FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ games/doomsday | 1.12.2 | 1.14.0-build1154 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: postfix depends on db41??
nano wrote: What's the proper use for: WITH_$PORT_VER= DEFAULT_$PORT_VER= $PORT_PORT= Example: WITH_BDB_VER=5 DEFAULT_PGSQL_VER=93 APACHE_PORT=www/apache24 Are they essentially interchangeable and achieve the same result? According to recent changes and /usr/ports/UPDATING 20140211: AFFECTS: users of lang/php* database/postgresql* database/mysql* www/apache* AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org The default versions of lang/php*, databases/postgresql*, databases/mysql* and www/apache* have been changed to support the new DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable. DEFAULT_APACHE_VER, DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER, DEFAULT_PGSQL_VER, DEFAULT_FPC_VER and DEFAULT_PHP_VER are now deprecated. You can use the new DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable like this: DEFAULT_VERSIONS=php=5.5 mysql=5.6 apache=2.4 As you can see, not all ports were converted to this new DEFAULT_VERSIONS. Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[QAT] r346483: 1x depend (ignored: is only for i386, while you are running amd64 in net/nxserver), 12x success, 3x configure_error, 1x depend (makefile in net/nxserver), 5x fail, 2x depend_object
- Chase devel/expect update - Build ID: 20140228101800-21955 Job owner: g...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 54 minutes Enddate: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:11:53 GMT Revision: r346483 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346483 - Port:devel/pecl-expect 0.2.9 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288076/pecl-expect-0.2.9.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288077/pecl-expect-0.2.9.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288078/pecl-expect-0.2.9.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288079/pecl-expect-0.2.9.log - Port:misc/dejagnu 1.5.1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288080/dejagnu-1.5.1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288081/dejagnu-1.5.1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288082/dejagnu-1.5.1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288083/dejagnu-1.5.1.log - Port:misc/sshbuddy 1.05_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288084/sshbuddy-1.05_1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288085/sshbuddy-1.05_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288086/sshbuddy-1.05_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288087/sshbuddy-1.05_1.log - Port:net-mgmt/rancid 2.3.8_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: CONFIGURE_ERROR Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288088/rancid-2.3.8_1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: CONFIGURE_ERROR Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288089/rancid-2.3.8_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: CONFIGURE_ERROR Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288090/rancid-2.3.8_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL - Port:net-mgmt/rancid-devel 2.3.2a10_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: DEPEND_OBJECT Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288093/rancid-devel-2.3.2a10_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: DEPEND_OBJECT Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288094/rancid-devel-2.3.2a10_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL - Port:net/freenx 0.6.0_4 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: DEPEND (MAKEFILE IN NET/NXSERVER) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228101800-21955-288097/nxserver-2.1.0_9.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: DEPEND (IGNORED: IS ONLY FOR I386, WHILE YOU ARE RUNNING AMD64 IN NET/NXSERVER) Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228101800-21955 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[QAT] r346485: 2x fail, 2x ???
- Support staging - Build ID: 20140228102200-38079 Job owner: cu...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 51 minutes Enddate: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:13:28 GMT Revision: r346485 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346485 - Port:french/fortune-mod-zarathoustra 20100905 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: ??? Log: https://qat.redports.org//~cu...@freebsd.org/20140228102200-38079-288101/fr-fortune-mod-zarathoustra-20100905.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: ??? Log: https://qat.redports.org//~cu...@freebsd.org/20140228102200-38079-288102/fr-fortune-mod-zarathoustra-20100905.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228102200-38079 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[QAT] r346487: 17x fail, 1x configure_error, 6x success
- Bump PORTREVISION after lang/expect update Suggested by: mat - Build ID: 20140228103200-60271 Job owner: g...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 51 minutes Enddate: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:22:47 GMT Revision: r346487 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346487 - Port:devel/pecl-expect 0.2.9_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228103200-60271-288109/pecl-expect-0.2.9_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228103200-60271-288110/pecl-expect-0.2.9_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL - Port:misc/dejagnu 1.5.1_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228103200-60271-288113/dejagnu-1.5.1_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228103200-60271-288114/dejagnu-1.5.1_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL - Port:misc/sshbuddy 1.05_2 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228103200-60271-288117/sshbuddy-1.05_2.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228103200-60271-288118/sshbuddy-1.05_2.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL - Port:net-mgmt/rancid 2.3.8_2 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: CONFIGURE_ERROR Log: https://qat.redports.org//~g...@freebsd.org/20140228103200-60271-288122/rancid-2.3.8_2.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL - Port:net-mgmt/rancid-devel 2.3.2a10_2 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL - Port:net/freenx 0.6.0_5 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228103200-60271 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[QAT] r346490: 4x fail
- Fix dependency line - Build ID: 20140228110002-37848 Job owner: g...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 24 minutes Enddate: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:23:55 GMT Revision: r346490 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346490 - Port:net-mgmt/rancid-devel 2.3.2a10_2 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228110002-37848 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[QAT] r346486: 2x fail, 1x ???, 1x success
- Fix build on FreeBSD 10, which need a C++11 library. - Fix a strncpy() in a patch I wrote by actually allocating storage space fo - Bump PORTREVISION MFH:2014Q1 - Build ID: 20140228102400-14175 Job owner: r...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 65 minutes Enddate: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:29:26 GMT Revision: r346486 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346486 - Port:www/chromium 33.0.1750.117_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: ??? Log: https://qat.redports.org//~r...@freebsd.org/20140228102400-14175-288105/chromium-33.0.1750.117_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~r...@freebsd.org/20140228102400-14175-288106/chromium-33.0.1750.117_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228102400-14175 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: plexmediaserver-plexpass-0.9.9.5.411_1
I don’t see a pidfile at /var/run/plex/plex.pid, but the rd-script works fine anyway. Is the pid-file somewhere else? I want to know so I can configure monit to check plex. — Tom Fagerland ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: postfix depends on db41??
On 27 Feb 2014, at 18:42 , Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Lowell Gilbert wrote: LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes: # portmaster mail/postfix210 [...] === Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports === Launching child to install databases/db41 === postfix210-2.10.3,1 databases/db41 (1/1) Why? postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf is set for version 5.3 # cat /etc/make.conf WITH_PKGNG=yes WITH_BDB_VERS=5.3 You mean WITH_BDB_VER (no 'S')? Well, yes, that might make a difference. dammit. And also just 5, not 5.3? I am pretty sure I tried that. I went ahead and built manually which built against db48. I'll mess with db5 next time. -- If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[QAT] r346501: 1x fail, 3x success
- Support staging - Define EXAMPLES option - Define DOCS option - Build ID: 20140228124800-38702 Job owner: eha...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 3 hours Enddate: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:50:46 GMT Revision: r346501 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346501 - Port:security/flawfinder 1.27 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~eha...@freebsd.org/20140228124800-38702-288176/flawfinder-1.27.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~eha...@freebsd.org/20140228124800-38702-288178/flawfinder-1.27.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~eha...@freebsd.org/20140228124800-38702-288179/flawfinder-1.27.log -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228124800-38702 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Can't figure out github syntax
I'm working on a new port that's fetched from github. This works: MASTER_SITES= https://github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/releases/download/v1.0.2-FINAL/ DISTNAME= libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL But I cannot for the life of me figure out how to convert that to the more normal USE_GITHUB syntax. Is there a doc on the GITHUB syntax that explains it for dummies? -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them. George Orwell ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
QAT troubles today [Was: Re: [QAT] r346501: 1x fail, 3x success]
This is a general reply to all of the QAT mails that were send out today. They can all be ignored and sorry for the troubles they might have caused! I have done some maintenance today which also cleaned up some stuff from last weeks heavy lifting of the building backends to 11-current. The ride was a bit rough and 11-current is troubling us a bit. We also hit a clang 3.4 issue on the way that caused a lot of jobs to fail like the one below which was hard to diagnose why. The good news is that we have made a workaround for it and dim has found a clang fix upstream that he will merge to our clang 3.4 so we are back in business already. The builders will be slower than usual for a few days because I also cleaned up their package caches and the distfiles. Thanks for bearing with us and thanks a lot to sbruno and mat who did the heavy lifting of the backends which will bring us 10.0-RELEASE builds for QAT very soon and already brought us 10.0-REL and 11-current environments for redports. Thanks! On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ports-QAT q...@redports.org wrote: - Support staging - Define EXAMPLES option - Define DOCS option - Build ID: 20140228124800-38702 Job owner: eha...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 3 hours Enddate: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:50:46 GMT Revision: r346501 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346501 - Port:security/flawfinder 1.27 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~eha...@freebsd.org/20140228124800-38702-288176/flawfinder-1.27.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: FAIL Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~eha...@freebsd.org/20140228124800-38702-288178/flawfinder-1.27.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~eha...@freebsd.org/20140228124800-38702-288179/flawfinder-1.27.log -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228124800-38702 redports https://qat.redports.org/ -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
sysutils/lsof and defining _KERNEL
I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the last few days, and I can't figure out what's going on. Any clues? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysutils/lsof and defining _KERNEL
On 2014-02-28 14:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the last few days, and I can't figure out what's going on. Any clues? what release of FreeBSD? What svn rev of the Ports Tree? and have you done a buildworld/buildkernel, installworld/installkernel? I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current sources. Larry Rosenman sysutils/lsof maintainer -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysutils/lsof and defining _KERNEL
Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the last few days, and I can't figure out what's going on. Any clues? what release of FreeBSD? What svn rev of the Ports Tree? and have you done a buildworld/buildkernel, installworld/installkernel? I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current sources. RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysutils/lsof and defining _KERNEL
On 2014-02-28 14:48, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the last few days, and I can't figure out what's going on. Any clues? what release of FreeBSD? What svn rev of the Ports Tree? and have you done a buildworld/buildkernel, installworld/installkernel? I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current sources. RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system. Hrm. can you send me the config log? I'll take a look -- likely tomorrow, as I'm traveling when I get off work today. Also, have you done a make clean for sysutils/lsof? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysutils/lsof and defining _KERNEL
Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:48, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the last few days, and I can't figure out what's going on. Any clues? what release of FreeBSD? What svn rev of the Ports Tree? and have you done a buildworld/buildkernel, installworld/installkernel? I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current sources. RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system. Hrm. can you send me the config log? I'll take a look -- likely tomorrow, as I'm traveling when I get off work today. Okay; as soon as I finish another buildworld cycle; I still think it's likely to be something screwed up on my system, given that lsof is a dependency for some widely-used ports. Also, have you done a make clean for sysutils/lsof? Certainly. Even removed the whole sysutils subtree and re-checked it out. I don't actually *have* ZFS on this system, so I could hack around the problem easily enough, but I'd rather get to the bottom of it. Be well. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysutils/lsof and defining _KERNEL
On 2014-02-28 14:57, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:48, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the last few days, and I can't figure out what's going on. Any clues? what release of FreeBSD? What svn rev of the Ports Tree? and have you done a buildworld/buildkernel, installworld/installkernel? I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current sources. RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system. Hrm. can you send me the config log? I'll take a look -- likely tomorrow, as I'm traveling when I get off work today. Okay; as soon as I finish another buildworld cycle; I still think it's likely to be something screwed up on my system, given that lsof is a dependency for some widely-used ports. Also, have you done a make clean for sysutils/lsof? Certainly. Even removed the whole sysutils subtree and re-checked it out. I don't actually *have* ZFS on this system, so I could hack around the problem easily enough, but I'd rather get to the bottom of it. Be well. Ok. If that doesn't jump out at me, can I get a login on your system to look around? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can't figure out github syntax
2014-02-28 19:43 GMT+01:00 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com:
I'm working on a new port that's fetched from github.
This works:
MASTER_SITES=
https://github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/releases/download/v1.0.2-FINAL/
DISTNAME= libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL
But I cannot for the life of me figure out how to convert that to the more
normal USE_GITHUB syntax.
Is there a doc on the GITHUB syntax that explains it for dummies?
In Mk/bsd.sites.mk grep GITHUB
Place in your Makefile these lines:
MASTER_SITES= GH GHC
GH_ACCOUNT= collectiveintel
GH_PROJECT= cif-v1
GH_TAGNAME= v${PORTVERSION}-FINAL
GH_COMMIT= d86ca6c
USE_GITHUB= yes
if you define PORTVERSION= 1.0.2
Regards
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
***
It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson
There are some ideas so wrong that only a very
intelligent person could believe in them. George Orwell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
olivier
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can't figure out github syntax
On 28.02.2014 20:43, Paul Schmehl wrote: I'm working on a new port that's fetched from github. This works: MASTER_SITES= https://github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/releases/download/v1.0.2-FINAL/ DISTNAME= libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL But I cannot for the life of me figure out how to convert that to the more normal USE_GITHUB syntax. Is there a doc on the GITHUB syntax that explains it for dummies? Hi! Check out the (/usr/ports)/Mk/bsd.sites.mk file, It's pretty well documented. I think the right combination of GH_ACCOUNT, GH_PROJECT, GH_TAGNAME and GH_COMMIT would do the trick. Regards, Kozlov Sergey ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can't figure out github syntax
--On February 28, 2014 at 11:21:24 PM +0200 Kozlov Sergey
kozlov.sergey@gmail.com wrote:
On 28.02.2014 20:43, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm working on a new port that's fetched from github.
This works:
MASTER_SITES=
https://github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/releases/download/v1.0.2-FINAL/
DISTNAME= libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL
But I cannot for the life of me figure out how to convert that to the
more normal USE_GITHUB syntax.
Is there a doc on the GITHUB syntax that explains it for dummies?
Hi!
Check out the (/usr/ports)/Mk/bsd.sites.mk file, It's pretty well
documented.
i wish that were true. It might be for developers, but it's not for me.
I think the right combination of GH_ACCOUNT, GH_PROJECT, GH_TAGNAME and
GH_COMMIT would do the trick.
I would think so too, however...
Here's my Makefile:
# cat Makefile
# $FreeBSD$
PORTNAME= cif
PORTVERSION=1.0.2
MASTER_SITES= GH GHC
CATEGORIES= www perl5
MAINTAINER= pa...@utdallas.edu
COMMENT=Collective intelligence framework tool
LICENSE=LGPL3
BUILD_DEPENDS= p5-Net-SSLeay=1.43:${PORTSDIR}/security/p5-Net-SSLeay \
p5-Config-Simple=4.59:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Config-Simple \
p5-DateTime-Format-DateParse=0.05:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-DateTime-Format-DateParse
\
p5-Google-ProtocolBuffers=0.08:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Google-ProtocolBuffers
\
p5-Regexp-Common=2.122:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/p5-Regexp-Common \
p5-URI=1.56:${PORTSDIR}/net/p5-URI \
p5-LWP-Protocol-https=6.02:${PORTSDIR}/www/p5-LWP-Protocol-https \
p5-Digest-SHA1=2.10:${PORTSDIR}/security/p5-Digest-SHA1 \
p5-Net-Patricia=1.16:${PORTSDIR}/net/p5-Net-Patricia \
p5-Module-Pluggable=3.8:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Module-Pluggable \
p5-Try-Tiny=0.04:${PORTSDIR}/lang/p5-Try-Tiny \
p5-MIME-Base64=3.06:${PORTSDIR}/converters/p5-MIME-Base64 \
p5-Iodef-Pb-Simple=0.21:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Iodef-Pb-Simple \
p5-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR=0.02:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/p5-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR
\
p5-Compress-Snappy=0.18:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/p5-Compress-Snappy \
p5-Log-Dispatch=2.32:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Log-Dispatch \
p5-JSON-XS=3.0.0:${PORTSDIR}/converters/p5-JSON-XS
USE_GITHUB= yes
GH_ACCOUNT= collectiveintel
GH_PROJECT= cif-v1
GH_TAGNAME= libcif-v${PORTVERSION}-FINAL
GH_COMMIT= d86ca6c
#https://github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/releases/download/v1.0.2-FINAL/libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL.tar.gz
HAS_CONFIGURE= yes
CONFIGURE_ARGS= --prefix=${STAGEDIR}/${PREFIX}
.include bsd.port.mk
The commented out url is what I want to pull down. The TAGNAME does not do
that. If I call the url MASTER_SITES it works fine, but that's obviously
not the right way to do it.
I don't understand how to get these macros to do what I need.
Attempting to fetch
https://codeload.github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/legacy.tar.gz/libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL?dummy=/cif-1.0.2.tar.gz
fetch:
https://codeload.github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/legacy.tar.gz/libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL?dummy=/cif-1.0.2.tar.gz:
Not Found
= Attempting to fetch
http://codeload.github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/legacy.tar.gz/libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL?dummy=/cif-1.0.2.tar.gz
Obviously it's not descending into the releases/download folder to find the
tarball. The question is, why isn't it, and how do I get it to do that?
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
***
It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson
There are some ideas so wrong that only a very
intelligent person could believe in them. George Orwell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can't figure out github syntax
--On February 28, 2014 at 4:02:16 PM -0600 Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
--On February 28, 2014 at 11:21:24 PM +0200 Kozlov Sergey
kozlov.sergey@gmail.com wrote:
On 28.02.2014 20:43, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm working on a new port that's fetched from github.
This works:
MASTER_SITES=
https://github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/releases/download/v1.0.2-FINA
L/ DISTNAME= libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL
But I cannot for the life of me figure out how to convert that to the
more normal USE_GITHUB syntax.
Is there a doc on the GITHUB syntax that explains it for dummies?
Hi!
Check out the (/usr/ports)/Mk/bsd.sites.mk file, It's pretty well
documented.
i wish that were true. It might be for developers, but it's not for me.
I think the right combination of GH_ACCOUNT, GH_PROJECT, GH_TAGNAME and
GH_COMMIT would do the trick.
I would think so too, however...
Here's my Makefile:
# cat Makefile
# $FreeBSD$
PORTNAME= cif
PORTVERSION=1.0.2
MASTER_SITES= GH GHC
CATEGORIES= www perl5
MAINTAINER= pa...@utdallas.edu
COMMENT=Collective intelligence framework tool
LICENSE=LGPL3
BUILD_DEPENDS= p5-Net-SSLeay=1.43:${PORTSDIR}/security/p5-Net-SSLeay \
p5-Config-Simple=4.59:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Config-Simple \
p5-DateTime-Format-DateParse=0.05:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-DateTime-Format-
DateParse \
p5-Google-ProtocolBuffers=0.08:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Google-ProtocolBuff
ers \
p5-Regexp-Common=2.122:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/p5-Regexp-Common \
p5-URI=1.56:${PORTSDIR}/net/p5-URI \
p5-LWP-Protocol-https=6.02:${PORTSDIR}/www/p5-LWP-Protocol-https \
p5-Digest-SHA1=2.10:${PORTSDIR}/security/p5-Digest-SHA1 \
p5-Net-Patricia=1.16:${PORTSDIR}/net/p5-Net-Patricia \
p5-Module-Pluggable=3.8:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Module-Pluggable \
p5-Try-Tiny=0.04:${PORTSDIR}/lang/p5-Try-Tiny \
p5-MIME-Base64=3.06:${PORTSDIR}/converters/p5-MIME-Base64 \
p5-Iodef-Pb-Simple=0.21:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Iodef-Pb-Simple \
p5-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR=0.02:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/p5-Regexp-Common-ne
t-CIDR \
p5-Compress-Snappy=0.18:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/p5-Compress-Snappy \
p5-Log-Dispatch=2.32:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Log-Dispatch \
p5-JSON-XS=3.0.0:${PORTSDIR}/converters/p5-JSON-XS
USE_GITHUB= yes
GH_ACCOUNT= collectiveintel
GH_PROJECT= cif-v1
GH_TAGNAME= libcif-v${PORTVERSION}-FINAL
GH_COMMIT= d86ca6c
# https://github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/releases/download/v1.0.2-FINAL
# /libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL.tar.gz
HAS_CONFIGURE= yes
CONFIGURE_ARGS= --prefix=${STAGEDIR}/${PREFIX}
.include bsd.port.mk
The commented out url is what I want to pull down. The TAGNAME does not
do that. If I call the url MASTER_SITES it works fine, but that's
obviously not the right way to do it.
I don't understand how to get these macros to do what I need.
Attempting to fetch
https://codeload.github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/legacy.tar.gz/libcif-v
1.0.2-FINAL?dummy=/cif-1.0.2.tar.gz
fetch:
https://codeload.github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/legacy.tar.gz/libcif-v
1.0.2-FINAL?dummy=/cif-1.0.2.tar.gz: Not Found
= Attempting to fetch
http://codeload.github.com/collectiveintel/cif-v1/legacy.tar.gz/libcif-v1
.0.2-FINAL?dummy=/cif-1.0.2.tar.gz
Obviously it's not descending into the releases/download folder to find
the tarball. The question is, why isn't it, and how do I get it to do
that?
So, I go to github, click on releases and click on tags. I find the
tagname I want -
v1.0.2-FINAL, which has the commit has of d86ca6c. I put that in my
Makefile and run make makesum. The system pulls down the
cif-v1.0.2-FINAL.tar.gz file. Not really what I want (I only want
libcif-v1.0.2-FINAL.tar.gz), but OK, I can work around that.
So I run make install, and what happens? can't cd to
/usr/ports/www/cif/work/collectiveintel-cif-v1-d86ca6c: No such file or
directory
WTF???
So I ls work:
ls work/
.extract_done.cif._usr_local.license-catalog.mk
.license-report .license_done.cif._usr_local
collectiveintel-cif-v1-ebd850d/
WTF?? Why is the commit hash different than the one I specified?
Ive run into this time and time again trying to build ports that use
GITHUB. I HATE it. Drives me batty. It at least doubles the time it
takes me to figure out how to get a damn port working.
I've considered just saying fuck it, you put your software on github, I
will no longer maintain the damn port.
Why is this so frickin' hard to do?
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
***
It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson
There are some ideas so wrong that
ports/182985 maintainer timeout
A recent change to the www/nginx Makefile broke the port for the case
where you have the OpenSSL port installed on FreeBSD 10. The breakage
is due to incorrectly setting WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and the fix is to remove
two lines in the Makefile:
--- Makefile.old2014-01-30 02:01:51.0 -0800
+++ Makefile2014-02-06 16:02:21.385735156 -0800
@@ -850,8 +850,6 @@
.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MSPDY}
.if ${OSVERSION} 128
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT= yes
-.else
-WITH_OPENSSL_BASE= yes
.endif
.endif
.endif
Osa didn't reply to my email back on February 6 and there hasn't been
any reponse at all to the issue when it was raised in the PR almost two
months ago. Would some kind commiter please push this fix?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Can't build db48
I am unable to build databases/db48 and db6 on FreeBSD 9.2 powerpc64. I've tried with the default gcc, gcc4.8 and gcc 4.9. They all result in the same problem: ./libtool --mode=compile g++49 -c -I. -I./../dist/.. -D_THREAD_SAFE -O2 -pipe -O3 -maltivec -mcpu=G5 -fno-strict-aliasing ./../dist/../cxx/cxx_dbc.cpp libtool: compile: g++49 -c -I. -I./../dist/.. -D_THREAD_SAFE -O2 -pipe -O3 -maltivec -mcpu=G5 -fno-strict-aliasing ./../dist/../cxx/cxx_dbc.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/cxx_dbc.o In file included from ./../dist/../dbinc/mutex.h:15:0, from ./db_int.h:884, from ./../dist/../cxx/cxx_dbc.cpp:11: ./../dist/../dbinc/mutex_int.h: In function 'int MUTEX_SET(int*)': ./../dist/../dbinc/mutex_int.h:599:15: error: cast from 'int*' to 'int' loses precision [-fpermissive] return (int)tsl; ^ *** [cxx_db.lo] Error code 1 *** [cxx_dbc.lo] Error code 1 2 errors === Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** [do-build] Error code 1 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[QAT] r346531: 3x leftovers, 1x depend (fetch in devel/ninja)
Update audio/soundkonverter to 2.1.0. Changes: * Order GitHub before LOCAL in MASTER_SITES ChangeLog: -Add: Update translations - Build ID: 20140228154800-24307 Job owner: d...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 11 hours Enddate: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 03:00:08 GMT Revision: r346531 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=346531 - Port:audio/soundkonverter 2.1.0 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~d...@freebsd.org/20140228154800-24307-288300/soundkonverter-2.1.0.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: DEPEND (FETCH IN DEVEL/NINJA) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~d...@freebsd.org/20140228154800-24307-288301/ninja-1.4.0_1,1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~d...@freebsd.org/20140228154800-24307-288302/soundkonverter-2.1.0.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~d...@freebsd.org/20140228154800-24307-288303/soundkonverter-2.1.0.log -- Buildarchive URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140228154800-24307 redports https://qat.redports.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysutils/lsof and defining _KERNEL
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote: On 2014-02-28 14:57, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:48, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org writes: On 2014-02-28 14:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the last few days, and I can't figure out what's going on. Any clues? what release of FreeBSD? What svn rev of the Ports Tree? and have you done a buildworld/buildkernel, installworld/installkernel? I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current sources. RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system. Hrm. can you send me the config log? I'll take a look -- likely tomorrow, as I'm traveling when I get off work today. Okay; as soon as I finish another buildworld cycle; I still think it's likely to be something screwed up on my system, given that lsof is a dependency for some widely-used ports. Also, have you done a make clean for sysutils/lsof? Certainly. Even removed the whole sysutils subtree and re-checked it out. I don't actually *have* ZFS on this system, so I could hack around the problem easily enough, but I'd rather get to the bottom of it. Be well. Ok. If that doesn't jump out at me, can I get a login on your system to look around? FWIW, I am also unable ot build lsof sine the last update. I am running 10-Stable ( r262619) and get this failure: --- dnode2.o --- In file included from dnode2.c:55: In file included from /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zfs_znode.h:33: In file included from /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zfs_vfsops.h:31: In file included from /usr/src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/vfs.h:37: In file included from /usr/src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/vnode.h:49: In file included from /usr/src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/file.h:32: In file included from /usr/include/sys/file.h:42: In file included from /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/refcount.h:33: In file included from /usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zfs_context.h:71: /usr/src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sdt.h:33:10: fatal error: 'opt_kdtrace.h' file not found #include opt_kdtrace.h ^ --- lib/liblsof.a --- ranlib liblsof.a Looks like the exact same issue. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
