[QAT] r337952: 4x leftovers

2013-12-29 Thread Ports-QAT
Install the showchar binary as show_char to avoid a conflict with
print/psutils.

Bump PORTREVISION
-

  Build ID:  20131229104000-26307
  Job owner: r...@freebsd.org
  Buildtime: 9 minutes
  Enddate:   Sun, 29 Dec 2013 10:48:57 GMT

  Revision:  r337952
  Repository:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=337952

-

Port:misc/biosfont-demos 1.1_2

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~r...@freebsd.org/20131229104000-26307-245120/biosfont-demos-1.1_2.log

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~r...@freebsd.org/20131229104000-26307-245121/biosfont-demos-1.1_2.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~r...@freebsd.org/20131229104000-26307-245122/biosfont-demos-1.1_2.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~r...@freebsd.org/20131229104000-26307-245123/biosfont-demos-1.1_2.log


--
Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20131229104000-26307
redports https://qat.redports.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Berkeley DB cleanup has apparently broken ports where no db is currently installed

2013-12-29 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:44:35 -0800
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
 wrote:
 
  On 12/26/2013 12:41 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
 
  I disagree on the assessments of efforts here. I checked the docs,
  and the actual .db files are supposed to be compatible,
 
 
  Sure, they are, to some extent, SUPPOSED to be compatible.
  Experience tells us that is not the case.
 
 
   excepting the
  corner cases mentioned in the wiki. The manual effort only exists
  for ports using BDB in transactional mode, while most ports just
  use it as a key-value data vault.
 
 
  So you're volunteering to walk every user whose stuff gets broken
  through the repair?
 
 
   Ttbomk, deprecated does not cause build failures, and even if so,
  WITH_BDB_VER=5 would fix that.
 
 
  portmaster treats DEPRECATED as a fatal error. I did neglect to
  point that out in my previous post however.
 
   Finally, I would like to see technical or other_compelling_
  reasons
 
  why we would need 48 in the tree in the future.
 
 
  Well shouldn't that argument go the other way around? Shouldn't the
  people proposing the purge be the ones to provide _compelling_
  reasons to do the purge?
 
 
  Doug
 
 
 I updated from 9-Stable to 10.0-RC3 dy before yesterday. I had one odd
 error during the upgrade, but  managed to complete the upgrade. Then I
 re-built all ports. I had a few issues, all resolved except one that
 i have opened a PR for, but I did have a very annoying time with
 Berkeley DB.
 
 I had deleted all ports, so I assumed that port requiring Berkeley DB
 would use db5 or db6. But, as Doug noted, no such luck. As Doug
 pointed out, this is because some ports require db4x. Specifically,
 databases/evolution-data-server required db41. No option for any newer
 version. apr1 required db42+, but that just pulls in db4* forts, so
 no db5 gets installed, even though the port clearly stats that it
 works with 5. So 4.2+ really means any db4. version.
 
 There is no reason that ports using USE_BDB=4.\+ could not have been
 found (by a simple grep) and been fixed to use db5 (assuming that
 they really do work with db5), but they were not. Or the Mk files
 could have caused the cases where db4.\+ were called for that this
 could not have installed db5 or even db6 rather than insist on db4.
 (And, quite oddly, the LOWEST db4 version that allowed was the one
 installed when no matching db was installed.
 
 Rather than mess around with fixing multiple Makefiles while my
 system was unable to do much of anything, I just removed the
 DEPRECATED lines form db41, db42, and db43. I'll need to go clean
 them all up, now. And some don't even make it clear that they will
 run with db5.  And I still have seen no reason that the db4 ports
 really needed removal. They still work fine and are widely used.
 Deprecation was just asking for trouble. (Don't forget that a
 DEPRECATED statement in a port Makefile is fatal.)
 
 I will also mention that the man page for portmaster REALLY needs to
 be updated for pkgng. This wasted just a bit more of my time. Due to
 the iconv move to base, the quick and dirty rebuild option of
 portmaster -aD fails miserably. I suspect portupgrade would have a
 similar problem, but I have not used it in a couple of years, so I
 can't be sure.

A side note on the iconv change: It seems like most ports have been
changed to use base iconv where available, so the only criterion was ABI
compatibility. The fact that some ports are written for GNU iconv and
not POSIX iconv wasn't taken into account.

The most prominent example is PHP5, converters/php5-iconv to be
precise. Its documentation clearly describes GNU iconv extensions
(TRANSLIT/IGNORE) as core features - it does not qualify based on
you iconv library, because PHP5 is supposed to be built with GNU
iconv. It was changed nevertheless, so upgrading to 10-RELEASE and
rebuilding PHP5 will break people's code.

I opened ports/184596 a few weeks ago, no response so far:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/184596

 
 On the whole, I have to call this one a really botched change that
 should be rolled back until it can be implemented to work properly,
 at least for a clean install of all ports.





-- 
Michael Gmelin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[QAT] r338013: 4x fail, 8x depend (forbidden: triggering a nasty freebsd bug in java/openjdk6), 2x chown, 2x ???, 8x success

2013-12-29 Thread Ports-QAT
Stage ports maintained by me in irc java mail

Cleanups in several places
-

  Build ID:  20131229154800-12144
  Job owner: cr...@freebsd.org
  Buildtime: 69 minutes
  Enddate:   Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:56:51 GMT

  Revision:  r338013
  Repository:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=338013

-

Port:irc/charybdis 3.4.2_1

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245400/charybdis-3.4.2_1.log

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245401/charybdis-3.4.2_1.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245402/charybdis-3.4.2_1.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245403/charybdis-3.4.2_1.log

-

Port:java/castor 1.3.2

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

-

Port:java/jgraph 5.13.0.4

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   FAIL

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   FAIL

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   FAIL

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   FAIL

-

Port:java/jgraphx 1.10.3.0

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   DEPEND (FORBIDDEN: TRIGGERING A NASTY FREEBSD BUG IN 
JAVA/OPENJDK6)

-

Port:mail/biabam 0.9.7_2

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245416/biabam-0.9.7_2.log

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245417/biabam-0.9.7_2.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245418/biabam-0.9.7_2.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245419/biabam-0.9.7_2.log

-

Port:mail/sympa 6.1.17_1

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   CHOWN
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245420/sympa-6.1.17_1.log

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   CHOWN
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245421/sympa-6.1.17_1.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   ???
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245422/sympa-6.1.17_1.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   ???
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~cr...@freebsd.org/20131229154800-12144-245423/sympa-6.1.17_1.log


--
Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20131229154800-12144
redports https://qat.redports.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 AMD64 pdftk and gcc 4.6.4 dependency problem

2013-12-29 Thread CeDeROM
Hello :-)

When trying to install pdftk I get gcc dependency problem:

# uname -a
FreeBSD hexagon 10.0-RC3 FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 #0 r259778: Mon Dec 23
23:27:58 UTC 2013
r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64

# pkg install pdftk
Updating repository catalogue
The following 2 packages will be installed:

Installing gcc46: 4.6.4_1,1
Installing pdftk: 2.02

The installation will require 570 MB more space

0 B to be downloaded

Proceed with installing packages [y/N]:
y

(..)

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/man/man1/rebuild-gcj-db46.1.gz with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/man/man3/ffi46.3.gz with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/man/man3/ffi_call46.3.gz with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/man/man3/ffi_prep_cif46.3.gz with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/share/gcc-4.6.4/python/libjava/aotcompile.py with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/share/gcc-4.6.4/python/libjava/classfile.py with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/share/gcc-4.6.4/python/libstdcxx/__init__.py with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/share/gcc-4.6.4/python/libstdcxx/v6/__init__.py with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/share/gcc-4.6.4/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/share/java/libgcj-4.6.4.jar with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/share/java/libgcj-tools-4.6.4.jar with:
- gcc46-4.6.4_1,1


-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Still no traceback for ports conflicts during pkg upgrade

2013-12-29 Thread Beeblebrox
I am getting several ports conflicts when doing a pkg upgrade. The most
obvious example is lang/gcc vs lang/gcc46:
pkg: WARNING: locally installed gcc-4.6.4 conflicts on
/usr/local/lib/gcc46/include/c++/x86_64-portbld-freebsd11.0/bits/error_constants.h
with:  - gcc46-4.6.4_1,1

As I had requested previously, There needs to be an -x (exclude) flag or
better yet a traceback method for pkg upgrade so that one can trace the
port causing the issue.  lang/gcc46 is not the only port causing such
problem.

I admit that one of the possible causes could be that I marcusmerge the
gnome3 ports. However, this does not make my request any less sensible,
since there will probably be many other development branches in the future.



-
FreeBSD-11-current_amd64_root-on-zfs_RadeonKMS
--
View this message in context: 
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Still-no-traceback-for-ports-conflicts-during-pkg-upgrade-tp5872335.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[QAT] r338048: 4x leftovers

2013-12-29 Thread Ports-QAT
Enable stage support
-

  Build ID:  20131229215800-36824
  Job owner: joh...@freebsd.org
  Buildtime: 52 minutes
  Enddate:   Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:50:17 GMT

  Revision:  r338048
  Repository:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=338048

-

Port:math/sc 7.16_1

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~joh...@freebsd.org/20131229215800-36824-245620/sc-7.16_1.log

  Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~joh...@freebsd.org/20131229215800-36824-245621/sc-7.16_1.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~joh...@freebsd.org/20131229215800-36824-245622/sc-7.16_1.log

  Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
  Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
  Log: 
https://qat.redports.org//~joh...@freebsd.org/20131229215800-36824-245623/sc-7.16_1.log


--
Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20131229215800-36824
redports https://qat.redports.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [FIXED] ports/183791: audio/liba52 (liba52-0.7.4_2) is not jobs safe

2013-12-29 Thread Chad J. Milios

 On Dec 25, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Peter p...@citylink.dinoex.sub.org wrote:
 
 This seems to be a race condition with the timestamps of the Makefiles. 
 make install thinks that the Makefiles are outdated, and recreates
 them before doing the install - but now with the target pointing directly 
 to /usr/local and not to the staging area.
 
 In the log we can see this happening: 
 
 Making install in liba52
 gmake[1]: Entering directory 
 `/usr/ports/audio/liba52/work/a52dec-0.7.4/liba52'
 cd .. \
  CONFIG_FILES=liba52/Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status
 config.status: creating liba52/Makefile
 config.status: executing default-1 commands
 gmake[1]: Leaving directory 
 `/usr/ports/audio/liba52/work/a52dec-0.7.4/liba52'
 gmake[1]: Entering directory 
 `/usr/ports/audio/liba52/work/a52dec-0.7.4/liba52'
 gmake[2]: Entering directory 
 `/usr/ports/audio/liba52/work/a52dec-0.7.4/liba52'
 /bin/sh ../autotools/mkinstalldirs /usr/local/lib
 
 while on successful runs these lines do not appear:
 
 Making install in liba52
 gmake[1]: Entering directory 
 `/usr/ports/audio/liba52/work/a52dec-0.7.4/liba52'
 gmake[2]: Entering directory 
 `/usr/ports/audio/liba52/work/a52dec-0.7.4/liba52'
 /bin/sh ../autotools/mkinstalldirs 
 /usr/ports/audio/liba52/work/stage/usr/local/lib
 
 
 I could not figure out why or how this happens - but for now a suitable 
 workaround seems to be the following addition to the (main) makefile:
 
 pre-install:
   touch work/a52dec-*/*/Makefile

I can confirm that addition to the Makefile worked perfectly for me on all of 
200 runs on both test servers. Thanks Peter!

Can someone close the PR after making a commit with the addition of the 
aforementioned pre-install target to /usr/ports/audio/liba52/Makefile please? 
(No revision bump necessary.)

-Chad
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org