Re: Status of USE_GITHUB fetching
On 06/07/13 22:32, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 6/6/2013 8:26 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports using USE_GITHUB are currently broken. Github changed their tar/compression algorithm which has resulted in mismatched checksums. I am working on changing our implementation and updating all affected ports and should have the fix committed by this weekend, after enough testing. Github fixed the checksums issue. You will see random 'size not known' warnings. These should be harmless. It's due to how they have implemented their download streaming. Are you saying this might happen once and be resolved or that it will be ongoing and not resolvable? Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Status of USE_GITHUB fetching
On 6/9/2013 8:07 AM, Steve Wills wrote: On 06/07/13 22:32, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 6/6/2013 8:26 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports using USE_GITHUB are currently broken. Github changed their tar/compression algorithm which has resulted in mismatched checksums. I am working on changing our implementation and updating all affected ports and should have the fix committed by this weekend, after enough testing. Github fixed the checksums issue. You will see random 'size not known' warnings. These should be harmless. It's due to how they have implemented their download streaming. Are you saying this might happen once and be resolved or that it will be ongoing and not resolvable? The size warnings (during fetch) will essentially always happen. The checksumming/size checking after fetch is fine. I really recommend all USE_GITHUB ports use a mirror as their default MASTER_SITE and use the GH MASTER_SITE secondary. This will prevent checksum errors in the future if they change things again, and avoid the size warnings during fetch. MASTER_SITES= http://some.mirror.com/ \ GH This will check the mirror first, then check github. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
x11/nvidia-driver: NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-319.23: nvidia_sysctl.c:174:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror,-Wreturn-type]
I try to install the most recent nvidia-GPU driver for FreeBSD, which
is 319.23.
I face a strange bug, which reports while compiling:
[...]
cc -O2 -pipe -O3 -march=native -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -march=native
-DNV_VERSION_STRING=\319.23\ -D__KERNEL__ -DNVRM -Wno-unused-function
-Wuninitialized -O -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -UDEBUG -U_DEBUG
-DNDEBUG -O3 -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I. -I@
-I@/contrib/altq -fno-common -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-aes
-mno-avx -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mno-mmx -mno-sse -msoft-float
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector
-std=iso9899:1999 -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef
-Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs
-fdiagnostics-show-option -Wno-error-tautological-compare
-Wno-error-empty-body -Wno-error-parentheses-equality -c
nvidia_sysctl.c nvidia_sysctl.c:174:1: error: control reaches end of
non-void function [-Werror,-Wreturn-type] } ^ 1 error generated. ***
Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped
in /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-319.23/src
[...]
Interestingly, the line 174 of file nvidia_sysctl.c is a function
called
int nvidia_sysctl_bus_type(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
{
struct nvidia_softc *sc = arg1;
char *bus_type;
if (nvidia_pci_find_capability(sc-dev, PCIR_CAP_ID_EXP) != 0)
bus_type = PCIe;
else
bus_type = PCI;
}
which is supposed to be patched by the Makefile of the port - but for
some reasons, there is the return 0; gone as well as the patched
line, which can be found in nvidia_sysctl.c.bak and states:
int nvidia_sysctl_bus_type(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
{
struct nvidia_softc *sc = arg1;
char *bus_type;
if (nvidia_pci_find_capability(sc-dev, PCIR_CAP_ID_EXP) != 0)
bus_type = PCIe;
else
bus_type = PCI;
return SYSCTL_OUT(req, bus_type, strlen(bus_type) + 1);
}
Somehow, the complete return SYSCTL_OUT() gets deleted.
Oliver
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[QAT] r320362: 2x leftovers, 2x ignored: is only for i386, while you are running amd64
Improve 3D acceleration for emulators/i386-wine-devel. - Install the dri library drivers that are required by mesaGL - Teach binbounce about LIBGL_LIBRARY_PATH - Prevent recursive definitions by binbounce - Follow the example of mesagl/nvidia-driver wrt library handing - Lay initial ground work to handle old and new xorg WARNING: there appears to be a problem with FREEBSD32 which prevents 3D-acceleration support from working, further investigation is required HELP WANTED TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM Approved by:eadler,bdrewery (mentors, implicit) - Build ID: 20130609174400-31289 Job owner: d...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 3 hours Enddate: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:17:48 GMT Revision: r320362 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=320362 - Port:emulators/i386-wine-devel 1.5.31,1 Buildgroup: 9.1-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: IGNORED: IS ONLY FOR I386, WHILE YOU ARE RUNNING AMD64 Buildgroup: 9.1-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~d...@freebsd.org/20130609174400-31289-149369/i386-wine-1.5.31,1.log Buildgroup: 8.3-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: IGNORED: IS ONLY FOR I386, WHILE YOU ARE RUNNING AMD64 Buildgroup: 8.3-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~d...@freebsd.org/20130609174400-31289-149371/i386-wine-1.5.31,1.log -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20130609174400-31289 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Updates to net/remmina?
Hi, Is there any chance for an update to net/remmina to 1.0? This should hopefully enable the RDP plugin to compile with the latest freerdp. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[CFT] New helpers now that new options frameworks allow them :)
Hi,
Here is a couple of new helpers that the new options framework allows.
To simplify some ports here is a couple of helpers I propose to add to the ports
tree:
OPTIONS_SUB= yes
if set, the framework will automatically some new PLIST_SUB:
for example: OPTIONS_DEFINE= OPT1
if OPT1 is set OPT1= will be added to PLIST_SUB
if OPT1 is unset OPT1=@comment will be added to the PLIST_SUB
OPT1_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= option
if OPT1 is set --enable-option will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
if OPT1 is unset --disable-option will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
OPT1_CONFIGURE_ON= --with-bla
OPT1_CONFIGURE_OFF= --no-something
if OPT1 is set --with-bla will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
if OPT1 is unset --no-something will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
OPT1_CFLAGS
OPT1_LDFLAGS
OPT1_CXXFLAGS
OPT1_MAKE_ENV
OPT1_CONFIGURE_ENV
if OPT1 is set the flags will be appended to the corresponding MACROS.
OPT1_USES= bla
if OP1 is set bla will be added to USES
OPT1_TYPE_DEPENDS= XXX:${PORTSDIR}/cat/port
with TYPE being PKG EXTRACT PATCH FETCH BUILD LIB or RUN
Will add the given dependency to the right place if OPT1 is set
Patch is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/optionsng.diff
An example of usage is:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/zsh-new-options.diff
(on top of the zsh Makefile)
Any opinion?
regards,
Bapt
pgp3WOmmazU1r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] New helpers now that new options frameworks allow them :)
On 6/9/2013 5:12 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
Here is a couple of new helpers that the new options framework allows.
To simplify some ports here is a couple of helpers I propose to add to the
ports
tree:
OPTIONS_SUB= yes
if set, the framework will automatically some new PLIST_SUB:
for example: OPTIONS_DEFINE= OPT1
if OPT1 is set OPT1= will be added to PLIST_SUB
if OPT1 is unset OPT1=@comment will be added to the PLIST_SUB
OPT1_CONFIGURE_ENABLE= option
if OPT1 is set --enable-option will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
if OPT1 is unset --disable-option will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
OPT1_CONFIGURE_ON= --with-bla
OPT1_CONFIGURE_OFF= --no-something
if OPT1 is set --with-bla will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
if OPT1 is unset --no-something will be added to CONFIGURE_ARGS
OPT1_CFLAGS
OPT1_LDFLAGS
OPT1_CXXFLAGS
OPT1_MAKE_ENV
OPT1_CONFIGURE_ENV
if OPT1 is set the flags will be appended to the corresponding MACROS.
OPT1_USES=bla
if OP1 is set bla will be added to USES
OPT1_TYPE_DEPENDS=XXX:${PORTSDIR}/cat/port
with TYPE being PKG EXTRACT PATCH FETCH BUILD LIB or RUN
Will add the given dependency to the right place if OPT1 is set
Patch is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/optionsng.diff
An example of usage is:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/zsh-new-options.diff
(on top of the zsh Makefile)
Any opinion?
regards,
Bapt
Great idea. All tested here, works great.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
GNOME 3
Is there any ETA on getting GNOME 3 into FreeBSD ports? I was looking at https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html Is all the work really going into 2.90, or is this page outdated? I'd really like to try GNOME 3, especially since even the OpenBSD guys have it right now. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: GNOME 3
On 06/09/2013 06:33 PM, Kenta Suzumoto wrote: Is there any ETA on getting GNOME 3 into FreeBSD ports? Also, if gnome3 goes into ports, is there any chance we could keep a legacy gnome2 going for a while? I discovered that I really hate gnome3 based upon my usage with ubuntu, and I have switched instead to mate. It would be good to keep gnome2 going on FreeBSD at least until FreeBSD has a well working mate. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: GNOME 3
I think gnome2 will be replace by Mate which is far more better and less buggy. I am running mate 1.6 right now on FreeBSD it work well and fast. https://github.com/jlmess77/mate-ports#mate-ports-for-freebsd On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote: On 06/09/2013 06:33 PM, Kenta Suzumoto wrote: Is there any ETA on getting GNOME 3 into FreeBSD ports? Also, if gnome3 goes into ports, is there any chance we could keep a legacy gnome2 going for a while? I discovered that I really hate gnome3 based upon my usage with ubuntu, and I have switched instead to mate. It would be good to keep gnome2 going on FreeBSD at least until FreeBSD has a well working mate. ___ freebsd-gn...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-gnome-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- *Eric Turgeon **GhostBSD project* Office location: 1-11 connaught Moncton NB Canada www.ghostbsd.org http://www.ghostbsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: GNOME 3
Back on the list.. On 06/09/2013 at 9:20 PM, Eric Turgeon ericturgeon@gmail.com wrote: I can't say anything sure on that, but for now more it go more it look like lost cause. The first time I have install it all was working fine, but now every time I compile it failed or if get it compile it buggy I'm not familiar with Ghost BSD but are you in cooperation with the FreeBSD GNOME/Ports team(s)? Hopefully there aren't multiple teams trying to reinvent each other's work. If a group like OpenBSD with such limited manpower can port it, surely the FreeBSD guys can do so, too. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: GNOME 3
Yes I am The GhostBSD project Founder my project depend on FreeBSD project and the Gnome team I have to try to help as mush I can with the time I don't have lol. Yes it is possible to ports it but it take time and man power. On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Kenta Suzumoto ken...@hush.com wrote: Back on the list.. On 06/09/2013 at 9:20 PM, Eric Turgeon ericturgeon@gmail.com wrote: I can't say anything sure on that, but for now more it go more it look like lost cause. The first time I have install it all was working fine, but now every time I compile it failed or if get it compile it buggy I'm not familiar with Ghost BSD but are you in cooperation with the FreeBSD GNOME/Ports team(s)? Hopefully there aren't multiple teams trying to reinvent each other's work. If a group like OpenBSD with such limited manpower can port it, surely the FreeBSD guys can do so, too. -- *Eric Turgeon **GhostBSD project* Office location: 1-11 connaught Moncton NB Canada www.ghostbsd.org http://www.ghostbsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updates to net/remmina?
Hi, Jonathan. I'm working on that. That's almost done and some trivial fixes (plist fixes) are remained. Remmina 1.0 and its plugins are available on my redports repository but still in progress. https://redports.org/browser/meta/net/remmina Thanks, 2013-06-10 6:31 Jonathan Chen wrote: Hi, Is there any chance for an update to net/remmina to 1.0? This should hopefully enable the RDP plugin to compile with the latest freerdp. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta m...@vmeta.jp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updates to net/remmina?
On 10 June 2013 13:45, Koichiro IWAO m...@vmeta.jp wrote: Hi, Jonathan. I'm working on that. That's almost done and some trivial fixes (plist fixes) are remained. Remmina 1.0 and its plugins are available on my redports repository but still in progress. https://redports.org/browser/meta/net/remmina Thanks for your effort and work! -- Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: GNOME 3
On 06/09/2013 08:27 PM, Eric Turgeon wrote: I think gnome2 will be replace by Mate which is far more better and less buggy. I am running mate 1.6 right now on FreeBSD it work well and fast. https://github.com/jlmess77/mate-ports#mate-ports-for-freebsd Cool! On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu mailto:step...@missouri.edu wrote: On 06/09/2013 06:33 PM, Kenta Suzumoto wrote: Is there any ETA on getting GNOME 3 into FreeBSD ports? Also, if gnome3 goes into ports, is there any chance we could keep a legacy gnome2 going for a while? I discovered that I really hate gnome3 based upon my usage with ubuntu, and I have switched instead to mate. It would be good to keep gnome2 going on FreeBSD at least until FreeBSD has a well working mate. ___ freebsd-gn...@freebsd.org mailto:freebsd-gn...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-gnome-unsubscr...@freebsd.org mailto:freebsd-gnome-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- *Eric Turgeon **GhostBSD project* Office location: 1-11 connaught Moncton NB Canada www.ghostbsd.org http://www.ghostbsd.org/http://www.ghostbsd.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
