INDEX build failed for 8.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..clang: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: rubygem-bunny-0.6.0 Committers on the hook: jgh jkim swills Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': Ueditors/libreoffice/Makefile Udevel/libvirt/Makefile Updated to revision 322156. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: curl-7.24.0_3
Am 2013-07-02 06:48, schrieb Kevin Oberman: On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Andrey S. Shevchenko a.shevche...@compassplus.com wrote: Hi, Current curl version in the ports tree has vulnerabilities http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20130622.html Please update it. Sincerely yours, Andrey Shevchenko Information Security Unit Engineer I just submitted a patch to update curl to ports/180072. Hi Folks, FYI there's already a PR for that http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180058 -- Frank BRONIEWSKI METRICO s.à r.l. géomètres technologies d'information géographique rue des Romains 36 L-5433 NIEDERDONVEN tél.: +352 26 74 94 - 28 fax.: +352 26 74 94 99 http://www.metrico.lu ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde3 ports expired today
On 02-07-2013 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió: bsdstats.org ports stats would have that information probably http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91 says in column 'times in use': x11/kde3: 534 x11/kde4: 86 So? 1. Collecting statistics is voluntary, so it could be that more people have installed kde4 than kde3 but not the reporting tool (sysutils/bsdstats). 2. There are multiple ports which do not exist anymore but are still listed there, e.g. x11-wm/xfce with 649 users or x11/qt1 (15 users). So either these ports are still in use (!) or the data is outdated. 3. FreeBSD releases look up-to-date, but are most people still running single-core ( http://bsdstats.org/bt/cpus.html ) ? René ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde3 ports expired today
René Ladan r...@freebsd.org wrote: On 02-07-2013 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió: bsdstats.org ports stats would have that information probably http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91 (bsdstats.org contact cc'ed) bsdstats.org seems to be broken. I get the following error when trying to access http://bsdstats.org/freebsd/ Warning: require_once(BSDSmarty.class.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/local/www/bsdstats.org/www/freebsd/index.php on line 3 Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required 'BSDSmarty.class.php' (include_path='.:/usr/local/share/pear') in /usr/local/www/bsdstats.org/www/freebsd/index.php on line 3 Emanuel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: curl-7.24.0_3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The maintainer have a patch submitted to portmgr@ for exp-run already, and miwi@ is already working on it: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172325 An exp-run is desirable because this change would touch many dependencies. Since this have been brought up so many times, I have just committed r322159 so users can install a patched version of curl without recompiling everything for now. Cheers, -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR0oiuAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzNJIIAKUq83TYK/RZTINBDyAUiPu1 jvAYe1gV2O06ac8jPWcvhGoLnDVKbJ8hflKvMK8rdkPp7DmgI9BdslcfVVRd5U17 E7x7dc4f5ZL0RPxgoX1hcfiszQeganLCeQSUSoi5jP2obBfZZk4KiopXSDETrtcH M7d/FtLEnIKbl8kK5TM6885iMLRz/vyufN2AWCsG0F/MCGd8t4Umu0OCPo9u9BlE Cf68i9X6vEM68uFlJolJv6XJw5/7dPu0MR7Tc+LTdvjIoFnNr/xkVh3Z5K7bPDP5 eDu4T7WARd6B80aV8wj2Tn7LA17EOkQPKoMw9RDy9vCitGoJhyuGNrJDHu//ZFI= =2uy7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 8.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..clang: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: rubygem-bunny-0.6.0 Committers on the hook: culot delphij girgen jgh jkim sbz swills Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': Udatabases/pgbadger/Makefile Udatabases/pgbadger/distinfo Usecurity/vuxml/vuln.xml Udevel/p5-Config-INI/Makefile Udevel/p5-Config-INI/distinfo Udevel/p5-Config-INI/pkg-descr UU devel/py-ptrace/pkg-plist UU devel/py-ptrace/Makefile UU devel/py-ptrace/distinfo Adevel/libvirt-glib Adevel/libvirt-glib/pkg-plist Adevel/libvirt-glib/Makefile Adevel/libvirt-glib/distinfo Adevel/libvirt-glib/pkg-descr Udevel/Makefile Uftp/curl/Makefile Aftp/curl/files/patch-CVE-2013-2174 Updated to revision 322161. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ databases/geoserver-mysql-plugin| 2.1.1 | 2.3.3 +-+ devel/ireport | 3.7.6 | 5.2.0 +-+ misc/freeswitch-scripts-devel | 1.2.3 | 1.2.11 +-+ net/freeswitch-curl-devel | 1.2.3 | 1.2.11 +-+ net/freeswitch-insideout-devel | 1.2.3 | 1.2.11 +-+ net/freeswitch-sbc-devel| 1.2.3 | 1.2.11 +-+ net/freeswitch-vanilla-devel| 1.2.3 | 1.2.11 +-+ sysutils/fusefs-libs| 2.9.2 | 2.9.3 +-+ www/xpi-pentadactyl | 20130407| 20130702 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portsc...@freebsd.org Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: oddness with py27-ldap2 port vs poudiere package, also how to sign digests.txz?
Not sure this will be useful to anyone but it turned out that the reason py-ldap2 was being odd is because i was building openldap-client and openldap-sasl-client, it was building against the sasl-client but I only had the non sasl client installed. Thanks to the pkg developers for fixing the digests.txz issue too. Vince On 28/06/2013 15:06, Vincent Hoffman wrote: I build my packages locally using poudriere-devel root@bsdpkgbuild:~ # pkg info poudriere-devel poudriere-devel-3.0.99.20130614 I am trying to add py-ldap2 however I'm getting errors installing py27-ldap2 from packages which I dont when I build it locally. The output when I try to install the package I have build and put in my repo: root@ipamtest:~ # pkg install py27-ldap2 Updating repository catalogue digests.txz 100% 22KB 22.4KB/s 22.4KB/s 00:00 pkg: fopen((null)): Bad address pkg: /etc/ssl/certs/pkg.cert: error:04077068:rsa routines:RSA_verify:bad signature pkg: Invalid signature, removing repository. pkg: No digest falling back on legacy catalog format repo.txz 100% 185KB 185.4KB/s 185.4KB/s 00:00 pkg: Repo repo-packagesite upgrade schema 2001 to 2002: Modify shlib tracking to add 'provided' capability pkg: Repo repo-packagesite upgrade schema 2002 to 2003: Add abstract metadata capability pkg: Repo repo-packagesite upgrade schema 2003 to 2004: Add manifest digest field pkg: Repo repo-packagesite upgrade schema 2004 to 2005: Rename 'abstract metadata' to 'annotations' The following 1 packages will be installed: Installing py27-ldap2: 2.4.12 The installation will require 724 kB more space 107 kB to be downloaded Proceed with installing packages [y/N]: y pkg: cached package py27-ldap2-2.4.12: checksum mismatch, fetching from remote py27-ldap2-2.4.12.txz 100% 108KB 107.6KB/s 107.6KB/s 00:00 Checking integrity... done [1/1] Installing py27-ldap2-2.4.12...defines: HAVE_SASL HAVE_TLS HAVE_LIBLDAP_R extra_compile_args: extra_objects: include_dirs: /opt/openldap-RE24/include /usr/include/sasl /usr/include library_dirs: /opt/openldap-RE24/lib /usr/lib libs: ldap_r file Lib/ldap.py (for module ldap) not found file Lib/ldap/controls.py (for module ldap.controls) not found file Lib/ldap/extop.py (for module ldap.extop) not found file Lib/ldap/schema.py (for module ldap.schema) not found warning: no files found matching 'Makefile' warning: no files found matching 'Modules/LICENSE' file Lib/ldap.py (for module ldap) not found file Lib/ldap/controls.py (for module ldap.controls) not found file Lib/ldap/extop.py (for module ldap.extop) not found file Lib/ldap/schema.py (for module ldap.schema) not found file Lib/ldap.py (for module ldap) not found file Lib/ldap/controls.py (for module ldap.controls) not found file Lib/ldap/extop.py (for module ldap.extop) not found file Lib/ldap/schema.py (for module ldap.schema) not found In file included from Modules/LDAPObject.c:9: Modules/errors.h:8:18: error: lber.h: No such file or directory Modules/errors.h:9:18: error: ldap.h: No such file or directory In file included from Modules/LDAPObject.c:9: Modules/errors.h:12: error: expected ')' before '*' token In file included from Modules/LDAPObject.c:11: Modules/LDAPObject.h:12:2: error: #error Current python-ldap requires OpenLDAP 2.x In file included from Modules/LDAPObject.c:11: Modules/LDAPObject.h:23: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'LDAP' Modules/LDAPObject.h:31: error: expected ')' before '*' token In file included from Modules/LDAPObject.c:12: Modules/ldapcontrol.h:11: error: expected ')' before '*' token Modules/ldapcontrol.h:12: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'LDAPControl' Modules/ldapcontrol.h:13: error: expected ')' before '*' token In file included from Modules/LDAPObject.c:13: Modules/message.h:11: error: expected ')' before '*' token In file included from Modules/LDAPObject.c:14: Modules/berval.h:10: warning: 'struct berval' declared inside parameter list Modules/berval.h:10: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want Modules/berval.h:12: warning: 'struct berval' declared inside parameter list Modules/berval.h:13: warning: 'struct berval' declared inside parameter list Modules/LDAPObject.c:18:18: error: sasl.h: No such file or directory Modules/LDAPObject.c:26: error: expected ')' before '*' token Modules/LDAPObject.c: In function 'dealloc': Modules/LDAPObject.c:42: error: 'LDAPObject' has no member named 'ldap' Modules/LDAPObject.c:43: error: 'LDAPObject' has no member named 'valid' Modules/LDAPObject.c:44: error: 'LDAPObject' has no member named '_save' Modules/LDAPObject.c:44: error:
INDEX build failed for 8.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..clang: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: rubygem-bunny-0.6.0 Committers on the hook: culot delphij girgen jgh jkim sbz swills wg Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': Umail/gmime26/Makefile Umail/gmime26/distinfo Udevel/dits/distinfo Udevel/dits/pkg-descr Udevel/dits/Makefile Updated to revision 322163. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: INDEX build failed for 8.x
Fixed, sorry about that. On 07/02/13 09:08, Ports Index build wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..clang: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: rubygem-bunny-0.6.0 Committers on the hook: culot delphij girgen jgh jkim sbz swills Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': Udatabases/pgbadger/Makefile Udatabases/pgbadger/distinfo Usecurity/vuxml/vuln.xml Udevel/p5-Config-INI/Makefile Udevel/p5-Config-INI/distinfo Udevel/p5-Config-INI/pkg-descr UU devel/py-ptrace/pkg-plist UU devel/py-ptrace/Makefile UU devel/py-ptrace/distinfo Adevel/libvirt-glib Adevel/libvirt-glib/pkg-plist Adevel/libvirt-glib/Makefile Adevel/libvirt-glib/distinfo Adevel/libvirt-glib/pkg-descr Udevel/Makefile Uftp/curl/Makefile Aftp/curl/files/patch-CVE-2013-2174 Updated to revision 322161. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
preinst_fs_violation - sysutils/py-salt
I've been maintaining a port for some time, but with a recent update of poudriere I'm now getting the following error when building: Filesystem touched before install: root/.python-eggs extra Error: Build failed in phase: preinst_fs_violation Can anyone suggest what needs to be updated in order to properly build the sysutils/py-salt port? Cheers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX now builds successfully on 8.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde3 ports expired today
On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió: bsdstats.org ports stats would have that information probably http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91 says in column 'times in use': x11/kde3: 534 x11/kde4: 86 matthias We should add those who uninstalled KDE3, knowing it would soon be removed, but are still missing it. I, for one, moved to XFCE before it's too late, but feel I've lost a lot. Just my 2c. bye av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde3 ports expired today
On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió: bsdstats.org ports stats would have that information probably http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91 says in column 'times in use': x11/kde3: 534 x11/kde4: 86 I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650). Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always easy in the past. The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they have committed to KMail. Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured a lot from its early days. Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for several years now. Jim ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portmaster -r perl rebuild almost everything, including apache24, php53 etc.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:32:29, Boris Samorodov wrote: BS 21.06.2013 23:23, Lev Serebryakov пиÑеÑ: I have old 9-STABEL eserver, which was converted to pkg-ng some time ago. This server has perl5.12, apache24, php53, some php modules, etc. installed via ports. I've tried to upgrade perl5.12 with recommended portmaster -r perl and it rebuild almost everything, including apache, php, all php modules, all apache modules, midnigght commander (mc) and lot more. BS BS Well, for me it's not all at amount POV: BS - BS % pkg info | wc -l BS 726 BS % pkg info -r perl | wc -l BS 234 This is because dependencies stored in package database are recursive. Even with pkgng. With old /var/db/pkg was not easy to recursively calculete dependencies when need, and this recursive list was pre-calculeted and stored. I don't know why this is not fixed in pkgng. For example if you have ports: A - B - C - D in package database stored, that A depends on B+C+D, but should only be stored that A depends on B. This recursive dependencies causes different problems - many extra ports to rebuild is only one of this problems. glib among others depends on perl, so with recursive dependencies all ports, that depends on glib will be rebuild by portmaster -r perl with no profit from this rebuild. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde3 ports expired today
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote: On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió: bsdstats.org ports stats would have that information probably http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91 says in column 'times in use': x11/kde3: 534 x11/kde4: 86 I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650). Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always easy in the past. The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they have committed to KMail. Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured a lot from its early days. Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for several years now. Jim I was about to write something similar. My work machine has been on KDE4 for years, and though it was quite rocky in the earlier versions it has kind of quietly disappeared into the background (in a good way) now - while I can understand the gnome2 revival projects, I don't quite see the point of e.g. Trinity. -- Daniel Nebdal ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portmaster -r perl rebuild almost everything, including apache24, php53 etc.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Anton Yuzhaninov cit...@citrin.ru wrote: On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:32:29, Boris Samorodov wrote: BS 21.06.2013 23:23, Lev Serebryakov пишет: I have old 9-STABEL eserver, which was converted to pkg-ng some time ago. This server has perl5.12, apache24, php53, some php modules, etc. installed via ports. I've tried to upgrade perl5.12 with recommended portmaster -r perl and it rebuild almost everything, including apache, php, all php modules, all apache modules, midnigght commander (mc) and lot more. BS BS Well, for me it's not all at amount POV: BS - BS % pkg info | wc -l BS 726 BS % pkg info -r perl | wc -l BS 234 This is because dependencies stored in package database are recursive. Even with pkgng. With old /var/db/pkg was not easy to recursively calculete dependencies when need, and this recursive list was pre-calculeted and stored. I don't know why this is not fixed in pkgng. For example if you have ports: A - B - C - D in package database stored, that A depends on B+C+D, but should only be stored that A depends on B. This recursive dependencies causes different problems - many extra ports to rebuild is only one of this problems. glib among others depends on perl, so with recursive dependencies all ports, that depends on glib will be rebuild by portmaster -r perl with no profit from this rebuild. portmaster/upgrade -r perl5.xx is safe, but re-installs a huge number of ports that simply don't need it. Instead, I do the following: portmaster lang/perl5 p5- net-snmp ImageMagick dvdrip This will catch almost every perl module. If you don't have net-snmp, dvdrip, or ImageMagick installed on your system, leave them off the command. Once that is done, go to /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl. Then cd to the directory for the OLD version that you just replaced. (e.g. cd 5.14.2.) Check for any remaining regular files (not directories) under this location find . -type f should do the trick. Use pkg_info or pkg info to find out which port installed the files, if any are found and re-install that port. portmaster p5-XML-Parser (don't know why, but something odd seems to happen with that file after a perl update, so you can re-install it AGAIN, just to be sure. Yes, it's more complicated and may have some cases where something is missed, but it seems to work for me. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde3 ports expired today
On 2013-07-02 18:31, Daniel Nebdal wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote: On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió: bsdstats.org ports stats would have that information probably http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91 says in column 'times in use': x11/kde3: 534 x11/kde4: 86 I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650). Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always easy in the past. The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they have committed to KMail. Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured a lot from its early days. Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for several years now. Jim I was about to write something similar. My work machine has been on KDE4 for years, and though it was quite rocky in the earlier versions it has kind of quietly disappeared into the background (in a good way) now - while I can understand the gnome2 revival projects, I don't quite see the point of e.g. Trinity. Of course KDE4 works and many people use it daily - but for me who got used to a fairly stripped desktop with just the basics I work with all the time KDE4 was just in the way, in fact, it made me work more on Windows XP. My hope now is that xfce grows just a little bit more in functionality to be roughly a KDE3 successor. //per ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
patch to remove KDE3/QT3
Hi, (CC'd maintainers of ports that are scheduled for removal) I have prepared a patch to remove the KDE3 and QT3 ports, it is available at [1]. This patch also: - removes ports/Mk/bsd.kde.mk (only used for KDE3/QT3) - patches bsd.port.mk (removes USE_KDEBASE_VER, USE_KDELIBS_VER, USE_QT_VER) - undocuments the KDE and QT knobs (ports should use the KDE4 and QT4 knobs instead) - updates CHANGES Two more ports, graphics/kipi-plugins net-p2p/museekplus, use QT3 but are not part of KDE3 and can easily be modified to live without. I have PRs for those to their maintainers. A local INDEX-9 build is fine, not sure if we want an exp-run for this? [1] ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/kde3-rm.diff % ls -l kde3-rm.diff -rw-r--r-- 1 rene ftp 7811874 Jul 2 22:10 kde3-rm.diff % sha256 kde3-rm.diff SHA256 (kde3-rm.diff) = 91d7dc21a7121fc8121d73959067d795e0941d5f4a1d64de0c06915adc4febe3 % Regards, René ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde3 ports expired today
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se wrote: On 2013-07-02 18:31, Daniel Nebdal wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote: On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió: bsdstats.org ports stats would have that information probably http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91 says in column 'times in use': x11/kde3: 534 x11/kde4: 86 I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650). Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always easy in the past. The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they have committed to KMail. Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured a lot from its early days. Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for several years now. Jim I was about to write something similar. My work machine has been on KDE4 for years, and though it was quite rocky in the earlier versions it has kind of quietly disappeared into the background (in a good way) now - while I can understand the gnome2 revival projects, I don't quite see the point of e.g. Trinity. Of course KDE4 works and many people use it daily - but for me who got used to a fairly stripped desktop with just the basics I work with all the time KDE4 was just in the way, in fact, it made me work more on Windows XP. My hope now is that xfce grows just a little bit more in functionality to be roughly a KDE3 successor. //per I haven't tried it, but Razor-Qt looks like a reasonable environment as well - though you need to add apps, like, oh, the KDE4 ones. Which might not be quite what you were after. x) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
curl fails to upgrade on 9.1-RELEASE-p3 but succeeds on 8.3
=== Cleaning for curl-7.24.0_4 === curl-7.24.0_4 has known vulnerabilities: curl-7.24.0_4 is vulnerable: cURL library -- heap corruption in curl_easy_unescape WWW: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/01cf67b3-dc3b-11e2-a6cd-c48508086173.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** [check-vulnerable] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ftp/curl. *** [build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ftp/curl. === make failed for ftp/curl === Aborting update === Update for ftp/curl failed === Aborting update === Killing background jobs I've done this upgrade on a 8.3 system without problems, but it stops on my 9.1 laptop. Ports tree is updated. /Leslie ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
