream ports. This in particular is a long term goal, however I and many othersi greatly appreciate Hiroki-san's efforts to bring TeX Live to FreeBSD ports. It may come later. I quite agree. It's great to finally have TeXLive on FreeBSD and Hiroki's efforts are very much appreciated. AvW -- I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. pgpdEYoIu5NVF.pgp Description: PGP signature
[QAT] r318328: 4x leftovers
Upgrade to 1.7.9. Changelog at http://tt-rss.org/redmine/versions/91. - Build ID: 20130516183601-6650 Job owner: thie...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 12 minutes Enddate: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:47:38 GMT Revision: r318328 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=318328 - Port:www/tt-rss 1.7.9 Buildgroup: 9.1-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~thie...@freebsd.org/20130516183601-6650-139680/tt-rss-1.7.9.log Buildgroup: 9.1-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~thie...@freebsd.org/20130516183601-6650-139681/tt-rss-1.7.9.log Buildgroup: 8.3-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~thie...@freebsd.org/20130516183601-6650-139682/tt-rss-1.7.9.log Buildgroup: 8.3-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~thie...@freebsd.org/20130516183601-6650-139683/tt-rss-1.7.9.log -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20130516183601-6650 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: teTeX and TeXLive
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote in 51941f70.2060...@gmx.de: ma I have been looking at the texlive-base and -texmf ports, prompted by a ma discussion on IRC involving marino, Niclas Zeising and myself, and I ma must say that I am impressed - not to say scared - by the sheer size of ma the ports' distfiles (130 MB for base, 1.4 GB for -texmf), and have not ma yet taken the time to install and test the port. ma ma I suppose the -texmf port would be all of texlive. ma ma Is there any optimization we can make to get the texlive material more ma manageable? People have expressed concerns about daily download limits ma (although that situation does not affect me personally currently). ma ma Are you aware of a list/overview/... that would explain the difference ma between the -base and the -texmf ports? -base is binary part of the TeXLive, and -texmf includes data such as TeX macro packages, fonts, configuration files, and documentation. Both are needed to make TeX (yes, strictly speaking it is much more than pure TeX) work. The reason why -texmf is huge is fonts and docs. Both are about 1GB respectively. The other tex-* ports that I committed/will commit are ones split from -base and -texmf in per functionality basis. I will continue to split down them until the granularity reaches where the other ports require. It means -base and -texmf will be shrunk (and the number of */tex-* ports will increase). -full always installs everything but most of ports which need TeX do not require it in building stage or runtime and blindly specifying this as a dependency is a pain for users. So, every ports which require TeX must specify the minimal set of USE_TEX knobs. We should complete this stage to go further. I expect the number of split TeX ports will be ~100 (FYI, the number of ports which directly depend on TeX is currently around 150). Some minimal installation options will also be added. This is my mid-term goal in 1-2 months. Although modularization is also planned, it will be happened once we confirm the new ports work fine in the current shape. I agree that the size of the distfiles is another pain, but it is what TeXLive is, unfortunately. -- Hiroki pgpEDHtyhe8Hj.pgp Description: PGP signature
INDEX build failed for 8.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait.. Done. make_index: wmnetload-1.3_4: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/libdockapp make_index: wmnetload-1.3_4: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/libdockapp make_index: XScreenSaver.App-2.3_3: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/libdockapp make_index: XScreenSaver.App-2.3_3: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/libdockapp Committers on the hook: bdrewery crees erwin olivierd rakuco rm thierry zeising Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': Udeskutils/contacts/Makefile Udeskutils/gruler/Makefile Dtextproc/p5-KinoSearch Utextproc/ibus-qt/Makefile Utextproc/ibus-qt/distinfo Utextproc/Makefile Umisc/mshell/Makefile Upolish/libtlen/Makefile Ugraphics/cimg/Makefile Ugraphics/cimg/distinfo UU graphics/cimg/pkg-descr Dgraphics/cimg/files/patch-examples_gmic.cpp Ugraphics/cimg/files/patch-examples::Makefile Ugraphics/cimg/pkg-plist Ugraphics/agave/Makefile Ugraphics/gcolor2/Makefile Ugraphics/potrace/Makefile Usecurity/cfs/files/cfsd.in Usecurity/cfs/files/pkg-message.in UMOVED Uftp/bareftp/distinfo Uftp/bareftp/files/patch-po-LINGUAS Uftp/bareftp/pkg-plist Uftp/bareftp/Makefile Udatabases/py-sqlkit/Makefile Udatabases/py-sqlkit/pkg-plist Unet-im/komclean/Makefile Dx11-wm/libdockapp Ux11-wm/Makefile Ux11-themes/cursor-jimmac-theme/Makefile Uemulators/javatari/Makefile Uemulators/javatari/distinfo Uwww/tt-rss/Makefile Uwww/tt-rss/distinfo Uwww/tt-rss/pkg-plist Ucad/opencascade/Makefile Acad/opencascade/files/patch-src_Standard_Standard_CString.cxx Acad/opencascade/files/patch-src_Standard_Standard_CLocaleSentry.hxx Acad/opencascade/files/patch-inc_Standard_CLocaleSentry.hxx Udevel/mercurial/distinfo Udevel/mercurial/Makefile Updated to revision 318339. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Portaudit claims nginx 1.2.x vulnerable
Hi, I just noticed that portaudit considers www/nginx =1.2.0,1 1.4.1,1 to be affected by CVE-2013-2028, creating noise and preventing installation: http://portaudit.freebsd.org/efaa4071-b700-11e2-b1b9-f0def16c5c1b.html According to the announcement on the nginx mailing list, only versions of nginx = 1.3.9 1.4.1,1 should be affected: http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2013/000112.html and the fix in nginx trac http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/changeset/5189/nginx I just checked the source of 1.2.8 (the current version in ports, www/nginx) and it doesn't even contain the affected functionality, nor the affected function implementing it (ngx_http_parse_chunked). This is in line with additional media and bugtracker coverage: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960605 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/07/3 http://www.ehackingnews.com/2013/05/cve-2013-2028-buffer-overflow.html http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/NGINX-patches-major-security-flaw-1858438.html Long story short: I would kindly ask you to correct the entry in the portaudit database to match only affected versions of nginx. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Gmelin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [patch included] teTeX and TeXLive
On Fri, 17 May 2013 00:32:58 +0900 (JST) Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote in CAO+PfDe0nEdG=6zvnce90ktjsy4jyrk9jr1pmfbawrbj5cb...@mail.gmail.com: de 2013/5/12 Florent Peterschmitt flor...@peterschmitt.fr: de Le 11/05/2013 20:36, Hiroki Sato a écrit : de Hello, de de As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and de one can choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for de pre-compiled packages is still teTeX. de de If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following de knob: de de TEX_DEFAULT= texlive de de To do this, almost all of ports which use TeX will depend on de TeXLive. Although some ports which install a new TeX macro de package may not work because of incompatibility such as de difference of directory structure between the two, ones which de use TeX for typesetting should work fine. Ones to install de macro packages which were non-standard in teTeX but are de included in TeXLive will be fixed or removed. de de Please test TeXLive and send your failure report to me. Once de it is confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch de the default value from tetex to texlive at some point. de de de Thank you very much, however I have a install failure on poudriere de with ports tree up to date 5 minutes ago: Thank you for your report. I have received several reports about install failures on poudriere and am investigating them. -- Hiroki Hello, I had exactly the same issue. I have a manual solution so far and am trying out the automation from ports. I am posting my progress hoping to save someone some time. I reproduced the issue in an empty poudriere jail. After installing print/texlive-base and print/texlive-texmf via pkg add and $ cd /usr/ports/print/tex-formats $ make $ make install yields (taken only the last bit) ---Begin OPTIONS List--- ---End OPTIONS List--- ===phase: check-config == === ===phase: fetch== === Fetching all distfiles required by tex-formats-20120701 for building === ===phase: checksum == === Fetching all distfiles required by tex-formats-20120701 for building === ===phase: extract == === Fetching all distfiles required by tex-formats-20120701 for building === Extracting for tex-formats-20120701 === ===phase: patch== === Patching for tex-formats-20120701 === ===phase: configure== === Configuring for tex-formats-20120701 === ===phase: build== === ===phase: run-depends == === ===phase: install-mtree== === ===phase: install == === Installing for tex-formats-20120701 === Generating temporary packing list === Checking if print/tex-formats already installed tcfmgr: config file `tcfmgr.map' (usually in $TEXMFMAIN/texconfig) not found (ls-R missing?). fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found. *** [do-fmtutil-amstex] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/tex-formats. running $ texconfig rehash $ make install solves the issue. I suspect my approach to constitute a dirty hack, but for the time being, I have added texconfig rehash as a post-install target to print/texlive-texmf. Compiling has started, I am off to bed now and will report tomorrow. Hope to save some people some time, even if what I am doing is actually not quite right. Cheers, -- Christopher TZ: GMT + 2h GnuPG/GPG: 0xE8DE2C14 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #2: Tue Nov 27 03:45:16 UTC 2012 root@darkstar:/usr/obj/pcbsd-build90/fbsd-source/9.1/sys/GENERIC Punctuation matters: Lets eat Grandma or Lets eat, Grandma - Punctuation saves lives. A panda eats shoots and leaves or A panda eats, shoots, and leaves - Punctuation teaches proper biology. diff -uN /poudriere/ports/default/print/texlive-texmf/Makefile tree/print/texlive-texmf/Makefile --- /poudriere/ports/default/print/texlive-texmf/Makefile 2013-05-16 19:38:19.919421187 +0200 +++
Re: Portaudit claims nginx 1.2.x vulnerable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Michael, On 05/16/13 15:04, Michael Gmelin wrote: Hi, I just noticed that portaudit considers www/nginx =1.2.0,1 1.4.1,1 to be affected by CVE-2013-2028, creating noise and preventing installation: http://portaudit.freebsd.org/efaa4071-b700-11e2-b1b9-f0def16c5c1b.html According to the announcement on the nginx mailing list, only versions of nginx = 1.3.9 1.4.1,1 should be affected: http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2013/000112.html and the fix in nginx trac http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/changeset/5189/nginx I just checked the source of 1.2.8 (the current version in ports, www/nginx) and it doesn't even contain the affected functionality, nor the affected function implementing it (ngx_http_parse_chunked). This is in line with additional media and bugtracker coverage: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960605 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/07/3 http://www.ehackingnews.com/2013/05/cve-2013-2028-buffer-overflow.html http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/NGINX-patches-major-security-flaw-1858438.html Long story short: I would kindly ask you to correct the entry in the portaudit database to match only affected versions of nginx. I have took a look at these and found this: http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2013/000114.html I'll update the vuxml entry to include these information. Cheers, - -- Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttps://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJRlV9sAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzmM4H/i66ifeXHOJX8cle5cf9ATXt Y5G74TCLqLlxEv+1DCGh8Wks/JvN7KVsLNieXkf+jVonuXr4O5LCV7Pgj3SQ6EQK TISbHwDDnwBqIvNncO4uZxOs6JbuTKWh43YdoPG7Rfpb0AJWJl/N8LFtxEckohyu jWfyK6n1ftnjtaHoXZ63hF3daMHJwxtj8nJmHOqD1O7LbI+UCTPDwuYDb6BJGq9h 1JNt/NUyuANupRHftKa42+NLBa8zeGSggu7nYFhjuhcQN1ts31klKC/ReUIoUrTI 09+6Eu6AwpTvVa+rSRv6WUvLuG2srEKHS8zS+toFINAcY5EUO0zdqTglXGL8/E8= =fQL9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Portaudit claims nginx 1.2.x vulnerable
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:36:28 -0700 Xin Li delp...@delphij.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Michael, On 05/16/13 15:04, Michael Gmelin wrote: Hi, I just noticed that portaudit considers www/nginx =1.2.0,1 1.4.1,1 to be affected by CVE-2013-2028, creating noise and preventing installation: http://portaudit.freebsd.org/efaa4071-b700-11e2-b1b9-f0def16c5c1b.html According to the announcement on the nginx mailing list, only versions of nginx = 1.3.9 1.4.1,1 should be affected: http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2013/000112.html and the fix in nginx trac http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/changeset/5189/nginx I just checked the source of 1.2.8 (the current version in ports, www/nginx) and it doesn't even contain the affected functionality, nor the affected function implementing it (ngx_http_parse_chunked). This is in line with additional media and bugtracker coverage: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960605 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/07/3 http://www.ehackingnews.com/2013/05/cve-2013-2028-buffer-overflow.html http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/NGINX-patches-major-security-flaw-1858438.html Long story short: I would kindly ask you to correct the entry in the portaudit database to match only affected versions of nginx. I have took a look at these and found this: http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2013/000114.html I'll update the vuxml entry to include these information. Cheers, Hi Xin, I missed that nginx got updated to 1.4.0 and now 1.4.1,1 - seems like I've been working on an old copy of the ports tree. So recovering from this should be easy for users and at the same time my statement about the current version in the ports tree being 1.2.8 was clearly wrong. Anyway, thanks for the clarification, so basically CVE-2013-2070 and CVE-2013-2028 got mixed up (the former affecting only certain setups while the latter affecting everybody in a severe way unless they took special measures to harden their setup). Cheers thanks for your swift response, Michael -- Michael Gmelin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [patch included] teTeX and TeXLive
Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de wrote in 20130517001153.1d7d4...@dijkstra.cruwe.de: cj de Thank you very much, however I have a install failure on poudriere cj de with ports tree up to date 5 minutes ago: cj cj Thank you for your report. I have received several reports about cj install failures on poudriere and am investigating them. cj cj -- Hiroki cj cj Hello, cj cj I had exactly the same issue. I have a manual solution so far and am cj trying out the automation from ports. I am posting my progress hoping cj to save someone some time. Could you try r318346? -- Hiroki pgpSFJcFjoOqQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
INDEX now builds successfully on 8.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[HEADS UP] New pkgng git location
Pkg has moved from http://github.com/pkgng/pkgng to http://github.com/freebsd/pkg Please update any links or git checkouts you have. You can update your git checkout with: git remote set-url origin git://github.com/freebsd/pkg.git pkgng/pkgng -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
