Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Antoine Brodin anto...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote: Hi! jbeich suggests in https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-February/084775.html that you improve the patch using SRC_BASE and test if SRC_BASE is available. Can you submit this and send me the PR ? I'll get it committed. Done: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197394 Committed, thanks! I fixed the check but this still looks wrong, why doesn't the port link dynamically against zlib? If there is a vulnerability in zlib, the port won't be fixed by a zlib update. I'll have a look at it when I can. Cheers. Cheers, Antoine ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Why is pkg writting informational output to stderr??
Hi, I'm using a small tool (cronic) to reduce reporting pollution. And one of the ways of doing it, is scanning stderr and exit-values. But pkg emits this informational message over stderr. Any chance of changing this line to stdout as well?? Regards, --WjW Forwarded Message Subject: Cron root@rack1 cronic /usr/sbin/pkg audit -F Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:56:00 +0100 (CET) From: Cron Daemon r...@smtp.digiware.nl To: r...@smtp.digiware.nl Cronic detected failure or error output for the command: /usr/sbin/pkg audit -F RESULT CODE: 0 ERROR OUTPUT: pkg: vulnxml file up-to-date STANDARD OUTPUT: 0 problem(s) in the installed packages found. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Is pkg-install the best solution?
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 07:30:47 +0100 olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote
On 2015-02-09 03:05, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I'm working with a port that [conditionally] requires
creating/setting a UID GID. Following is my approach
for a pkg-install. But would simply setting them as
USERS=
GROUPS=
in Makefile be a better approach?
pkg-install:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/bin:/usr/sbin
if [ -z ${WRAP_USER} ]; then
WRAP_USER=myapp
fi
case $2 in
PRE-INSTALL)
UID=181
GID=${UID}
if [ ! -d ${MYAPP_DIR} ]; then
mkdir -p ${MYAPP_DIR}
fi
if pw user show ${WRAP_USER} 2/dev/null; then
echo You already have a user \${WRAP_USER}\, so I will use it.
if pw usermod ${WRAP_USER} -d ${MYAPP_DIR}
then
echo Changed home directory of \${WRAP_USER}\ to
\${MYAPP_DIR}\ else
${MYAPP_DIR}\ failed...
snip ...
Hi Chris,
go with USERS,GROUPS in Makefile and if the user/group does not already exist
in ports/UIDs, ports/GIDs request one together with the new port.
Using pkg-install to create users/groups is deprecated.
Perfect. Good to know.
Thank you, olli!
Greatly appreciated. :)
--Chris
--
Regards,
olli
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Is pkg-install the best solution?
On 2015-02-09 03:05, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I'm working with a port that [conditionally] requires
creating/setting a UID GID. Following is my approach
for a pkg-install. But would simply setting them as
USERS=
GROUPS=
in Makefile be a better approach?
pkg-install:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/bin:/usr/sbin
if [ -z ${WRAP_USER} ]; then
WRAP_USER=myapp
fi
case $2 in
PRE-INSTALL)
UID=181
GID=${UID}
if [ ! -d ${MYAPP_DIR} ]; then
mkdir -p ${MYAPP_DIR}
fi
if pw user show ${WRAP_USER} 2/dev/null; then
echo You already have a user \${WRAP_USER}\, so I will use
it.
if pw usermod ${WRAP_USER} -d ${MYAPP_DIR}
then
echo Changed home directory of \${WRAP_USER}\ to
\${MYAPP_DIR}\
else
${MYAPP_DIR}\ failed...
snip ...
Hi Chris,
go with USERS,GROUPS in Makefile and if the user/group does not already exist
in ports/UIDs, ports/GIDs request one together with the new port.
Using pkg-install to create users/groups is deprecated.
--
Regards,
olli
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Is pkg-install the best solution?
Greetings,
I'm working with a port that [conditionally] requires
creating/setting a UID GID. Following is my approach
for a pkg-install. But would simply setting them as
USERS=
GROUPS=
in Makefile be a better approach?
pkg-install:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/bin:/usr/sbin
if [ -z ${WRAP_USER} ]; then
WRAP_USER=myapp
fi
case $2 in
PRE-INSTALL)
UID=181
GID=${UID}
if [ ! -d ${MYAPP_DIR} ]; then
mkdir -p ${MYAPP_DIR}
fi
if pw user show ${WRAP_USER} 2/dev/null; then
echo You already have a user \${WRAP_USER}\, so I will use
it.
if pw usermod ${WRAP_USER} -d ${MYAPP_DIR}
then
echo Changed home directory of \${WRAP_USER}\ to
\${MYAPP_DIR}\
else
${MYAPP_DIR}\ failed...
exit 1
fi
else
if pw useradd ${WRAP_USER} -u ${UID} \
-d ${MYAPP_DIR} -s /sbin/nologin -c MyApp Daemon
then
echo Added user \${WRAP_USER}\.
else
echo Adding user \${WRAP_USER}\ failed...
exit 1
fi
fi
;;
esac
--Chris
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
xfe-1.37_1 does not start...
Hello, xfe-1.37_1 does not start after update of the fox16-1.6.50 library. portupgrade -fr x11-toolkits/fox16 has no effect. Best regards, -- Amicalement et librement, Éric Douzet Consultant Informatique Administrateur Réseaux, Système et Base de Données Consultant Sage (Logiciels de Gestion) - Comptable Diplômé Sécurité Réseaux - Hébergeur FreeBSD - Audit de Site Web Systèmes : FreeBSD, Mac OSX, Unix et Windows Site Web professionnel : www.c-extra.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
